Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

Similar documents
Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

[Proposedi Order Granting Motion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:16-cv JBS-JS Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1342 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Defendant.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:17-cv JPO Document 47 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 5

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

[PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:11-cv JLL-JAD Document 81 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 963

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 1:02-cv LJM-WTL Document 117 Filed 08/16/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/22/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff, SIRILJS XM RADIO INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants.

Case 1:14-cv PAC Document 94 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 1:16-cv JBS-JS Document 56 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 1085 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Defendant.

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

SUGGESTED AMENDMENT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (CR)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

Case5:10-cv JF Document72 Filed09/16/11 Page1 of 7

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 243 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 14. Case 1:15-cv NRB Document Filed 09/19/17 Page 1of14

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

[FORM OF FINAL DISMISSAL ORDER] UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-si Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JAMES KAWAHITO (SBN ) KAWAHITO LAW GROUP APC N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite El Segundo, California 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) - SAHAG MAJARAIN II (SBN ) LAW OFFICES OF SAHAG MAJARIAN II 0 Ventura Blvd. Tarzana, CA Telephone: () 0-00 Fax No.: () 0-0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Clinton Simril and Class Members CLINTON SIMRIL, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, TVI, Inc., and DOES through 0, inclusive, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendants. CASE NO.: -CV-00-SI [Honorable Judge Susan Illston, Courtroom, th Floor] ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT -CV-00-SI Notice of Motion

Case :-cv-00-si Document Filed 0// Page of 0 -CV-00-SI ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT On April, the Court heard Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement by Plaintiff Clinton Simril ( Plaintiff or Class Representative ), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. The Motion is not opposed by Defendant TVI, Inc. ( TVI ). The Court has considered the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and Release ( Settlement Agreement ), the proposed Notice of Class Action Settlement ( Class Notice ) and the Motion for Preliminary Approval and its attached forms, the submissions of counsel, and hereby finds and Orders as follows:. Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used in this Order (the Preliminary Approval Order ) will have the same meaning as defined in the Settlement Agreement.. The Court finds on a preliminary basis that the settlement memorialized in the Settlement Agreement, filed with the Court, falls within the range of reasonableness and, therefore, meets the requirements for preliminary approval.. Based on a review of the papers submitted by the parties, the Court finds that the settlement is the result of arms-length negotiations conducted after Class Counsel adequately investigated the claims and became familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of those claims. The assistance of an experienced mediator in the settlement process supports the Court s conclusion that the settlement is non-collusive.. The Court conditionally finds that, for the purposes of approving this settlement only, the proposed Class meets the requirements for certification of a settlement class under Rule (a) and (b)() of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: (a) the proposed Class is ascertainable and so numerous that joinder of all members of the Class is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law or fact common to the proposed Class; (c) certain claims of Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the members of the proposed Class; (d) Plaintiff and their counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the proposed Class; and (e) a class action is superior to the other available methods for an efficient resolution of this controversy. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court conditionally certifies, for settlement purposes --

Case :-cv-00-si Document Filed 0// Page of 0 only (and for no other purpose and with no other effect upon this or any other action, including no effect upon this action should the settlement not ultimately be approved), the following class: All persons who worked for Defendant in California as a non-exempt employee from December, to the date of Preliminary Approval. For purposes of this Preliminary Approval Order, Class Period means the period from December, through the date of preliminary approval.. If the settlement does not become final for any reason, the fact that the parties were willing to stipulate to class certification as part of the Settlement shall have no bearing on, and will not be admissible in connection with the issue of whether a class in this action should be certified in a non-settlement context.. The Court s conditional findings are limited solely to the claims brought on behalf of the proposed Class. The Court s findings are for purposes of conditionally certifying a Class and will not have any claim or issue preclusion or estoppel effect in any other action against Defendant or in this action if the settlement is not finally approved.. The Court appoints, for settlement purposes only, Plaintiff Clinton Simril as representative for the claims against TVI.. The Court appoints, for settlement purposes only, Kawahito Law Group APC and the Law Offices of Sahag Majarian II as Class Counsel. 0. The Court approves CPT Group, Inc. as the Claims Administrator to perform duties in accordance with the Settlement Agreement.. The Court finds that the procedures for notifying the Class about the settlement as described in the Settlement Agreement and Class Notice provide the best notice practicable under the circumstances and therefore meet the requirements of due process, and directs the mailing of the Class Notice and the attachments thereto in accordance with the Settlement Agreement.. The Court approves, as to form and content, the proposed Class Notice and associated forms. The Claims Administrator is authorized to mail those documents, after they are updated with the appropriate dates and deadlines consistent with the Settlement Agreement, to the Class Action members as provided in the Settlement Agreement. -CV-00-SI --

Case :-cv-00-si Document Filed 0// Page of 0. The Court approves the requirements for submitting objections to the Settlement Agreement set forth in the Class Notice. Class Members who wish to object to the Settlement must send or file a written objection with the Court, not later than sixty calendar days from the date the Claims Administrator mails the Class Notice to the Class Members. Class Members who does not submit an objection in the manner and by the deadline specified above will be deemed to have waived all objections and will be foreclosed from making any objections to the Settlement, whether by appeal or otherwise. In the event any objections are asserted, Plaintiff and Defendant may address those objections in their briefing for Final Approval of the Settlement.. The Court approves the procedures for Class Members to request exclusion from the Settlement Agreement as set forth in the Class Notice. In particular, Class Members may elect to opt out of the Settlement by sending a written request for exclusion to the Claims Administrator at the address that is set forth in the Class Notice. To be timely, all such Requests for Exclusion must be postmarked no later than sixty calendar days after the date the Claims Administrator mails the Class Notice to the Class Members. Class Members who fail to comply with the opt-out procedure shall not be excluded and shall instead be bound by all provisions of the Settlement Agreement and all orders issued pursuant thereto.. The parties are ordered to carry out the Settlement according to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. /// -CV-00-SI --

Case :-cv-00-si Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Plaintiff shall file the motion for fees and costs by June,. Plaintiff shall file the motion for final approval of the settlement by July,. The Court will conduct a Fairness and Good Faith Determination Hearing on August, at :00 p.m. for the purposes of: (i) determining the fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness of the Settlement Agreement terms and associated settlement pursuant to class action procedures and requirements; (ii) determining the good faith of the Settlement Agreement and associated settlement; and (iii) entering Judgment. The Fairness and Good Faith Determination Hearing may be continued without further notice to Class Members. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: April, -CV-00-SI SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge --