DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: January 27, 2006

Similar documents
Oregon Theodore R, Kulongoski, Governor

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: May 16, 2006

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street, Suite 150 Salem, OR Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor (503)

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, November 27, 2009

Oregon. <paa> y. Department of Land Conservation and Development. Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, October 30, 2009

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Tuesday, March 22, 2011

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, December 26, 2008

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: October 2,2006

Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan or Land Use Regulation Amendments

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Thursday, December 08, 2011

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

s 2 Notice of Adoption THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED TO DLCD WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE FINAL DECISION PERORS , OAR CHAPTER DIVISION 18

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Wednesday, September 01, 2010

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, March 12, 2010

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Wednesday, December 14, 2011

NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION

NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT 05/26/2009 Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan or Land Use Regulation Amendments Plan Amendment Program Specialist

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Wednesday, September 22, 2010

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Thursday, December 10, 2009

I Oregon NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT OR DEADLINE TO APPEAL: 5/18/2010

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Thursday, February 24, 2011

Oregon Theodore R KjibngDski, Governor

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, March 09, 2012

Oregon NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT 03/23/2009. Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan or Land Use Regulation Amendments

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Thursday, June 25, 2009

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Monday, May 02, 2011

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, March 11, 2011

NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Thursday, March 26, 2009

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, November 16, 2012

A. Implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan for citizen involvement and the planning process;

ARTICLE 4 APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES AND APPROVAL CRITERIA 3

Lane Code CHAPTER 12 CONTENTS

CHAPTER 7 ANNEXATION Chapter Outline

ARTICLE 1 ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Article 4 Administration of Land Use and Development

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

FINAL ACTIONS Planning Commission Meeting of May 3, 2016

City of Calistoga Staff Report

CITY OF HOOD RIVER PLANNING APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Summary of SB includes dash 8 amendments

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, September 10, 2010

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Article 2. Section 1 of the Ashland City Charter provides:

BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION (VARIANCE FROM SUBDIVISION OR ZONING ORDINANCE) Sec or Sec (c)

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

CHAPTER V - ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE 5.0 ADMINISTRATION AND APPLICATION REVIEW PROVISIONS

Kent Studebaker, Mayor Members of the City Council. Paul Espe, Associate Planner. Ordinance Annexing Property at 5022 Upper Drive (AN )

Chapter 205 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES

CITY OF HOOD RIVER PLANNING APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Washington County King City Urban Planning Area Agreement

All applicants are to complete the following:

CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY Attachments for Acres X Ordinance. Approved by.

RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE PROCEDURE OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI AS ADOPTED

VARIANCE APPLICATION Type A B C (circle one)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Item No Halifax and West Community Council May 17, 2016

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51A, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No , as

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Friday, July 30, 2010

Act upon building, construction and use applications which are under the jurisdiction of the Code Enforcement Officer.

CB District Central Business

STAFF REPORT CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

CITY OF LEE S SUMMIT SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS. Purpose of Special Use Permit

CITY COUNCIL CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU No CDI HONOLULU, HAWAII Proposed RESOLUTION

UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD P.O. BOX 2187 UPPER CHICHESTER, PA (610)

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK

2018 MEETING DATES AND FILING DEADLINES

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

REZONING (MAP AMENDMENT) Pre-Application Meeting

Ordinance 2755 Annexing Property at and Boones Ferry Road (AN )

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 1051 CHAPTER... AN ACT

Town of Sudbury. Planning Board. TOWN OF SUDBURY PLANNING BOARD PROCEDURES Adopted October 23, Section 1 - Title; Amendment; Authority

ARTICLE 9. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Tuesday, May 28, 2013

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Tina Axelrad, Principal City Planner DATE: August 14, 2013

INFORMATION PACKET City of Tallahassee Application For Rezoning Review

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Notice of Two Upcoming Public Hearings. Date: September 26, 2017 Beginning at 6:00 pm

Variance 2018 Bargersville Board of Zoning Appeals Application Kit

Updated on-line 12/29/14 Lane Code CHAPTER 14 CONTENTS

MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: DATE: Planning Commission and City Council History

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255

ORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG

1.000 Development Permit Procedures and Administration

Transcription:

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT January 11, 2006 TO: FROM: Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 Salem, Oregon 97301-2524 Phone: (503) 373-0050 First Floor/Costal Fax: (503) 378-6033 Second Floor/Director's Office: (503) 378-5518 Web Address: http:/ /www.oregon.gov/lcd Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan or Land Use Regulation Amendments Mara Ulloa, Plan Amendment Program Specialist SUBJECT: City of Talent Plan Amendment DLCD File Number 006-05 The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) received the attached notice of adoption. Copies of the adopted plan amendment are available for review at DLCD offices in Salem, the applicable field office, and at the local government office. Appeal Procedures* DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: January 27, 2006 This amendment was submitted to DLCD for review prior to adoption with less than the required 45- day notice. Pursuant to ORS 197.830 (2)(b) only persons who participated in the local government proceedings leading to adoption of the amendment are eligible to appeal this decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). If you wish to appeal, you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government. If you have questions, check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline. Copies of the notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 661, Division 10). Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. *NOTE: Cc: <paa> ya THE APPEAL DEADLINE IS BASED UPON THE DATE THE DECISION WAS MAILED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT. A DECISION MAY HAVE BEEN MAILED TO YOU ON A DIFFERENT DATE THAN IT WAS MAILED TO DLCD. AS A RESULT YOUR APPEAL DEADLINE MAY BE EARLIER THAN THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE. Gloria Gardiner, DLCD Urban Planning Specialist John Renz, DLCD Regional Representative John Adam, City of Talent

FORM 2 D L C D NOTICE OF ADOPTION This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after tke final decision per ORS 197.610, OAR Chapter 660 - Division 18 ^ r\ G 'j&fo '"'f^h0 Jurisdiction: &fvy o t gn-t- Local File No.: OS'^05' (If no number, use none) Date of Adoption: Oi / 0 ^ / 1-ogQ Date Mailed: Qj / oc / 7-oo b (Must be filled in) (Date mailed or sent to DLCD) Date the Notice of Proposed Amendment was mailed to DLCD: Qj / ^ o / 00 f Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ^Land Use Regulation Amendment Zoning Map Amendment New Land Use Regulation Other: (Please Specify Type of Action) Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." rols ic r J Lj Otri-U? Co^t ^ a. C-+- cly r~ <gl7) r <3.M<Sr Describe how the adopted amendment differsfrom the proposed amendment. If it is the same, write "Same." If you did not give notice for the proposed amendment, write "N/A." ( M _? -f s + M A ^c. ^uu FA J Jl ^ stftce? L~h' Uv^i S now- S uh S e*. Plan Map Changed from : Xi/A to to/a Zone Map Changed from: a) / kr to N / Ar Location: V -by ^ Acres Involved: Specify Density: Previous: to/a- New: *J /A- Applicable Statewide Planning Goals: Was an Exception Adopted? Yes: No: DLCD File No.: frpb (l4~lo<)

Did the Department of Land Conservation and Development receive a notice of Proposed Amendment FORTY FIVE (45) davs prior to thefirst evidentiary hearing. Yes: ^ No: If no, do the Statewide Planning Goals apply. Yes: No: If no, did The Emergency Circumstances Require immediate adoption. Yes: No: Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: fc^-»v g ^ Lid. ro^^gn"/"^ "T^- jfuj lei f-ous Local Contact: J<?U JlJa <m Area Code + Phone Number: 535-7 VOt Address: ^po JS-o^- t/tff City: ^U ZipCode+4\ 32lA ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final decision per ORS 197.610, OAR Chapter 660 - Division 18. 1. Send this Form and TWO (2) Copies of the Adopted Amendment to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 2. Submit TWO (2) copies the adopted material, if copies are bounded please submit TWO (2) complete copies of documents and maps. 3. Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than FIVE (5) working days following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 4. Submittal of of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings and supplementary information. 5. The deadline to appeal will be extended if you submit this notice of adoption within five working days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date, the "Notice of Adoption" is sent to DLCD. 6. In addition to sending the "Notice of Adoption" to DLCD, you must notify persons who participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. 7. Need More Copies? You can copy this form on to 8-1/2x11 green paper only ; or call the DLCD Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to:(503) 378-5518; or Email your request to Larry.French@state.or.us - ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST. J:\pa\paa\forms\noticead.frm revised: 7/29/99

ORDINANCE NO. 05-796-0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PORTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 692, THE TALENT LAND DIVISIONS ORDINANCE, TO MODIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES AND TO CREATE RULES FOR FLAG LOT PARTITIONING THE CITY OF TALENT ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT: That the material contained in "Exhibit A" and attached hereto shall amend and replace Section 70 of the City of Talent Land Divisions Ordinance. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT: That the material contained in "Exhibit B" and attached hereto shall become Section 26 of the City of Talent Land Divisions Ordinance. SECTION 3. FINDINGS: That the City Council adopts the findings of the Planning Commission's Recommendation, attached hereto as "Exhibit C/ which provide justification for the amendment. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: Under the provisions of the Talent Charter of July 1998, Chapter VIII, Section 33, the provisions of this ordinance shall take effect 30 days after adoption. Duly enacted by the City Council in open session on 4 January 2006 by the following vote: AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT: 0 Be Ci todian of City records

Ordinance No. 05-796-0 Exhibit A The following replaces Section 7D of the Land Divisions Ordinance D, Traffic Study Requirements. The City or other agency with access jurisdiction may require a traffic impact study (TIS) prepared by a certified professional transportation engineer acceptable to the City. The engineer must be currently licensed and otherwise qualified to perform the work under applicable professional and community standards and must have no financial interest in the project whatsoever and no past or current pecuniary association of any kind with the developer other than occasional work as an independent contractor performing traffic impact studies. The TiS shall determine the impact of the proposed development on existing and proposed transportation facilities and assess the applicant's plans to mitigate such impacts, to determine access^ circulation and other transportation requirements to mitigate impacts. (See also Section 6 Transportation Facility Standards).

Ordinance No. 05-796-0 Exhibit A The following appends to the Land Divisions Ordinance as a new Section 26 Section 26 Flag Lot Partitions. The following standards apply to flag lots in all residential zones: A. Purpose. These standards allow the creation of a single flag lot out of a parent lot in limited circumstances. The limitations minimize the negative impacts of flag lots on an area while allowing land to be divided when other options are not achievable. B. Whert a flag lot is allowed. A flag lot is allowed only when the following are met: 1. An existing dwelling unit on the site is located so that it precludes a land division that meets the minimum lot width standard of its zoning district. 2. Only one flag lot is proposed; 3. There will be only one residence on the flag lot (except in R2 zone); 4. Minimum density, minimum lot size and maximum building coverage requirements of the zone wilt be met; and 5. In the interest of protecting existing neighborhood context, structures taller than 16 feet will not be allowed if more than 50 percent of the lots sharing common lot lines, not including the parent lot, have houses on them that are less than 16 feet tall. Lots without houses on them will not be considered. C. Flag lot access pole. The pole portion of the flag lot must meet the following standards. Adjustments are prohibited: 1. The pole must connect to a street and must be at least 13 feet wide at the street and for its entire length, or 24 feet if the length from the centerline of the street right-ofway to the flag portion is more than 150 feet or if there will be more than one residence on the flag lot; 2. The pole portion must be part of the flag lot and must be under the same ownership as the flag portion. 3. The access drive must be at least 12 feet wide (or 24 feet; see paragraph 1, above) and paved with concrete or asphalt. The drive must be designed so that stormwater run-off is directed toward an appropriate location and not onto neighboring properties. 4. The flag lot and the existing lot wilt share the flag lot access pole for common access to the two lots unless the City Planner finds such a set-up physically impractical.

D. Minimum lot dimensions. No dimension of a flag lot may be less than 40 feet, excepting the pole portion. For the purposes of this subsection width and depth are measured at the midpoint of the opposite lot lines. All other lot dimension standards must be met. E. Flag lot development standards. The following standards apply to development on flag lots: 1 Setbacks (See Figure 26-1). Flag lots have required building setbacks that are the same along all lot lines, except that the setback on the pole portion side shall be at least 13 or 24 feet, as appropriate, plus an additional 20 feet for garage entrances, Or more if there is a possibility the pole may someday become part of a larger public right-of-way. The City reserves the right to require greater setbacks in such cases for garages and/or entire structures. The required setbacks for primary structures, including houses and garages, are: Zone Setback R1-8 15 feet R1-6, MH and R2 10 feet Figure 26-1. Flag lot setbacks. r I f i! J Flag lot 0 r buildable area (not including building coverage restrictions) 4 STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY Pole portion

Ordinance No. 05-796-0 Exhibit A Planning Commission findings: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals do not apply in this case because the matter is one of clarification and refinement. The modified language under Section 70 does not impose an undue burden on applicants. The flag lot partitioning rules clarify what staff has had to pull together out of the existing code while adding provisions protective of existing neighborhoods where flag lots will be created; 2. The flag lot amendment complies with the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Plan contains Policy 1: "Provide for all of Talent's housing needs for the twentyyear planning period within the existing urban growth boundary/ The amendment encourages infill while protecting existing neighborhoods.