your members to serve as foreperson of the Jury. Your verdict will be determined by how you

Similar documents
CO:MMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY 28th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT DMSION.1 CML ACTION NO. 17-CI INSTRUCTIONS OF THE COURT

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

NO. 07-CI JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION TEN (10) JUDGE IRV MAZE TONIA FREEMAN PLAINTIFF. BECKER LAW OFFICE, PLC, et al.

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

Immejdiatelyjupon retiring to the jury room, you shall elect aforeperson. To reach averdict,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION. No. 3:13-CV-0755

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

CAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

7.32 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: INTERROGATORIES (Approved before 1985) NOTE TO JUDGE

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

June 2015 Supplement to Pattern Jury Instructions for Motor Vehicle Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 4, 2002 Session

CAUSE NO IN THE INTEREST OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHILDS NAME CHILDREN COUNTY, TEXAS A CHILD 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHARGE OF THE COURT

Tara A. Newman v. Wonderful Miracle Hospital, Dr. Sharpest Blade, Ima Smartone, RN and Sharron D. Blame, RN EXHIBITS

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

Motor Carrier Claims for Negligent Entrustment, Hiring and Retention

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 13, 1996 D.S. NASH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 11, 2005 Session

CAUSE NO CHARGE OF THE COURT

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open

9 of their attorneys you have learned the conclusion which 10 each party believes should be drawn from the evidence

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 1:17-cv WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 JURY INSTRUCTIONS

In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Friday the 30th day of October, 2009.

Page 1 of 10 N.C.P.I. MOTOR VEHICLE TABLE OF CONTENTS MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Supreme Court of Florida

The Below Average Defendant: Establishing BAC Evidence in DUI Cases

CAUSE NO. COME NOW, Raymond Gilbert (REDACTED) and Daniela (REDACTED), Individually, and

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :18 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

MARR V. NAGEL, 1954-NMSC-071, 58 N.M. 479, 272 P.2d 681 (S. Ct. 1954) MARR vs. NAGEL

Question 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:

9/29/2017 1:57:26 PM 17CV42542 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. Appellants, Case Nos. 5D D

How the Law Works A guide to the Oregon court system and civil cases

GENE ROBERT HERR, II OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. September 15, 2006 FRANCES STUART WHEELER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA JUDGMENT ORDER

Chapter 3 The Court System and Chapter 4 The Litigation Process

The Rules of the Road Approach -- An Examination of a Plaintiff s Strategy for Proving Liability in Trucking Cases

Preparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GREENE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

1. Duty, Breach, and the Meaning of Negligence

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 02/15/ :54 PM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2017

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI

MODEL JURY SELECTION QUESTIONS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D02-58

OPINION. This matter is before the court to consider defendant. Jackson Township s motion for summary judgment regarding

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 16, 2001 Session

CHAPTER 4 JURY DELIBERATIONS; VERDICT FORMS

No th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT'S CHARGE

This memo was published originally as Appendix C to the 1996 Report of the Governor s Advisory Task Force on Civil Justice Reform.

ENTRY ORDER 2008 VT 108 SUPREME COURT DOCKET NOS & MARCH TERM, 2008

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2010 CA 0005 LINDA ALESSI JOSEPH ALESSI JR AND TOMMIE SINAGRA VERSUS

Neil B. KIRSCHEN, M.D., Winthrop University Hospital, Linda W. Roberts,

Voir Dire Workshop. Making and Preserving For- Cause Challenges in Voir Dire

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Trial Outline Page Chavez-Porter v. Sutton

Alpena County. Version 1.0 JURY DUTY HANDBOOK

Case 5:06-cr TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29

Motion for Rehearing Denied July 14, 1971; Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied August 12, 1971 COUNSEL

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Truck Accident Litigation in the SML Footprint:

SCMF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

4/9/13 IMES: THE GOOD, THE BAD WIS. STAT AND THE UGLY I DON T KNOW WHY THIS GUY LOOKS LIKE HE S DEAD

BRIEF IN MOTION TO DISMISS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Judgment Rendered September

eihj of, 9licIummd on g~day tjie 10tJi day of,.atlay" 2018.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 23

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF DARKE COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 07CA1720. vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 05CV62070

MOCK TRIAL PROCEDURE

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Date: July 17, In Re: Dear

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, 1 Hassell, and Keenan, JJ.

JERRY WAYNE WHISNANT, JR. Plaintiff, v. ROBERTO CARLOS HERRERA, Defendant NO. COA Filed: 2 November 2004

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

Court Records Glossary

No. 51,759-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

Plaintiff 's Proposed Jury Instructions

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

HIEU PHUONG HOANG NO CA-0749 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL THORTON SERVICES, INC., ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series

Transcription:

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY PERRY CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-CI-l84 TRAVIS SLONE PLAINTIFF VS. JURY INSTRUCTIONS LINDA S. MOORE DEFENDANT INSTRUCTION NO. 1 Immediately upon retiring to the jury room, the first thing you shall do is to elect one of your members to serve as foreperson of the Jury. Your verdict will be determined by how you answer the questions in these instructions. Nine (9) or more ofyou may agree upon a verdict. Ifall twelve (12) agree, the verdict need be signed only by the foreperson, otherwise it must be signed by the nine (9) or more who agree to it. The nine (9) or more who agree to one verdict need not be the same nine (9) or more who agree on the other verdicts.

INSTRUCTION NO. 2 "Ordinary care" means such care as the Jury would expect an ordinarily prudent person to exercise under similar circumstances.

INSTRUCTION NO. 3 It was the duty oflinda Moore, in drivingthe Perry County school bus, to exercise ordinary care for the safety ofother persons using the highway, and this general duty includedthe following specific duties: a. To have the school bus under reasonable control; ' b. To keep a lookoutfor other vehicles so near her intended line oftravel as to be in danger ofcollision; c. To exercise ordinary care generally to avoid collision with other persons or vehicles using the highway; d. To yield the right-of-way to approaching vehicles and not to enter Kentucky Highway 80 ifvehicles are approaching so close as to constitute an immediate hazard.

INSTRUCTION NO. 3 (cont.^ / Do you believe from the evidence that school bus driver Linda Moore failed to comply with one or more of the duties listed in Instruction No. 3, and that this failure was a substantial factor in causing injuries to Travis Slone? YES NO yuj^ fru'^l IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED "YES" TO INSTRUCTION NO. 3, IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED "NO" TO INSTRUCTION NO. 3, YOUR DELIBERATIONS ARE COMPLETE. PLEASE INFORM THE BAILIFF.

INSTRUCTION NO. 4 It was the duty of pickuptruck driver OscarDuaneStidham, in driving his pickuptruck,to exercise ordinarycare for his own safety, for the safetyof passenger, Travis Slone, and the safety of otherpersons using the roadway, and this general duty included the following specific duties: a. To have his automobile under reasonable control; b. To keep a lookout ahead for other vehicles so near his intended line oftravel as to be in danger ofcollision; and c. To exercise ordinary care generally to avoid collision with other persons or vehicles using the roadway.

INSTRUCTION NO. 4 rcont.^ Do you believe from the evidence that pickup truck driver Oscar Duane Stidham failed to comply with one or more of these duties listed in Instruction No. 4, and that this failure was a substantial factor in causing injuries to Travis Slone? YES NO

INSTRUCTION NO. 5 It was the duty ofpassengertravis Slone to exercise ordinary care for his ovra safety. Do you believe from the evidence that passenger Travis Slone failed to comply with his duty listed in Instruction No. 5, and that this failure was a substantial factor in causing his injuries? YES NO

INSTRUCTION NO. 6 You will determine from the evidence and indicate in the following blank spaces what percentage ofthe total fault was attributableto each ofthe parties you have found to be at fault, as follows: Linda Moore Oscar Duane Stidham Travis Slone % (Only if you have answered "yes" to Interrogatory No.3) % (Only if you have answered "yes" to Interrogatory No.4) (Only if you have answered "yes" to Interrogatory No.5) Total: 100% In determining the percentages offault, you shall consider both the nature ofthe conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between their conduct and the damages claimed.

INSTRUCTION NO. 7 The Court instructs the Jury that if youbeheve from the evidence that all, or anypart, of the injuries of which Travis Slone complains were not caused by the incident about which you have heardevidence, but were caused at some othertime, or occurred from some othercause, you will not find for Travis Sloneon account of the injuries whichyou may believefrom the evidence werecausedat someothertime or occurred fromsomeothercause, but will onlyfind suchdamages you may believe Travis Slone sustained on account ofthe injuries which he suffered as a result of the incident about which you have heard evidence.

INSTRUCTION NO. 8 If you found for the Plaintiff, Travis Slone, you will determine from the evidence the sum of money that will fairly and reasonably compensate him for future medical expenses that he is reasonably likely to incur as direct result ofthis accident, not to exceed $654,046.00. We, the Jury,returna verdictto TravisSlone of $_ for his future medical expenses.

INSTRUCTION NO. 9 If you found for the Plaintiff, Travis Slone, you will determine from the evidencethe sum of money thatwill fairly and reasonably compensate him for permanent impairment of his power to earn money as direct result ofthis accident, not to exceed $1,684,760.00. We, the Jury, return a verdict to Travis Slone of $ for his permanent impairment of his power to earn money.

INSTRUCTION NO. 10 Ifyou found for the Plaintiff, Travis Slone, you will determine from the evidence the sum of money that will fairly and reasonably compensate him for past physical or mental pain and suffering, which he has sustained as a result of his injuries directly caused by this accident from the time ofhis injuries and up to today's date, not to exceed $7,000,000.00. We, the Jury, return a verdict to Travis Slone of $ for his past physical and mental pain and suffering.

INSTRUCTIONNQ.il If you found for the Plaintiff, Travis Slone, you will determine from the evidence the sum of money that will fairly and reasonably compensate him for future physical ormental pain and suffering as direct result ofthis accident, not to exceed $20,000..000.00. We, the Jury, return a verdictto Travis Slone of $_ for his future physical and mental pain and suffering.

INSTRUCTION NO. 12 If you answered "yes" to Instruction No. 3, and awarded this Plaintiff a sum of money under Instructions Nos. 8, 9, 10, or 11, and if you are further satisfied, by clear and convincing evidence, that Defendant, Linda Moore, acted inreckless disregard tothe lives, safety, orproperty of others, including the Plaintiff, Travis Slone, you may, in your discretion, award punitive damages against her in addition to the damages awarded under Instructions Nos. 8, 9, 10, and/or 11. "Punitive damages" are damages to be awarded against the Defendant, LindaMoore, for the purpose of punishing her for her conduct in this case and deterring her and others from engaging in similar conduct in the future. If you awardpunitive damages, they must be fixed with calm discretion and soundreason, and must never be awarded or fixed in an amount because of any sympathy, bias, or prejudice for or against any party in this case. If you award punitive damages, you will statethe amount separate from the sum or sums awarded in previous Instructions.

Do you wish to award punitive damages? INSTRUCTION NO. 12 rcont.^ YES NO If yes, please state the amount of punitive damages you wish to award, not to exceed $20,000,000.00. We, the Jury, return a verdict to Travis Slone of $_ for punitive damages. YOUR DELIBERATIONS ARE NOW COMPLETE. PLEASE INFORM THE BALIFF.