UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ), by

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS. This Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement (this Agreement ) is made and entered into

FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE. WHEREAS, on or about,, (" ), an adult resident citizen of County,, was. involved in an automobile accident on in

Qualified Escrow Agreement

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, LegalMatch acknowledges that persons eligible to utilize legal aid services are not LegalMatch s target demographic;

(01/31/13) Principal Name /PIA No. PAYMENT AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT No.

GENERAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, Theresa M. Petrello of Manchester, New Hampshire (hereinafter,

TENDER OF COMPLETION CONTRACTOR TO CITY AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. This TENDER OF COMPLETION CONTRACTOR TO CITY AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. INC., JASON STUBBS and STUBBS (hereinafter Releasors ), by, from, or on

Getty Realty Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

B. The Parties wish to avoid the expense and uncertainty of further litigation without any

KS" KS, SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, Richard P. Kearns of Bethlehem, New Hampshire (hereinafter, "Plaintiff")

NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE FOR USE OF SCHOOL WORDMARKS AND LOGOS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, Alfredo Valentin of Manchester, New Hampshire (hereinafter, Plaintiff )

REGULAR AGENDA NEW BUSINESS #8

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SAMPLE PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPOKANE AIRPORT AND

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

Case 2:17-cv JMV-CLW Document 23 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 168..EruvLitigation.com

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is

EXHIBIT H Strategic Partnership Agreement

Case 2:09-cv TPG ECF No filed 02/17/12 PageID.1700 Page 1 of 8 MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:14-cv KBM-GJF Document 118 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Len Gorecki, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. into by and between Sandra G. Myrick ("Myrick") and the North Carolina Administrative Office

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTAND RELEASE. On this day of February 2013, the Lebanon School District ( the District ), and

CONTRACT STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF GEORGETOWN

TimeshareCancelServices.com

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. day of April, 2018, by and between the Bergen Rockland Eruv Association, Inc. ("BREA"),

Case KG Doc 451 Filed 11/15/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Plaintiff, Defendants.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE WHEREAS, WARE COUNTY, BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Guarantor additionally represents and warrants to Obligee as

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PORT OF SEATTLE AND THE CITY OF

CITY OF ENID RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT

SERVICE AGREEMENT TRAINING OR WORKSHOP

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE RECITALS

COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Board of Trustees Meeting June 8, 2015

ASSUMPTION OF RISK, RELEASE AND LIABILITY WAIVER

The Above Blank Space Is for Recording Purposes.

TERMINATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

JOSEPH AMANIERA :SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff :LAW DIVISION, OCEAN COUNTY. :Docket No. I-- /1 THE PARTIES

Class Action Settlement Agreement

POLE ATTACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT SKAMANIA COUNTY PUD

Home Foundation Subcontractor Services Agreement

COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

GUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

LAND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREBY SUBMIT THE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASES

ARTWORK LICENSING AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

RAM Holdings Ltd. (RAMR) EX 10.1 RAM RE HOUSE 46 REID STREET HAMILTON, D0 HM 12 (441)

THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS NOVEMBER 2004

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Storm Water Pump Covenant Master Requirement GEN 114 Building Department: , fax:

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

NAPA SANITATION DISTRICT

TRAVELERS BENEFIT PROGRAM RELEASE AGREEMENT. This Travelers Benefit Program Release Agreement is made and entered into by and between

Security Agreement Assignment of Hedging Account (the Agreement ) Version

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

LICENSE AGREEMENT RECITALS:

E&S PERFORMANCE BOND

SERVICE AGREEMENT XX-XXXX-XXX-XX

REVOCABLE ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

CUSTODIAN AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H:

PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT & FULL AND FINAL RELEASE

RECITALS. WHEREAS, CVTD currently operates five bus routes within the City with a total of eighty-five stops along such routes;

the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Applicant hereby agree as follows:

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Contract No.

Phased Development Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 4899, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)

mg Doc 5954 Filed 11/26/13 Entered 11/26/13 14:41:13 Main Document Pg 1 of 7 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtors.

FINAL RELEASE OF CONSTRUCTION LIEN RIGHTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

AWORKER WORK TOKEN PURCHASE AGREEMENT

SOURCE ONE SURETY, LLC.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

BRU FUEL AGREEMENT RECITALS

AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN:

THE UNINSURED UNITED PARACHUTE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. d/b/a UNITED PARACHUTE TECHNOLOGIES PURCHASE, USE, RELEASE AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

January 11, 2013 All Local Unions with Members Formerly Employed by Hostess Brands, Inc.

CAPTION FINANCIAL SUMMARY

The Above Blank Space Is For Recording Purposes

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Melissa Hill, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Plaintiff, vs. The City of Minneapolis; Minneapolis Police Department; Officer Amy Vreeland; The United States Federal Protective Service; FPS Inspector Jesse Rodriguez; DECO, Inc.; Timothy Sarkela; John Kangas; Michael Thoms, SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Defendants. 1. PARTIES TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement ) is entered into on by and between Plaintiff Melissa Hill and the following parties (hereinafter referred to collectively as Defending Parties ): 1. The City of Minneapolis; 2. The United States, through its agency the Federal Protective Service (FPS); 3. DECO, Inc. and all DECO-affiliated entities, including but not limited to DECO Security Services; 4. Timothy Sarkela; 5. John Kangas; and 6. Michael Thoms. 2. RECITALS: A. The City of Minneapolis is a municipal governmental unit performing an array of services and functions, including the operation and maintenance of public rights-of-way located within its borders; and the protection and preservation of public health and welfare within City Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 1

limits. The Minneapolis Police Department is a division of the City of Minneapolis that provides local law enforcement services. Officer Amy Vreeland is a police officer with the Minneapolis Police Department. B. FPS is a federal agency responsible for providing protective security and law enforcement services for properties owned or leased by the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), including the Federal Office Building located at 212 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota (hereinafter Federal Building ). At all times relevant to these proceedings, Inspector Jesse Rodriguez was a law enforcement official employed by FPS. C. DECO, Inc. (hereinafter DECO ) is a privately held company providing an array of services to government agencies and private organizations, including protective security services for various properties. FPS contracted with DECO to provide protective security services for GSA-owned/leased properties located in Minneapolis, including the Federal Building. At all times relevant to these proceedings, Michael Thoms was employed by DECO as a sergeant of the security guard force; and Timothy Sarkela and John Kangas were employed by DECO as Protective Security Officers (PSOs). D. Plaintiff Melissa Hill filed a lawsuit entitled Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al., Court File No. 12-cv-738 (MJD/AJB) ( this Action ) against the City of Minneapolis, Minneapolis Police Officer Amy Vreeland, FPS, FPS Inspector Jesse Rodriguez, DECO, Timothy Sarkela, John Kangas and Michael Thoms arising from an incident that occurred on June 9, 2011 at the Federal Building. Plaintiff asserts constitutional and state tort claims, including violations of her First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights, and seeks compensatory damages as well as injunctive relief, as more fully set forth in the Second Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 2

E. In addition to this Action, Plaintiff also filed an administrative action against FPS on the basis of the June 9, 2011 incident, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) ( the Administrative Claim ). Notice of the Administrative Claim was provided by Plaintiff s counsel to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on or about November 29, 2011, and remains active pending investigation. Documents reflecting the Administrative Claim are attached hereto as Exhibit B. F. Defending Parties have denied, and continue to deny, Plaintiff s allegations, damages, claims for relief, and all liability in both this Action and the Administrative Claim. G. FPS was dismissed from this Action on sovereign immunity grounds by Order of the Honorable Michael Davis, dated March 18, 2011, affirming the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Arthur Boylan. Nonetheless, FPS subsequently participated in settlement negotiations, and has agreed to be a party to and bound by this Settlement Agreement and Release. FPS collaborated with DECO to establish and agree to the non-monetary consideration specified in Paragraph 4(A) below, and has specifically authorized DECO to take the actions specified therein in the performance of its security services contract with FPS. H. The parties and their insurers now desire to settle all claims that have been asserted, or could have been asserted, by any party as a result of the June 9, 2011 incident, pursuant to the terms negotiated and set forth below. WHEREFORE, FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 3. PAYMENT A. The City of Minneapolis, the United States, and DECO shall pay the total amount of Five Thousand and no/100 ($5,000.00) Dollars to the American Civil Liberties Union of Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 3

Minnesota Foundation ( ACLU ) for the attorneys fees and out-of-pocket costs expended in the representation of Ms. Hill as follows: i. Nine Hundred Ninety-Nine and 99/100 Dollars shall be paid to the ACLU by the City of Minneapolis; ii. One Thousand and 01/100 Dollars shall be paid to the ACLU by the United States; and iii. Three Thousand and no/100 Dollars shall be paid to the ACLU by DECO and/or its insurer. B. Following their receipt of a signed and properly executed copy of this Agreement from Plaintiff, along with documents required by the Minneapolis finance department including a W-9 form from the ACLU, as well as the ACLU s employer identification number, the Defending Parties shall deliver a check or checks for the full amount of the settlement to the ACLU c/o Teresa Nelson, 2300 Myrtle Avenue, Suite 180, St. Paul, MN 55114-1879, pursuant to the schedule below: i. City of Minneapolis within 30 days; ii. iii. DECO within 10 business days; and United States as soon as practicable. C. Plaintiff specifically understands and agrees that the payment specified in this provision is in full satisfaction of all compensatory damages and defense costs, including attorneys fees, which have been claimed, or could have been claimed, in this Action or the Administrative Action. By executing this Agreement and accepting payment hereunder, Plaintiff hereby waives any other claim against the above-named Defendants for payment or reimbursement of attorney s fees and/or defense costs that were or could have been incurred as a Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 4

result of the June 9, 2011 incident. Plaintiff will not seek any award of costs or attorneys fees from the Court, under any legal doctrine or theory, regardless of whether those attorneys fees or costs were actually paid by Plaintiff. 4. NON-MONETARY CONSIDERATION DECO, FPS, and the City of Minneapolis further stipulate and agree as follows: A. DECO: i. DECO stipulates and agrees that, as of the date of this Agreement, writing with non-permanent chalk on public sidewalks is not, in and of itself, unlawful in the City of Minneapolis; and that PSOs working at GSAowned/leased properties in Minneapolis are not permitted to stop, seize, detain, or search individuals who write in non-permanent chalk on the public sidewalks surrounding federal property unless there is reasonable suspicion to believe a crime or security threat has occurred or will occur. DECO further agrees that the act of writing with non-permanent chalk on a public sidewalk is not currently, in and of itself, a factor supporting reasonable suspicion. ii. DECO shall establish written guidelines instructing PSOs working at GSA-owned/leased federal properties in Minneapolis that there are currently no Federal, State of Minnesota, or Minneapolis laws prohibiting individuals from writing with non-permanent chalk on public sidewalks in the City of Minneapolis. Counsel for DECO shall provide written notice to counsel for Plaintiff upon issuance of said guidelines. Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 5

iii. DECO shall establish a written guideline for PSOs working at GSAowned/leased federal properties in Minneapolis that they shall not issue Notices of Trespass pursuant to Minn. Stat. 609.605 and Mpls. Code 385.380 to individuals engaged in legal activity on public sidewalks surrounding federal property. Counsel for DECO shall provide written notice to counsel for Plaintiff upon issuance of such guidelines. iv. DECO stipulates and agrees that searches of individuals by DECO personnel at GSA-owned/leased federal properties in Minneapolis shall be: a. consistent with state and federal laws governing search and seizures; and b. documented in a writing setting forth the reason for the search; the basis for reasonable suspicion or probable cause (whichever standard is applicable); and the results of the search. c. This provision does not apply to compulsory searches of entrants to a federal building via x-ray scanner or wand if the individual voluntarily enters the federal building and passes under the x-ray scanner. v. DECO shall provide training to its PSOs working at GSA-owned/leased federal properties on First and Fourth Amendment rights, including the guideline established in Paragraph 4(A)(ii) above, as follows: a. During the initial basic training provided to newly-hired PSOs; Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 6

b. During the 40-hour refresher training provided to PSOs every three years. vi. The provisions of Paragraph 4(A)(ii) and the reference thereto in the training provision of 4(A)(v) shall be deemed null and void by operation of law should the act of writing with non-permanent chalk on public sidewalks in Minneapolis be prohibited by Federal, State of Minnesota, or Minneapolis law after the date of this Agreement. B. FPS: i. FPS shall ensure that the Form 3155 Offense/Incident Report associated with the June 9, 2011 incident is destroyed or otherwise removed completely from Plaintiff Melissa Hill s record. Counsel for FPS shall provide written confirmation of such action to counsel for Plaintiff. ii. FPS hereby authorizes DECO to agree to the provisions set forth in Paragraph 4(A) above in order to effectuate this Settlement Agreement and Release. By signing this Agreement, FPS agrees that it has had ample opportunity to participate in the settlement negotiations in this case, that it has specifically discussed the provisions of Paragraph 4(A) with DECO and counsel, and that it has authorized DECO to agree to the provisions set forth in Paragraph 4(A). iii. FPS agrees to cooperate in good faith with DECO so that DECO may establish guidelines, training, and procedures in compliance with DECO s obligations under Paragraph 4(A) without being deemed to have breached the parties security services contract, or to have infringed upon the Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 7

authority or jurisdiction of FPS or GSA. FPS agrees to review guidelines in draft established by DECO pursuant to Paragraphs 4(A)(ii) and 4(A)(iii) above to ensure that they are not in conflict with FPS requirements and/or policies for GSA-owned properties. Once any FPS recommended changes are incorporated by DECO, FPS waives any objection that same is in conflict with FPS requirements and/or policies for GSA-owned properties. Once the guidelines are final, FPS shall provide copies of said guidelines to those individuals, government agencies, and/or other thirdparties not privy to this Agreement who have an interest in the FPS-DECO contract. If FPS requirements and/or policies for GSA-owned properties change in the future, FPS will notify DECO of the change and work with DECO to update the guidelines they have developed. C. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS: i. The City of Minneapolis stipulates and agrees that the Minneapolis Police Department s law enforcement personnel are prohibited from issuing Notices of Trespass to individuals engaged in legal activity on the public sidewalks surrounding federal property, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 609.605 and Mpls. Code 385.380. ii. The City of Minneapolis shall establish written guidelines for the Minneapolis Police Department and its law enforcement personnel regarding the issuance of Notices of Trespass pursuant to Minn. Stat. 609.605 and Mpls. Code 385.380. The written guidelines will state that City of Minneapolis law enforcement officials are not authorized to Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 8

issue Notices of Trespass to individuals engaged in legal activities on the public sidewalks surrounding federal property. Counsel for the City of Minneapolis shall provide written notice to counsel for Plaintiff upon issuance of such guidelines. iii. The City of Minneapolis shall provide a one-time training session to the Minneapolis Police Department regarding the written guidelines established pursuant to Paragraph 4(C)(ii) at the next department-wide training session. Thereafter, the City of Minneapolis shall include the written guidelines in the Minneapolis Police Department policy manual, beginning with the next publication or edition of the manual. 5. GENERAL RELEASE By the signing of this Agreement for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Plaintiff Melissa Hill and Defending Parties do hereby completely, fully and forever release, remise, acquit and forever discharge each other, along with their respective insurers, including but not limited to Philadelphia Insurance Companies; their respective employees, including but not limited to Officer Amy Vreeland; and their respective former employees, including but not limited to Inspector Jesse Rodriguez, from any and all known and unknown, past, present and future claims, actions, causes of action, suits, demands, rights and damages of whatever kind or nature arising out of, connected or in any way related to, the June 9, 2011 incident. This Release specifically includes, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the claims asserted by Plaintiff in this Action, as well as in the Administrative Claim. Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 9

This Release is a general Release and also releases the heirs, executors, administrators, representatives, agents and assigns, parents, successors, affiliates, principals, officers and directors of the Parties, and all other persons, firms or corporations who are or might be liable for the damages claimed or which could have been claimed in this Action or the Administrative Claim. The Parties further understand and expressly agree that the claims released by this Agreement include all unknown damages and consequences arising out of any of the claims released herein, regardless of whether such damages or consequences occur in the future. Collectively, these released claims are referred to as Released Claims. 6. DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE A. DISMISSAL OF DISTRICT COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS: i. The parties agree that within seven (7) days following the full execution of this Agreement the parties will execute and file a Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice of this Action. ii. Plaintiff hereby agrees to withdraw the Administrative Action. The written withdrawal directed to Federal Protective Service Legal Office, DHS, Office of the General Counsel, of the Administrative Action is attached as Exhibit C. B. PRIOR DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS: Upon final agreement by the parties to the terms set forth herein, but prior to execution of this Agreement, Officer Amy Vreeland and Inspector Jesse Rodriguez shall be dismissed from this Action with prejudice. The parties will execute and file a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice prior to final execution of this Agreement. 7. NO ADMISSION OF LIABILITY Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 10

The Parties recognize and agree that the settlement set forth in this Agreement is the compromise of disputed claims and that the consideration tendered and accepted hereunder is not intended, nor shall it be construed by anyone, to be an admission of liability by or on behalf of any of the Parties, by whom all such liabilities are expressly denied, the Parties intending by this Agreement merely to avoid the litigation and buy their peace. Defending Parties have denied, and continue to deny, the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint. 8. LIABILITY OF SETTLING PARTIES EXTINGUISHED It is understood and agreed that the purpose, intent and legal effect of this Agreement is to extinguish the entire liability of the Parties arising out of or connected with the Released Claims, and to forever bar any recovery by way of subrogation, indemnity or contribution against any party by any other party relating to or arising out of the Released Claims. 9. THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS If any party to this Agreement makes any claim against a third person who is not a party to this Agreement, which claim is related to or arises out of the claims released hereunder relating to the June 9, 2011 incident, then the party making such claims shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other parties to this Agreement from any claims for contribution, indemnity, subrogation or other reimbursement of such third party. 10. COMPLETE AGREEMENT The parties acknowledge that no promise or inducement has been made or offered except as set forth herein, and that the parties execute this Agreement without reliance upon any statement or representation by anyone as to the nature and extent of the losses, injuries or damages or of the probable or possible consequences thereof. The Parties understand and agree that this Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 11

Released Claims, and that the terms of this Agreement are contractual and not a mere recital. By their signatures below, the Parties each represent that they have carefully read this Agreement, know and understand the terms and effect hereof, have fully discussed the terms and effect of this Agreement with their attorneys, and have signed this Agreement as their free and considered act. This Agreement includes separate signature pages. 11. SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS In the event and to the extent that any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such provisions shall be deleted and a new, legally valid and enforceable provision shall replace it. No invalid or unenforceable provision shall be construed to invalidate any other provision contained in this Agreement. 12. INTERPRETATION The parties agree that should any dispute arise over the interpretation of this Agreement, any rule requiring interpretation against the party drafting the various provisions shall not apply and the agreement shall instead be interpreted in a neutral manner. The parties acknowledge that any disputes concerning this Agreement are to be construed in accordance with Minnesota law, regardless of the domiciles of the parties, the state in which they executed the Agreement, or other facts which could affect choice of law. 13. SIGNING This Agreement may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all which together will constitute one and the same Agreement. Dated: MELISSA HILL Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 12

APPROVED AS TO FORM: MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN & BRAND, LLP Dated: WILLIAM Z. PENTELOVITCH #85078 NADEGE J. SOUVENIR #387957 MELISSA MURO LAMERE #0393295 3300 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-4140 (612) 672-8200 and TERESA NELSON #269736 American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota 2300 Myrtle Avenue, Suite 180 St. Paul, MN 55114-1879 (651) 645-4097 Attorneys For Plaintiff Melissa Hill Dated: DECO, INC. By: (Print Name) Its: (Print Title) Dated: Dated: Dated: TIMOTHY SARKELA JOHN KANGAS MICHAEL THOMS Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 13

APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUSINEAU McGUIRE CHARTERED Dated: PETER VAN BERGEN # 0112033 MEAGHAN C. BRYAN #388268 Attorneys for DECO, Inc., Timothy Sarkela, John Kangas, and Michael Thoms 1550 Utica Avenue South, Suite 600 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416-5318 (952) 546-8400 Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS By: (Print Name) Its: (Print Title) FOR THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Dated: SUSAN L. SEGAL Minneapolis City Attorney By: TIMOTHY S. SKARDA (#10176X) ANDREA KLOEHN NAEF (#0386497) Assistant City Attorneys Attorneys for City Defendants 350 South 5 th Street, Room 210 Minneapolis, MN 55415 (612) 673-2553 Dated: THE UNITED STATES By: (Print Name) Its: (Print Title) Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 14

APPROVED AS TO FORM: FOR THE UNITED STATES Dated: B. TODD JONES United States Attorney BY: DAVID W. FULLER #390922 Assistant U.S. Attorney 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600 Minneapolis, MN 55415 (612) 664-5600 Melissa Hill v. City of Minneapolis et al, Civil File No. 12-CV-738-MJD-AJB Page 15