United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Similar documents
Case 1:18-cv TCW Document 218 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 06/04/2018 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SCA Hygiene (Aukerman Laches): Court Grants En Banc Review

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 179 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. CV T

Case 1:08-cv DAB Document 78 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 5. On March 10, 2010, this Court denied Defendants recovery

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

In The United States Court of Federal Claims

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER

Docket Number: 3757 WASHINGTON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. Mark F. Nowak, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

United States Court of Appeals

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3

NOS , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNDER SEAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

Case , Document 133-1, 04/09/2018, , Page1 of 3 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 189 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 5

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 484 Page: 1 08/06/

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT : : : : : : : : : : : : :

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

NEW YORK STATE COURT OF APPEALS. Preliminary Appeal Statement Pursuant to section of the Rules of the Court of Appeals

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 121 Filed: 10/01/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1626. No. - IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 19-cv HSG 8

Case: 4:14-cv ERW Doc. #: 74 Filed: 07/13/15 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 523. Case No.: 4:14-cv-00159

Case 1:06-cv CAP Document 47 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 3:18-cv JJH Doc #: 40 Filed: 01/08/19 1 of 6. PageID #: 296

The Court has recounted the procedural history of this case. See ECF No. 123 at 1-2.'

Case 1:15-cv JMF Document 9 Filed 08/27/15 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Appellant, v. Case No. 8:12-cv-2498-T-33 Bankr. No. 8:11-bk CPM ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-2689-N ORDER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Objectors-Appellants, Docket Nos. Plaintiff-Appellant. Plaintiffs-Appellees, Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD (and consolidated cases)

Case: 2:14-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 98 Filed: 11/26/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 6215

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No.

Case 2:16-cv WJM-MF Document 173 Filed 04/02/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 5820 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 7:16-cv O Document 85 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2792

Case: , 12/08/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 80-1, Page 1 of 8 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 121 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, LUCERO and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION. ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Nos and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

Case 1:10-cv SS Document 465 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case , Document 122-1, 04/10/2017, , Page1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

8:13-cv JFB-TDT Doc # 51 Filed: 10/08/13 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1162 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 5:17-cv JSM-PRL

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 14, 2016)

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Matter of Qudian Sequrities Litig NY Slip Op 32919(U) November 14, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge: O.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH, TEXAS

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cv AKK. versus

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:08-cv FAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008 Page 1 of 7

J. Lightner v Route 22 West Operating Company, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Transcription:

Case 1:17-cv-00449-SGB Document 177 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 7 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit CONTINENTAL SERVICE GROUP, INC. PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY, INC., Consolidated- COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellees Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant CBE GROUP, INC., PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., VALUE RECOVERY HOLDINGS, LLC, WINDHAM PROFESSIONALS, INC., AUTOMATED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC., Intervenor-Defendant 2017-2155, -2215

Case 1:17-cv-00449-SGB Document 177 Filed 07/18/17 Page 2 of 7 2 CONTINENTAL SERVICE GROUP INC. US Claims in Nos. 1:17-cv-00449-SGB and 1:17-cv-00499- SGB, Chief Judge Susan G. ACCOUNT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC., GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., VALUE RECOVERY HOLDINGS, LLC, CBE GROUP, INC., WINDHAM PROFESSIONALS, INC., AUTOMATED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC., TEXAS GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN CORP., Intervenor-Defendants Intervenor- 2017-2156, -2210 Claims in No. 1:17-cv-00493-SGB, Chief Judge Susan G. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --

Case 1:17-cv-00449-SGB Document 177 Filed 07/18/17 Page 3 of 7 CONTINENTAL SERVICE GROUP INC. US 3 Plaintiff-Appellant GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., CBE GROUP, INC., VALUE RECOVERY HOLDINGS, LLC, WINDHAM PROFESSIONALS, INC., 2017-2157, -2216 Claims in No. 1:17-cv-00517-SGB, Chief Judge Susan G. PERFORMANT RECOVERY, INC. COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., VAN RU CREDIT CORPORATION, ALLIED INTERSTATE LLC, Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellees

Case 1:17-cv-00449-SGB Document 177 Filed 07/18/17 Page 4 of 7 4 CONTINENTAL SERVICE GROUP INC. US GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Intervenor- 2017-2158, -2214 Claims in No. 1:17-cv-00558-SGB, Chief Judge Susan G. COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Intervenor- CBE GROUP, INC., PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Intervenor- 2017-2159, -2212

Case 1:17-cv-00449-SGB Document 177 Filed 07/18/17 Page 5 of 7 CONTINENTAL SERVICE GROUP INC. US 5 Claims in No. 1:17-cv-00578-SGB, Chief Judge Susan G. VAN RU CREDIT CORPORATION, Intervenor- Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee Intervenor- 2017-2160, -2221 Claims in No. 1:17-cv-00633-SGB, Chief Judge Susan G. ON MOTION Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge. O R D E R

Case 1:17-cv-00449-SGB Document 177 Filed 07/18/17 Page 6 of 7 6 CONTINENTAL SERVICE GROUP INC. US Alltran Education, Inc., moves to stay, pending these appeals, the May 31, 2017, preliminary injunctions entered in the above-captioned appeals by the United States Court of Federal Claims enjoining the United States Department of Education from (1) authorizing the purported awardees to perform on the contract awards under Solicitation No. ED-FSA-16-R-0009 ( the Solicitation ) and (2) transferring work to be performed under the Solicitation to other private collection agencies to circumvent or moot the bid protest. The United States separately moves for the same relief. Continental Service Group, Inc., opposes the motions. Financial Management Systems, The CBE Group, Inc., Progressive Financial Services, Inc., and Van Ru Credit Corporation respond to the motions. Alltran and the United States reply. In its opposition to Alltran s motion, Continental moves to dismiss 2017-2155. Alltran and the United States oppose the motion. Continental replies. Continental argues that the court lacks jurisdiction over 2017-2155 because 28 U.S.C. 1292(d)(2) controls interlocutory appeals from the Court of Federal Claims, as 1292(a)(1) is directed only to district courts. However, 1292(c)(1) grants the court jurisdiction of an appeal from an interlocutory order or decree described in subsection (a) or (b) of this section in any case over which the court would have jurisdiction of an appeal under section 1295 of this title, and a preliminary injunction is the type of interlocutory order that is appealable under 1292(a)(1). The motion to dismiss the appeal is therefore without merit. The court notes that Alltran s motions to stay the preliminary injunction are pending at the Court of Federal Claims. The Court of Federal Claims has not yet acted on Alltran s motions to stay, the briefing of which has only recently been completed. The court will hold the motions

Case 1:17-cv-00449-SGB Document 177 Filed 07/18/17 Page 7 of 7 CONTINENTAL SERVICE GROUP INC. US 7 to stay in abeyance pending the Court of Federal Claims decision on Alltran s motions. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Continental s motion to dismiss 2017-2155 is denied. (2) Alltran s and the United States motions to stay are held in abeyance. Within five days of the Court of Federal Claims rulings on Alltran s motions to stay the May 31, 2017, preliminary injunctions, Alltran and the United States are ordered to inform the court how they believe the motions should proceed. FOR THE COURT /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court s26