CONSENT DECREE;~:~~~~~ s; ~~~: c:? The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission" or "EEi:;~ins0\Ited

Similar documents
EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

)

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

US v Matagorda County Decree UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

Case 2:01-cv MLM Document 59 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. Tbe Litigation

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

I. Background and History of Proceedings

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A GARNISHMENT OF PERSONAL EARNINGS OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR (Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 2716 et seq.) (REVISED 2/3/2015)

SAMPLE. It is agreed that this proposal may not be withdrawn within a period of thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening thereof.

Case 2:99-cv JPM Document 14 Filed 11/24/1999 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Employment and Settlement Agreement With Release and Waiver

)

) Case 3:05-cv MEJ Document 21-2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

District 2 Public Health

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

Case 5:13-cv ATB Document 67 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 5:12-CV-818

I' " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ~ICHIGAN SOUTHERN,,{ON J;:: Zi.. Plaintiff, Defendant ~I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

Anita Robinson, et al., v. Boeing Company, d/b/a Boeing Defense & Space Group

~ Civil Action No. A-04-C~-o03370lI

AFFIDAVIT, ORDER AND NOTICE OF GARNISHMENT AND ANSWER OF GARNISHEE (PERSONAL EARNINGS) LOGAN, OHIO 105 West Hunter Street NOTARY PUBLIC

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Transcription:

~. - Civil parties IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION EQUAL ENWLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant. ---------------- CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:01-CV-117 CONSENT DECREE;~:~~~~~ s; ~~~: c:? The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission" or "EEi:;~ins0\Ited Action No.1 :01-CV-117 under the authority granted by Sections 16(c and 17 ofthe Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA", as amended, 29 U.S.c. 216(c and 217, to enforce the requirements ofthe Equal Pay Act of 1963, codified as Section 6(d ofthe FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 206(d ("EPA"; Section 706(f(1 and (3 oftitle VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.c. 2000e-5(f(1 and (3 ("Title VII"; and Section 102 oftitle I ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1991,42 U.S.c. 1981a. The Commission's action was brought to correct allegedly unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex, and to restrain the allegedly unlawful payment ofwages to employees ofone sex at rates less than the rates paid to employees ofthe opposite sex, which allegedly unlawful practices and payments are specifically denied by the Defendant, SuperValu Holdings, Inc. (hereinafter "SuperValu". The Commission and SuperValu hereby stipulate to the jurisdiction ofthe Court over the and the subject matter. i :.".-... I N "T'.,.-- I,-.,-. I', C

I The Commission and SuperValu have advised the Court that they desire to resolve Civil Action No. I :01-CV-117 without the burden, expense, and delay offurther litigation. It is, therefore, the finding ofthe Court, based on the pleadings and the record as a whole, that: (l the Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter ofthis action, and (2 implementation ofthis Decree, as provided in paragraphs I through 13 below, will advance the purposes and provisions of Title vn and the EPA. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1. By entering into this agreement, SuperValu does not admit that it violated Title VII or the EPA. It is the position ofsupervalu that it has complied with, and will continue to comply with, the EPA, Title VII and all the laws, rules, and regulations dealing with equal employment opportunity, and SuperValu has consented to the entry oftms Decree solely to avoid the burden and expense offurther litigation. 2. This Consent Decree is final and binding, as ofthe date offinal approval and entry ofthe Consent Decree by the Court, upon the Commission and SuperValu pursuant to the terms herein. This Consent Decree is intended to and does resolve, fully, finally, and forever, all matters and claims in dispute between the Commission and SuperValu in this action, and all other matters and individual or class claims which could have been raised in this action under Title VII or the EPA based upon anything which occurred prior to the date ofthe filing ofthe Joint Motion for Entry of a Consent Decree. 3. SuperValu agrees that it will not retaliate or discriminate against any ofits employees, former employees, or applicants for employment because the individual has made a charge or opposed an unlawful employment practice under the EPA or Title VII or has assisted or 2

participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under the EPA or Title VII. 4. SuperValu agrees that it will not engage in any act, policy, or practice that has the purpose or effect ofunlawfully discriminating against female employees or applicants for employment on the basis ofsex. Specifically, SuperValu agrees that, as required by the EPA, within any establishment, it will pay its female employees at rates equal to the rates paid to male employees performing equal work on jobs the performance ofwhich requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to (i a seniority system, (ii a merit system, (iii a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality ofproduction, or (iv a differential based on any other factor other than sex. 5. SuperValu agrees to post the Notice ofnon-discrimination Policy attached to this Decree as Appendix A in conspicuous locations visible to applicants and employees throughout its Fort Wayne Distribution Center. Said notices shall remain posted throughout the term ofthis Decree. 6. SuperValu agrees to pay a total gross amount of$400,000, which will be distributed to the individuals listed on Appendix B in the specific amounts set forth therein as determined by the Commission, subject to applicable taxes and withholdings. SuperValu will not withhold taxes or other withholdings from any amounts other than amounts paid for back wages. SuperValu agrees not to deduct from any amount the employer's share ofany costs, taxes, or social security required by law to be paid by SuperValu. The Commission will forward releases (Appendix C to each ofthe individuals listed on Appendix B for their execution. The Commission will notify counsel for SuperValu when it has received the executed releases and 3

will forward copies ofthem to counsel. Then, within ten business days ofreceipt ofthe releases or entry ofthe Decree, whichever is later, SuperValu shall mail checks, payable to the individuals, by certified mail to individuals who have executed releases (to the addresses provided to SuperValu by the Commission. SuperValu shall mail a copy ofthe checks and proofoftheir delivery (signed certified mail receipts to the Commission. The Commission will then provide the original releases to counsel for SuperValu. 7. In the event that an individual listed on Appendix B decides not to execute a release, or the EEOC is unable to locate an individual listed, that individual will be entitled to nothing under this Decree, and the amount due to that individual will be divided pro rata among the individuals who execute releases according to the percentages listed on Appendix B. 8. SuperValu shall adopt and implement a training program for all ofits supervisors and managers at its Fort Wayne Distribution Center. This training shall cover what constitutes unlawful employment practices under the EPA and Title VII. The training must be conducted within 120 days from the date ofentry ofthis Decree. Thirty days before the training, SuperValu shall provide notice to the Commission ofthe date, time, and place ofthe training; and shall send to the Commission a copy ofthe training program and all written materials, ifany, to be used. The Commission may provide reasonable input on the content ofthe training but shall do so no later than ten days prior to the commencement ofthe training. 9. SuperValu agrees to submit a report to the EEOC detailing compliance with this Decree within 120 days ofthe date of entry ofthe Decree. SuperValu will certify to the EEOC's Regional Attorney that it has complied with ~~s 5 and 8 ofthis Decree. In addition, SuperValu 4

shall submit a report due on March 1,2003. In both reports, Defendant shall include the following information: 1. the dates and topics of all training programs offered concerning Title VII and the EPA; n. a copy ofall written materials utilized or disseminated at the training programs; and 111. the name and position of each employee who attends the training programs. All reports shall be sent to the attention oflaurie A. Young, Regional Attorney, or her successor, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900, Indianapolis IN 46204-4203. 10. SuperValu agrees that the EEOC may review compliance with this Decree. As part of such review, the EEOC may inspect the premises, interview employees, and examine and copy documents. In the event that the EEOC alleges that a violation ofthis Decree has occurred, before the EEOC seeks enforcement ofthis Decree by the Court, the EEOC shall give notice in writing specifically identifying the alleged violation to SuperValu. SuperValu will have ten business days in which to investigate and respond to the allegation. 11. The term ofthis Decree shall be for two years following the date ofentry ofthis Decree. 12. Each party will bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses in this action. 13. The Court will retain jurisdiction ofthis cause for two years for purposes ofmonitoring compliance with the Decree and entry ofsuch further orders or modifications as may be necessary or appropriate. 5

SO ORDERED. Date: ;-;;L-d,;- Honorable William Lee ----.. District Judge Copies to: Kenneth L. Bird E. Paige Freitag EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900 Indianapolis IN 46204-4203 Byron Myers Michael Marine ICE MILLER One Indiana Square Box 82001 Indianapolis IN 46282-0002 6

EMPLOYEE NOTICE Posted Pursuant to an Agreement Resolving a Charge of Employment Discrimination filed with the U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNI,TY COMMISSION Indianapolis District Office This Notice is being distributed and posted by agreement between SuperValu Holdings, Inc., and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, resolving Civil Action No. 1:01-CV-117 in the ~nited States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. Federal law prohibits discrimination against any employee, former employee, or job applicant because of the individual's sex, race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or age (over 40. Federal law also prohibits retaliation of any kind against any person who has opposed any practice made unlawful under federal law or because an individual has filed a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing. SuperValu supports and will comply with federal law in all respects and will not take any actions against employees because they have exercised their rights under the law. SuperValu agrees to continue its policy of non-discrimination in employment, will conduct a training program on Title VII and the Equal Pay Act, and will not retaliate against an individual who files a charge of discrimination. If you have any complaints of discrimination, you may contact the EEOC at the address or telephone number given below. An employee has the right, and is encouraged to exercise that right, to report allegations of employment discrimination in the workplace. An employee may contact the U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for the purpose of filing a charge of employment discrimination. Questions concerning this notice may be addressed to: :...:.:...' Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900 Indlan.polle. Indiana 46204-4203 T (3172~7212 '1 - TTY (S11 ~1e2

. CLASS DISTRIBUTIONS Diane Bobilya $23,219.78 5.80% Jane Christman 23,219.78 5.80% Susan Claypool 23,219.78 5.80% Amanda Cook 22,951.64 5.74% Kathleen Crick 342.53 0.09% Lisa Elmer-Sorge 23,219.78 5.80% Cristine Enos 23,219.78 5.80% Donna Everest 23,219.78 5.80% Cami Gerdes 18,355.87 4.59% Julie Gropengeiser 23,219.78 5.80% Cheryl Guzman 8,404.88 2.10% Elizabeth Hammond 7,463.43 1.87% Kimberly Howey 16,985.75 4.25% Patricia Klaiss 4,590.90 1.15% Joanne Lantz 23,219.78 5.80% M. Sue Luther 23,219.78 5.80% Denise Parker 19,588.97 4.90% Rebecca Payton 18,355.87 4.59% Violet Thomas 22,951.64 5.74% Kathryn Van Ryn 4,590.90 1.15% Carol Zent 23,219.78 5.80% Jaliene Zent 23,219.78 5.80% APPENDIXB

, t RELEASE In consideration ofthe payment to me by SuperValu Holdings, Inc., of$,-, less appropriate tax deductions and withholdings, and in consideration ofthe Consent Decree (of which this release is a part agreed to by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and SuperValu Holdings, Inc., in Civil Action 1:0l-CV-117, which the Court will enter ofrecord, I,, hereby fully and forever release and discharge SuperValu Holdings, Inc., and SuperValu, Inc., and their affiliates, successors, and assigns, including their present and former directors, officers, employees, and agents, from any claim or obligation (including attorneys' fees based on alleged discrimination in violation ofthe Equal Pay Act or Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was or could have been raised in Civil Action 1:0l-CV-117. I have read this Release and I execute it voluntarily, without coercion or threat ofreprisal. Dated: ------ Subscribed and sworn to before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for County, State of, this _day of, 2001. _ Signature ofnotary Public Printed name ofnotary Public County ofresidence: My Commission Expires: APPENDIXC