STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF CALHOUN IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
EXHIBIT 1. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Aug 21 11:51 AM - CALHOUN - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2018CP

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314


ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

v. No. D-202-CV MAILED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-cv-2456-T-26EAJ. v. CASE NO. 8:15-cv-2588-T-26JSS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:17-cv JSM-AEP

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEGAL NOTICE IF YOU REFINANCED A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE IN CONNECTICUT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. CASE NO. 8:17-cv SDM-JSS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

EARTH FARE, INC. S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND A JUDGMENT

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION. Consol. Case No

Case 2:05-cv DRH-AKT Document 202 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 8234 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM EXCLUDE YOURSELF. Write to the Court explaining why you don t like the Settlement. OBJECT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement.

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Barbara Allen v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC, now known as CIOX Technologies, LLC, Fla. 13 th Jud. Cir. Ct. Case No. 12-CA

Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Transcription:

G. Wayne Lorick, Michael W. Shuler, Dahl C. Shuler, Frederick H. Stabler, Jr., Tom L. Doyle, Jr., Sky Strickland, and Vertelle Pondexter-Jamison, individually and as representatives of others similarly situated and, as a representative of Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc., v. Plaintiffs, Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc., Heath Hill, Maurice P. Etheridge, Jr., W. Kenneth Davis, Jr., F. Douglas Shuler, Jr., Barbara R. Heape and Mary A.W. Brown, Individually and in their official capacity as Current members of the Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. Board of Trustees and Officers of Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc., Defendants. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF CALHOUN IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE NO. 2018-CP-09-00083 PROPOSED PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER This matter having come before the Court on the Parties Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement, to Appoint Named Plaintiffs as Derivative Member Representatives, and to Appoint Plaintiffs Counsel as Derivative Action Counsel (the Motion, the Court having reviewed in detail and considered the Motion and memorandum in support of the Motion, the Proposed Settlement Terms, and all other papers that have been filed with the Court related to this Action or the Settlement Agreement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Capitalized terms used in this Order that are not otherwise defined herein have the same

meaning assigned to them as in the Settlement Agreement. 2. The terms of the Settlement Agreement are preliminarily approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate under all the circumstances. There is good cause to find that the Settlement Agreement was negotiated at arms-length between the Parties, who were vigorously represented by experienced counsel. 3. For settlement purposes only, the Court finds that the Plaintiffs herein fairly and adequately represent the interests of others similarly situated as members of Tri-County, and that the prerequisites to derivative action treatment under Rule 23(b(1, SCRCP, have been preliminarily satisfied. 4. For settlement purposes only, Plaintiffs G. Wayne Lorick, Michael W. Shuler, Dahl C. Shuler, Frederick H. Stabler, Jr., Tom L. Doyle, Jr., Sky Strickland, and Vertelle Pondexter-Jamison are hereby appointed as Derivative Member Representatives. 5. For settlement purposes only, the following counsel are hereby appointed as Derivative Action Counsel: Celeste T. Jones, Esq. South Carolina Bar No. 3173 Bradley S. Wright, Esq. South Carolina Bar No. 16991 MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A. P.O. Box 11390 Columbia, SC 29211 cjones@mcnair.net bwright@mcnair.net Telephone: (803 799-9800 Facsimile: (803 753-3278 C. Bradley Hutto, Esq. South Carolina Bar No. 6436 WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS P.O. Box 1084 Orangeburg, SC 29116 cbhutto@williamsattys.com 2

Telephone: (803 534-5218 Facsimile: (803 928-5190 6. The Court recognizes that Defendants retain all rights to object to the propriety of said appointments in all other contexts and for all other purposes, should the Settlement not be finally approved. Therefore, as more fully set forth below, if the Settlement is not finally approved, and litigation resumes, this Court s preliminary findings regarding the matters herein shall be of no further force or effect whatsoever, and this Order will be vacated in its entirety. 7. The Court approves, in form and content, the Derivative Membership Notice attached hereto as EXHIBIT 1 and finds it meets the requirements of S.C.R.C.P. 23(b(1 and 23(c and satisfies Due Process. Notice to be sent to all current members of Tri-County, the cost being borne by Defendants and the specific form of the Notice to be approved by the Court. 8. The Parties, by agreement, may revise the proposed Derivative Membership Notice in ways that are not material, or in ways that are appropriate to update those documents for purposes of accuracy or formatting for publication. 9. Pursuant to the said Notice, a hearing will be held (at a date and time to be determined, and communicated to the Tri-County Membership in the final Notice to consider final approval of the Settlement. Any Member of Tri-County objecting to any aspect of the proposed settlement shall be entitled to be heard at this hearing. The Court shall thereupon issue a Final Order with respect to the proposed Settlement, which shall be binding upon all Parties and all members of Tri-County, even if they have previously initiated, or subsequently initiate, litigation or other proceedings against Defendants or the Parties released as part of the final Settlement.. 3

10. Any Tri-County Member who wishes to object to the proposed Settlement, but fails to appears at the final hearing hereon and state said objection, shall be deemed to have waived the objection. 11. Pending the final determination of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the proposed Settlement, no Derivative Settlement Member or Tri-County Member may prosecute, institute, commence, or continue any civil lawsuit (individual action or class action with respect to the Released Claims against any of the Released Parties. 12. Following the Notice period herein prescribed, Court may enter a judgment approving the Settlement Agreement and a Final Judgment and Order in accordance with the Settlement Agreement that adjudicates the rights of all Derivative Settlement Members. 13. Derivative Settlement Members and Tri-County Members do not need to take any action in order to indicate their approval of the proposed Settlement. 14. All discovery and other proceedings in the Litigation as between Plaintiffs and Defendants are stayed and suspended until further order of the Court except such actions as may be necessary to implement the Settlement Agreement and this Order. 15. Until a new Board of Trustees is properly elected and installed, Tri-County shall retain a qualified, independent accounting firm to provide oversight and advisory duties. 16. For clarity, the deadlines set forth above and in the Settlement Agreement are as follows: Member Notice Mailed by: Publication Notice by: Deadline for Objections/Exclusions: 14 days from Date of Preliminary Approval, by, 2018. 14 days from Date of Preliminary Approval, by, 2018. 21 days from Date of Preliminary Approval, by, 2018. 4

Final Approval Motion: IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTERED: 30 days from Date of Preliminary Approval, by, 2018 Honorable Edgar W. Dickson Chief Judge for Administrative Purposes 5

EXHIBIT 1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED DERIVATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT G. Wayne Lorick, et al. v. Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al.; State of South Carolina, County of Calhoun, Court of Common Pleas; Civil Action File No. 2018-CP-09-00083 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE EXPLAINS YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM. This is a court-authorized notice of a proposed derivative action settlement. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer and is not notice of a lawsuit against you. WHY DID I GET THIS NOTICE? This is a court-authorized notice of a proposed settlement in a civil action derivative lawsuit, G. Wayne Lorick, et al. v. Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al.; State of South Carolina, County of Calhoun, Court of Common Pleas; Civil Action File No. 2018-CP-09-00083, pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Calhoun County, South Carolina before the Honorable Edgar W. Dickson. The settlement would resolve a civil lawsuit brought on behalf of persons who allege that Tri-County Electric Cooperative paid and its Board of Trustees received excessive or improper compensation and/or other benefits received. If you received this notice directly, you have been identified as someone who is a Tri-County member. The Court has granted preliminary approval of the settlement. This notice explains the nature of the derivative action lawsuit, the terms of the Settlement, and the legal rights and obligations of the Settlement Members. Please read the instructions and explanations below so that you can better understand your legal rights. WHY IS THIS A DERIVATIVE ACTION? A derivative action is a lawsuit in which an individual called a Member Representative brings a single lawsuit on behalf of other people who have similar claims. Once a derivative action Settlement is approved by the Court, it resolves the issues for all Settlement Members. WHY IS THERE A SETTLEMENT? To resolve this matter without the expense, delay, and uncertainties of litigation, and to enable the Cooperative to focus its resources on its core mission, the Parties have reached a Settlement, which resolves all civil claims against Defendants. The Settlement requires the Board of Trustees to resign, never again seek reelection or seek to elect their spouse or family member, and to not challenge the outcome of an August 18, 2018 meeting of Tri-County members or to otherwise interfere with the ongoing operations of Tri-County. The Settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing by Defendants and does not imply that there has been, or would be, any finding that Defendants paid or received improper or excessive compensation and/or other benefits. The Court has preliminarily approved the Settlement. Nevertheless, because the settlement of a derivative action determines the rights of all members of Tri-County, the Court overseeing this lawsuit must give final approval to the Settlement before it can be effective. The Court has conditionally approved the Settlement, so that members of Tri-County can be given this notice and the opportunity to be heard and to object or voice their support or opposition 6

to final approval of the Settlement. If the Court does not give final approval to the Settlement, or if it is terminated by the Parties, the Settlement will be void, and the lawsuit will proceed as if there had been no settlement. WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT? You are a member of the Settlement if you are a member of Tri-County Electric Cooperative. WHAT ARE MY OPTIONS? (1 Accept the Settlement. No action is necessary for you to ratify the Settlement. (2 Object to the Settlement. If you wish to object to the Settlement, you must submit your objection in writing to the Clerk of the Court of the Calhoun County Courthouse. The objection must be received by the Court no later than. You must also send a copy of your objection to the attorneys for all Parties to the lawsuit, including the attorneys representing the Member Representatives and the Members in the Derivative Settlement (Celeste T. Jones and Bradley S. Wright, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., P.O. Box 11390, Columbia, SC 29211 and C. Bradley Hutto, WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS, P.O. Box 1084, Orangeburg, SC 29115, as well as the attorneys representing Defendants (for Tri-County, J. David Black, NEXSEN PRUET, LLC, P.O. Box 2426 Columbia, SC 29202; for the Trustees, John M. Mahon, Jr., LAW FIRM OF JOHN M. MAHON, JR., 1420 Wellington Drive, Columbia, South Carolina 29204, postmarked no later than. Any objection to the proposed Settlement must include your full name; address; the year you joined Tri-County; your Tri-County membership certificate the identification of any other objections you have filed, or have had filed on your behalf, in any other class action or derivative cases in the last four years; and all grounds for the objection with factual and legal support for the stated objection. If you hire an attorney in connection with making an objection, that attorney must also file with the Court a notice of appearance by the objection deadline of. If you do hire your own attorney, you will be solely responsible for payment of any fees and expenses the attorney incurs on your behalf. (3 Do Nothing. If you do nothing, you will still be bound by all orders and judgments of the Court. WHAT RIGHTS AM I GIVING UP IN THIS SETTLEMENT? Giving up your civil legal claims is called a release. The precise terms of the release are set forth in the Settlement Agreement, which is available on the settlement website. Unless you formally object to this, you will release your civil claims. If you have any questions, you can talk for free to the attorneys identified below who have been appointed by the Court to represent the Membership, or you are welcome to talk to any other lawyer of your choosing at your own expense. WHEN WILL THE COURT RULE ON THE SETTLEMENT? The Court has already given preliminary approval to the Settlement. A final order approving the Settlement will be entered unless you or another Member file an objection and obtain a hearing. This final order will make final the Settlement. If the Settlement is given final approval, the Court will not make any determination as to the merits of the claims against Defendants or the defenses to those claims. Instead, the Settlement s terms will take effect and the lawsuit will be dismissed on the merits with prejudice. Both sides have agreed to the Settlement in order to achieve 7

an early and certain resolution to the lawsuit, in a manner that provides specific and valuable benefits to the members of the Settlement Membership. If the Court does not approve the Settlement, if it approves the Settlement and the approval is reversed on appeal, or if the Settlement does not become final for some other reason, all of the Members will be in the same position as they were prior to the execution of the Settlement, and the Settlement will have no legal effect, and the Plaintiff and Defendants will continue to litigate the lawsuit. There can be no assurance that if the Settlement is not approved, the Settlement Membership will recover more than is provided in the Settlement, or indeed anything at all. WHO REPRESENTS THE MEMBERSHIP? The Court has approved the following attorneys to represent the Membership. They are called Membership Counsel. You will not be charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer instead, you may hire one at your own expense. Celeste T. Jones, Esq. Brad S. Wright, Esq. MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A. P.O. Box 11390 Columbia, SC 29211 cjones@mcnair.net bwright@mcnair.net Telephone: (803 799-9800 Facsimile: (803 753-3278 C. Bradley Hutto, Esq. WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS P.O. Box 1084 Orangeburg, SC 29115 cbhutto@williamsattys.com Telephone: (803 534-5218 Facsimile: (803 928-5190 WHERE CAN I GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION? This Notice is only a summary of the proposed Settlement of this lawsuit. If you have any questions, you can also call Membership Counsel at the numbers or email addresses set forth above. In addition to the documents available on the Tri-County Electric Cooperative website, all pleadings and documents filed in Court may be reviewed or copied in the Office of the Clerk. Please do not call the Judge or the Clerk of the Court about this case, as they will not be able to give you advice on your options. 8

Calhoun Common Pleas Case Caption: G Wayne Lorick VS Tri County Electric Cooperative, Inc Et Al Case Number: 2018CP0900083 Type: Order/Approval Of Settlement So Ordered s/ Edgar W. Dickson #2153 Electronically signed on 2018-08-21 14:22:56 page 9 of 9