STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER

Similar documents
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. v. DOAH Case No.: APD Rendition: APD FO FINAL ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER. case on April 8, 2009, in Florida, before Jeff B.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on May 4, 2009,

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION FINAL ORDER. "ALT) submitted his Recommended Order to the State Board of Administration (hereafter

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. UNTO OTHERS, INC. Petitioner, Case No DOR FOF

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLHASSEE, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. FT. LAUDERDALE ROTARY FOUNDATION #1090 Petitioner, CASE NO DOR FOF

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ) FINAL ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. DOTAS, INC., Petitioner, Case No DOR 98-6-FOF vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA INTEGRA CORPORATION, Petitioner, DOR 90-1-FOF vs. CASE NO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVIStON OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. Petitioner, Case No DOR QS-1- For.: DEPARTMENT OF REVE~UE Respondent.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. MY OIL COMPANY, INC., Petitioner,

No. 1D October 2, 2018

Guardian Advocacy Forms

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

02 FEB - I PH 4: 26 STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSI.Q~TATE Of FLORIDA FINAL ORDER

Keith Illig v. Commissioner Social Security

Supreme Court of Florida

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

NC General Statutes - Chapter 35A Article 1 1

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS RECOMMENDED ORDER. A duly noticed final hearing was held in this matter on

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LINROY BOTTOSON, STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. REPLY TO STATE S ANSWER TO APPELLANT S INITIAL BRIEF

,~.; SIJ:'ATE: OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FINAL ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OFFICE OF APPEAL HEARINGS FINAL ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION (JUDGE HAYES)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D L.T. CASE NO.: L

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT

Julia P Forrester Assistant General Counsel Department of State Division of Elections Room 2002 The Capitol Tallahassee, FL.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs.

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO , JUDGE JOHN RENKE, III

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO , JUDGE JOHN RENKE, III

Petitioner, CASE NO:73,465 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

11/03/11 CHAPTER 122C - Article 5 - Part 7 Page 1

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

NC General Statutes - Chapter 35A 1

Petitioner, Respondent.

2.3 Involuntary Commitment: Prehearing Procedures

CASE NO DIVISION: 03

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER, EMILY HALE S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

FINAL ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Petitioner, John Bougon ( Bougon or Petitioner ) seeks certiorari review of the

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES, AND MOBILE HOMES

Supreme Court of Florida

BEFORE THE STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON ETHICS

CHAPTER 17 REPRESENTING YOURSELF BEFORE THE DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS (DOAH)

*Filling these positions are conditional on the Agency receiving subsidy and we may not proceed with interviews for all positions posted.

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Gist v. Comm Social Security

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FINAL ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

By' STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PHARMACY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC12- ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT

NC General Statutes - Chapter 122C Article 5 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioners, CASE NOS.: 91,966 92,382 vs. 92,451 (Consolidated) JAMES S. PARHAM,

FINAL ORDER DENYING A TEMPORARY VARIANCE FROM RULE 58AER17-1, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.

No. 1D Petition for Writ of Certiorari Original Jurisdiction. May 10, 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL ANSWER BRIEF OF RESPONDENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ROBERT RANSONE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT. Appellants, v. Case No. 1D

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES, AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Lower Tribunal Case Number: 1D Case Number: SC05-957

STATE OF FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION. FLWAC Case No.: APP DOAH Case No.: DRI DRAFT FINAL ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. Case No. 89,432

Transcription:

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS vs. Petitioner, AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, Respondent. Case No. 08-5231APD RECOMMENDED ORDER Administrative Law Judge (ALJ Daniel Manry conducted the final hearing of this case for the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH on February 19, 2009, in, Florida. The parties, witnesses, and court reporter attended the hearing at the hearing site in Florida. The ALJ conducted the hearing by telephone from Tallahassee, Florida. For Petitioner: APPEARANCES For Respondent: Diana R. Esposito, Esquire Office of the Attorney General 501 East Kennedy Street, Suite 1100 Tampa, Florida 33602

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE The issue is whether Petitioner has a developmental disability, defined in Section 393.063, Florida Statutes (2006. 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT By letter dated September 12, 2006, Respondent denied the application of Petitioner to participate in the Developmental Disabilities Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS or the Family and Supported Living (FSL waiver. Petitioner requested a fair hearing, and the agency referred the matter to DOAH to assign an ALJ to conduct the hearing. At the hearing, Petitioner appeared with Petitioner and testified, cross-examined Respondent's witnesses and exhibits, and submitted two composite exhibits for admission into evidence. Respondent called one witness and submitted two composite exhibits. The identity of the witnesses and exhibits and the rulings regarding each are identified in the record of the hearing. Neither party requested a transcript of the hearing. Petitioner did not file a proposed recommended order (PRO. Respondent timely filed its PRO on February 25, 2009. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Respondent is the state agency responsible for administering the HCBS and FSL waiver programs for the state. 2

Petitioner is who will be 19 years old sometime in 2009. 2. It is undisputed that Petitioner is disabled. Petitioner is diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder, Intermittent Explosive Disorder, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Medical treatment includes multiple psychotropic medications. 3. Petitioner is not diagnosed with a disability defined in Section 393.063. Petitioner is not diagnosed with autism, cerebral palsy, high risk, mental retardation, Prader-Willi syndrome, or spina bifida. 4. Petitioner does not satisfy the statutory definition of mental retardation in Subsection 393.063(31. Petitioner has a full scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ of 78. In order to satisfy the statutory definition of mental retardation, Petitioner would need to have an FSIQ of 70 or lower. 5. A standard deviation is 15. Two or more standard deviations below 100 is a score of 70 or lower. 6. Petitioner does have significant deficits in adaptive behavior, as that phrase is used in Subsection 393.063(31. However, the deficits in adaptive behavior do not occur concurrently with intellectual functioning that is two or more standard deviations below the mean score of 100. 3

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 7. DOAH has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and parties to this proceeding. 120.569, 120.57(1, 393.0651(8, and 393.125(1(a, Fla. Stat. (2008; J.M. v. Florida Agency for Persons With Disabilities, 938 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006. DOAH provided the parties with adequate notice of the final hearing. 8. Petitioner seeks eligibility based on a disability defined in Subsection 393.063(31 as mental retardation. Petitioner has the burden of proof to show, by a preponderance of evidence, that Petitioner satisfies statutory requirements for immediate enrollment in the HCBS program. Department of Transportation v. J. W. C. Company, Inc., 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981. 9. Petitioner did not satisfy burden of proof. Petitioner did not show by a preponderance of the evidence that Petitioner is diagnosed with a disability defined in Section 393.063. RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that Respondent enter a final order denying Petitioner s application for services. 4

DONE AND ENTERED this 12th day of March, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. S DANIEL MANRY Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850 488-9675 Fax Filing (850 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 12th day of March, 2009. 1/ ENDNOTE References to subsections, sections, and chapters are to Florida Statutes (2006, unless otherwise stated. COPIES FURNISHED: Cathy Bedell, Esquire Agency for Persons with Disabilities Fair Hearing Coordinator 4030 Esplanade Way, Suite 380 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950 Diana R. Esposito, Esquire Office of the Attorney General 501 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 1100 Tampa, Florida 33602 5

M. Catherine Lannon, Esquire Office of the Attorney General Administrative Law Section The Capitol, Plaza Level 01 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050 John Newton, General Counsel Agency for Persons with Disabilities 4030 Esplanade Way, Suite 380 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950 James DeBeaugrine, Executive Director Agency for Persons with Disabilities 4030 Esplanade Way, Suite 380 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case. 6