POLITICAL TELEVISION ADVERTISING (NAT FOR 2000 CAMPAIGN (June 1 - November 7)

Similar documents
INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

2016 us election results

If you have questions, please or call

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

Population Change and Crime Change

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

Independent and Third-Party Municipal Candidates. City Council Election Reform Task Force April 8, :00 p.m.

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

SPECIAL FOCUS The Facts

Immigrant Incorporation and Local Responses

Washington, D.C. Update

Racial and Ethnic Separation in the Neighborhoods: Progress at a Standstill

The Brookings Institution

New Home Affordability Trends. February 23, 2018

The New Metropolitan Geography of U.S. Immigration

Silence of the Innocents: Illegal Immigrants Underreporting of Crime and their Victimization

American Dental Association

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

DONATE. From: DNC Rapid Response Subject: Donald Trump's Supreme Court pick? Date: July 19, 2016 at 9:06 PM To:

Newspaper Audience Database

Sample file. 2. Read about the war and do the activities to put into your mini-lapbook.

Healthcare and the 2012 Election. October 17 th, 2012

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

WHY ASIAN AMERICANS AND PACIFIC ISLANDERS SHOULD VOTE

Trump, Populism and the Economy

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

A Nation Divides. TIME: 2-3 hours. This may be an all-day simulation, or broken daily stages for a week.

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

2018 MIDTERM ELECTION OUTLOOK

Professor Samuel Walker POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY CONSULTANT. Professor Samuel Walker

Twenty-first Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America

Bringing Vitality to Main Street How Immigrant Small Businesses Help Local Economies Grow

APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES

Election 2014: The Midterm Results, the ACA and You

This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by

Research Brief. Resegregation in Southern Politics? Introduction. Research Empowerment Engagement. November 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States

Checklist for Conducting Local Union Officer Elections

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

Presentation Outline

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

BENCHMARKING REPORT - VANCOUVER

April 12, Dear Senator Cochran, Senator Durbin, Congressman Frelinghuysen, and Congressman Visclosky:

Electing a President. The Electoral College

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

NATURALIZATION POLICY & PROGRAM MENU

Sunlight State By State After Citizens United

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

Constitution in a Nutshell NAME. Per

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

election guide Primaries & caucuses debates filing deadlines conventions

COUNCIL OF THE GREAT CITY SCHOOLS 62nd ANNUAL FALL CONFERENCE BUILDING A GENERATION: BLUEPRINTS FOR SUCCESS IN URBAN EDUCATION OCTOBER 24 TO 28, 2018

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Historical and Revision Notes Act

By 1970 immigrants from the Americas, Africa, and Asia far outnumbered those from Europe. CANADIAN UNITED STATES CUBAN MEXICAN

Majority of State Minimum Wages Higher Than Federal Rate for 2015

Limited Liability Corporations List of State Offices Contact Information

Table 1. Top 100 Metro Areas in Established, New/Emerging, and Pre-Emerging Gateways

IBT and CWA JOINT AGREEMENT FOR THE FORMATION OF IBT-CWA PIEDMONT CUSTOMER SERVICE EMPLOYEES ALLIANCE

Official Rules 2018 Taylor Swift reputation Stadium Tour Ticket Giveaway

Professor Samuel Walker POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY CONSULTANT. Professor Samuel Walker

Campaign 16. A Hawthorn Group visit with Kansas City Chamber June 24, 2016

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

Endnotes on Campaign 2000 SOME FINAL OBSERVATIONS ON VOTER OPINIONS

The Electoral College And

ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND BACKGROUND INFO

APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES

2016 NATIONAL CONVENTION

Alissa A. Horvitz Member Attorney

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

arxiv: v3 [stat.ap] 14 Mar 2018

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

Ballot Questions in Michigan. Selma Tucker and Ken Sikkema

Background Checks and Ban the Box Legislation. November 8, 2017

Historically, state PM&R societies have operated as independent organizations that advocate on legislative and regulatory proposals.

findings: Among the Conducted by that ad-watching is hitting a low to 28 papers. for 72 adwatches. Bee ran no to account Sacramento with 126.

PRESS RELEASE. POLIDATA Political Data Analysis

Electoral College Reform: Evaluation and Policy Recommendations

June 15, Washington, DC Washington, DC 20510

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

A Way with Words Broadcast and Podcast Media Kit

Transcription:

POLITICAL TELEVISION ADVERTISING (NAT 1. Presidential Race - Comparison of Spending on Ads Through November 7 1996 ADVERTISING FOR BUSH Bush Campaign $39,210,195 (Dole) $33,000,000 Republican Party $44,744,774 $25,000,000 Groups $2,113,756 Total Spending $86,068,725 ADVERTISING FOR GORE Gore Campaign $27,906,724 (Clinton) $38,000,000 Democratic Party $35,150,025 $23,000,000 Groups $14,004,163 Total Spending $77,060,912

2. Presidential Race - Spending * on Ads in Battleground States State Through November 7 BUSH GORE Arkansas $1,043,182 $1,053,932 California $10,787,658 $126,939 Florida $14,471,492 $10,063,322 Michigan $7,458,514 $9,704,302 Missouri $4,144,240 $6,007,466 Ohio $8,759,333 $9,482,357 Pennsylvania $12,899,103 $15,446,054 Tennessee $1,115,913 $869,343 Washington $5,376,242 $5,446,943 Wisconsin $2,987,561 $3,739,636 * SPENDING REFLECTS COMBINED ACTIVITY OF CANDIDATES, PARTIES, AND GROUPS.

3. Presidential Race - Heaviest Spending on Ads by Group Rank Group Through November 7 BUSH GORE 1 Planned Parenthood $7,214,845 2 AFL/CIO $3,149,130 3 Americans for Job Security $1,778,067 4 Handgun Control $1,674,172 5 Sierra Club $1,019,981 RANKING IS BASED ON SPENDING SINCE JUNE 1

4. Presidential Race - Priority Media Markets for Most Active Groups Group Media Markets Planned Parenthood 1 PHILADELPHIA 2 SEATTLE-TACOMA 3 MIAMI-FT LAUDERDALE 4 ORLANDO 5 PORTLAND OR AFL/CIO 1 ST LOUIS 2 CLEVELAND 3 DETROIT 4 COLUMBUS 5 PITTSBURGH Americans for Job Security 1 SPOKANE 2 SEATTLE-TACOMA 3 PORTLAND OR 4 TAMPA-ST PETERSBURG 5 KNOXVILLE Handgun Control 1 CLEVELAND 2 ST LOUIS 3 MILWAUKEE 4 PHILADELPHIA 5 DETROIT Sierra Club 1 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE 2 PORTLAND OR 3 DETROIT 4 DENVER 5 ST LOUIS

5. Presidential Race - Campaign Appeals Masquerading as Issue Advocacy THROUGH NOVEMBER 7 Party spending on ads for candidates (RNC & DNC) $79,894,799 Percentage of total spending on ads 49% Candidate spending on ads (Bush and Gore campaigns) $67,116,919 Percentage of total spending on ads 41% Group spending on ads for candidates $16,117,919 Percentage of total spending on ads 10% Percentage of soft money party ads mentioning party label 0% Percentage of soft money party ads mentioning a candidate 100%

6. All House Races - Comparison of Spending on Ads Through November 7 ADVERTISING FOR REPUBLICANS Candidates $35,636,547 Republican Party $16,805,969 Groups $20,453,580 Total Spending $72,896,096 ADVERTISING FOR DEMOCRATS Candidates $39,535,144 Democratic Party $22,734,127 Groups $9,349,875 Total Spending $71,619,146

7. All U.S. House Races - Heaviest Spending on Ads by Group Rank Group Through November 7 Republicans Democrats 1 Citizens for Better Medicare $13,801,042 2 AFL/CIO $5,136,659 3 Chamber of Commerce $3,905,861 4 Emily's List $2,185,741 5 Business Roundtable $1,974,259 6 Coalition for American Workers $710,900 RANKING IS BASED ON SPENDING SINCE JUNE 1

8. All U.S. House Races - Priority Congressional Districts for Most Active Groups Group Races Citizens for Better Medicare 1 CA - 49 2 KY -3 3 NH -2 4 WA - 5 5 AR -4 AFL/CIO 1 KY - 3 2 KY - 6 3 WA - 5 4 CA - 49 5 AR - 4 Chamber of Commerce 1 CA - 49 2 KY - 6 3 NC -11 4 AR - 4 5 MN - 6 Emily's List 1 FL - 22 2 KY - 6 3 MI - 8 4 NJ - 7 Business Roundtable 1 NM - 1 2 CA - 20 3 KY - 6 4 PA -10 5 CA - 49

9. All Senate Races - Comparison of Spending on Ads Through November 7 REPUBLICANS Candidates $64,337,196 Republican Party $17,746,531 Groups $4,873,120 Total Spending $86,956,847 DEMOCRATS Candidates $60,935,231 Democratic Party $21,435,241 Groups $5,684,411 Total Spending $88,054,883

10. All Senate Races - Heaviest Spending on Ads by Group Rank Group Through November 7 Republicans Democrats 1 Friends of Hillary $2,541,850 2 Chamber of Commerce $1,362,521 3 Americans for Quality Nursing Home Care $1,270,241 $51,754 4 Republican Leadership Council $735,550 5 Americans for Job Security $697,326 RANKING IS BASED ON SPENDING SINCE JUNE 1

11. All Senate Races - Priority Senate Races for Most Active Groups Group Media Markets Friends of Hillary 1 New York 1 Michigan Chamber of Commerce 2 Virgnia 3 Washington Americans for Quality Nursing Home Care 1 Missouri 2 Utah 3 Pennsylvania 4 Deleware 5 Michigan Republican Leadership Council 1 New York 2 New Jersey 3 Deleware

12. Top 10 Markets for Political Advertising in All Races by All Advertisers Number of Ads 1 ST LOUIS 28,680 2 DETROIT 28,620 3 KANSAS CITY 27,255 4 SEATTLE 26,393 5 GRAND RAPIDS 23,945 6 FLINT 23,582 7 SPOKANE 22,778 8 PHILADELPHIA 21,488 9 LOUISVILLE 19,003 10 ORLANDO 17,556