X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Similar documents
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

The Supreme Court s last 30 years of Federal Indian Law: Looking for Equilibrium or Supremacy?

HOPE FOR INDIAN TRIBES IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT?: MENOMINEE, NEBRASKA V. PARKER, BRYANT, DOLLAR GENERAL... AND BEYOND

Finding the Way to Indian Country: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Decisions in Indian Law Cases

Tribal Supreme Court Project: Ten Year Report

Funds Provided to American Indians/Alaska Natives that are Excluded by Law

USET SPF Policy and Legislative Affairs Discussion: Trump Administration and the 115 th Congress

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

2013 Federal Docs Offers List #1 from Missouri Southern State University

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Federal Indian Law Cases in the Supreme Court's Term

In The Supreme Court of the United States

TRIBAL SUPREME COURT PROJECT MEMORANDUM

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Native American House Reports 70th Congress (1927) 95th Congress (1978)

TRIBAL SUPREME COURT PROJECT MEMORANDUM

Finding Aid to the Indian Claims Commission Records MS No online items

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Jails in Indian Country, 2013

Montana at the Crossroads

Senate Reports 70th Congress (1927) 95th Congress (1978)

House Reports 70th Congress (1927) 95th Congress (1978)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Appeal from Escambia County Circuit Court; CV ) BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT OF COUNSEL:

Rice v. Cayetano: The Supreme Court Declines to Extend Federal Indian Law Principles to Native Hawaiians Sovereign Rights 1. Jeanette Wolfley 2

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Native American Senate Documents 60th Congress (1908) 94th Congress (1975)

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

The Honorable Barack Obama President of the United States of America The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20500

SUPREME COURT REPORTER 523 U.S. 749

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Case3:12-cv CRB Document32-1 Filed06/22/12 Page1 of 10

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. BILLY JO LARA, Respondent.

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

In The United States Court Of Appeals For The Tenth Circuit

National Business Institute June 23, 2010 Teleconference. Jurisdiction on Tribal Lands

IN WATER WHEEL, THE NINTH CIRCUIT CORRECTS A LIMITATION ON TRIBAL COURT JURISDICTION

CASE 0:16-cv JRT-LIB Document 41 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

KIOWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA v. MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. certiorari to the court of civil appeals of oklahoma, first division

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits

Extending the Status Quo: Indian Law and the Supreme Court's Term

Supreme Court of the United States

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Bulletin. Jails in Indian Country, Bureau of Justice Statistics

Legal Studies Research Paper Series

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv JDL Document 34 Filed 08/06/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 330 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

BYLAWS (As Amended Through October 8, 2014)

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

Factbound and Splitless: The Certiorari Process as a Barrier to Justice for Indian Tribes

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

Employment debate in the context of NAFTA. September 2017

Nos & (consolidated) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

Case 4:14-cv BLW Document 72 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 38

Native American Natural Resources Law

Juris Doctor: Northwestern School of Law, Chicago, Illinois.

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

TRIBAL SELF-DETERMINATION AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT: THE PROBLEM OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS WITHIN THE RESERVATION

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Native American Natu ral Resources Law

20. ENFORCEMENT OF ICWA REQUIREMENTS

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. IN RE: GREEKTOWN HOLDINGS, LLC Debtor,

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

Federal Disbursements for Indian Title in the Louisiana Territory,

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

1. What is the supreme law of the land? the Constitution

States Adopt Emancipation Day Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012

Acentral theme in federal Indian law focuses on the inherent

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA. Appellant, Case No. 3D L.T. Case No CA-21856

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

In the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

State Complaint Information

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

Alabama 2.5 months 2.5 months N/R N/R 3.5 months 3.5 months 3.5 months 3.5 months No No

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

How Utah Ranks. Utah Education Association Research Bulletin

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS. No. CV-02-05

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

Pamela Williams, Director Secretary s Indian Water Rights Office. WSWC Spring Meeting March 21, 2019 Chandler, AZ

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Tribal Nations United States Relations: Policy Eras and Future Developments

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Civics (History and Government) Questions for the Naturalization Test

Transcription:

1986 1 Iowa Mutual v. Laplante, 480 U.S. 9 (1987). 2 California v. Cabazon Band, 480 U.S. 202 (1987). 3 Amoco Prod. Co. v. Gambell, 480 U.S. 531 (1987). 4 United States v. Cherokee Nation, 480 U.S. 700 (1987). 5 Hodel v. Irving, 481 U.S. 704 (1987). 6 Lyng v. Northwest Indian CPA, 485 U.S. 439 (1988). 1987 Powell resigns Rehnquist Brennan White Marshall Blackmun Powell Stevens O Connor Scalia 50% 66.6% 50% 66.6% 66.6% 60% 16.6% 33.3% 33.3% 3/6 4/6 3/6 4/6 4/6 3/5 1/6 2/6 2/6 X X X X X - - X X X 1988 Kennedy Begins 7 Oklahoma Tax Comm n v. Graham, 489 U.S. 838 (1989). 8 Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989). Rehnquist Brennan White Marshall Blackmun Stevens O Connor Scalia Kennedy 27.2% 72.7% 36.3% 72.7% 63.6% 9% 27.2% 27.2% 0% 3/11 8/11 4/11 8/11 7/11 1/11 3/11 3/11 0/4 9 Cotton Petroleum v. New

Mexico, 490 U.S. 163 (1989). 10 Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1988). 11 Duro v. Reina, 495 U.S. 676 (1990). X X X X X X X X - 1990 Brennan Resigns Souter Begins 12 Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Potawatomie, 498 U.S. 505 (1991). 13 Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak, 501 U.S. 775 (1991). Rehnquist White Marshall Blackmun Stevens O Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter 27.2% 38.4% 76.9% 69.2% 23% 30.7% 30.7 16.6% 4/13 5/13 10/13 9/13 3/13 4/13 4/13 1/6 50% 1/2 1991 Marshall Resigns Thomas Begins 14 County of Yakima v. Yakima Indian Nation, 502 U.S. 251 (1992). 15 Negonsott v. Samuels, 507 U.S. 99 (1993). 16 Oklahoma Tax Comm n v. Sac and Fox Nations, 508 U.S. 114 (1993). 17 Lincoln v. Vigil, 508 U.S. 182 (1993). Rehnquist White Blackmun Stevens O Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas 33.3 6/18 38.8% 7/18 66.6% 12/18 27.7% 5/18 33.3% 6/18 33.3% 6/18 27.2% 3/11 57.1% 4/7 40% 2/5

18 South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993). 1993 White Resigns Ginsburg Begins 19 Hagen v. Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1993). 20 Department of Taxation and Finance of New York v. Milhelm Attea, 512 U.S. 61 (1994). Rehnquist Blackmun Stevens O Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas Ginsburg 30% 65% 25% 30% 30% 23% 55.5% 28.5% 0% 6/20 13/20 5/20 6/20 6/20 3/13 5/9 2/7 0/2 1994 Blackmun Resigns Breyer Begins 21 Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996). 22 Strate v. A-1 Contractors, 520 U.S. 438 (1997). 23 Idaho v. Coeur d Alene Tribe, 521 U.S. 261 (1997). 24 South Dakota v. Yankton Tribe, 522 U.S. 329 (1998). 25 Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie, 522 U.S. 520 (1998). 26 Montana v. Crow Tribe, 523 U.S. 696 (1998). Rehnquist Stevens O Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas Ginsburg Breyer 17.7% 34.7% 30.4% 19.5% 17.9% 42.8% 12.1% 35.7% 8/45 16/46 14/46 9/46 7/39 15/35 4/33 10/28 32% 8/25 27 Kiowa Tribe v.

Manufacturing Techs., 523 U.S. 751 (1998). 28 Cass County v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, 524 U.S. 103 (1988). 29 Arizona Dept. of Revenue v. Blaze Construction, 526 U.S. 32 (1999). 30 El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie, 526 U.S. 473 (1999). 31 Minnesota v. Mille Lacs, 526 U.S. 172 (1999). 32 Amoco Production v. Southern Ute, 526 U.S. 172 (1999). 33 Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000). 34 Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392 (2000). 35 Dept. of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protec. Assoc., 532 U.S. 1 (2001). 36 C&L Enterprises v. Citizen Band Potawatomi, 532 U.S. 511 (2001). 37 Atkinson Trading v. Shirley, 532 U.S. 645 (2001). 38 Idaho v. United States, 533 U.S. 262 (2001). 39 Nevada v. Hicks, 533 U.S. 353 (2001). 40 Chickasaw Nation v. United States, 534 U.S. 84 (2001). 41 United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 537 U.S. 465 (2003). X X X X X X X X - 42 United States v. Navajo

Nation, 537 U.S. 488 (2003). 43 Inyo County v. Paiute Shoshone Indians, 538 U.S. 701 (2003). 44 United States v. Lara, 541 U.S. 193 (2004). 45 Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma & Shoshone- Paiute v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2004). 46 Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation, 544 U.S. 197 (2005). - - X X X X X X X X 2005 Rehnquist Dies Roberts Begins 47 Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, 546 U.S. (2005). Roberts Stevens O Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas Ginsburg Breyer 0% 0/1 34.0% 16/47 29.7% 14/47 19.1% 9/47 20% 8/40 41.6% 15/36 11.7% 4/34 37.9% 11/29 30.7% 8/26 2006 O Connor Resigns Alito Begins 48 Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle, 554 U.S. (2008). Roberts Stevens Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas Ginsburg Breyer Alito 0% 35.2% 17.6% 18.1% 40% 10.5% 36.3% 30% 0% 0/5 18/51 9/51 8/44 16/40 4/38 12/33 9/30 0/4

49 Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. (2009). 50 Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 556 U.S. (2009). 51 United States v. Navajo Nation, 556 U.S. (2009). 2009/2010 Souter/Stevens Resign 2009/2010 Sotomayer/Kagan Begin Roberts Scalia Kennedy Thomas Ginsburg Breyer Alito Sotomayer Kagan 8.3% 18.96% 19.6% 11.1% 35.0% 27.0% 0% 71.4% 60.0% 52 United States v. Tohono O odham Nation, 563 U.S. (2011). 53 U.S. v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, 564 U.S. 162 (2011) 54 Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Nation, 132 S.Ct. 2181 (2012) 55 Match-E-Be-Nash-She- Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak, 132 S.Ct. 2199 (2012) 56 Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 133 S.Ct. 2552 (2013) 57 Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 134 S.Ct. 2024 (2014) 58 Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 750 (2016) 1/12 11/58 10/51 5/45 14/40 10/37 0/11 5/7 3/5 X X X X X X X X - - X X X X X X X X - -

2016 Scalia Dies Roberts Vacant Kennedy Thomas Ginsburg Breyer Alito Sotomayer Kagan 20.0% 3/15 22.2% 12/54 14.6% 7/48 37.2% 16/43 30.0% 12/40 14.3% 2/14 70.0% 7/10 59 Nebraska v. Parker, 136 S.Ct. 791 (2016) X X X X X X X X 60 Sturgeon v. Frost, 136 S.Ct. 62.5% 5/8 X X X X X X X X 1061 (2016) 61 U.S. v. Bryant, 136 S.Ct. 1954 (2016) X X X X X X X X 62 Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, 136 S.Ct. 2159 (2016) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -