Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

STATE OF GEORGIA! i,- 1 ii tu 1, Rs I fa~~~~~,

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. MDL No SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 2

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Judge Mary L. Mikva CALENDAR 6 - ROOM 2508 Telephone: 312/ Fax: 312/

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CLEFL1 >' SO. DtT. OF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GENERAL ORDER

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017)

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF (****) Case No. The Discovery Status Conference came before Discovery Referee on.

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY IAS PART 14 PART MATRIMONIAL RULES & PROCEDURES (revised 05/23/17)

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

THE HONORABLE MEL DICKSTEIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRACTICE POINTERS & PREFERENCES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Watts v. Brunson, Robinson & Huffstutler, Attorneys, P.A. et al Doc. 55

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Family Cases Assigned to Judge Paul B. Kanarek (December 20, 2010)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

Case 2:18-cv KOB Document 49 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Domestic Relations Division Calendar #62 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 3010 Chicago, Illinois 60602

ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION CALENDAR 7 COURTROOM 2405 JUDGE DIANE J. LARSEN STANDING ORDER 2.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 5:18-cv DAE Document 9 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIALS)

SUBPOENA IN AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

JUDGE ERIC C. ROBERSON Circuit Civil Division CV-G Hearing Room 712

JURISDICTION AND LOCAL RULES. Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C.A This is called federal

Case 2:18-cv PSG-FFM Document 24 Filed 10/11/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:219. Deadline

Third, it should provide for the orderly admission of evidence.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. ELAINE SCOTT, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:09-cv-3039-MH v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

COUNTY COURT JUDGE GIUSEPPINA MIRANDA PROCEDURES FOR DIVISION 52. (Amended May 1, 2017)

THE COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF RECORD IN COLORADO CHAPTER 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Elizabeth Metzger Guidelines and Procedures. Probate Division ( CP cases) (Effective January 2, 2019) Page 1 of 7

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 143

INFORMATION FOR RESPONDENTS

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

Practices for Part 3

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : :

Judge Krier s Civil Division Procedures Collier County

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

AGREED / ROUTINE / PROVE-UP MOTIONS - 10:15 a.m. (Mon. thru Thur.) EMERGENCY MOTIONS / REQUESTS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS - 10:00 a.m.

Transcription:

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION Flint Riverkeeper, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-cv-435(CAR Southern Mills, Inc. Defendant. RULES 16 AND 26 ORDER This Order, and the attached Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order Form, must be carefully read. This Order and the attached Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order Form are amended from time to time. This document includes the latest revisions. Counsel and parties not represented by counsel should read Rules 16 and 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court s Local Rules. The Local Rules are available on the Court s web site (http://www.gamd.uscourts.gov and may be obtained from the clerk s office. Counsel and parties not represented by counsel must abide by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and the Local Rules during the course of this litigation. If a nongovernmental corporate party has failed to timely file its disclosure statement in accordance with Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the party must file the statement within 14 days of the date of this Order. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information that the statement requires. Pursuant to Rules 16(b and 26(f of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 2 of 5 Local Rule 26, the parties are ordered to confer within 20 days of the date of this Order, and to develop a Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order (the Proposed Order, which must be submitted to the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. The Proposed Order must be submitted by e-mail to macon.ecf@gamd.uscourts.gov in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Do not convert the Proposed Order to.pdf. The form for the Proposed Order is attached to this Order. A copy of the Proposed Order must be served upon each party. If the parties cannot agree on the Proposed Order, the parties must state their differences and specify their positions in the Proposed Order. Notify the Court immediately by contacting Lee Anne Purvis, Courtroom Deputy, at 478.752.0739 or leeanne_purvis@gamd.uscourts.gov if a party does not cooperate in preparing the Proposed Order. Failure by counsel or parties not represented by counsel to cooperate in the preparation and filing of the report will result in sanctions. Failure to comply with discovery or with any order of the Court may result in dismissal of the case, default judgment, or other sanctions. The Proposed Order must include time limits for the items addressed in Rule 16(b(3(A; the name and address of every witness to be deposed; the anticipated scope of discovery; the name, address, e-mail address, and telephone and facsimile number of lead counsel for each party; any issues about electronically stored information and claims of privilege; and the date the complaint was filed and the date the complaint was answered. The Proposed Order may also include such other matters as the parties deem appropriate. The Proposed Order will be carefully considered and, subject to such changes as may be deemed appropriate, either adopted by the Court or discussed with counsel in -2-

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 3 of 5 person or by conference call. The Proposed Order must include page numbers as well as a date line and a signature line for the Court below the attorney s signature. The initial disclosures required by Rule 26(a(1 shall be served no later than the date of the submission of the Proposed Order to the Court. The Court expects that, absent good cause shown, all discovery will be completed within 180 days from the submission of the Proposed Order to the Court. No discovery request may be served unless the response to the request can be completed within the discovery period, and no discovery deposition shall be scheduled beyond the discovery period. The Court considers requests for admission to be a discovery device subject to the discovery deadline. Depositions to preserve testimony are not subject to the discovery deadline, but the failure to timely schedule such depositions shall not be grounds for continuance. Any party who may use an expert witness at trial must disclose the expert early enough in the discovery period to give the opposing party the opportunity to depose the expert. All expert witness disclosures must satisfy the requirements of Rule 26(a(2(B. A plaintiff designating an expert must disclose the identity of the expert within 90 days after the submission of the Proposed Order to the Court. A defendant designating an expert must disclose the identity of the expert within 120 days after the submission of the Proposed Order to the Court. The parties are reminded that a treating physician, depending on the subject matter of the physician s testimony, may be treated as an expert for purposes of disclosure of the physician s opinions and the admissibility of those opinions. See Wilson v. TASER International, Inc., 303 Fed. Appx. 708 (11th Cir. 2008; Williams v. Mast Biosurgery USA, Inc., 644 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2011. The parties have a continuing duty to supplement all disclosures and responses in accordance with Local Rule 26(e and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. -3-

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 4 of 5 Local Rule 34 limits production requests to 10 per party, and Local Rule 36 limits requests for admission to 15 per party. However, the Court encourages the parties to expedite the trial process by stipulating to the authenticity of documents prior to trial. Therefore, requests for admission that are propounded solely to authenticate documents as provided for under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a(1(B are excluded from Local Rule 36 s limitation on the number of requests to admit that can be propounded. All documents produced by any party shall be identified by a number. All dispositive motions must be filed within 30 days of the close of discovery. All briefs in support of a motion for summary judgment, response briefs and reply briefs must conform to the standards set by Local Rules 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4. The Court relies heavily on the parties statements of facts required by Local Rule 56. Generally, facts should be presented in chronological order. When deposition transcripts are filed with the Court, the parties shall also email transcripts in ASCII or PTX format to Ms. Purvis at leeanne_purvis@gamd.uscourts.gov. If counsel or a party not represented by counsel believes that it would be appropriate to have a telephone conference with the Court to discuss the Proposed Order or discovery issues, please contact Ms. Purvis to schedule a telephone conference. Before moving for an order relating to discovery, including motions to compel or contested motions for protective orders, the movant must request a conference with the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b(3(B(v. Do not send courtesy copies of letters, motions, or briefs to the Court. The parties must submit a report on the status of discovery 120 days after the Scheduling and Discovery Order is filed. The report should summarize the status of both written discovery and depositions. The report should also address any expert discovery -4-

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 5 of 5 issues. Counsel and any party not represented by counsel must cooperate in the preparation of the report. The report may be filed jointly or separately. In the event of settlement, the parties must notify the Court immediately. If a defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, any party seeking a stay of discovery pending resolution of the motion should file an appropriate motion within 14 days of the date of this Order. The Court prefers that the motion be jointly filed and that the parties consent to the stay whenever possible. SO ORDERED, this 25th day of May, 2017. S/ C. Ashley Royal C. ASHLEY ROYAL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -5-

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19-1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION, Plaintiff, v. : -CV- (CAR, Defendant. PROPOSED SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER The parties held a Rule 26(f conference on. In accordance with the Court s Rules 16 and 26 Order dated,, the parties to this action conferred and jointly developed this Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order (the Proposed Order containing deadlines and limitations as follows: I. Nature of the Case: Please include a brief description of the nature of the case and the legal issues to be tried. This summary should not be argumentative nor recite the evidence, but should call the Court s attention to any unique or complex issues or circumstances surrounding the case. II. Counsel of Record: The following individually-named attorneys are designated lead counsel for the parties: Please include all relevant contact information for each lead counsel or pro se litigant, including mailing address, phone number, facsimile number, and email address.

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19-1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 2 of 5 III. Complaint and Answer filing dates: Complaint was filed: Answer was filed: III. Discovery Deadlines: A. Time for Discovery The time for discovery in this case shall expire, that being no more than 180 days after the submission of the Proposed Order to the Court. If a party believes that more time for discovery is needed, an appropriate motion, accompanied by a proposed order for the Court, may be filed setting forth good cause for an extension. B. Scope of Discovery Please state the subjects on which discovery may be needed, when discovery should be completed, and whether discovery should be conducted in phases or be limited to or focused on particular issues. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b(1, (f(3(b. C. Electronically Stored Information Please discuss any issues about disclosure, discovery, or preservation of electronically stored information, including the form or forms in which it should be produced. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b(3(B(iii, 26(f(3(C. D. Privilege Claims Please discuss any issues about claims of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation materials, including if the parties agree on a procedure to assert these claims after production whether to ask the Court to include their agreement in an order under Federal Rule of Evidence 502. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b(3(B(iv, 26(f(3(D. E. Witnesses to be Deposed

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19-1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 3 of 5 Please include the name and address of every witness to be deposed. F. Expert Witnesses 1. Designation of Experts The Plaintiff must disclose the identity of any expert witness on or before, that being no more than 90 days after the submission of the Proposed Order to the Court. The Defendant must disclose the identity of any expert witness on or before, that being no more than 120 days after the submission of the Proposed Order to the Court. 2. Expert Reports Expert reports shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a(2(B. Any supplemental expert reports must be served on or before, that being no more than 160 days after the submission of the Proposed Order to the Court. No additional supplemental reports may be disclosed or provided after this date without leave of Court. G. Discovery Limitations or Need for Protective Order The parties agree that requests for admission that are propounded solely to authenticate documents as provided for under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a(1(B are excluded from Local Rule 36's limitation on the number of requests to admit that can be propounded. Please include here any other relevant matters, including any matters referenced in Rule 26(f. H. Discovery Disputes Before moving for an order relating to discovery, including motions to compel or contested motions for protective orders, the movant must contact Lee Anne Purvis, Courtroom Deputy (478.752.0739 to request a telephone conference with the Court.

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19-1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 4 of 5 IV. Time for Filing Motions: A. Motions to Amend the Pleadings or to Join Parties All motions seeking to amend the pleadings or to join parties must be filed no later than, that being no more than 60 days after the entry of this Scheduling and Discovery Order. B. Dispositive Motions All dispositive motions must be filed no later than, that being no more than 30 days after the expiration of discovery in this case. C. Daubert Motions All Daubert motions must be filed no later than, that being no more than 30 days after the expiration of discovery in this case. V. Certification of the Parties and Counsel: The Parties, by the signature of counsel below, certify they have conferred and discussed the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for prompt settlement or resolution of the case, pursuant to Local Rule 26(a. Counsel further certify they have read the Court s Rules 16 and 26 Order. All counsel of record shall digitally sign below. This day of,. Counsel for Plaintiff(s XXX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Counsel for Defendant(s XXX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Case 5:16-cv-00435-CAR Document 19-1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 5 of 5 The Court, having reviewed the information contained in the Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order completed and filed jointly by the parties to this action, hereby ADOPTS the parties plan and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. SO ORDERED, this day of,. C. ASHLEY ROYAL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT