IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Similar documents
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. to reach agreement by the end of the business day on March 14 th, and some parties were not

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1 OSBORN MALEDON, P.A North Central Avenue, 21St Floor 2 Phoenix, Arizona Telephone:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Appealing a Civil Traffic Case to the Superior Court

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv Document 430 Filed in TXSD on 11/18/16 Page 1 of 6

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 158 Filed 03/27/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:18-cv RDP Document 60 Filed 01/04/19 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

ARIZONA IRC v. Fields, 75 P.3d 1088, 206 Ariz. 130 (Ariz. App., 2003)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 4:13-cv JMM Document 4 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

SENATOR KEL SELIGER 5/20/2014

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

MANUEL de JESUS ORTEGA MELENDRES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; et al.

INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE

Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 239 Filed 07/03/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PlainSite. Legal Document. Arizona District Court Case No. 4:11-cv Carreon v. Toyota Financial Services Corporation et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PRESCOTT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Sherman v. City of Tempe, 2002 AZ 54 (AZ, 2002) [1]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 5:17-cv OLG Document 58 Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 6

Plaintiffs, v. No. D-101-CV Plaintiffs, v. No. D-101-CV FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. vs. Civil Action 1:15-cv RP

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1319 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:06-cv PLF-EGS-DST Document 170 Filed 10/07/2009 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. CV PHX-DGC (SPL) Petitioner, vs.

Case 1:07-cv WDM-CBS Document 40 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 1

Charles Edward Lincoln, pro se 603 Elmwood Place, Suite #6 Austin, Texas Tel:

Case 1:11-cv DLI-RR-GEL Document 489 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 11288

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv HEH Document 34 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 134

Motion Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc. Doc. 769

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF DEL NORTE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Gonzalez v. Arizona, 485 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir., 2007)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 171 Filed 02/01/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1338 Filed 01/02/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1323 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:04-cv JLK Document 213 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv PLF-EGS-DST Document 136 Filed 06/13/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2016 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv LY Document 135 Filed 04/11/08 Page 1 of 5

COMES NOW San Juan County and moves the Court to defer consideration

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

Public Meeting Announcement of Hearing and Meeting of the Governing Body of. BASIS Chandler 4825 S. Arizona Ave. Chandler, Arizona 85248

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

Case 2:08-cv JWL-DJW Document 3 Filed 05/02/2008 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS AT KANSAS CITY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION NOTICE OF APPEAL

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.

Case 1:17-cv GBD Document 60 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 4 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:06-cv JF

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 932 as Exhibit A. The chart in Exhibit A identifies the intrinsic and ext

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 832 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 214 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 4:12-cv RH-CAS Document 38 Filed 07/03/12 Page 1 of 6

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Case No

NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. v. CV 10-CV PCT-JAT

Transcription:

A. David Braun (Arizona Bar # 004786) P O Box 7372 Phoenix AZ 85011-7372 phone: 602-254-3934 fax: 801-365-6736 email: A.Braun@azbar.org George M. Sterling, Jr. (Arizona Bar # 003105) 818 East Osborn Rd. Phoenix AZ 85014-5218 phone 602-277-1123 fax 602-287-8767 Edward Still (D.C. Bar # 438985) Title Bldg., Suite 710 300 Richard Arrington Blvd. N. Birmingham AL 35203-3352 phone: 205-322-1100 fax: 877-264-5513 email: Still@votelaw.com Attorneys for Congressional Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ARIZONA MINORITY COALITION FOR FAIR REDISTRICTING, an unincorporated association; et al., and MARY ANN ARVIZU, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, ARIZONA INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION, a state agency; et al., Case No. CV2002-004380 Case No. CV2002-004882 (Assigned to Hon. Kenneth L. Fields) Statement of Facts of Arvizu et al. to Support Motion for Summary Judgment Defendants. This document relates to Congressional case

1. The Independent Redistricting Commission ( IRC or Commission ) has admitted that it did not adopt any definitions of the terms community of interest, competitive districts, or significant detriment to the other goals. See the answers of the IRC to the Congressional plaintiffs Requests for Admission and Interrogatories, as Exhibits A and B. 2. The Commission applied several standards for judging competitiveness of districts. See Exhibits C through I attached to the Arvizu Motion for Summary Judgment. 3. Exhibit C is a spreadsheet prepared by the staff or consultants of the IRC and produced in discovery by IRC. It shows the registration of each major party and the AQD measurements in the final congressional plan adopted by the Commission. 4. Exhibit D is a spreadsheet prepared by the staff or consultants of the IRC and produced in discovery by IRC. It shows the registration of each major party in the Downtown Competitive congressional plan considered by the Commission. 5. Exhibit E is a slide in a PowerPoint presentation prepared by the staff or consultants of the IRC and produced in discovery by IRC. It shows the AQD measure for the Competitive B Test version 3 considered and rejected by the Commission. 6. Exhibit F is a spreadsheet prepared by the staff or consultants of the IRC since the adoption of the congressional plan and produced in discovery by IRC. It shows the registration of each major

party and the AQD measurements in the final congressional plan adopted by the Commission, using rebuilt databases not available to the Commission when it adopted the Congressional plan. 7. Exhibit G is a spreadsheet prepared by the staff or consultants of the IRC since the adoption of the congressional plan and produced in discovery by IRC. It shows the registration of each major party and the AQD measurements in the Downtown Competitive plan considered by the Commission, using rebuilt databases not available to the Commission when it adopted the Congressional plan. 8. Exhibit H is a report prepared by Dr. Michael McDonald, a consultant of the IRC and produced in discovery by IRC. It shows the Judge It analysis for the Congressional draft map (top of page 3) and the Downtown Competitive Congressional plan (bottom of page 4). With a few modifications, the Congressional draft map became the adopted Congressional plan. 9. Exhibit I is a spreadsheet prepared by the staff or consultants of the IRC and produced in discovery by IRC. It shows the AQD measurements in the Downtown Competitive congressional plan considered by the Commission. 10. The Congressional plaintiffs adopt paragraphs 1 through 3 of the statement of facts made by the Arizona Minority Coalition and the City of Flagstaff in support of their joint motion for summary judgment.

11. The Congressional plaintiffs adopt paragraphs 3 through 5 of the statement of facts made by the Navajo Nation et al. in support of their motion for summary judgment. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th of May 2003, by, OF COUNSEL: Paul Bender College of Law Arizona State University P.O. Box 877906 Tempe AZ 85287-7906 phone 480-965-2556 fax 602-252-6202 /s/ A. David Braun A. David Braun Edward Still George M. Sterling, Jr. Attorneys for Congressional Plaintiffs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on 19 May 2003, the original of the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of Court, Maricopa County Superior Court, Central Court Building, 201 West Jefferson Street, Phoenix AZ 85003-2243 a copy of the foregoing was delivered to Hon. Kenneth L. Fields, Maricopa County Superior Court, 914 East Court Building, 101 West Jefferson Street, Phoenix AZ by hand delivery or by email to swhitake@superiorcourt.maricopa.gov a copy of the foregoing delivered by facsimile, email, and/or first class mail to the following:

Judith Dworkin Marvin S. Cohen SACKS TIERNEY PA 7047 E. Greenway Parkway, Suite 150 Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-8109 Judith.Dworkin@sackstierney.c om Fax: 480-624-5637 Dana L. Bobroff Assistant Attorney General The Navajo Nation, Dept. of Justice P. O. Drawer 2010 Window Rock, Arizona 86515 dbobroff@msn.com Neil Vincent Wake Linda D. Skon 3030 N. Third Street, Suite 1220 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-3050 wake@wakelaw.com Fax: 602-241-9862 Michael A. Carvin JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE 51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 macarvin@jonesday.com Attorneys for Arizonans for Fair and Legal Redistricting et al. Attorneys for the Navajo Nation Daniel R. Ortega, Jr. Gary A. Husk ORTEGA & ASSOCIATES 411 N. Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004 danny@ortegalaw.com Fax: 602-495-1738 Attorneys for Hopi Tribe Joseph A. Kanefield Office of the Attorney General 1275 W. Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2997 Joseph.Kanefield@azbar.org Fax: 602-542-8308 Jessica Funkhouser Special Counsel Attorney General's Office 1275 W. Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Fax: 602-542-8308 Jessica.Funkhouser@ag.state.az.us Attorneys for Arizona Secretary of State

Lisa T. Hauser Gammage & Burnham Two North Central Avenue Eighteenth Floor Phoenix AZ 85004 phone: 602-256-4462 fax: 602-256-4475 lhauser@gblaw.com Jose de Jesus Rivera Haralson Miller Pitt Feldman & McAnally PLC 3003 North Central, Suite 1400 Phoenix AZ 85012 phone: 602-604-2151 fax: 602-604-2124 jrivera@hmpmlaw.com Marguerite Leoni Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP 591 Redwood Hwy., Building 4000 Mill Valley CA 94941 phone: 415-389-6800 fax: 415-388-6874 mleoni@nmgovlaw.com Attorneys for the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission John R. Moffitt Prescott Legal Department Post Office Box 2059 Prescott, Arizona 86302-2059 John.moffitt@cityofprescott.net Fax: 928-776-6325 Attorney for City of Prescott Paul F. Eckstein Michael S. Mandell Michael G. Nichols BROWN & BAIN, P.A. 2901 North Central Avenue Post Office Box 400 Phoenix, Arizona 85001-0400 eckstein@brownbain.com mandell@brownbain.com mnichols@brownbain.com Fax: 602-351-8516 Richard A. Halloran Joshua Grabel LEWIS AND ROCA, LLP 40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-5529 RHalloran@lrlaw.com JGrabel@lrlaw.com Fax: 602-734-3893 Aaron Kizer Law Offices of Aaron Kizer, PLC 411 North Central Avenue Suite 520 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2133 kizer@sonalink.com Fax: 602-253-6073 Attorneys for Plaintiffs AMC et al. Ivan Legler Town Of Prescott Valley 7501 E. Civic Circle Prescott Valley, AZ 86314 ilegler@pvaz.net Fax: 928-777-1325 Attorney for Town of Prescott Valley

David J. Cantelme Ernest Calderón Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C. The Collier Center, 11th Floor 201 East Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2385 Dcantelme@jsslaw.com Ecalderon@jsslaw.com Fax: 602-253-3255 Joseph R. Bertoldo City of Flagstaff 211 West Aspen Avenue Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Joseph.Bertoldo@azbar.org Fax: 928-213-3023 Attorneys for City of Flagstaff Thomas Saenz Steve Reyes Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund 6344 South Spring St., 11th Floor Los Angeles, Ca 90014 TSaenz@maldef.org SReyes@maldef.org Richard M. Martinez 3131 E. Second Street Tucson, Arizona 85716 Richard@richardmartinezlaw.co m Nina Perales Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund 140 E. Houston Street Suite 300 San Antonio, TX 78205 NPerales@maldef.org Attorneys for Defendant Intervenors Jaime Abeytia et al. Robert A. Taylor City of Kingman 310 North 4th Street Kingman, Arizona 86401 dshaw@ci.kingman.az.us Attorney for City of Kingman Maureen George City Attorney Lake Havasu City 2330 McCulloch Boulevard Lake Havasu City, Arizona 86403 Fax: 928-854-3580 ctyatty@ci.lake-havasucity.az.us Attorney for Lake Havasu City William J. Ekstrom, Jr. Mohave County Attorney Post Office Box 7000 Kingman, Arizona 86402-7000 Bill.Ekstrom@co.mohave.az.us Attorneys for Mohave County Steve M. Titla Titla & Parsi P. O. Box 1143 Globe, Arizona 85002 Titla@azbar.org Fax: 928-425-9048 Attorneys for the San Carlos Apache Tribe

Daisy Flores Mark Gunning Gila County Attorney s Office 1400 E. Ash Globe, Arizona 85501 dflores@co.gila.az.us mgunning@co.gila.az.us Attorneys for Gila County Derek Rapier Greenlee County Attorney P.O. Box 1717 Clifton, Arizona 85533-1717 drapier@co.greenlee.az.us Attorneys for Greenlee County Ronald M. Lehman Gabroy, Rollman & Bosse, P.C. 3507 N. Campbell Avenue, Ste 111 Tucson, AZ 85719 rmlehman@gabroylaw.com Attorneys for Santa Cruz County Criss Candelaria Nancy Dean Brad Carlyon P. O. Box 637 St. Johns, Arizona 85936 ccandelaria@co.apache.az.us ndean@co.apache.az.us bcarlyon@co.apache.az.us Fax: 928-337-2427 Attorneys for Apache County Kenneth Angle Graham County Attorney 800 West Main Street Safford, Arizona 85546-2823 kangle@graham.az.gov Attorneys for Graham County Mark W. Drutz Grant K. McGregor William B. Carroll MUSGROVE, DRUTZ & KACK, P.C. 1135 Iron Springs Road Prescott, Arizona 86301 mdrutz@mindspring.com Fax: 928-445-5980 Attorneys for Town of Chino Valley BY /s/ A. David Braun