SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FONTANA DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FONTANA DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO GRAND JURY [YYYY] The [Day, i.e. 12th] Day of [Month, Year] Plaintiff.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Defendant I N F O R M A T I O N S U M M A R Y

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA HALL OF JUSTICE COMPLAINT FOR ARREST WARRANT(S) XZAVYER CLEMENTE NARVAEZ EFD511

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Defendant SUMMARY_

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO. Dept.1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Defendant SUMMARY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Defendant SUMMARY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Defendant SUMMARY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED OR THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU!

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM FORFEITURE RULES OF PROCEDURE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Case No. [redacted]

FELONY COMPLAINT FOR ARREST WARRANT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

Guidelines for Completing the White Collar Crime Complaint Form

Occupational License Application

PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS (Section et seq., Ala. Code 1975)

YOLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JEFF W. REISIG 301 Second Street Woodland, California (530) Fax: (530) CONSUMER FRAUD COMPLAINT

OMBUDSMAN BILL, 2017

PETITION FOR CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON [Pursuant to Penal Code and ]

SECURING EXECUTION OF DOCUMENT BY DECEPTION

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 4 Filed 07/23/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

* IN THE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AFFIDAVIT OF N. TUCKER MENEELY

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED OR THE APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU!

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY., Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories, which the undersigned

INMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY

ATTACHMENT NO. 1 BIDDER S PROPOSAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

[CAPTION] INTERROGATORIES [NAME AND ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF S ATTORNEY] Attorneys for Plaintiff TO:

STATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Plaintiff, Defendants.

EVICTION IMPORTANT NOTICE:

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

prohibited expenditures and contributions under , , & of the

PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF (Rule 40, HRPP) Name: Prison Number Place of Confinement S.P.P. No. (to be supplied by the Clerk of the Court)

Application to Serve as Temporary Judge SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER PETITION FOR DISMISSAL UNDER PENAL CODE 1210.

PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS (Section et seq., Ala. Code 1975)

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

EVICTION CASE INSTRUCTIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY., Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories, which the undersigned

State your full name, social security number, date of birth, residence address, and telephone number.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

BADGE APPLICATION FORM KALAMAZOO / BATTLE CREEK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

APPLICATION FOR SECOND HAND DEALER LICENSE

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Peter S. Holmes, Kent C. Meyer, Jessica Nadelman, Attorneys of Record for Defendant

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

CHAPTER 119 WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

LEASE ADDENDUM FOR DRUG-FREE HOUSING. Property Address:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA. STATE OF ALABAMA, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CC ) FELIX BARRY MOORE, ) Defendant. ) MOTION TO DISMISS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

Case 1:09-cr LEK Document 121 Filed 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 902 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 206

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR TRIAL OR DISPOSITION PURUSANT TO PENAL CODE SECTION 1381 OR

APPROVED: 3/31/08 1 of 1

U.C.A Title. This chapter is known as the Utah False Claims Act.

County of Fresno Office of the District Attorney Lisa A. Smittcamp, District Attorney

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No: PETITION THE PARTIES

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

PETITION: EVICTION CASE CASE NO. 4LT With suit for Rent COURT DATE:

KATHERINE K. HANNA JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, PCT. #3 BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Rhode Island False Claims Act

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants.

FILED STATE OF CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO Dec, I~ BYt:an\ra~ on ANALYST

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio,

SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NASSAU STATE OF NEW YORK. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- RANDY STITH, Defendant

CHAPTER 368 THE EXTRADITION ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS

MODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

S 0556 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

FLORIDA MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF FORM FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.

Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

Department of Legislative Services

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

Chicago False Claims Act

Supreme Court of Florida

The City of Chamblee, GA Door-To-Door Salesman Permit Application

Transcription:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Scot Matthew Spencer, Felice G. Luciano vs. Plaintiff Defendant COURT CASE NO. FSB1301129 FIRST AMENDED FELONY COMPLAINT DA CASE NO. 2013-00-0014606 The undersigned is informed and believes that: COUNT 1 On or about July 23, 2008 through May 23, 2011, in the above named judicial district, the crime of CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A CRIME, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTION 182(a(1, a felony, was committed by Scot Matthew Spencer and Felice G. Luciano, who did unlawfully conspire together and with another person and persons whose identity is unknown to commit the crime of Grand Theft, in violation of Section 487(a of the Penal Code, a felony; that pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out the objects and purposes of the aforesaid conspiracy, the said defendants committed the following overt act and acts at and in the County of San Bernardino: On July 29, 2008, Scot Spencer, through an attorney, submitted a draft claim to the San Bernardino International Airport Authority seeking compensation of $1.75 million. The claim fraudulently stated that SBD Aircraft Services (SBDAS faxed a letter to the Democratic National Committee (DNC on July 24, 2008, in which SBDAS purported to cancel a lease agreement with DNC for use of an aircraft. The claim stated that the cancellation was due to the inability of SBDAS and Norton Aircraft Maintenance Services (NAMS to occupy a hangar at San Bernardino International Airport, which was required to prepare the aircraft for the non-existent lease. Page 1

On March 26, 2010, Scot Spencer traveled to New York City and met with Felice Luciano at the Blue Water Grill. At Spencer's urging, Luciano signed an "Aircraft Lease Agreement" purporting to arrange for the lease of an aircraft from SBDAS to Unique Aviation Properties (Unique Aviation, for the purpose of providing the aircraft to DNC no later than August 23, 2008. Scot Spencer signed the agreement on behalf of SBDAS, while Luciano signed the agreement on behalf of Unique Aviation. On March 29, 2010, Scot Spencer, through an uncharged co-conspirator, provided a copy of the fraudulent lease agreement between SBDAS and Unique Aviation in response to a court order. On May 3, 2010, Scot Spencer testifed falsely under oath regarding his relationships with NAMS, the fraudulent agreement and his criminal history. On May 23, 2011, Scot Spencer testified falsely under oath regarding his relationship with NAMS. It is further alleged as to count 1 that in the commission of the above offense the said defendant Scot Matthew Spencer, with the intent to do so, took, damaged, and destroyed property of a value exceeding $200,000, within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.6(a(2. It is further alleged as to count 1 that in the commission of the above offense the said defendant Felice G. Luciano, with the intent to do so, took, damaged, and destroyed property of a value exceeding $200,000, within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.6(a(2. Page 2

COUNT 2 On or about March 26, 2010 through May 23, 2011, in the above named judicial district, the crime of CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A CRIME, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTION 182(a(1, a felony, was committed by Scot Matthew Spencer and Felice G. Luciano, who did unlawfully conspire together and with another person and persons whose identity is unknown to commit the crime of False Documents to Be Used in Evidence, in violation of Section 134 of the Penal Code, a felony; that pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out the objects and purposes of the aforesaid conspiracy, the said defendants committed the following overt act and acts at and in the County of San Bernardino: On July 29, 2008, Scot Spencer, through an attorney, submitted a draft claim to the San Bernardino International Airport Authority seeking compensation of $1.75 million. The claim fraudulently stated that SBD Aircraft Services (SBDAS faxed a letter to the Democratic National Committee (DNC on July 24, 2008, in which SBDAS purported to cancel a lease agreement with DNC for use of an aircraft. The claim stated that the cancellation was due to the inability of SBDAS and Norton Aircraft Maintenance Services (NAMS to occupy a hangar at San Bernardino International Airport, which was required to prepare the aircraft for the non-existent lease. On March 26, 2010, Scot Spencer traveled to New York City and met with Felice Luciano at the Blue Water Grill. At Spencer's urging, Luciano signed an "Aircraft Lease Agreement" purporting to arrange for the lease of an aircraft from SBDAS to Unique Aviation Properties (Unique Aviation, for the purpose of providing the aircraft to DNC no later than August 23, 2008. Scot Spencer signed the agreement on behalf of SBDAS, while Luciano signed the agreement on behalf of Unique Aviation. On March 29, 2010, Scot Spencer, through an uncharged co-conspirator, provided a copy of the fraudulent lease agreement between SBDAS and Unique Aviation in response to a court order. Page 3

On May 3, 2010, Scot Spencer testifed falsely under oath regarding his relationships with NAMS, the fraudulent agreement and his criminal history. On May 23, 2011, Scot Spencer testified falsely under oath regarding his relationship with NAMS. COUNT 3 On or about May 3, 2010, in the above named judicial district, the crime of PERJURY UNDER OATH, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTION 118, a felony, was committed by Scot Matthew Spencer, who being a person, having taken an oath that he would testify, declare, depose, and certify truly before a competent tribunal, officer, and person, to wit, Scot Spencer, in a case in which such an oath may by law be administered, to wit, testimonial, did contrary to such oath state as true a material matter which he knew to be false, to wit: regarding his relationships with NAMS, the fraudulent agreement and his criminal history. COUNT 4 On or about May 23, 2011, in the above named judicial district, the crime of PERJURY UNDER OATH, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTION 118, a felony, was committed by Scot Matthew Spencer, who being a person, having taken an oath that he would testify, declare, depose, and certify truly before a competent tribunal, officer, and person, to wit, regarding his relationship with NAMS., in a case in which such an oath may by law be administered, to wit,, did contrary to such oath state as true a material matter which he knew to be false, to wit: regarding his relationship with NAMS. Page 4

COUNT 5 On or about March 29, 2010, in the above named judicial district, the crime of PREPARING FALSE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTION 134, a felony, was committed by Scot Matthew Spencer, who did unlawfully prepare a false and ante-dated book, paper, record, instrument in writing, and other matter and thing, with intent to produce it, and to allow it to be produced for a fraudulent and deceitful purpose, as genuine and true, upon a trial, proceeding, and inquiry whatever, authorized by law. * * * * * NOTICE TO DEFENDANT AND DEFENDANT S ATTORNEY Pursuant to Penal Code Sections 1054.5.(b, the People are hereby informally requesting that defense counsel provide discovery to the People as required by Penal Code Section 1054.3. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY The materials accompanying this notice may include information about witnesses. If so, these materials are disclosed to you pursuant to Penal Code section 1054.2 which provides: "No attorney may disclose or permit to be disclosed to a defendant the address or telephone number of a victim or witness whose name is disclosed to the attorney pursuant to subdivision (a of Section 1054.1 unless specifically permitted to do so by the court after a hearing and a showing of good cause." I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT THIS COMPLAINT CONSISTS OF 5 COUNT(S. Executed at San Bernardino, California, on April 8, 2013. R. Brown R. Brown Page 5

DECLARANT AND COMPLAINANT Agency: FBI Riverside Prelim Est. 00:00 Defendant Scot Matthew Spencer Felice G. Luciano Birth Date 11/24/1964 10/23/1943 Booking No. CII No. NCIC Page 6