Environmental Due Diligence: Why Should You Care About Environmental Contamination & Due Diligence?

Similar documents
ALI-ABA Course of Study Environmental Litigation

Notwithstanding a pair of recent

Chapter VIII SUPERFUND LAWS. In the aftermath of Love Canal and other revelations of the improper disposal of

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND REGION 6 OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Citizens Suit Remedies Can Expand Contaminated Site

TITLE 58. WATERS AND WATER SUPPLY CHAPTER 10B. HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION

Environmental Questionnaire

The PCS Nitrogen Case: A Chilling Effect on Prospective Contaminated Land Purchases

Environmental Settlements in Bankruptcy: Practice Pointers for the Business Lawyer. A. Overview of the Bankruptcy Process

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of PRPs to Recover Cleanup Costs from Other PRPs, and the United States

LIBRARY. CERCLA Case Law Developments ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE. Full Article

Expediting Productive Reuse of Superfund Sites: Some Legislative Solutions for Virginia and the Nation

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Appellant

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Policy Issues at Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Frequently Asked State Questions August 2010

TITLE 42, CHAPTER 103 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) EMERGENCY RESPONSE & NOTIFICATION PROVISIONS

LIBRARY. CERCLA Case Law Developments ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE. Full Article

and the Transboundary Application of CERCLA:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT

Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, Inc. v. Samuel Easton, Jr.

What definitions do I need to know in order to understand the "CRO rules?".

Risk Assessments and Hazardous Waste Cleanup in Indian Country: The Role of the Federal-Indian Trust Relationship

In This Issue: Spring 2002

LIBRARY. CERCLA Case Law Developments ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE. Full Article

Colorado s Hazardous Waste Program: Current Activities and Issues

Innocent in the Land of the Guilty: Promoting Efficiency and Fairness in CERCLA Defenses

Cleaning Up the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION LEGISLATIVE BILL REPORT FOR 2006 LEGISLATIVE SESSION October 3, 2006

Transportation Agencies as Potentially Responsible Parties at Hazardous Waste Sites

LIMITED OBJECTIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL TO DEBTORS JOINT PLAN

CTS Corp. v. Waldburger

Michael J. Van Zandt Partner

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

TITLE 42 THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

U.S. v. 718 W. Wilson Ave., Glendale, Cal., 91203

Toxic Torts Recent Relevant Decisions. Rhon E. Jones Beasley, Allen Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.

Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Law

Practice and Ethical Issues for Environmental Lawyers

SHOULD I REPORT MY CLIENT S SPILL?

DEFENSES TO LIABILITY UNDER CERCLA *

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

NAVAJO NATION UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE- GROUND STORAGE TANK ACT

Market Systems Focus: Capitalism and Free Enterprise

ALI-ABA Course of Study Environmental Law

US V. Dico: A Guide To Avoiding CERCLA Arranger Liability?

ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TRUST AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG

Courthouse News Service

Chapter Bill No. Signed Date Effective Date

Impact of Aviall on Real Estate and Corporate Transactions. By Larry Schnapf

Tribal Waste and Response Assistance Program Steering Committee Priorities

DETERMINING DAMAGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES IN THE WORLD AFTER BURLINGTON NORTHERN

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Environmental Law Commons

No IN THE Supreme Court of the Unite Statee. MORRISON ENTERPRISES, LLC, Petitioner, DRAVO CORPORATION, Respondent.

Fordham Environmental Law Review

Environmental Questionnaire

Cost Recovery: Lawyers As A Plus?

Riding on the CERCLA-Cycle: Is the Third Circuit Backpedaling? E.I. DePont de Nemours & Co. v. U.S.

Military Installation Real Property and Services: Proposed Legislation in the 111 th Congress

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD ANNUAL TOWN MEETING WARRANT

Study of Civil Liability Systems for Remedying Environmental Damage FINAL REPORT. (as at 31st December 1995)

M. Bloem called the meeting to order at 8:58 a.m. and asked for the nomination for Chair for the Olds Intermunicipal Planning Commission.

Environmental Obligations in United States Bankruptcy Actions: An Analysis of Two Key Issues

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Appropriations for FY2013

Asset Forfeiture Model State Law April 9, 2011

District of Columbia Municipal Regulations

Debtors. LIMITED OBJECTIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK TO DEBTORS MOTION FOR AN ORDER APPROVING SALE OF ASSETS PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C.

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } }

Working with Tribes during Superfund Responses Anne Dailey, OLEM/OSRTI Christine Poore, OLEM/OSRTI Mary Cooke, OLEM/FFRRO

The Brownfields Act: Providing Relief for the Innocent or New Hurdles to Avoid CERCLA Liability?

Assessing Costs under CERCLA: Sixth Circuit Requires Specificity in Complaints Seeking Prejudgment Interest. United States v. Consolidation Coal Co.

POLICY ON REPATRIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CULTURALLY SENSITIVE MATERIALS

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION RESPONSE ACTIVITY

SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1986 (SARA) - TITLE III EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW

PLUMAS COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT 555 Main Street Quincy, CA fax (530)

Environmental Cost Recovery & Lender Liability Update

Consulting and Coordinating with Tribes for Superfund Sites

12/11/ NGWA Government Affairs: Year in Review. Year in Review: NGWA Government Affairs. A New Era in Washington: Executive Orders

Part I ARTICLES. 1 Joel M. Gross is a partner in the law rm of Arnold & Porter in Washington, D.C.,

Tribal SW Code Development & TRP. - Solid Waste - Hazardous/Special Waste - Tribal Response Program

CHAPTER 19 REGULATING OUTDOOR STORAGE OF JUNK AND JUNK VEHICLES ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS

Fordham Environmental Law Review

Fourth Circuit Summary

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1967

b. On the basis of race, color or national origin, in Executive Order as implemented by Department of Labor regulations at 41 CFR Chapter 60.

Environmental Claims in Bankruptcy. Matthew A. Paque

Natural Resources Journal

PRP Contribution Claims Under CERCLA Strategies for Cost Recovery Against Other Potentially Responsible Parties

UNITED STATES V. ATLANTIC RESEARCH: OF SETTLEMENT AND VOLUNTARILY INCURRED COSTS

Enforcement of CERCLA against Innocent Owners of Property

CITY OF KALAMAZOO ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE TO CREATE APPENDIX A: CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3.5, WELLHEAD PROTECTION OVERLAY

Informal Trade in Africa

Lloyd "Rusty" R. Cress, Jr. Partner

42 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Environmental Resource Management Division

The Hon. Harold C. Heinze September 5, 1991 Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources

The Permissibility of Actions for Response Costs Arising After the Commencement of a RCRA Citizen Suit: A Post-Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Renewable Energy Transmission Authority ( Authority ). [ NMAC - N, 12/15/2011]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 23, 2014.

Survival of the Fittest: Federal Law v. State Law in the Context of Successor Liability under CERCLA

Transcription:

6/25/14 Legal Perspective on Environmental Due Diligence & Liability Protection: An Overview Photos courtesy Brewer Economic Development Jonathan A. Pottle, Esq. Environmental Due Diligence: Why Should You Care About Environmental Contamination & Due Diligence? Ø Community & Environmental Health Ø Liability (statutory and common law) o What is your liability & available protecfons from liability? Ø Benefit of a deal and integrity of assets Ø Planning Ø Business opportunifes 1

Environmental Due Diligence: Are you Dealing With Contaminated Property? Ø Is your property contaminated? Ø Are you involved in a transacfon, associated, or otherwise connected to contaminated property? Ø Are you interested in redeveloping property that has or may have contaminafon? Ø What is your comfort/interest level in dealing with contaminated property? Environmental Due Diligence: How Do You Know if You are Dealing with Contaminated Property? Ø Environmental Assessments (generally): Study whether land, water, or structures are contaminated (on- site; migrafon) Ø Examples of Assessment Methods: Research (e.g., paper), intrusive & non- intrusive invesfgafons and analysis Ø Varying degrees of assessments Ø Why Conducted? q Property transfers/financing q Redevelopment q Ongoing compliance q Risk (e.g., abandoned sites) q Community/Environmental Planning 2

Liability Regime for Contaminated Property: Major Federal Laws Ø Comprehensive Environmental Response, CompensaFon, & Liability Act [CERCLA] Ø Addresses Sites Contaminated with Hazardous Substances q 1980 Original Law q Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza9on Act of 1986 Expanded scope of hazardous waste cleanup and amount in Superfund q 1996 Amendments Secured Lenders & Fiduciaries Liability Exemp9on q Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitaliza9on Act of 2002 Provided relief for certain parfes and small businesses from liability (e.g., bona fide purchasers) PromoFon of clean- up and reuse Enhancement of state response programs Liability Regime for Contaminated Property: Major Federal Laws Ø CERCLA introduced statutory liability for contaminated sites q PotenFally Responsible ParFes [PRPs] Owner & Operators (current and past) Arrangers (treatment, disposal, or transport) Transporters Owners of hazardous substance treatment, storage, and disposal facilifes q Strict, Joint, & Several Liability (and RetroacFve, except for natural resource damages pre- CERCLA) q Examples of liability: removal costs, remedial costs, natural resource damages, health assessment/effects study costs 3

Liability Regime for Contaminated Property: Major Federal Laws Ø Resource ConservaFon & Recovery Act [RCRA] q Designed to prevent contaminafon q Requires correcfve acfon if contaminafon occurs q Liability for certain treatment, storage, and disposal facilifes of hazardous wastes ( cradle to grave ) q Generally applies to RCRA- permihed facilifes (though generators and non- permihed facilifes may also have liability in certain circumstances) Liability Regime for Contaminated Property: Major State Laws Ø Maine s Uncontrolled Hazardous Substance Sites Act (38 M.R.S. 1361 et. seq.) (Maine s CERCLA ) Ø Places where hazardous substances are or were handled or otherwise came to be located Ø PRPs (joint and several liability) q Owner or operator q Prior owner or operator q Arranger for transport or handling q Person who accepts hazardous substance for transport Ø Oil Storage FaciliJes & Groundwater ProtecJon Act (38 M.R.S. 568 et. seq.) Ø Hazardous MaPer Control Act (Maine s RCRA) 4

Potential Environmental Liability Can Discourage Transactions & Redevelopment Ø Environmental laws are very broad and the potenfal liability they impose tends to chill interest in contaminated property (and perpetuate potenfal risks to the environment & community) Ø However, there are certain exempfons and liability protecfons, funding sources, and other incenfves available Liability Exemptions & Protections Ø Acts of God Ø Acts of war Ø Acts of certain 3 rd parfes Ø Innocent landowner Ø ConFguous property owner Ø Bona fide purchaser Ø Lenders & Fiduciaries Ø Maine s Voluntary Response AcFon Program ( VRAP ) Ø MunicipaliFes (tax lien foreclosure) 5

Innocent Landowner; Bona Fide Purchaser; & Contiguous Property Owner Defense Ø The All Appropriate Inquiry ( AAI ) into the prior ownership and uses of the property CERCLA s Due Diligence Ø All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) = possible liability protecfon (Federal law) Ø Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) by Environmental Professional = AAI Ø Due diligence study beyond Phase I; Phase II Site Assessments; Phase III RemediaFon (if required) Ø Maine s VRAP Program (uflizes Phase I, II, III Assessment Approach): UlFmate liability protecfon at the state level is achieved through the VRAP program Typical Players in a Transaction & Common Scenarios Ø Typical Players: Sellers, Purchasers, Lenders, & Governmental Facilitators; all players, to varying degrees, perform their own due diligence Ø Common Scenarios q Clean Property: No contaminafon when due diligence is performed; purchaser establishes standing as innocent landowner q Contaminated Property: Purchaser walks away Purchaser delays closing unfl seller cleans up property and secures cerfficafon of complefon Purchaser agrees to buy and obtains liability protecfon if certain condifons are met (or agrees to take on liability) ContaminaFon is from neighboring land and new purchaser agrees to certain acfons with respect to on- going cleanup 6

Incentives to Deal with Contaminated Property Ø Brownfields Program q Provides funds to states, communifes, tribes, & nonprofits to prevent, inventory, assess, clean- up, and reuse Brownfield sites q 3 Types of Funding Programs: Assessment Grants Revolving Loan Fund Programs Clean- up Grants Ø Maine s Groundwater Cleanup Program Ø Maine s Voluntary Response AcJon Program ( VRAP ) Ø Contracts Other Potential Incentives to Deal with Contaminated Property Ø Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Ø State CDBG (for planning, public infrastructure and commercial financing) Ø Pine Tree Zone Program (tax savings) Ø Federal and State historic tax credits Ø Local leadership Ø Long range planning (e.g., downtown plan) Ø Public Infrastructure (i.e. upgrade area roads, water/sewer Ø UFliFes, electric power, walking & bike paths Ø AcquisiFon, demolifon and environmental clean- up (by someone else ) 7

Benefit of Property Redevelopment Ø Turning unused or underused contaminated property into producfve, well- uflized property Ø Improvement in the appearance of a community and in the use of the property by a community Ø Liability protecfons for owners (and operators) of property Ø Improving economic condifons for property owners and communifes Environmental Due Diligence: Practice Pointers Ø Decide if you are really interested in contaminated property or property with suspect contaminafon Are the risks manageable and what are the potenfal rewards? - How much are you willing to spend on due diligence? Ø Research exisfng site informafon and conduct other types of due diligence reviews (e.g., land use restricfons; economic) Ø Do Not rely on owner/seller or any other person s representafons find out for yourself Ø Retain Appropriate Environmental Professional(s) don t rely solely on yourself if you are not qualified (or other unqualified persons) Ø UFlize available liability protecfons and incenfves (e.g., VRAP) to negofate and gain comfort & confidence in a transacfon Ø Ensure ongoing environmental compliance (and/or get liability protecfon/ indemnificafons) 8

9