Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Similar documents
PlainSite. Legal Document

Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box San Francisco, California

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No TODD S. GLASSEY AND MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Case: , 07/03/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 12-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No John Teixeira; et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:13-cv WHO Document 90 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No

Case: , 05/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 33-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

March 11, Re: Realtek Semiconductor Corp. v. LSI Corp. et al., No Panel: Judges Farris, Reinhardt & Tashima

Case 2:10-cv JAM -EFB Document 53 Filed 01/18/12 Page 1 of 7

Case: , 12/29/2014, ID: , DktEntry: 20-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:15-cv MCE-DB Document 46 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 3

Case: , 04/24/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 23-1, Page 1 of 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 12/15/2015, ID: , DktEntry: 51-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No John Teixeira; et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 02/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 54-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 26-1 Filed: 12/04/2014 Pages: 6 NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) )

Case: , 08/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 10/18/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 57-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

No ORAL ARGUMENT HELD JUNE 1, 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

[Dist Ct. No.: 3:12-CV WHO] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. JOHN TEIXEIRA; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, vs.

Docket

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Case: /16/2014 ID: DktEntry: 37-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 9) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Case 2:11-cv JEM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2011 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv CAS-MAN Document 107 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1464 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 08/16/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 28-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: /08/2009 Page: 1 of 2 DktEntry:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 04/25/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 61-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADULT AND JUVENILE DETENTION; et al.,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs - Appellants, Defendants - Appellees.

Case 2:12-cv SVW-PLA Document 21 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:204

Case 2:14-cv ODW-RZ Document 66 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:791

Appeal No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Bradley Berentson, et al. Brian Perryman,

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case: , 03/23/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 38-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 03/16/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Attorneys for Plaintiff Regina Bozic, the Proposed Classes, and the Appeals Class (See FRAP 3(c)(3))

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:11-cv JEM Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

NOS , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNDER SEAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

Case: , 08/27/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 126-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 07/31/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 60-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:15-cv HEH Document 64 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 445

Case: , 01/08/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 55-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 01/02/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 43-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Nos and UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

Instructions for Filing an Emergency Motion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court District of Utah

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 613 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2391 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

Nos and IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room St. Louis, Missouri 63102

U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv RDM

Case 3:09-cv IEG -BGS Document 55 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 5

No No CV LRS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPELLANT S OPENING BRIEF

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case: /20/2014 ID: DktEntry: 56-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 13) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 12/06/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 45-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 5:11-cv LHK Document 3322 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-sc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN ) PRATT & ASSOCIATES The Alameda, Suite San Jose, CA Telephone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) -0 pgore@prattattorneys.com David P. Wilson (admitted pro hac vice) PROVOST UMPHREY LAW FIRM LLP 0 Park Street P.O. Box 0 Beaumont, TX 0 Telephone: (0) -000 dwilson@provostumphrey.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALEX ANG and KEVIN AVOY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, WHITEWAVE FOODS COMPANY, DEAN FOODS COMPANY, WWF OPERATING COMPANY, and HORIZON ORGANIC DAIRY LLC, Defendants. SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH NINTH CIRCUIT RULE - REPRESENTATION STATEMENT

Case :-cv-0-sc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Notice is hereby given that Plaintiffs Alex Ang and Kevin Avoy, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the judgment entered in the above captioned action, including the Order Granting Motion to Dismiss entered on December,, Dkt., which dismissed all Plaintiffs claims with prejudice. Dated: January,. Respectfully submitted, _/S/ David P. Wilson David P. Wilson (admitted pro hac vice) PROVOST UMPHREY LAW FIRM LLP 0 Park Street P.O. Box 0 Beaumont, TX 0 Telephone: (0) -000 dwilson@provostumphrey.com Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN ) PRATT & ASSOCIATES The Alameda, Suite San Jose, CA Telephone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) -0 pgore@prattattorneys.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs - -

Case :-cv-0-sc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of RULE - REPRESENTATION STATEMENT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Alex Ang and Kevin Avoy, are represented by: David P. Wilson PROVOST UMPHREY LAW FIRM LLP 0 Park Street P.O. Box 0 Beaumont, TX 0 Telephone: (0) -000 dwilson@provostumphrey.com Ben F. Pierce Gore PRATT & ASSOCIATES The Alameda, Suite San Jose, CA Telephone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) -0 pgore@prattattorneys.com. All Defendant-Appellees, including WhiteWave Operating Company, Dean Foods Company, WWF Operating Company, and Horizon Organic Dairy LLC, are represented by: Angela C. Agrusa (Bar No. ) aagrusa@linerlaw.com Randall J. Sunshine (Bar No. ) rsunshine@linerlaw.com Nathan M. Davis (Bar No. ) ndavis@linerlaw.com LINER GRODE STEIN YANKELEVITZ SUNSHINE REGENSTREIF & TAYLOR LLP 00 Glendon Avenue, th Floor Los Angeles, California 00.0 Telephone: () 00-00 Facsimile: () 00-0 Dated: January,. _/S/ David P. Wilson David P. Wilson (admitted pro hac vice) PROVOST UMPHREY LAW FIRM LLP 0 Park Street P.O. Box 0 Beaumont, TX 0 Telephone: (0) -000 dwilson@provostumphrey.com - -

Case :-cv-0-sc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN ) PRATT & ASSOCIATES The Alameda, Suite San Jose, CA Telephone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) -0 pgore@prattattorneys.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants - -

Case :-cv-0-sc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY CM/ECF I hereby certify that on January,, I served PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF APPEAL AND NINTH CIRCUIT RULE - REPRESENTATION STATEMENT by electronically filing the foregoing document listed above by using the Case Management/ Electronic Case filing system. I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the court s CM/ECF system _/S/ David P. Wilson David P. Wilson - -

Case: Case -0 :-cv-0-sc 0/0/ Document ID: 0 - Filed DktEntry: 0/0/- Page Page: of of Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box San Francisco, California - --000 January 0, No.: -0 D.C. No.: :-cv-0-sc Short Title: Alex Ang, et al v. Whitewave Foods Company, et al Dear Appellant/Counsel A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court. The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. th Cir. R. -.

Case: Case -0 :-cv-0-sc 0/0/ Document ID: 0 - Filed DktEntry: 0/0/- Page Page: of of UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JAN 0 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ALEX ANG; KEVIN AVOY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs - Appellants, WHITEWAVE FOODS COMPANY; DEAN FOODS COMPANY; WWF OPERATING COMPANY; HORIZON ORGANIC DAIRY, LLC, No. -0 D.C. No. :-cv-0-sc U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Francisco TIME SCHEDULE ORDER Defendants - Appellees. The parties shall meet the following time schedule. Thu., January, Mon., April, Mon., May, Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration for Appellate ECF is confirmed after this date, the Mediation Questionnaire is due within one day of receiving the email from PACER confirming your registration. Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP and th Cir. R. -. Appellee's answering brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP and th Cir. R. -.

Case: Case -0 :-cv-0-sc 0/0/ Document ID: 0 - Filed DktEntry: 0/0/- Page Page: of of The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the appellee's brief, pursuant to FRAP and th Cir. R. -. Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See th Cir. R. -. FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Ruben Talavera Deputy Clerk