Raise the Age Presentation: 2017 NYSAC Fall Seminar. September 21, 2017

Similar documents
THE SERVICE OF SENTENCES AND CREDIT APPLICABLE TO OFFENDERS IN CUSTODY OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

RUNAWAYS FROM OUT OF COUNTY INTAKE

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 H 2 HOUSE BILL 725 Committee Substitute Favorable 6/12/13

New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA) Solicitation of Interest #014 Attorney for the Child Juvenile Delinquency Representation Services

2014 Kansas Statutes

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 1 HOUSE BILL 399. Short Title: Young Offenders Rehabilitation Act. (Public)

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2549

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Overcrowding Alternatives

HOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Correctional Population Forecasts

Options of court at dispositional hearing. If in its decree the juvenile court finds that the child comes within the purview of this chapter,

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 85 1

No An act relating to jurisdiction of delinquency proceedings. (H.751) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No SENATE LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: MARCH 12, 2015

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

Department of Corrections

IC Chapter 16. Problem Solving Courts

First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED. Bill Summary

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

Florida Senate SB 880

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 1 HOUSE BILL 280. Short Title: Juvenile Justice Reinvestment Act. (Public)

(d) "Incarceration" and "confinement" do not include electronic home monitoring.

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

LAWS RELATING TO LIFETIME SUPERVISION

MISSOURI VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS¹

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 46 1

A male female. JOURNAL ENTRY OF ADJUDICATION AND SENTENCING Pursuant to K.S.A , and

Summit County Pre Trial Services

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

18 USC 3006A. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE (42 PA.C.S.) AND LAW AND JUSTICE (44 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS 25, 2008, P.L.

Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

Male Initial Custody Assessment Procedures

Assembly Bill No. 579 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

HOUSE BILL 86 (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 30, 2011): PROVISIONS DIRECTLY IMPACTING

Report to Joint Judiciary Interim Committee

Session Law Creating the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission and Abolishing Parole, 1978 Minn. Laws ch. 723

New York State Violent Felony Offense Processing 2016 Annual Report

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Detention, Commitment, and Parole Population Projections

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1552

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 280 Committee Substitute Favorable 5/10/17

REVISOR XX/BR

Chapter 148. State Prison System. Article 1. Organization and Management Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 1262, s. 10.

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

Information Memorandum 98-11*

IC ARTICLE 30. JUVENILE LAW: JUVENILE COURT JURISDICTION

IC Chapter 6. Parole and Discharge of Delinquent Offenders

Department of Legislative Services

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1975 SESSION CHAPTER 742 HOUSE BILL 750

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT S.2371, AN ACT RELATIVE TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2004 Session

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER

Each specialized docket is presided over by one of the six elected judges. The presiding judge may refer the specialized docket to a magistrate.

SENATE, No. 881 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 215th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2012 SESSION

AMENDED ORDER GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF SELECTED INMATES INTO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS, OSCEOLA COUNTY

NC General Statutes - Chapter 148 Article 3 1

JUVENILE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: SECTION 2. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 15A IS CREATED TO

Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright 2016 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

IC Chapter 2.5. Home Detention

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

Sentencing, Corrections, Prisons, and Jails

Supreme Court of Virginia CHART OF ALLOWANCES

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Juvenile Justice Code Book

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF SENATE BILL NO. 18

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1995 SESSION CHAPTER 545 SENATE BILL 53

Justice and Public Safety Subcommittee Fiscal Year Budget Highlights

ICAOS Rules. General information

Frequently Asked Questions: Sentencing Guidelines (6 th Edition & 6 th Edition, Revised) and General Sentencing Issues

Conditions of probation; evaluation and treatment; fees; effect of failure to abide by conditions; modification.

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

REVISOR ACF/EP A

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

Comprehensive Prison Package Acts 81, 82, 83 and 84 of 2008

2012 Judicial Conference. Swift and Sure Sanctions Pilot Program (SSSP)

Juvenile Law. Protection of the Public. Before Adjudication: Custody, Detention, Deferred Prosecution and Other Preliminaries

PL ARTICLE 70: PRISON.

Adult and Juvenile Correctional Populations Forecasts

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Transcription:

Raise the Age Presentation: 2017 NYSAC Fall Seminar September 21, 2017

September 21, 2017 2 Legislation Signed into Law Raise the Age (RTA) legislation was enacted on April 10, 2017 (Part WWW of Chapter 59 of the Laws of 2017): It prohibits 16- and 17-year-olds from being held in adult jails and prisons It makes substantive changes to the procedures and mechanisms used to process 16- and 17-year-olds in the criminal and youth justice systems It allows for additional services for youth and alters the types of detention and/or placement they may receive

September 21, 2017 3 Implementation will be phased in October 1, 2018: law takes effect for 16-year-olds October 1, 2019: law takes effect for 17-year-olds

September 21, 2017 4 Terms used in this presentation References to youth s age refer to their age on the date the alleged act occurred, unless otherwise noted Use of 16- and 17-year-olds refers to individuals affected by the law when it is phased-in References to crime refer to the most severe offense the youth was charged with or was alleged to have committed

September 21, 2017 5 Three types of Offender Categories Adolescent Offender (AO) New category created by RTA Juvenile Offender (JO) Juvenile Delinquent (JD)

September 21, 2017 6 Adolescent Offender (AO) Age: 16- or 17-years-old at the time of the offense Alleged Crime: Felony; if convicted, current adult sentencing applies Court: Youth Part of Superior (Criminal) Court Pre-trial detention: New specialized secure juvenile detention facilities for older youth Probation Service: Eligible for voluntary case planning services prior to conviction Probation Supervision: AOs will receive probation terms consistent with current law Post-Sentence Confinement Options: Definite sentence of one year or less new specialized secure juvenile detention or Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) secure facility (judicial choice) Sentence of one year or more and under 18-years-old at sentencing new Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) AO facility Sentence of one year or more and 18 or older at sentencing existing DOCCS adult facility

September 21, 2017 7 Juvenile Offender (JO) Age: 13- to 15-years-old at the time of the offense Alleged Crime: Select set of serious offenses (e.g. murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery 1) Court: Youth Part of Superior (Criminal) Court Pre-trial Detention: Existing local detention facilities licensed by OCFS Probation Service: Eligible for voluntary case planning services prior to conviction Probation Supervision: JOs will receive probation terms consistent with current law Post-Sentence Confinement: Existing OCFS Secure Facilities

September 21, 2017 8 Juvenile Delinquent (JD) JD classification is extended to include 16- and 17-year-olds under the appropriate circumstances Age: Under 16-years-old at the time of the offense Alleged Crime: non-jo felony or a misdemeanor Court: Family Court Age: 16- or 17-years-old at the time of the offense Alleged Crime: misdemeanor (except VTL) Age: 16- or 17-years-old at the time of the offense Alleged Crime: non-violent or violent felony offense (VFO) AND was removed to Family Court by the Youth Part Pre-trial Detention: Existing secure or non-secure juvenile detention facility licensed by OCFS Probation Service: Eligible and suitable youth may receive adjustment services Probation Supervision: Not to exceed two (2) years consistent with current law Post-sentence confinement: Existing OCFS limited secure or non-secure facility or voluntary agency (OCFS or Local Departments of Social Services (LDSS) custody)

September 21, 2017 9 Pre-Adjudication Youth Process Juvenile questioning rooms, inspected and approved by the appropriate court administrator and usually located in police administrative offices, will be used for questioning youth who have been arrested Youth may be brought to his/her home by police, and with consent of the parent or legal guardian, be questioned there for a reasonable period of time Parental notification of arrest will be required for 16- and 17-year-olds, similar to what is now available for youth 15 years of age and under in Family Court

September 21, 2017 10 Court Jurisdiction New Youth Part County/Superior Court: Family Court Judges and Criminal Court Rules all 16- and 17-year-old felony (violent and non-violent) offenses and vehicle and traffic law (VTL) misdemeanors start in the Youth Part all 13- to 15-year-old JOs Existing Family Court: Family Court Judges and Rules all 7- to 15-year-old offenses start in Family Court (except JO offenses) all 16- to 17-year-old misdemeanors start in Family Court (except VTL offenses) 16- and 17-year-old felonies removed by Youth Part Existing Local Criminal Courts: Criminal Court Judges and Rules all 16- and 17-year-old violations and infractions (e.g. traffic violations)

September 21, 2017 11 Youth Part The RTA legislation creates a Youth Part within the Superior (Criminal) Courts in each county and in New York City Judges presiding in the Youth Parts will be specially-trained Family Court judges Youth Part

September 21, 2017 12 Youth Part Jurisdiction The following cases will be heard in the Youth Part: 16- and 17-year-olds charged with felonies (i.e. AOs) whose cases are not removed to Family Court 16- and 17-year-olds charged with VTL misdemeanors 13-, 14-, and 15-year-old Juvenile Offenders (JOs) whose cases are not transferred to Family Court

September 21, 2017 13 Features of Youth Part Voluntary probation services tailored to youth will be available for AOs and JOs There is a presumption against detention

September 21, 2017 14 Removal from Youth Part to Family Court: Non-Violent AOs VTL misdemeanors cannot be removed to Family Court AOs accused of non-violent felonies will automatically be removed to Family Court within 30 days of arraignment, unless: The defendant waives removal; or The District Attorney (DA) moves to prevent removal If the DA moves to prevent removal, they must prove extraordinary circumstances that warrant keeping the case in the Youth Part or the case will be removed to Family Court

September 21, 2017 15 Removal from Youth Part to Family Court: Violent AOs Removal of AOs for violent felony offenses and Class A offenses (other than drug offenses) is based upon a three-part test. Cases will not be removed if: The defendant displayed a firearm, shotgun, rifle, or deadly weapon; The defendant engaged in certain criminal sexual conduct; or The defendant caused significant physical injury on a non-participant in the crime If one of these three circumstances is not found, the case will be removed within 30 days unless the DA moves to prevent removal and demonstrates extraordinary circumstances Cases may be removed in less than 30 days with agreement from all parties

September 21, 2017 16 Removal from Youth Part to Family Court: JOs For Juvenile Offenders (JOs) in the Youth Part, the criteria for removal to Family Court will not differ from current law

September 21, 2017 17 Family Court Jurisdiction Juvenile Delinquent (JD) cases will continue to be heard in Family Court Family Court jurisdiction will expand to include 16- and 17-year-olds when: They are accused of a misdemeanor (except VTL); or Their cases are transferred from the Youth Part AOs that are transferred to Family Court will then be classified and treated as JDs 16- or 17-year-olds in Family Court will be treated the same as 15-year-olds currently: They will have an opportunity to limit detention and placement through available alternatives to detention They will have the same dispositional options, such as placement or probation

September 21, 2017 18 Eligibility for Adjustment Services Adolescent Offenders removed to Family Court may receive adjustment services through probation Juvenile Offenders will not be eligible for adjustment services Juvenile Delinquents deemed eligible and suitable may receive adjustment services consistent with current law

September 21, 2017 19 3 Types of Pre-Sentence Confinement New specialized secure juvenile detention facilities Existing secure juvenile detention facilities Existing non-secure juvenile detention facilities

September 21, 2017 20 Specialized Secure Juvenile Detention Facilities New type of detention created by the RTA legislation that is reserved exclusively for AOs Will be jointly certified and regulated by OCFS and the State Commission of Correction (SCOC) These facilities will be locally administered: Outside of New York City, counties may opt to have the local probation or social services department administer the program in conjunction with the local sheriff In New York City, the Administration for Children s Services (ACS) will administer these facilities in conjunction with the NYC Department of Correction (NYC DOC) Not every county will be required to operate a facility, but all must have one available for use These facilities will not be co-located with local jails

September 21, 2017 21 Specialized Secure Juvenile Detention Facilities These facilities may be co-located with currently operating juvenile secure detention facilities, provided the following conditions are met: AOs must be assigned to separate housing units from JDs and JOs Facilities may share common spaces (e.g. cafeteria, medical, vocational and recreational) for AOs and JDs/JOs, but physical access between the populations must be prevented Facilities may be allowed to share space for AOs, JDs, and JOs for educational purposes Facilities must abide by all OCFS and SCOC regulations OCFS and SCOC have notified all sheriffs and juvenile detention agencies of this update OCFS and SCOC are actively working to promulgate regulations for the establishment, certification, and operation of these facilities

September 21, 2017 22 Specialized Secure Juvenile Detention Facilities Pre-trial Detention: AOs may be confined to a specialized secure detention facility while their criminal trial is pending Post-conviction Sentencing: These facilities will also be a post-conviction sentencing option for AOs with a definite sentence of one year or less

September 21, 2017 23 Rikers Island RTA legislation prohibits the placement of youth at Rikers Island April 1, 2018: All youth under the age of 18 must be removed from Rikers Island, if practicable October 1, 2018: All youth must be removed from Rikers Island

September 21, 2017 24 Adolescent Offender Facilities The law requires that DOCCS create one or more facilities to house AOs impacted by this legislation that are under 18 years of age at sentencing and sentenced to one year or more These facilities will operate a two-year treatment model developed in collaboration between DOCCS and OCFS A council made up of representatives from DOCCS, OCFS, SCOC and the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) will jointly oversee the facilities

September 21, 2017 25 AO Facilities: Hudson CF Model Pursuant to Governor Cuomo s Executive Order in 2015, Hudson CF in Columbia County currently houses incarcerated 16- and 17-year-olds and provides age-appropriate programming for its residents Hudson CF will transition to an AO Facility: Hudson will remain the reception center for all (male and female) AOs received into DOCCS Custody Hudson will remain an Office of Mental Health (OMH) and Medical Level 1 facility, providing medical and mental health services 24 hours a day Hudson will be the only facility to house female AOs

September 21, 2017 26 AO Facilities: Site Locations Two sites were selected by DOCCS to serve as AO facilities: Adirondack CF and the former Groveland Annex Adirondack CF: Essex County Current Status: Medium Security, Male Facility Operational Date: October 1, 2018 Former Groveland Annex: Livingston County Current Status: Decommissioned Medium Security, Male Facility Operational Date: October 1, 2019

September 21, 2017 27 AO Facilities: County Housing As an interim measure before the law takes effect, DOCCS will continue to review requests from counties to house 16- and 17-year-olds who receive a definite sentence of imprisonment in excess of 90 days at Hudson CF If approved, due to limited capacity, there will be a per capita cost associated with housing these youth from the counties After Phase 1 of RTA implementation, DOCCS will continue this practice as it relates to 17-year-olds

September 21, 2017 28 AO Facilities: Program Treatment Model AO Facilities will operate under the Program Treatment Model: Specialized therapeutic programs designed for adolescents to develop cognitive skills Academic transition plans will be developed with the AO student and the school psychologist to transition the AO student to education programs, vocational training, and/or employment Substance abuse treatment will be offered AOs that complete the 2 year program model and are transferring to a DOCCS adult general confinement facility will have a transition plan in place

September 21, 2017 29 AO Facilities: Discharge Planning Services Discharge Planning Services are a coordinated effort between DOCCS correction and community supervision staff, Re-Entry Services, County Re-Entry Task Forces (CRTFs), and OCFS Where appropriate, this includes: Family reintegration Housing assistance Mental health and medical continuity of care Employment support Educational needs Counties can sign up for a monthly automated email notification that will provide information on AOs released to their counties

September 21, 2017 30 Post Release Supervision DOCCS Community Supervision staff will provide post release supervision to both AOs released from DOCCS and JOs released from OCFS and DOCCS: They will be supervised by a Parole Officer in bureaus based on county/area of residence Until the age of 18, they will be supervised at a Youthful Offender risk level, which is a supervision ratio of 40:1 At age 18, a risk assessment instrument will determine the appropriate level of supervision

September 21, 2017 31 Sealing Provision Effective October 7, 2017, RTA provides individuals previously convicted of certain crimes with the opportunity to apply to have their criminal record sealed An application for sealing cannot be made until at least ten years has passed since the individual s date of conviction or date of release from confinement and the individual has remained crime-free during that time period Individuals who were convicted of two or more felonies, a sex offense, violent felony, or other specified serious felonies are not eligible to have their records sealed This provision does not apply solely to youth rather, all eligible, previously convicted individuals can apply to have their record sealed This provision will not impact the information available to law enforcement

September 21, 2017 32 RTA Forecast Models The arrest, processing, and average daily population (ADP) projections were developed in conjunction between DCJS and OCFS Forecast system flow at full RTA implementation (2020 and later) is based on: RTA statute provisions Continuing downward trends in arrest numbers Recent processing patterns in Criminal and Family Court Practice assumptions (e.g. higher placement rates for older JDs due to more extensive legal history) These numbers are estimates it is difficult to predict responses to the new RTA system Estimates are based on current contributions to statewide arrest/confinement totals

September 21, 2017 33 Data Projections for Rest of State Information presented here is based on the aggregate projections for the 57 counties outside of New York City Updates to regional and county-level data is being sent out this week to all County Executives/Administrators, LDSS Commissioners, Probation Directors, District Attorneys, and Sheriffs

September 21, 2017 34 Rest of State: Arrest & Case Processing Projections for 16/17-year-olds Table 1: Arrest & Case Processing Projections for 16/17-year-olds ONLY Rest of State Current System (2016) Estimated Range at Full RTA Implementation Arrest Projections (16/17-year-olds ONLY) Total 10125 6500 9000 Felony 2856 2500 3000 Misdemeanor 7269 4500 6000 Case Processing Projections (16/17-year-olds ONLY) Arrests Proceeding in Youth Part Total 500 650 Violent Felony 450 600 Arrests Handled via Family Court Process Total 6500 8500 Felony 1800 2300 Misdemeanor 4500 6000 Specialized Secure Juvenile Detention Facility Admissions Annual AO Detention Admissions 750 950 Annual AO Sentenced Admissions 100 225

September 21, 2017 35 Rest of State: Average Daily Population (ADP) Projections Table 2: Average Daily Population (ADP) Projections for Total System Rest of State Youth Part Confinement Projections (16/17-year-olds ONLY) Estimated ADP Range at Full RTA Implementation AO Specialized Secure Juvenile Detention 180 225 Family Court Confinement Projections (All youth 17 and under) Detention Placement Secure 125 150 Non-Secure 50 60 Voluntary Agency (OCFS & LDSS Custody) 1065 1425

September 21, 2017 36 Possible Impacts on Social Services Departments Counties may require more contracts with voluntary agencies to accommodate an increase in JD placements Local Social Services Departments that operate detention centers may have an increase in youth to be served in those facilities Localities may choose to operate specialized secure detention facilities with local sheriffs departments (or NYC DOC) Unlike previous versions, the enacted RTA legislation does not include reforms for youth alleged or adjudicated to be a Person in Need of Supervision (PINS) Instead, state funding to localities for PINS detention and placement will expire in 2020 pending further policy actions

September 21, 2017 37 Possible Impacts on Social Services Departments, cont. Localities may need to change their claiming practices to isolate RTA-related expenses Local Social Services Departments designated the lead agency for Supervision and Treatment Services for Juveniles Program (STSJP) should anticipate expanded programs with increased eligibility Effective October 1, 2018: OCFS will expand eligibility for the Supervision and Treatment Services for Juveniles Program (STSJP) to include youth who are alleged to be or are convicted as Adolescent Offenders (JOs and JDs are already eligible by law) OCFS-supported Juvenile Justice Alternatives Continuum Prevention Early Intervention Alternative to Detention [including specialized secure] Alternative to Placement (ATP) Aftercare / Reentry Programming

September 21, 2017 38 Possible Impacts on Voluntary Agencies Voluntary agencies (VAs) will treat new youth in residential settings For VA placement, youth must be adjudicated JDs placed in non-secure care with OCFS or a Local Social Services Department; or placed with NYC ACS under the Close to Home program

September 21, 2017 39 Possible Impacts on Voluntary Agencies, cont. VAs may need additional staff and beds to meet the needs of the new population OCFS will determine the best Maximum State Aid Rate (MSAR) for the new population OCFS will review and modify current regulations as well as create new regulations, policies, and procedures to address the population, including searches, security, programming, law enforcement engagement, etc.

September 21, 2017 40 Possible Impacts on Probation Departments Probation Departments may need additional staff to meet the needs of the new population Probation Departments may need access to additional community-based services to meet the needs of the new population e.g. educational, vocational, cognitive behavioral interventions, behavioral health, family treatment, intensive case management Probation Departments that operate detention centers may experience an increase in youth to be served in those facilities DCJS will review and modify current regulations to address the population, including case planning and the provision of services to AOs and JOs, intake and adjustment services, court ordered investigations, supervision, and other related regulatory changes

September 21, 2017 41 Local Costs State statute authorizes and the State Financial Plan assumes 100% State reimbursement to eligible localities for RTA-related expenditures this includes all incremental capital, personnel, and non-personnel costs counties/municipalities incur as a result of RTA The State will cover incremental costs, such as: law enforcement; local detention; court services; Sheriffs transportation; probation services; youth placement; and aftercare services Counties that meet the following criteria are eligible for reimbursement: Remain under the tax cap counties that remain under the tax cap are NOT required to contribute a local share of expenditures for RTA-related costs Demonstrate financial hardship for those counties not subject to or that exceed the tax cap, the State is authorized to waive the local share for each that can demonstrate financial hardship

September 21, 2017 42 Local Costs Test 1 Adherence to Tax Cap If the locality adheres to the tax cap, the State will reimburse the costs Test 2 Meet FRB or OSC Fiscal Stress Factors If the locality is a Fiscally Eligible Municipality under the Financial Restructuring Board s (FRB) statutory criteria OR received a fiscal distress designation from the Office of the State Comptroller s (OSC) Fiscal Stress Monitoring System, the State will reimburse the costs Test 3 Additional Fiscal Hardship Demonstration If the locality does not adhere to the tax cap or meet FRB or OSC fiscal stress factors, the Division of Budget will determine whether fiscal hardship is demonstrated, factors include: incremental cost of RTA; changes in state or federal aid payments; extraordinary costs, such as a disaster; infrastructure costs; growth in tax receipts; prepayment of expenses; fund balances, reserves, and surpluses; and control board oversight

September 21, 2017 43 Local Costs The State intends to maintain the current reimbursement process where modifications are necessary, the State is dedicated to ensuring ease of execution Reimbursement will require cost tracking at the local level, but the State is committed to establishing a reimbursement process that is: timely; streamlined; user-friendly; simple to navigate; and easy to implement Information about the application process for state reimbursement will be available on the NYS Division of the Budget and RTA websites

September 21, 2017 44 Other State Resources Moving Forward The State is currently working on a planning document to assist local stakeholders with their RTA planning efforts The State created a RTA website available at www.ny.gov/raisetheage which includes: A form for the submission of questions; Updates regarding the development of regulatory and administrative policies; and Additional information on RTA and juvenile justice efforts

Raise the Age Questions? September 21, 2017