Transparency in Policy Engagement and Political Participation

Similar documents
Transparency in Policy Engagement and Political Participation

American Express Company Semi-Annual Political Contributions Report July-December 2015

American Express Company Semi-Annual Political Contributions Report July-December 2017

Senate Committee Musical Chairs. August 15, 2018

Senate 2018 races. Cook Political Report ratings. Updated October 4, Producer Presentation Center

NRCAT Action Fund Senate Scorecard

American Express Company Semi-Annual Political Contributions Report January-June 2016

Senate committee overviews

American Express Company Semi-Annual Political Contributions Report July-December 2016

WASHINGTON REPORT. Michael Novogradac Novogradac & Company Merrill Hoopengardner National Trust Community Investment Corp.

JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH MAY JUNE APRIL JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER S M T W T F S S M T W T S M T W T F S S M T W T F S

Senate*** House**** Governors*****

Fluor Corporation Corporate Political Activity

2016 Time Warner Inc. PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates and Committees Candidate/Organization Contribution Type Amount Ameripac Leadership PAC

Fluor Corporation Corporate Political Activity

2014 Time Warner Inc. PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates and Committees Candidate/Organization Contribution Type Amount Aguilar, Pete US House

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Leadership in the 116 th Congress

Polarization: Implications for Policymaking & Accountability

U.S. House. U.S. House

2013 Political Contributions (January 1 - June 30): Capital One Associates Political Fund. Federal (PAC)

Federal Policy and Legislative Update. DDAA Board of Directors Meeting January 17, 2017

Congressional Leadership in the 116th Congress

LOBBYING CONTRIBUTION REPORT


U.S. Senate Support of Federal Priorities As of February 23, 2018; alpha. by state. MS Caucus Member. Signer FY 18. HELP; Special Committee on Aging

NOTE FROM THE LPL PAC CHAIR

James Inhofe Senate Republican Oklahoma Russell Senate Office Building

2017 Federal Budget Budget

2018 MIDTERM ELECTION OUTLOOK

Leadership in the 115 th Congress

Presentation Outline

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

2016 ANNUAL REPORT. Fighting to preserve independent advice for investors

Political Parties and Congressional Leadership Fall 2016

December Prepared by Katie Orrico. Page 1 of 9

Election 2014: The Midterm Results, the ACA and You

The Direct Selling Association (DSA) is the national trade association for companies that market products and services directly to consumers through

Washington Report. Michael Novogradac Novogradac & Company Shannon Ross Housing Partnership Network

Sample: Charlie Cook s Midterm Toolbox

Legislative Priorities for the 115th Congress National Association of Police Organizations

2018 MIDTERM ELECTION RECAP. Monday, January 28, :30am 10:30am Room: M107 Presenter: Andrew Newhart

SENATE APPOINTMENTS State Senator Time Building Room

2019 Washington Recap and Outlook

New Leadership Presidential Transition

NARFE-PAC Disbursements (Through September 30, 2017)

NRCAT Action Fund Senate Scorecard

A POST-ELECTION VIEW FROM WASHINGTON: IMPACT OF THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL AND CONGRESSIONAL CONTESTS

AGENTS OF CHANGE OR MORE OF THE SAME?

Next Generation NACo Network BYLAWS Adopted by NACo Board of Directors Revised February, 2017

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

NARFE-PAC Disbursements (Through December 31, 2017)

Political Parties and Congressional Leadership Fall 2016

U.S. Senate Support of MS Priorities Alphabetical by State

Senate Banking Committee Markup on Bipartisan Financial Regulatory Relief Bill

Governing Board Roster

2012 American Express Company PAC Contributions

Congressional Scorecard

U.S. Political Engagement: Policy, Oversight, and Disclosure. Updated September 2018

Now is the time to pay attention

2014 Mid-Term Elections: Impact on Health Care and Medical Groups. November 6, 2014

How the 2018 Midterm elections might affect your business October 29, :00-3:00pm ET

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

Voice of America s Private Schools.

Taxes, Healthcare, Spending and Earmarks: What to Expect From the New Congress Presented by:

AIEA Annual Conference Washington Update

AMERICA'S CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS * * * * * * *.. * ~ * * ESTABLISHED May 2, 2017

Facebook Inc., PAC ( )

The New Administration and the Future of Mortgage Lending

Historically, state PM&R societies have operated as independent organizations that advocate on legislative and regulatory proposals.

Election Cycle Disbursements As of July 31, 2018

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ASSOCIATES POLITICAL FUND 2015 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS (PAC) January 1 - June 30, 2015

Election Overview: Democrats take the House, Republicans Retain Control of the Senate

Washington, D.C. Update

RULE 2.4: LAWYER SERVING

RULE 1.1: COMPETENCE. As of January 23, American Bar Association CPR Policy Implementation Committee

Political Parties and Congressional Leadership /252 Fall 2012

2016 NATIONAL CONVENTION

Constitution in a Nutshell NAME. Per

RULE 1.14: CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY

Political Activity and Lobbying Report 2016

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

DC: I estimate a 4,600 valid sig petition drive for President in I budget $15,000 from the LNC.

2/11/2019. National Policy Overview. Disclosures & Objectives. Professional Disclosure. AANP wants NPs to succeed!

Senators of the 111th Congress

House Standing Committee Chairs and Ranking Minority Members: Rules Governing Selection Procedures

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

Inside Washington. Marco

24 th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference

Migrant and Seasonal Head Start. Guadalupe Cuesta Director, National Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Collaboration Office

Distribution & Home Health

Communities First REPORT ON ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP FROM CAUCUSES OF COLOR

2018 NATIONAL CONVENTION

October 3, United States Senate Washington, DC Dear Senator:

State and Local Immigration Laws: Recap of 2013 and Outlook for November 22, 2013

RULE 4.2: COMMUNICATION WITH PERSON REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL

2015 Vietnam Advocacy Day Schedule

PRINT'S VOICE '13 SCHEDULE OF CONGRESSIONAL OFFICE MEETINGS 05, 2013 TIME

Mandated Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PMPs) Map

Transcription:

Transparency in Policy Engagement and Political Participation 2017 Full Year Report Navient 123 Justison Street Wilmington, Delaware

Governance The company s Government Relations Department, under the direction of the senior vice president for public policy and government relations, is responsible for government relations policies and activities and manages all political activities conducted by or on behalf of Navient. The department reports annually to the Board of Directors Nominations and Governance Committee on political contribution matters and major lobbying priorities. Additionally, as required by its charter, the Nominations and Governance Committee is composed entirely of independent directors and receives periodic reports on political expenditures, payments made to trade associations, and contributions made to other taxexempt political organizations, as well as contributions by the company s Political Action Committee. The company maintains compliance processes intended to ensure that Navient and its employees conduct all its activities in accordance with our Code of Business Conduct and with all relevant laws governing political contributions and lobbying activities. Navient actively engages in the democratic process and plays an active role in forming policy to support the success of our customers, employees and shareholders. We are committed to fulfilling our role as an active corporate citizen with integrity and transparency. This full-year report covers activities from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. State and Federal Engagement Policy proposals, legislation, and regulation can have an impact on our customers, employees and shareholders. Federal, state, and local policy changes can significantly affect our operations, customer outcomes and service experience, revenues, and costs. Because of this impact, we have a responsibility to engage with policymakers to educate, provide factbased information, and to advance the success of our company and our stakeholders. We regularly share our expertise, express our views, and provide public officials with factual briefings to inform their decisions. We monitor legislative activities, analyze trends, and advance ideas to benefit our constituencies. Because of our 40-plusyear history in helping student loan borrowers navigate their way to financial success, we are frequently consulted by members of Congress, congressional and legislative staff, and other policymakers about the impact of federal and state proposals. 1

Federal Lobbying Meaningful engagement requires Navient to participate in the legislative process. The staff of Navient s Government Relations Department is registered to lobby and actively lobbies on issues that affect our customers and business. Only members of the Government Relations team are authorized to direct lobbying activities on behalf of Navient. Navient policy requires these professionals to work with counsel to assure that they conduct their activities in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations as well as maintain the highest standards of professional integrity. We disclose publicly all federal lobbying topics and expenditures on a quarterly basis, in accordance with the Lobbying Disclosure Act. Navient s quarterly filings are available at http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=selectfields. Navient s political expenditures reflect our interests as a company and are made without regard for the political preferences of any individual director, officer, or employee. Navient s disclosures provide all federal lobbying expenditures, including fees paid to outside consultants. In 2017, Navient engaged the services of Empire Consulting Group, The Kutler Group, Mercury Public Affairs, Nixon Peabody LLP (January 1, 2017, to March 31, 2017), Holland and Knight (April 1, 2017, onward) and Van Scoyoc Associates, who also file disclosures on their fees and activities on behalf of Navient. For all of 2017, Navient spent $2.3 million on federal lobbying expenditures, including fees paid to outside consultants. The chart below shows lobbying expenditures by quarter for the past eight years. 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Lobbying Expenditures by Quarter 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1st Q 2nd Q 3rd Q 4th Q 2

Among the topics we have advocated are: Better tools and information to help students and their families make informed borrowing decisions and help them successfully realize a return on their higher education investment Risk-based federal loan servicing and portfolio management approaches that help more borrowers avoid delinquency and default Ensuring that servicers have the necessary tools to contact borrowers and help them avoid default Streamlined repayment options to reduce complexity for borrowers and servicers and increase engagement Easier methods to enroll in and recertify federal income-driven repayment programs Programs that encourage borrowers to contact their student loan servicers More assistance to borrowers participating in the federal rehabilitation program to help them recover from default Improve federal budgeting to assure adequate funding for student loan delinquency and default prevention The establishment of a private loan rehabilitation program that creates a pathway for borrowers in default to get back on track and improve their credit A one-time credit bureau retraction for student loan borrowers who miss a payment while transitioning into repayment Require third party debt relief companies to prominently disclose the availability of such services from their loan servicer without cost Bankruptcy reform that allows federal and private student loans to be discharged after a good faith effort to repay Employer repayment assistance programs that allow pre-tax dollar benefits to be used for student loan repayment Issues relating to the collections industry and ensuring government debt collection programs employ industry best practices Political Contributions The company s policies ensure that, consistent with federal law, Navient may not contribute corporate funds or make in-kind contributions to candidates for federal office or to national party committees. Navient does not use corporate funds to make independent political expenditures. We have not spent any corporate funds on communications to the general public that expressly advocate the election or defeat of a federal candidate and we have no plans to spend direct corporate funds on such communications. State Contributions Navient made no contributions to state or local elected officials or candidates during 2017. 3

Trade Associations Navient participates in several trade associations that provide their members a variety of services including technical assistance, best practices, and that may also advocate on major public policy issues of importance to their members and the communities they serve. For most of these organizations, the primary purpose of Navient s membership is for professional development, technical assistance, and best industry practices. Our payments for membership dues come with the recognition that we may not always agree with all the positions of an organization or its individual members. On occasion, some of these organizations may undertake specific projects on behalf of their members for which additional fees and expense reimbursements may be paid in addition to membership fees disclosed below. Navient does not coordinate or earmark corporate funds toward election-related activity at the federal, state or local level, including contributions and expenditures in support of, or in opposition to, any candidate for any office, ballot initiative campaign, political party committee or PAC. Below is a list of the membership fees paid to the principal organizations 1 in which Navient renewed a membership or became a new member at any point during 2017 and which conduct some lobbying activity: Trade Association 2017 Membership and other Fees ACA International $12,268 Coalition of Higher Education Assistance Organizations $3,000 International Bridge, Tunnel, and Turnpike Association $17,000 National Association of College and University Business Officers $5,093 Structured Finance Industry Group $36,000 Student Loan Servicing Alliance $6,700 527 Political Organizations Navient does not provide funding to groups organized under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code except for those listed below. We maintain our memberships in these groups to support our operations in 1 We define principal organizations to include those trade associations that participated in lobbing activity and in which the company maintained a corporate membership and where our annual expenditures exceeded $1,000. We do not consider a trade association to be a principal organization if our employees are members to satisfy professional licensing requirements. In addition to the national organizations listed in the table, Navient is a member of state and local chambers of commerce where we have a significant employee presence. 4

the states in which our employees work and live. Our contributions to these groups are membership dues and are not earmarked to support the election of any specific candidate nor for funding specific expenditures or communications. In addition, we do not consult with these groups regarding the expenditure of their funds. Below is the list of four 527 groups that Navient contributed to in 2017. 2017 Organization Contribution Republican Governors Association $22,500 Democratic Governors Association $10,000 Republican State Leadership Committee $12,000 Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee $12,000 Political Action Committee The Navient Political Action Committee is funded solely through voluntary contributions from eligible employees. The PAC supports candidates, parties, and committees on a bipartisan basis whose views on specific issues are consistent with the company s priorities. The PAC does not contribute in connection with U.S. presidential elections. Navient s corporate policy requires that contributions from Navient s PAC promote company interests without regard for the private political preferences of executives. The Navient PAC is governed by a board comprised of senior leaders from several corporate functional and geographic areas as well as business units. The PAC Board annually reviews and approves a giving framework. The board is chaired by the senior vice president for public policy and government relations. In deciding who to support, PAC leadership considers candidates who represent the communities we serve, underserved communities, those who serve on relevant committees or in leadership, and those who have shown support for policies and initiatives of importance to the company, its customers, and shareholders. Contributions from Navient s PAC, as required by law, are reported in filings with the Federal Election Commission and are made publicly available. 5

Navient 2017 Political Contribution Snapshot January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 Navient PAC Contributions to U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House Candidate State District 2017 Contribution Rep. Alma Adams (D) NC Congressional District 12 $1,000 Rep. Louis J. Barletta (R) PA Congressional District 11 $2,000 Rep. Karen Bass (D) CA Congressional District 37 $1,000 Rep. Sanford Bishop (D) GA Congressional District 02 $1,000 Rep. Diane Lynn Black (R) TN Congressional District 06 $1,000 Rep. Susan W. Brooks (R) IN Congressional District 05 $1,000 Rep. George Kenneth Butterfield, Jr. (D) NC Congressional District 01 $1,000 Rep. Bradley Byrne (R) AL Congressional District 01 $1,000 Rep. Yvette Clarke (D) NY Congressional District 09 $1,000 Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, II (D) MO Congressional District 05 $1,000 Rep. James M. Costa (D) CA Congressional District 16 $1,000 Rep. Joseph Crowley (D) NY Congressional District 14 $1,000 Rep. Rodney Davis (R) IL Congressional District 13 $1,000 Rep. Debbie Dingell (D) MI Congressional District 12 $1,000 Rep. Sean Duffy (R) WI Congressional District 07 $1,000 Rep. Thomas Earl Emmer, Jr. (R) MN Congressional District 06 $2,500 Rep. Ron Estes (R) KS Congressional District 04 $1,000 Rep. Virginia Ann Foxx (R) NC Congressional District 05 $4,000 Rep. Marcia Louise Fudge (D) OH Congressional District 11 $1,000 Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D) CA Congressional District 34 $1,000 Rep. S. Brett Guthrie (R) KY Congressional District 02 $2,500 Rep. Karen Handel, (R) GA Congressional District 06 $1,000 Rep. Alcee Lamar Hastings (D) FL Congressional District 20 $2,500 Rep. James Andrew Himes (D) CT Congressional District 04 $1,000 Rep. Bill Huizenga (R) MI Congressional District 02 $1,000 Rep. Hakeem S. Jeffries (D) NY Congressional District 08 $1,500 Rep. Bill Johnson (R) OH Congressional District 06 $1,000 Rep. Ann McLane Kuster (D) NH Congressional District 02 $1,000 Rep. William Lacy Clay (D) MO Congressional District 01 $500 Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D) TX Congressional District 18 $500 Rep. Jason Mark Lewis (R) MN Congressional District 02 $1,000 Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R) MO Congressional District 03 $2,000 Rep. Ben Lujan (D) NM Congressional District 03 $1,000 Rep. Thomas MacArthur (R) NJ Congressional District 03 $3,000 6

Navient PAC Contributions to U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House Candidate State District 2017 Contribution Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R) CA Congressional District 23 $1,000 Rep. Donald McEachin (D) VA Congressional District 04 $1,000 Rep. Patrick McHenry (R) NC Congressional District 10 $3,000 Rep. Gregory Weldon Meeks (D) NY Congressional District 05 $1,000 Rep. Patrick L. Meehan (R) PA Congressional District 07 $500 Rep. Allan Lucas Messer (R) IN Congressional District 06 $5,000 Rep. Paul Mitchell, III (R) MI Congressional District 10 $2,000 Rep. Gwendolynne Sophia Moore (D) WI Congressional District 04 $2,000 Rep. Stacey Elizabeth Plaskett (D) VI Congressional District 01 $2,000 Rep. Bruce Lee Poliquin (R) ME Congressional District 02 $2,000 Rep. Cedric Richmond (D) LA Congressional District 02 $2,500 Rep. Thomas W. Reed, II. (R) NY Congressional District 23 $1,000 Rep. Paul Davis Ryan, Jr. (R) WI Congressional District 01 $5,000 Rep. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D) DE Congressional District 01 $2,000 Rep. Theodore Edward Rokita (R) IN Congressional District 04 $5,000 Rep. Linda Sanchez (D) CA Congressional District 38 $1,000 Rep. Stephen Joseph Scalise (R) LA Congressional District 01 $5,000 Rep. Terri Sewell (D) AL Congressional District 07 $1,000 Rep. Kyrsten Sinema (D) AZ Congressional District 09 $3,500 Rep. Elise M. Stefanik (R) NY Congressional District 21 $1,000 Rep. Marc Veasey (R) TX Congressional District 33 $2,500 Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D) NY Congressional District 07 $2,000 Rep. Gregory Paul Walden (R) OR Congressional District 02 $2,500 Rep. Jackie Walorski (R ) IN Congressional District 02 $1,000 7

Navient PAC Contributions to U.S. Senate U.S. Senate Candidate State District 2017 Contribution Sen. Lamar Alexander (R) TN United States Senate $4,000 Sen. Cory Anthony Booker (D) NJ United States Senate $1,500 Sen. Robert P. Casey, Jr (D) PA United States Senate $1,500 Sen. Christopher Andrew Coons (D) DE United States Senate $500 Sen. Bob P. Corker, Jr. (R) TN United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Joseph Simon Donnelly, Sr. (D) IN United States Senate $2,500 Sen. Deb Fischer (R) NE United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Charles Grassley (R) IA United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Martin Heinrich (D) NM United States Senate $3,000 Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D) ND United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Mazie Hirono (D) HI United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Tim Kaine (D) VA United States Senate $2,000 Sen. Angus King (D) ME United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D) MN United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Joseph Manchin, III (D) WV United States Senate $1,000 Sen. David Perdue (R) GA United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Gary Charles Peters (D) MI United States Senate $2,000 Sen. Ben Sasse (R) NE United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Timothy Eugene Scott (R) SC United States Senate $3,000 Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D) NH United States Senate $500 Sen. Jon Tester (D) MT United States Senate $2,000 Sen. Thom Tillis (R) NC United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Patrick Joseph Toomey (R) PA United States Senate $1,000 Sen. Tom Stewart Udall (D) NM United States Senate $500 Sen. Todd Young (R) IN United States Senate $1,000 8

Navient PAC Contributions to Leadership Committees Leadership PAC Sponsor 2017 Contribution A New Direction PAC Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D) $500 Build our Future PAC Rep. Francis Rooney (R) $1,000 Building Relationships in Diverse Geographic Rep. James E. Clyburn (D) $5,000 Environments PAC Citizens for Prosperity in America Today PAC Sen. Patrick Joseph Toomey (R) $3,500 Fearless for the People Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D) $5,000 Hawaii PAC Rep. Brian Schatz (D) $1,000 Heartlands Value PAC Sen. John Thune (R) $1,000 IMPACT Sen. Charles Schumer (D) $5,000 Keystone America PAC Rep. Robert P. Casey Jr. (D) $1,000 Making Business Excel PAC Sen. Michael Enzi (R) $1,000 Oorah! PAC Sen. Todd Young (R) $3,500 Prosperity Action Inc. Rep. Paul Davis Ryan Jr. (R) $5,000 Southwest Leadership Fund Sen. Tom Udall (D) $500 Supporting US of America's Next Leaders Rep. Susan Brooks (R) $1,500 The Eye of the Tiger PAC Rep. Steve Scalise (R) $1,000 Tomorrow is Meaningful PAC Sen. Tim Scott (R) $1,000 Victory and Freedom PAC Rep. Virginia Foxx (R) $1,000 Navient PAC Contributions to Congressional Caucus and Party Party/Caucus 2017 Contribution Congressional Black Caucus PAC (D) $5,000 CHC BOLD PAC $5,000 DSCC (D) $15,000 NRCC (R) $15,000 NRSC (R) $15,000 Other Political Activity Navient does not engage in, and expends no resources in support of, groups organized under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. 9

Navient does not engage in and expends no resources for grassroots lobbying communications, defined as any communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on legislation or regulation, and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. Navient does not engage in influencing and expends no resources to influence the outcome of ballot measures. Other than as disclosed above, Navient does not belong to any other tax-exempt organizations whose purpose it is to influence federal or state policy, including organizations that write and endorse model legislation. Employee Engagement Navient encourages employees to participate in political and civic activities of their choosing. Our employees have the right to participate in the political process by making personal contributions from personal funds, subject to applicable legal limits. In accordance with our Code of Business Conduct, employees may not be reimbursed or otherwise compensated by Navient for any such contributions, and political activity must take place on personal rather than company time. The Code of Business Conduct requires employee interactions with government officials maintain the highest standards of ethical behavior. To learn more, visit Navient.com. Facts sheets and FAQs Navient.com/facts Corporate governance Navient.com/investors 10