United States Department of the Treasury. Office of Foreign Assets Control Office of Global Targeting The Petition/Removal Process

Similar documents
SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control

What do the prohibitions in E.O. of August 24, 2017 mean? Are they blocking actions?

Federal Information Technology Supply Chain Risk Management Improvement Act of 2018 A BILL

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 123 Filed 11/15/13 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 2969

FLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL

ACUPUNCTURE LICENSURE RULES AND REGULATIONS

Returning Forfeited Assets to Crime Victims: An Overview ofremission and Restoration

CHAPTER 7. BOARD OF APPEALS

Libya Sanctions FAQ 25 January 2012

Vanderbilt Export Compliance Education Basic Principles of Export Control

Office of the Ombudsman 2016 Annual Report

3 rd Annual Gulf Coast AML Forum Tuesday, September 10, 2013 COLA CAN BE CLEAR

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 2, 2015 EXECUTIVE ORDER

PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

DEALING WITH VIOLATIONS IN EXPORT AND IMPORT TRANSACTIONS

AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION FEE ARBITRATION PETITION

Criminal Forfeiture Act

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release April 23, 2012 EXECUTIVE ORDER

Criminal Background Checks

Rules of Practice in Proceedings under Section 5 of the Debt Collection Act

Cuba Sanctions: Legislative Restrictions Limiting the Normalization of Relations

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93, 97 & 98)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER NINE APPELLATE DIVISION RULES...201

COCHRANE AND AREA HUMANE SOCIETY 2018 AGM Special Resolution BYLAWS

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. January 11, 2008 ROBERT D. H. FLOYD

The New Post-AIA World

The Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada

NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL

Board of Certification, Inc. Version Effective September 1, 2016 Updated May 2016

Case 1:09-cv FM Document 26 Filed 10/13/10 Page 2 of 17 I. Background The relevant facts are undisputed. (See ECF No. 22 ( Times Reply Mem. ) at

America Invents Act Implementing Rules. September 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1267 Committee: Al-Qaida/Taliban Sanctions

UNIFIED FAMILY COURT POLICIES & PROCEDURES HONORABLE SCOTT CUPP ( 5, 2018 NOTICE OF RELATED CASES IN UNIFIED FAMILY COURT

COMMENTS OFAC, THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, AND THE TERRORIST DESIGNATION PROCESS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF AGENCY DISCRETION LOUISA C.

Court Rules for Restraining Orders. Chapter 10. Table of Contents. Section 1. Title Section 2. Purpose Section 3. Definitions...

NACC Standards for Child Welfare Law Attorney Specialty Certification California Specific

SECURITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION 1970 (2011) CONCERNING LIBYA

SENATE BILL No. 808 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 24, Introduced by Senator Mendoza. February 17, 2017

CONTRACT CONSIDERATIONS WHEN DEALING WITH FOREIGN ENTITIES PRESENTED TO ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL. Presenters. Christy L.

The New York Intellectual Property Law Association. SAS Implications and Guidance

DEALING WITH VIOLATIONS IN EXPORT AND IMPORT TRANSACTIONS

Financial Integrity Network Policy Alert United States Issues First Global Magnitsky Sanctions January 4, 2018

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. September 28, 2001 SUBJECT. Blocking of Funds of Terrorists and Their Associates DETAILS ATTACHMENT MORE INFORMATION

Post-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO

U.S. Department of Justice

RESOLUTION AMENDING AND ADOPTING RULES FOR THE TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS

Part 44 Alberta Divorce Rules

Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals 800 K Street, NW, Suite 400-N Washington, DC (202) (202) (FAX)

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION DHS INTERIM EAD LAWSUIT. Frequently Asked Questions about Participating in this Lawsuit

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY WASHINGTON, D.C ORDER RELATING TO GLS SOLUTIONS. INC.

SUBCHAPTER 24F BOARD OF REVIEW SECTION.0100 GENERAL SUBCHAPTER 24F BOARD OF REVIEW SECTION.0100 GENERAL

Office of the Ombudsman Annual Report

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Adopted by the Security Council at its 4531st meeting, on 14 May 2002

IBADCC Ethics Disciplinary Procedures

8 USCA 1189 Page 1 8 U.S.C.A. 1189

United States citizen whom the government is attempting to kill without any legal

Appellate Practice: The Clerk s Perspective An unweighted top ten

GE Nuclear Energy, Inc Castle Hayne Rd. Wilmington, NC Attention: Dear Mr. White:

THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

CHAPTER 53 UNIFORM ADULT GUARDIANSHIP JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Archbishop O Leary Parent Advisory Association # Society Bylaws

FEE ARBITRATION PROGRAM

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

All mandatory traffic, non criminal citations, etc., shall be set on the first Wednesday of the month.

Participation of attorneys in resolution meetings when the parent is not accompanied by an attorney

Rules of Practice for Protests and Appeals Regarding Eligibility for Inclusion in the U.S.

Chapter X HEARINGS: MEDICAL QUALITY HEARING PANEL

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed

Berry Chamber of Commerce and Tourism Inc. Constitution

Update on Embargoes and Sanctions. Larry Hanson Angela Chamberlain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE CONCILIATIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Paper Entered: September 18, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals

U.S. TRADEMARK PRACTICE. FICPI 12 th Open Forum September 10, 2010 Munich, Germany Gary D. Krugman, Sughrue Mion, PLLC Washington, DC

DIVISION E--INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT REFORM

How our courts decide: The decision-making processes of Supreme Administrative Courts

Self-Help Legal Information Packet: When a Small Claims Case Has Been Filed Against You

Agency Information Collection Activities; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection:

UNIFORM APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

A Bill To ensure and certify that companies operating in the United States that receive U.S. government funds are not conducting business in Iran.

NAFSA/Department of State Liaison Call. September 21, 2011

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE GENERAL JURISDICTION ACCRA AD 2017

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 5, 2006 Session

INFORMATION ON FILING A PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

PLACER COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION

United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals

The opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ANNEX D. Classified Information Procedures Act: Statute, Procedures, and Comparison with M.R.E. 505

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

How to File a Canada Pension Plan Appeal (General Division)

DTCC Data Repository (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 14 Article 53B 1

MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT COLLECT A MONEY JUDGMENT

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER ON HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND OTHER HEARING MATTERS Policy & Procedure 921

Transcription:

United States Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control Office of Global Targeting The Petition/Removal Process November 1, 2017

Petitioning OFAC for Removal Know the facts of the case and of the Executive Order or statute Know the correspondence timeline -- 90 days to respond to a request from OFAC

Removals from SDN list In a typical year, OFAC removes several hundred individuals and entities from the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). Each removal is based on a thorough review by OFAC that evaluates every request for removal individually on its merits.

New Petitions FAQs Page In 2017, OFAC added a Frequently Asked Questions Page to our website.

New Petitions FAQs Page Do I need to hire an attorney in order to file a petition for removal? No. OFAC accepts petitions directly from listed persons or from their representatives.

Removals from SDN list The removal of a person from a sanctions list based a change represents a successful use of sanctions. The integrity of U.S. sanctions depends on a rigorous and consistent process to evaluate petition requests.

License for Representing SDN s With a Delisting Request In almost all of its sanctions programs, OFAC has issued general licenses (GLs) authorizing the provision of certain legal services to SDNs, including representation of SDNs in connection with delisting requests.

License for Payment by SDN Receipt of payment for legal services from sources outside of the United States is authorized by GL in many programs, and is routinely authorized by specific license in others. See e.g. 594.517 (general license), 598.507 (specific license). Even if the person making the payment to the lawyer is not the SDN (such as a friend, family member or other interested party), the lawyer must still be licensed by OFAC to receive payment for acting on behalf of the SDN because the SDN has an interest in the services that the lawyer is providing. Check the program specific regulations for details concerning what kinds of payments are acceptable.

Who has standing to apply? 501.807 Procedures governing delisting from the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. A person may seek administrative reconsideration of his, her or its designation or that of a vessel as blocked, or assert that the circumstances resulting in the designation no longer apply, and thus seek to have the designation rescinded. OFAC accepts delisting petitions from SDNs and their legal representatives. A third party, such as a foreign government, may not generally apply on behalf of an SDN.

Basis for Removal A petitioner may submit arguments or evidence that they believe establishes that an insufficient basis exists for the listing or that the circumstances resulting in the listing have changed pursuant to 31 C.F.R. 501.807 Procedures governing delisting from the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. Examples: Positive change in behavior Insufficient basis for designation Basis for the designation no longer exists

How Long Does the Petitions Process Take? It Depends Every petition seeking reconsideration is unique Petitioners must demonstrate either an insufficient basis for the listing action or that the circumstances resulting in the listing no longer apply, as set forth in our regulations (31 C.F.R. 501.807) If needed, OFAC endeavors to send a questionnaire within 90 days from the date the petition is received by OFAC The entire process can be quite lengthy You may email OFAC.Reconsideration@treasury.gov for an update at anytime

Reinvestigating Facts of the Case Sources of Information May Include: US and foreign law enforcement reports Intelligence Reports Statements/interviews Corporate records (Chamber of Commerce, etc.) Indictments or court transcripts (foreign or domestic) Interagency reports Information provided by petitioner or other petitioners (in writing or interview)

If Petition for Removal is Denied, Can I Reapply? Yes. A petitioner may reapply using the same process. If a petitioner reapplies without presenting new evidence or arguments, including but not limited to showing that the circumstances have changed since the previous denial, OFAC will summarily deny the application.

Judicial Review of Classified Evidence? When classified information needs to be submitted to a reviewing court it is done ex parte and in camera. The basis for this submission is IEEPA, the authority for the majority of OFAC s sanctions programs, which explicitly provides for the in camera ex parte review of classified evidence by the court.

Questions? 15