Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance. Ballot question committees break spending records in 2014

Similar documents
Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance

Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance. Ballot question committees break spending records in 2016

Campaign Finance Activity by Political Action Committees in Massachusetts 2011 & 2012

I. INTRODUCTION. 4. The FESA Committee is a Massachusetts ballot question committee organized pursuant to this Agreement.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance. Statewide candidates spent $33.1 million in 2014 election cycle

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

The Use of Public Resources for Political Purposes

New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission. Gubernatorial Public Financing

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

NC General Statutes - Chapter 18B Article 6 1

Ballot question seminar

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH

Bylaws of the Lakewood Tiger Football Booster Club (Approved December 2, 2014)

Special Edi tion: Campaign Fi nance Law Changes

Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board

MEMORANDUM To: PA-12 Republican Conferees From: Club for Growth Action Date: February 21, 2019 Re: Important information about PA Rep.

Campaign Finance Reports Handbook of Instructions

Working Draft of Proposed Rules

League of Women Voters, Washington

Recount Process. Ventura County Elections Division. 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA (805) venturavote.

Campaign Finance Manual

Political Parties and Soft Money

Toplines. UMass Amherst/WBZ Poll of MA Registered/Likely Voters

Campaign Disclosure Manual 1

Nova Law Review. So You Want to Amend the Florida Constitution? A Guide to Initiative Petitions. Jim Smith. Volume 18, Issue Article 25

FCPA REFERENCE MATERIALS TABLE OF CONTENTS

POLITICAL REFORM ACT TASK FORCE TENTATIVE PROPOSALS. 12/13/10 Draft I. ELECTRONIC FILING & STATE/LOCAL CONSISTENCY

D EXECUTIVE ORDER. Proclamation Declaration of Vote on Certain Measures

STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS & EXPENDITURES

Bolts Booster Club, Inc. By-Laws

Information about City of Los Angeles Campaign Finance Laws

AMHERST BAND BOOSTERS, INC. BY-LAWS ARTICLE I BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance

2013 National & Chapter Leadership Conference AGC PAC Briefing

CONSTITUTION of the Lewis Ski Club, Inc. The name of this non-profit Ohio Corporation shall be the Lewis Ski Club, Inc.

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

Alcohol Beverage Surtax. Sex Crimes Penalties. Victim Assistance. Initiative Statute.

CHAPTER 2 INITIATIVE, REFERENDUM AND LEGISLATIVE SUBMISSION

MCINTOSH HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS, INC. CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS

RECEIVED by MSC 3/13/2019 4:50:29 PM

A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Statewide Matters: Client may connect Chapters to statewide networks and policy initiatives.

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill Nos. 716 and 2660

HOLY SPIRIT ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION BYLAWS

Maryland Voter Poll on Prescription Drug Affordability Legislation

Colorado Campaign and Political Finance Manual

RANCHO CUCAMONGA ACE SOFTBALL LEAGUE 2018 CONSTITUTION

The Litter Control Designation Regulations

Political Reform Division th Street, Rm. 495 Sacramento, CA 95814

BETHLEHEM SOCCER CLUB. By-Laws (Amended and Restated as of May 13, 2014)

Brownie Mary Democratic Club of San Francisco. By-laws. Article I. Name

John G. Barisone Atchison, Barisone, Condotti & Kovacevich 333 Church Street Santa Cruz, CA THE INITIATIVE PROCESS AFTER PROPOSITION 218

Title 33 State Board of Elections Subtitle 13 Campaign Financing Chapter 01 Definitions

UPTOWN DEMOCRATIC CLUB IN SAN DIEGO

Campaign Finance Reform Ordinance San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code

BYLAWS OF THE CHEROKEE COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY. (rev. 06/28/2012)

LEGACY HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS SOCCER BOOSTER CLUB BYLAWS Bismarck, North Dakota. Written November 2014

Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

CAMPAIGN FILING MANUAL

OABC BYLAWS. NAME: Old Abe Booster Club (OABC). ADDRESS: 2225 Keith Street, Eau Claire, WI

Based on Article 95, paragraph 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro I hereby pass the

By-Laws Democratic Central Committee County of Del Norte By-Laws. Article I

CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW

BY LAWS OF PINECREST AREA III BAND BOOSTERS CLUB

STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PAC) W.S through 109

Bylaws of the LHS Soccer Booster Club

ASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY ELECTION CODE

May 31, Consensus Questions Initiative and Referendum Update

BY LAWS OF THE YOLO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Money In The Initiative Process: Who Spends? Who Wins? Contributions to California Ballot Measures in 2008

WHAT IS ROMNEY VICTORY?

Campaign Disclosure Manual 3

1616 W. Adams St. Phoenix, Arizona toll free

The By-Laws of the Democratic Executive Committee

Form 410 with original ink signature(s) Secretary of State Political Reform Division th Street, Rm 495 Sacramento, CA 95814

Testimony of Amy Loprest Executive Director New York City Campaign Finance Board. Charter Revision Commission June 16, 2010

Patriot Touchdown Booster Club, Inc. Bylaws

ARTICLE I DUTIES OF OFFICERS

Report on the Limited Public Financing System for Candidates for Statewide Office in the 1998 Election

Campaign Finance Manual

NAMES IN THE NEWS: SHELDON ADELSON

ROSEVILLE AREA HIGH SCHOOL FOOTLIGHTS FOUNDATION BYLAWS

Morrisville Youth Leadership Council By-Laws

SETS EFFECTIVE DATE FOR BALLOT MEASURES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

Guide to Vermont s Lobbying Registration & Disclosure Law

Seeking to balance protection of our constitutional rights with equitable access for citizen-initiated amendments to our constitution.

HARDINSBURG PARENT-TEACHER ORGANIZATION Supporting. Hardinsburg Elementary School. BY-LAWS. Article I ORGANIZATION

Information for State Candidates,Their Controlled Committees, and Primarily Formed Committees for State Candidates Manual 1

GENERAL BYLAWS & RULES

Are Interest Groups Good or Bad for Democracy? What Kinds of Interest Groups Do Americans Join? Interest Groups in America (HA)

A. Federal Contribution Limitations. To political committees established and maintained by the national political party 2 per calendar year

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

Northern Alberta Cricket Association. Bylaws. The name of the organization shall be Northern Alberta Cricket Association. The acronym shall be NACA.

For An Act To Be Entitled. Subtitle

BYLAWS OF THE HOME SHARERS DEMOCRATIC CLUB

Welcome! Take Action Webinar: Introduction to Move to Amend August 4, 2015 The webinar will begin in a few moments.

No. 90. An act relating to campaign finance law. (S.82) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:

BERMUDA CASINO GAMING (CASINO FEES) REGULATIONS 2017 BR 24 / 2017

Transcription:

Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 29, 2015 CONTACT: Jason Tait Director of Communications 617-979-8300 Ballot question committees break spending records in 2014 Ballot question committees spent $30.2 million on four propositions in 2014, shattering the previous record of $16.1 million set in 1992, according to an OCPF review of ballot question fundraising and spending. OCPF s review covered fundraising and spending for four questions that appeared on the 2014 statewide ballot: Question 1: Eliminating gas tax indexing (passed). Question 2: Expanding the beverage container deposit law (failed). Question 3: Expanding prohibitions on gaming (failed). Question 4: Earned sick time for employees (passed). More than half of the $30.2 million total was spent on Question 3 to expand prohibitions on casino gaming. Two proponents and two opponents spent $15,538,072 on the question, a new record for a single proposition. The previous record was set in 2006, when $13 million was spent on a question regarding wine sales in grocery stores. The bulk of spending on Question 3 came from a single ballot question committee, Coalition to Protect Mass. Jobs, which reported $14.7 million in spending. The committee s top donors were gaming companies Penn National Gaming ($6.7 million); MGM Resorts International ($5.3 million); and Wynn Resorts ($3 million). ers of Question 3 spent nearly $700,000, led by the Repeal the Casino Deal Committee, which received most of its contributions from individuals. More than $10.7 million was spent to support or oppose Question 2, the bottle bill question. That is more than was spent on all three ballot questions in 2012.

The No on Question 2: Stop Forced Deposits Committee reported $9.2 million in expenditures to oppose the question. The American Beverage Association was the primary donor, making $8.2 million in contributions. The Coalition for an Updated Bottle Bill Committee reported $1.3 million in expenditures to support Question 2. Its top contributors were the Massachusetts Sierra Club ($755,852); and the Elm Action Fund ($495,000). A total of $2.8 million was spent to support or oppose Question 1, concerning gas tax indexing. Most of the expenditures on Question 1 were made by the No on One Committee, which reported $2.7 million to oppose the question. The top contributors were the Construction Industries of Massachusetts ($529,361); and the CIM Advancement Fund ($300,000). The Committee to Tank the Automatic Gas Tax Hikes reported $63,048 in expenditures to support Question 1. It was funded mostly by individuals. Committees supporting or opposing Question 4 reported $1.1 million in expenditures, most of which was reported by the Raise Up Massachusetts Committee ($1,073,209), which supported the proposition. Various SEIU union organizations reported $915,809 in contributions to the committee. On the opposing side, the No on 4 Committee reported $47,500 in expenditures. The figures in this study are based on reports filed by committees covering the period through Dec. 31, and are subject to change due to any subsequent corrections, deletions or additions made as a result of any review conducted by OCPF or amendments filed by committees. In addition to the fundraising and spending reported by ballot question committees, businesses and other groups reported a total of $254,128 in spending that was independent of any ballot question committee. Reports filed by each of the committees may be found on OCPF s Electronic Filing System, a searchable database accessible on the office s website at www.ocpf.us. A breakdown of activity for each question follows.

Campaign Finance Activity for the 2014 Statewide Ballot Questions Totals include receipts and expenditures by each ballot question committee organized with OCPF for 2013 and 2014. In most instances, the committee organized during 2014. Question 1: Eliminating gas tax indexing (passed) Committee Receipts Expenditures In-Kind Committee to Tank the Automatic Gas Tax Hikes $53,969 $63,048 $6,648 -- Yes on 1 for Accountability -- -- -- -- Totals in favor No on One Committee Totals in opposition Question 1 Totals $53,969 $63,048 $6,648 -- $2,713,301 $2,707,839 $243,068 $444,771 $2,713,301 $2,707,839 $243,068 $444,771 $2,767,270 $2,770,887 $249,716 $444,771 Yes Vote: 1,095,229 No Vote: 972,271

Question 2: Expanding the beverage container deposit law (failed) Committee Receipts Expenditures In-Kind Coalition for an Updated Bottle Bill $1,368,191 $1,360,231 $5,210 -- Update the Bottle Bill -- -- $80,839 -- Mass Sierra Club Bottle Bill Committee $145,256 $143,422 -- -- Totals in favor $1,513,447 $1,503,653 $86,049 -- No on Question 2: Stop Forced Deposits $9,351,788 $9,259,945 $276,259 $35,830 Totals in opposition $9,351,788 $9,259,945 $276,259 -- Question 2 Totals $10,865,235 $10,763,598 $362,308 $35,830 Yes Vote: 564,381 No Vote: 1,561,591

Question 3: Expanding prohibitions on gaming (failed) Committee Receipts Expenditures In-Kind Repeal the Casino Deal Committee $700,472 $694,066 $159,615 $268,319 Yes on Three Massachusetts -- -- $1,060 -- Total expenditures in favor $700,472 $694,066 $160,675 $268,319 Coalition to Protect Mass Jobs $14,920,695 $14,677,472 $162,052 -- Everett United $200,020 $166,534 $81,375 -- Total expenditures in opposition Question 3 Total $15,120,715 $14,844,006 $243,427 -- $15,821,187 $15,538,072 $404,102 $268,319 Yes Vote: 845,880 No Vote: 1,271,404

Question 4: Earned sick time for employees (passed) Committee Receipts Expenditures In-Kind Raise up Massachusetts $1,075,457 $1,073,209 $959,200 -- Total expenditures in favor $1,075,457 $1,073,209 $959,200 No on 4 Committee $47,500 $47,500 $9,041 -- Total expenditures in opposition Question 3 Total $47,500 $47,500 $9,041 -- $1,122,957 $1,120,709 $968,241 -- Yes Vote: 1,256,841 No Vote: 859,621

Statewide Ballot Question Expenditures 1988 2014 Year Number of Questions Number of Committees Total spent 1988 4 18 $13,317,952 1990 6 20 $ 5,661,062 1992 4 8 $16,139,661 1994 9 23 $11,155,835 1996 1 3 $1,210,777 1998 3 9 $9,999,283 2000 8 16 $15,340,199 2002 3 6 $2,332,880 2006 3 6 $15,320,327 2008 3 7 $11,516,215 2010 3 9 $9,098,307 2012 3 13 $9,554,909 2014 4 13 $30,193,266 Note: There were no questions on the statewide ballot in 2004. ## End ##