* IN THE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AFFIDAVIT OF N. TUCKER MENEELY

Similar documents
SHERRY BELLAMY, et al. * IN THE

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

2. Defendant is the record owner of certain property consisting of the north half of Lot K and Lot I in Block 58 as shown on the Subdivision Plat.

SHERRY BELLAMY, et al. * IN THE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Remote Video Depositions Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Do Illinois rules expressly permit video recording of depositions, in lieu of stenography?

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/28/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/28/2012

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

PART 24. MANDATORY ARBITRATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL

TOM GREEN COUNTY BAIL BOND CORPORATE SURETY LICENSE APPLICATION

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA

The 30.02(6), or 30(b)(6), Witness: Proper Notice, Preparation, and Deposition Techniques

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITIONS AND DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS' MATERIAL S

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

(e) Appearance of Attorney. An attorney may appear in a proceeding in any of the following ways:

Information or instructions: Motion Order Affidavit for substituted service package PREVIEW

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: OCEAN COUNTY

Case 1:15-cv LM Document 8 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

MARITIME ARBITRATION RULES SOCIETY OF MARITIME ARBITRATORS, INC.

SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NO RIGHTHAVEN LLC, Appellant. WAYNE HOEHN, Appellee

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

HANDBOOK FOR MARYLAND NOTARIES PUBLIC

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:18-cv CG-B Document 18 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 3

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 461 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :59 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Information or instructions: Plea in abatement motion & Order to quash service Alternate Form

FROM THE KORTE WARTMAN LAW FIRM. Page: 1 IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA (AW)

Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1361

herein, counsel will move this Court before the Honorable Denny Chin, United States District

Filing # E-Filed 03/06/ :49:13 PM

Upon reading and filing the annexed affidavit of plaintiff,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2010 INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2010

***FOR BACKGROUND CHECK ONLY***

Plaintiffs * CIRCUIT COURT

TITLE XIV TRIALS (6/30/03) 84. The amendment is effective as of June 30, 2003.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :26 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016

DEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER

Chicago False Claims Act

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

- against - NOTICE OF MOTION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION FAMILY DIVISION PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF A CUSTODY ORDER

Case bjh Doc 69 Filed 04/29/16 Entered 04/29/16 19:18:10 Page 1 of 10

Information & Instructions: Motion to dissolve writ of garnishment. 1. A Motion to dissolve a Writ of Garnishment should set forth the following:

Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/18/14 Page 1 of 10

NOTICE, CLAIM AND SUMMONS TO APPEAR FOR TRIAL (Part 1)

AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)

scc Doc 928 Filed 03/12/12 Entered 03/12/12 18:37:05 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2016

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

NOMINATING PETITION FOR PRIMARY CANDIDATES

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by Respondent and the Committee that

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv CDJ Document 12 Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

EXEMPT (Reprinted with amendments adopted on June 5, 2017) FOURTH REPRINT A.B Referred to Committee on Judiciary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

BOTH SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims

Depositions upon oral examination. A. When depositions may be taken. After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2016

Ecclesiastical Court of the Missionary Diocese of CANA East Rules of Procedure

INSTRUCTIONS / GUIDELINES PRIMARY PETITION ENDORSING CANDIDATE FOR MUNICIPAL OFFICE

Transcription:

ROSALYNNE R. ATTERBEARY REVOCABLE TRUST, et al. v. Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL ON THE BAY, INC., et al. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT * FOR * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY * Case No: C-02-CV-15-003736 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AFFIDAVIT OF N. TUCKER MENEELY I,, being over the age of 18 years and competent to testify to the facts set forth herein, which are within my personal knowledge, hereby state as follows: 1. I am an associate of the law firm Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A. and am co-counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Property Owners Association of Arundel on the Bay, Inc. (the Association ). 2. On or about December 1, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint in the above-captioned matter. Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on that Complaint on January 26, 2016. In response to Plaintiffs Complaint, the Association filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 1, 2016, seeking dismissal for the Plaintiffs failure to join necessary parties, including all property owners in Arundel on the Bay and their mortgagees, and Anne Arundel County. Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on June 27, 2016 in response, and the Association renewed it Motion to Dismiss on July 12, 2016. This Court held a hearing on the Association s Motion to Dismiss on August 22, 2016, and held the matter sub curia.

3. During this time, the parties engaged in discovery. In addition to written discovery, the Association noted and scheduled the depositions of Plaintiffs and their respective agents. See Deposition Notices and Discovery Certificate, attached hereto collectively as Exhibit 1. The depositions were scheduled for early October, prior to the discovery deadline in this case. Id. Communicating regarding the pending motions, counsel for the Association made the reasonable request that the Association have the ability to depose Plaintiffs in order to respond to Plaintiffs then-pending motion for summary judgment. 4. Counsel for Plaintiffs requested the Association s consent to a motion to extend the discovery deadline until at least 45 days after a ruling on the Association s then-pending motion to dismiss. See Eileen Powers Email dated September 19, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Plaintiff s counsel also indicated a wish to avoid the time and expense of taking depositions if a motion extending discovery could be granted, presumably because the Court was considering a motion to dismiss the case at that time. Id. Plaintiffs counsel stated as follows: Id. I understand you want my clients depositions in order to respond to our motion for summary judgment. I explained that I intend to amend the motion as soon as we get a ruling on your motion, provided we go forward with the case. You want additional time to respond to our summary judgment motion in order to get the depositions done. I have no objection to that request, if you can let me know how much time you need. 5. Accordingly, the Association consented to a Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, which sought to extend discovery by 60 days after the Court ruled on the Association s Motion to Dismiss. The Association s consent was based in part on the fact that depositions had been noted, such that the Association would have the benefit of those depositions in responding to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment in the event that the Court denied the Association s Motion to 2

Dismiss, or if the Plaintiffs filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment as indicated by Plaintiffs Counsel. 6. Prior to the depositions taking place, however, this Court entered an Order staying its ruling on Plaintiffs Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order until after the Court ruled on the Association s Motion to Dismiss, during which time discovery would also be stayed. See September 23, 2016 Order (entered 9/28/16). As a result, the Association was unable to conduct the noted depositions. This Court did not enter a ruling on the Association s Motion to Dismiss until after the discovery deadline in this case had passed. A final ruling on the Association s Motion to Dismiss was not entered until February 8, 2017. 7. On January 13, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint, adding all lot owners of Arundel on the Bay as Defendants. Plaintiffs did not and have not renewed or otherwise filed an amended Motion for Summary Judgment, which is now moot. 8. On March 1, 2017, the Association filed a Seven-Count Counterclaim against Plaintiffs. The Counterclaim and the allegations therein, which also serve as the Association s defenses to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, assert claims for quiet title and for declaratory relief based. On March 31, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, asserting that the Association s Counterclaim was barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. 9. The Association s claims and defenses in this case necessarily involve a specific factual inquiry into the conduct of Plaintiffs and/or their predecessors in title. Accordingly, depositions of Plaintiffs and their agents (which were previously noted but cancelled due to this Court s Order staying discovery) are absolutely necessary. The Association diligently engaged in discovery and, in fact, scheduled and noted the depositions of Plaintiffs and their agents. The 3

inability of the Association to conduct said depositions is not due to any delay or inaction by the parties, but rather, this Court s order staying discovery, which was reasonable in light of a pending motion to dismiss at the time. 10. Because the Court has not ruled on the Consent Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Status and Scheduling Conference. The Association generally agrees with Plaintiffs Motion and will be filing a response shortly. 11. Given the stay of discovery and the discovery deadline passing during the Court s consideration of the Association s Motion to Dismiss, the Association has not had the benefit of full discovery in this case. The Association submits that the Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, sets forth arguments and supporting papers that warrant this Court denying Plaintiffs Motion. Nevertheless, all facts essential to justify the Association s Opposition cannot be set forth without the previously-noted depositions of Plaintiffs and their agents. Exhibit 1. I solemnly affirm under the penalties of perjury and upon personal knowledge that the contents of the foregoing paper are true. 4

THE REVOCABLE TRUST OF * IN THE ROSALYNNE R. ATTERBEARY, et al. * CIRCUIT COURT Plaintiffs * FOR v. * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL-ON-THE-BAY, INC. * Case No.: C-02-CV-15-003736 Defendant * DISCOVERY CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY that I served the following discovery materials in these proceedings as indicated and that I will retain the original of this document in my possession, without alteration, until the case is concluded in this Court, the time for noting any appeal has expired, and any appeal noted has been decided: Date of Service: September 13, 2016 Method of Service: MDEC Materials Served: 1. Defendant s Notice of Deposition of Rosalynne R. Atterbeary, Trustee Rosalynne R. Atterbeary Revocable Trust 2. Defendant s Notice of Deposition of Clyde T. Coble, Trustee Wilma L. Coble Qualified Personal Residence Trust 3. Defendant s Subpoena and Notice of Deposition of Wilma Coble 4. Defendant s Subpoena and Notice of Deposition of Knowlton R. Atterbeary Person(s) Served: See Certificate of Service Respectfully submitted, COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, P.A. By: /s/. Wayne T. Kosmerl Steven A. Brown Annapolis, MD 21401 (410) 268-6600 (410) 269-8409 fax Kosmerl@CouncilBaradel.com Meneely@CouncilBaradel.com Brown@CouncilBaredel.com Attorneys for Defendant

RULE 20-201(F)(1) CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing submission does not contain any restricted information. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE /s/. I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 13 th day of September, 2016, a copy of the foregoing paper was served upon all parties registered to receive service via MDEC and/or via first class mail upon the following: Eileen E. Powers, Esq. Barbara J. Palmer, Esq. Blumenthal, Delavan & Williams, P.A. 170 Jennifer Road, Suite 240 epowers@bdpplaw.com bpalmer@bdpplaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/. 2

THE REVOCABLE TRUST OF * IN THE ROSALYNNE R. ATTERBEARY, et al. * CIRCUIT COURT Plaintiffs * FOR v. * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL-ON-THE-BAY, INC. * Case No.: C-02-CV-15-003736 Defendant * DISCOVERY CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY that I served the following discovery materials in these proceedings as indicated and that I will retain the original of this document in my possession, without alteration, until the case is concluded in this Court, the time for noting any appeal has expired, and any appeal noted has been decided: Date of Service: September 13, 2016 Method of Service: MDEC Materials Served: 1. Defendant s Amended Subpoena and Amended Notice of Deposition of Wilma Coble Person(s) Served: See Certificate of Service Respectfully submitted, COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, P.A. By: /s/. Wayne T. Kosmerl Steven A. Brown Annapolis, MD 21401 (410) 268-6600 (410) 269-8409 fax Kosmerl@CouncilBaradel.com Meneely@CouncilBaradel.com Brown@CouncilBaredel.com Attorneys for Defendant

RULE 20-201(F)(1) CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing submission does not contain any restricted information. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE /s/. I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 21 st day of September, 2016, a copy of the foregoing paper was served upon all parties registered to receive service via MDEC and/or via first class mail upon the following: Eileen E. Powers, Esq. Barbara J. Palmer, Esq. Blumenthal, Delavan & Williams, P.A. 170 Jennifer Road, Suite 240 epowers@bdpplaw.com bpalmer@bdpplaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/. 2

ROSALYNNE R. ATTERBEARY REVOCABLE TRUST, et al. v. Plaintiffs, PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL ON THE BAY, INC. Defendant. * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT * FOR * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY * Case No: C-02-CV-15-003736 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF DEPOSITION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, Property Owners Association of Arundel on the Bay, Inc., pursuant to Rule 2-412, will take the oral deposition, for the purpose of discovery or use at trial, of the following individual before a certified court reporter, notary public, or some other individual authorized by law to administer oaths, the deposition to continue from day to day until complete. This deposition will be recorded by electronic audio or audio-video means in addition to stenographic recording, and any recording of the deposition by electronic audio-video means may be used during trial pursuant to Rule 2-416 and Rule 2-419. Name: Address: Wilma Coble c/o Eileen E. Powers, Esq. Barbara J. Palmer, Esq. Blumenthal, Delavan & Williams, P.A. 170 Jennifer Road, Suite 240 Date: October 5, 2016 Time: Place: 1:00 pm Law Offices of Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A. The deponent is hereby notified to personally appear and attend at the time and place specified

for the purposes of having his deposition taken in accordance with the foregoing Notice. A copy of the Subpoena for Deposition is attached hereto. Respectfully submitted, COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, P.A. By: /s/. Wayne T. Kosmerl Steven A. Brown Annapolis, MD 21401 (410) 268-6600 (410) 269-8409 fax Kosmerl@CouncilBaradel.com Meneely@CouncilBaradel.com Brown@CouncilBaredel.com Attorneys for Defendant 2

ROSALYNNE R. ATTERBEARY REVOCABLE TRUST, et al. v. Plaintiffs, PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL ON THE BAY, INC. Defendant. * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT * FOR * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY * Case No: C-02-CV-15-003736 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF DEPOSITION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, Property Owners Association of Arundel on the Bay, Inc., pursuant to Rule 2-412, will take the oral deposition, for the purpose of discovery or use at trial, of the following individual before a certified court reporter, notary public, or some other individual authorized by law to administer oaths, the deposition to continue from day to day until complete. This deposition will be recorded by electronic audio or audio-video means in addition to stenographic recording, and any recording of the deposition by electronic audio-video means may be used during trial pursuant to Rule 2-416 and Rule 2-419. Name: Address: Clyde T. Coble, Trustee Wilma L. Coble Qualified Personal Residence Trust c/o Eileen E. Powers, Esq. Barbara J. Palmer, Esq. Blumenthal, Delavan & Williams, P.A. 170 Jennifer Road, Suite 240 Date: October 5, 2016 Time: Place: 9:00 am Law Offices of Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A. The deponent is hereby notified to personally appear and attend at the time and place specified

for the purposes of having his deposition taken in accordance with the foregoing Notice. Respectfully submitted, COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, P.A. By: /s/ Wayne T. Kosmerl. Wayne T. Kosmerl Steven A. Brown Annapolis, MD 21401 (410) 268-6600 (410) 269-8409 fax Kosmerl@CouncilBaradel.com Meneely@CouncilBaradel.com Brown@CouncilBaredel.com Attorneys for Defendant 2

ROSALYNNE R. ATTERBEARY REVOCABLE TRUST, et al. v. Plaintiffs, PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL ON THE BAY, INC. Defendant. * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT * FOR * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY * Case No: C-02-CV-15-003736 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF DEPOSITION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, Property Owners Association of Arundel on the Bay, Inc., pursuant to Rule 2-412, will take the oral deposition, for the purpose of discovery or use at trial, of the following individual before a certified court reporter, notary public, or some other individual authorized by law to administer oaths, the deposition to continue from day to day until complete. This deposition will be recorded by electronic audio or audio-video means in addition to stenographic recording, and any recording of the deposition by electronic audio-video means may be used during trial pursuant to Rule 2-416 and Rule 2-419. Name: Address: Knowlton R. Atterbeary, Jr. c/o Eileen E. Powers, Esq. Barbara J. Palmer, Esq. Blumenthal, Delavan & Williams, P.A. 170 Jennifer Road, Suite 240 Date: October 4, 2016 Time: Place: 1:00 pm Law Offices of Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A. The deponent is hereby notified to personally appear and attend at the time and place specified

for the purposes of having his deposition taken in accordance with the foregoing Notice. A copy of the Subpoena for Deposition is attached hereto. Respectfully submitted, COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, P.A. By: /s/ Wayne T. Kosmerl. Wayne T. Kosmerl Steven A. Brown Annapolis, MD 21401 (410) 268-6600 (410) 269-8409 fax Kosmerl@CouncilBaradel.com Meneely@CouncilBaradel.com Brown@CouncilBaredel.com Attorneys for Defendant

ROSALYNNE R. ATTERBEARY REVOCABLE TRUST, et al. v. Plaintiffs, PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL ON THE BAY, INC. Defendant. * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT * FOR * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY * Case No: C-02-CV-15-003736 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF DEPOSITION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, Property Owners Association of Arundel on the Bay, Inc., pursuant to Rule 2-412, will take the oral deposition, for the purpose of discovery or use at trial, of the following individual before a certified court reporter, notary public, or some other individual authorized by law to administer oaths, the deposition to continue from day to day until complete. This deposition will be recorded by electronic audio or audio-video means in addition to stenographic recording, and any recording of the deposition by electronic audio-video means may be used during trial pursuant to Rule 2-416 and Rule 2-419. Name: Address: Rosalynne R. Atterbeary, Trustee Rosalynne R. Atterbeary Revocable Trust c/o Eileen E. Powers, Esq. Barbara J. Palmer, Esq. Blumenthal, Delavan & Williams, P.A. 170 Jennifer Road, Suite 240 Date: October 4, 2016 Time: Place: 9:00 am Law Offices of Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A. The deponent is hereby notified to personally appear and attend at the time and place specified

for the purposes of having his deposition taken in accordance with the foregoing Notice. Respectfully submitted, COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, P.A. By: /s/. Wayne T. Kosmerl Steven A. Brown Annapolis, MD 21401 (410) 268-6600 (410) 269-8409 fax Kosmerl@CouncilBaradel.com Meneely@CouncilBaradel.com Brown@CouncilBaredel.com Attorneys for Defendant 2

EXHIBIT 2