Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

Similar documents
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 32 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 616

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 86 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1928

Case 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

#: 685 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 17 Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 499

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 179 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 8

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,

2:18-CV W. SHAWN MURNAHAN (Ga. Bar No ) murnahanw(a~sec.gov

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA DIVISION. Plaintiff,

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

Case 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2016 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 24 Filed 03/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

Sec. 202(a)(1)(C). Disclosure of Negative Risk Determinations about Financial Company.

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 105 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 106

GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRA-ORDINARY. PART (II) OF SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (ii) PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA NOTIFICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CONSENT JUDGMENT. THIS CAUSE came on before the undersigned Judge for entry of a Consent Judgment

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Rules of the Equal Opportunities Commission November 10, 2016

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 830-X-6 EXEMPT SECURITIES AND EXEMPT TRANSACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Case 4:12-cv Document 209 Filed in TXSD on 07/02/14 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CAUSE NO STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

Arkansas Franchise Practices Act

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

ORTHOFIX INTERNATIONAL N V

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20

- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv KJM-EFB Document 40 Filed 01/14/13 Page 1 of 21

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

MUTUAL AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE CLAIMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, I COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Transcription:

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID # 543 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 417-cv-00336-ALM THURMAN P. BRYANT, III, and BRYANT UNITED CAPITAL FUNDING, INC. Defendants, ARTHUR F. WAMMEL, WAMMEL GROUP, LLC THURMAN P. BRYANT, JR., CARLOS GOODSPEED a/k/a SEAN PHILLIPS d/b/a TOP AGENT ENTERTAINMENT d/b/a MR. TOP AGENT ENTERTAINMENT Relief Defendants. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENTER AGREED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AND CONSENTS Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission ), respectfully moves the Court for entry of the attached proposed Agreed Preliminary Injunction and Other Relief as to Defendant Thurman P. Bryant, III and Defendant Bryant United Capital Funding, Inc. ( the Agreed Order ). In support of this motion, the Commission states as follows 1. On May 15, 2017, the Commission filed its Complaint [Dkt. No. 1] with this Court. On May 15, 2017, the Court entered the Ex Parte Order Granting Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Asset Freeze, Appointment of a Receiver, Document Preservation Order, Order to Make Accounting and Other Emergency Relief, and Setting UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENTER AGREED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AND CONSENTS PAGE 1 OF 3

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID # 544 Hearing Date on Plaintiff s Preliminary-Injunction Motion [Dkt. No. 16] (the TRO ). On May 26, 2017, the Court entered its Order Extending Temporary Restraining Order [Dkt. No. 24] thereby setting the preliminary injunction hearing for 200 p.m. on Friday, June 2, 2017. 2. The Commission has now reached a settlement with the Defendant Thurman P. Bryant, III ( Bryant ) and Bryant United Capital Funding, Inc. ( BUCF ) (collectively, Defendant(s) ) regarding the Commission s request for entry of the preliminary injunction. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission s Complaint, Defendants consent to the entry of an agreed preliminary injunction against them. 3. Bryant has executed a consent in this case by which he consents to, among other things, the jurisdiction of this Court and entry of the proposed Agreed Order (attached hereto as Exhibit A) without a hearing, argument, or adjudication of any fact or law. See Consent of Thurman P. Bryant, III (attached hereto as Exhibit B). 4. BUCF, by and through the Court-appointed receiver, has executed a consent in this case by which it consents to, among other things, the jurisdiction of this Court and entry of the proposed Agreed Order without a hearing, argument, or adjudication of any fact or law. See Consent of Bryant United Capital Funding, Inc. (attached hereto as Exhibit C). 5. The entry of the proposed Agreed Order obviates the need for a hearing on any of the consented to matters and conserves judicial resources. Therefore, the Commission moves the Court to cancel the presently scheduled preliminary injunction hearing set for 200 p.m. on Friday, June 2, 2017 as moot. 6. Defendants agree to the filing of this motion and the entry of the Preliminary Injunction Order and their respective consents. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENTER AGREED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AND CONSENTS PAGE 2 OF 3

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID # 545 Dated June 2, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Jason P. Reinsch JASON P. REINSCH Texas Bar No. 24040120 JESSICA B. MAGEE Texas Bar No. 24037757 United States Securities and Exchange Commission 801 Cherry Street, Suite 1900 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Telephone (817) 900-2601 (Reinsch) Fax (817) 978-4927 reinschj@sec.gov mageej@sec.gov ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on June 2, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing motion with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record who have consented to electronic notification. I further certify that I mailed the foregoing document and the notice of electronic filing by first-class mail to all non-cm/ecf participants. /s/ Jason P. Reinsch Jason P. Reinsch UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENTER AGREED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AND CONSENTS PAGE 3 OF 3

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID # 546 EXHIBIT A

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 2 of 4 PageID # 547 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 417-cv-00336-ALM THURMAN P. BRYANT, III, and BRYANT UNITED CAPITAL FUNDING, INC. Defendants, ARTHUR F. WAMMEL, WAMMEL GROUP, LLC THURMAN P. BRYANT, JR., CARLOS GOODSPEED a/k/a SEAN PHILLIPS d/b/a TOP AGENT ENTERTAINMENT d/b/a MR. TOP AGENT ENTERTAINMENT Relief Defendants. AGREED ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF The Court has considered Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission s (the Commission ) Complaint [Dkt. No. 1], the Commission s Emergency Ex Parte Application For Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Appointment of a Receiver, and Other Emergency and Ancillary Relief (the Application ) along with the memorandum of law and accompanying evidentiary materials [Dkt. No. 4], oral argument, if any, and the consents of defendants to an Order Granting Preliminary Injunction and Other Relief [Dkt. No. ]. The Court finds that the Commission has made a proper prima facie showing that (i) Defendant Thurman P. Bryant, III ( Bryant ) and Defendant Bryant United Capital Funding, Inc. ( BUCF ) (collectively, Defendant(s) ) directly or indirectly engaged in the violations alleged AGREED ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF PAGE 1 OF 3

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 3 of 4 PageID # 548 in the Complaint; (ii) there is a reasonable likelihood that these violations will be repeated; and (iii) entry of a preliminary injunction and order for other equitable relief as set forth below is necessary and appropriate. I. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (SECTION 17(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants and their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are preliminarily enjoined from the offer or sale of any securities by use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails from, directly or indirectly (a) Employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) Obtaining money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstance under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) Engaging in any transactions, practices or courses of business which operate or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any purchaser or prospective purchaser. [Securities Act 17(a) (15 U.S.C. 77q(a))]. II. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (SECTION 10(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND RULE 10b-5) IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED Defendants and their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or AGREED ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF PAGE 2 OF 3

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 4 of 4 PageID # 549 otherwise, are preliminarily enjoined from making use of any means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of any facility of a national security exchange, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security (a) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; (c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person; or (d) To use or employ any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of a rule or regulation prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. [Exchange Act 10(b) (15 U.S.C. 78j(b)) and Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5) thereunder]. III. DURATION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Preliminary Injunction shall remain in effect until entry of a Final Judgment in, or other final disposition of, this action, unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing by the parties. IV. CANCELLATION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the preliminary injunction hearing presently scheduled for 200 p.m. on Friday, June 2, 2017 [see Dkt. No. 24] is cancelled as moot. AGREED ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF PAGE 3 OF 3

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-2 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID # 550 EXHIBIT B

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-2 Filed 06/02/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID # 551 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 417-cv-00336-ALM THURMAN P. BRYANT, III, and BRYANT UNITED CAPITAL FUNDING, INC. Defendants, ARTHUR F. WAMMEL, WAMMEL GROUP, LLC THURMAN P. BRYANT, JR., CARLOS GOODSPEED a/k/a SEAN PHILLIPS d/b/a TOP AGENT ENTERTAINMENT d/b/a MR. TOP AGENT ENTERTAINMENT ReliefDefendants. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT THURMAN P. BRYANT, III TO AN ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1. Defendant Thurman P. Bryant, III ("Defendant") acknowledges having been served with the Complaint [Dkt. No. 1], enters a general appearance, and admits the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and over the subject matter ofthis action. 2. Without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to personal and subject matter jurisdiction, which Defendant admits), Defendant hereby consents to the entry ofthe Agreed Order in the form attached hereto (the "Agreed Order") and incorporated by reference herein, which, among other things, preliminarily restrains and enjoins Defendant from violation of Section 17(a) ofthe Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. Consentof DefendantThurman P. Bryant,in to an OrderGranting Preliminary Injunction Page l of 4

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-2 Filed 06/02/17 Page 3 of 5 PageID # 552 77q(a)] and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5(b)]. 3. Defendant waives the right to any hearing pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules ofcivil Procedure and waives entry offindings offact and conclusions oflaw pursuant to Rule 52 ofthe Federal Rules ofcivil Procedure. 4. Defendant waives the right, ifany, to appeal from the entry ofthe Agreed Order. 5. Defendant enters into this Consent voluntarily and represents that no threats, offers, promises, or inducements of any kind have been made by the Commission or any member, officer, employee, agent, or representative of the Commission to induce Defendant to enter into this Consent. 6. Defendant agrees that this Consent shall be incorporated into the Agreed Order with the same force and effect as iffully set forth therein. 7. Defendant will not oppose the enforcement ofthe Agreed Order on the ground, if any exists, that it fails to comply with Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and hereby waives any objection based thereon. 8. Defendant waives service ofthe Agreed Order and agrees that entry ofthe Agreed Order by the Court and filing with the Clerk of the Court will constitute notice to Defendant of its terms and conditions. Defendant further agrees to provide counsel for the Commission, within thirty days after the Agreed Order is filed with the Clerk ofthe Court, with an affidavit or declaration stating that Defendant has received and read a copy ofthe Agreed Order. 9. Consistent with 17 C.F.R. 202.5(f), this Consent resolves only the preliminary injunction against the Defendant based on the claims asserted against Defendant in this civil proceeding. Defendant acknowledges that no promise or representation has been made by the ConsentofDefendant Thurman P. Bryant, III Page 2 of 4 to an OrderGranting Preliminary Injunction

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-2 Filed 06/02/17 Page 4 of 5 PageID # 553 Commission or any member, officer, employee, agent, or representative ofthe Commission with regard to any criminal liability that may have arisen or may arise from the facts underlying this action or immunity from any such criminal liability. Defendant waives any claim of Double Jeopardy based upon the settlement of this proceeding, including the imposition of any remedy or civil penalty herein. Defendant further acknowledges that the Court's entry of a preliminary injunction may have collateral consequences under federal or state law and the rules and regulations of self-regulatory organizations, licensing boards, and other regulatory organizations. Such collateral consequences include, but are not limited to, a statutory disqualification with respect to membership or participation in, or association with a member of, a self-regulatory organization. This statutory disqualification has consequences that are separate from any sanction imposed in an administrative proceeding. In addition, in any disciplinary proceeding before the Commission based on the entry ofthe injunction in this action, Defendant understands that he shall not be permitted to contest the factual allegations ofthe complaint in this action. 10. In connection with this action and any related judicial or administrative proceeding or investigation commenced by the SEC or to which the SEC is a party, Defendant (i) agrees to appear and be interviewed by SEC staff at such times and places as the staff requests upon reasonable notice; (ii) will accept service by email, mail, or facsimile transmission of notices or subpoenas issued by the SEC for documents or testimony at depositions, hearings, or trials, or in connection with any related investigation by SEC staff; (iii) appoints Defendants undersigned attorney as agent to receive service ofsuch notices and subpoenas; (iv) with respect to such notices and subpoenas, waives the territorial limits on service contained in Rule 45 ofthe Federal Rules ofcivil Procedure and any applicable local rules, provided that the party requesting the testimony reimburses Defendant's travel, lodging, and subsistence expenses at the then- Consent ofdefendant Thurman P. Bryant, III to anordergranting Preliminary Injunction Page 3 of4

> Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-2 Filed 06/02/17 Page 5 of 5 PageID # 554 prevailing U.S. Government per diem rates; and (v) consents to personal jurisdiction over Defendant in any United States District Court for purposes ofenforcing any such subpoena. 11. Defendant agrees that the Commission may present the Agreed Order to the Court for signature and entry without further notice. 12. Defendant agrees that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose ofenforcing the terms ofthe Agreed Order. Dated ~/?a/zo /? Thurman P. Bryant, III On \A0iJfr?>Q, 2017, ivyof^ RnpA-f-,aperson known to me, personally illy appeared appearea before me and acknowledged executing the foregoing jgoing Consent. *< ">,, LISA MCAMACHO fff^kjfr Notary Public. State of Texas W'-^-W Comm- Expires 07-22-2018 XJS^ Notary ID 124278398 \ Notary Public Commission expires Consent of Defendant Thurman P. Bryant, III to an Order Granting Preliminary Injunction Page 4 of 4

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-3 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID # 555 EXHIBIT C

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-3 Filed 06/02/17 Page 2 of 4 PageID # 556

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-3 Filed 06/02/17 Page 3 of 4 PageID # 557

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-3 Filed 06/02/17 Page 4 of 4 PageID # 558

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-4 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID # 559 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 417-cv-00336-ALM THURMAN P. BRYANT, III, and BRYANT UNITED CAPITAL FUNDING, INC. Defendants, ARTHUR F. WAMMEL, WAMMEL GROUP, LLC THURMAN P. BRYANT, JR., CARLOS GOODSPEED a/k/a SEAN PHILLIPS d/b/a TOP AGENT ENTERTAINMENT d/b/a MR. TOP AGENT ENTERTAINMENT Relief Defendants. AGREED ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF The Court has considered Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission s (the Commission ) Complaint [Dkt. No. 1], the Commission s Emergency Ex Parte Application For Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Appointment of a Receiver, and Other Emergency and Ancillary Relief (the Application ) along with the memorandum of law and accompanying evidentiary materials [Dkt. No. 4], oral argument, if any, and the consents of defendants to an Order Granting Preliminary Injunction and Other Relief [Dkt. No. ]. The Court finds that the Commission has made a proper prima facie showing that (i) Defendant Thurman P. Bryant, III ( Bryant ) and Defendant Bryant United Capital Funding, Inc. ( BUCF ) (collectively, Defendant(s) ) directly or indirectly engaged in the violations alleged AGREED ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF PAGE 1 OF 3

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-4 Filed 06/02/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID # 560 in the Complaint; (ii) there is a reasonable likelihood that these violations will be repeated; and (iii) entry of a preliminary injunction and order for other equitable relief as set forth below is necessary and appropriate. I. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (SECTION 17(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants and their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are preliminarily enjoined from the offer or sale of any securities by use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails from, directly or indirectly (a) Employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) Obtaining money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstance under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) Engaging in any transactions, practices or courses of business which operate or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any purchaser or prospective purchaser. [Securities Act 17(a) (15 U.S.C. 77q(a))]. II. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (SECTION 10(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND RULE 10b-5) IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED Defendants and their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or AGREED ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF PAGE 2 OF 3

Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26-4 Filed 06/02/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID # 561 otherwise, are preliminarily enjoined from making use of any means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of any facility of a national security exchange, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security (a) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; (c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person; or (d) To use or employ any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of a rule or regulation prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. [Exchange Act 10(b) (15 U.S.C. 78j(b)) and Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5) thereunder]. III. DURATION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Preliminary Injunction shall remain in effect until entry of a Final Judgment in, or other final disposition of, this action, unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing by the parties. IV. CANCELLATION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the preliminary injunction hearing presently scheduled for 200 p.m. on Friday, June 2, 2017 [see Dkt. No. 24] is cancelled as moot. AGREED ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF PAGE 3 OF 3