Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804

Similar documents
Thinking Evidentially

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

FORENSIC EXERCISE. JTIP Handout: Lesson 28 Hearsay. b. Is consistent with the declarant s WHAT IS HEARSAY?

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012)

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE.

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline

Protecting the Child s Voice: Use and Application of the Child Victim Hearsay Exception

Recanting Victims 7/19/2018. Goals of Presentation. Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial

Evidence. I) Relevance

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

The Admissibility of Child Hearsay Statements in Custody Litigation David Butler, Associate Circuit Judge

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence

California Bar Examination

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Most Common Foundations for Exhibits Francis J. Carney

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.

PENOBSCOT COUNTY. Hearing was held on the defendant's motion to suppress and memoranda filed

A Prosecutor s Hail Mary in Domestic Violence Cases. FORFEITURE BY WRONGDOING

California Bar Examination

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES

New York Law Journal

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading

MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

THE SECRET TO HEARSAY AND HEARSAY EXEMPTIONS REVEALED

Appellate Division, Third Department, People v. Young

PART TWO VIRGINIA RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE VII. OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY.

HEARSAY OBJECTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS. By Simon H. Bloom & Ryan E. Harbin Bloom Sugarman, LLP

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

Defending Domestic Violence Cases Sarah Castaner Durham County Public Defenders Office September 2008

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. EVIDENCE

PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS AND THE APPLICATION OF R. v. K.G.B.

SEEKING ADMISSION OF POLICE REPORTS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN: A DUAL LEVEL HEARSAY CHALLENGE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media

DEQUAN SHAKEITH SAPP OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS March 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. Richard B. Davis, Jr., Judge. June 28, 2018

TRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE

Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(3) The statement against interest exception.

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Fall 2015) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1

Institutional Repository. University of Miami Law School. Meredith E. James. University of Miami Law Review

Indicia of Reliability and Face to Face Confrontation: Emerging Issues in Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions

Track 3 - Session 2. Litigation Tips

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Confronting Child Victims of Sex Abuse: The Unconstitutionality of the Sexual Abuse Hearsay Exception

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

LAW550 Litigation Final Exam Notes

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D (CORRECTED) STATE OF FLORIDA,

58 th Mid-Year Meeting Introducing Evidence in Family Court

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. JAMES DEMARCO WILLIAMS : (Criminal Appeal from Common : Pleas Court)

HINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION

MDT or OMG? Deflated. Traveling the Multidisciplinary Team Road Toward the Courtroom Part One

EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

2006 N BERBICE (CIVIL JURISDICTION)

Appendix 3J Training Memo How a Prosecutor Reads a Domestic Violence Related Police Report

PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS AND SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE

COMMONWEALTH vs. JOSHUA ROSADO. Suffolk. May 7, September 14, Present: Gants, C.J., Gaziano, Lowy, Budd, & Cypher, JJ.

EXPERT TESTIMONY IN CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CASES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

O P I N I O N ... and one count of unlawful restraint after a jury trial. Smith was sentenced to fifteen

Chapter 4: Children and Youth in the Courtroom

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMITTEE ON RULES OF EVIDENCE. Proposed Amendment of Rule of Evidence 803.1(1)

A Student s Guide to Hearsay REVISED 4th Edition

9. COMPETENCY AND PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE A. INTRODUCTION

Case 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

JUDICIAL CODE (42 PA.C.S.) - CHILD VICTIMS AND WITNESSES Act of Jul. 15, 2004, P.L. 736, No. 87 Cl. 42 Session of 2004 No

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

6. Secondary evidence rule. 7. CEC 352 discretion to exclude for unfair prejudice. a 2/3 vote by legislature after 1982.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 5, 2009 Session

USING THE CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON FORFEITURE BY WRONGDOING CONFRONTATION CLAUSE EXCEPTION IN CHILD ABUSE CASES.

CHAPTER 7 EVIDENCE RELATING TO ABUSE, NEGLECT AND DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

[Cite as Felice's Main Street, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 2002-Ohio-5962.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE V. TONEY, 2002-NMSC-003, 131 N.M. 558, 40 P.3d 1002 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Respondent, vs. MICHAEL TONEY, Defendant-Petitioner.

CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON: THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE REBORN

PART I INTRODUCTORY MATTERS AND TERMINOLOGY 1

MBE PRACTICE QUESTIONS SET 1 EVIDENCE

MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A

TAKING AND DEFENDING DEPOSITION September 26, :00-1:00 p.m. Presenter: Thomasina F. Moore, Esq.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

Transcription:

Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804 These exceptions are allowed because the rules feel that they have inherent indicia of reliability. Therefore, they can be allowed even though they re hearsay. The exceptions are classified by availability of the declarant: Rule 803 exceptions are allowable whether or not the declarant is available him/herself. Rule 804 exceptions are available only if the proponent can show that the declarant is unavailable to testify. This could be because the declarant refuses to testify, is dead, is out of town, etc. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 1

Rule 803 Statements Statements Exceptions 1 Rule 803(1): Present Sense Impression This means that the declarant made the statement while observing the action referenced in the statement without time for reflective thought. This doesn t t have to be during the event. Courts have held that as much as 15 minutes after the event could still be a present sense impression. E.g., The 911 operator testifies, John called and said I I see a car speeding through the school zone at 100 MPH. Rule 803(2): Excited Utterance This applied to any statement made out of stress or excitement spontaneously at the time of the event. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 2

Rule 803 Statements Statements Exceptions 2 Rule 803(3): Then Existing Mental Emotional or Physical Condition This must be a description as to feeling now. E.g. John told me he had a headache Threats and statements that indicate motive to do something often fall under this exception. Rule 803(4): Statement for the Purpose of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment This includes description of medical history, past or present symptoms. The statement must be made to a person that the declarant thought was involved in providing him or her with medical care. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 3

Rule 803 Records and Reports Exceptions 1 Rule 803(5) Recorded Recollections This is the exception that allowed the past recollection recorded technique discussed earlier in the course. If the witness wrote something down when it was still fresh in his or her memory and, when on the stand, can t remember, the notes can be read as evidence. This does not mean that something that would otherwise be hearsay can be admitted just because it s s written down! Rule 803(6) and 803(7) Records of Regularly Conducted Activities or Lack Thereof. This applies to records kept in the ordinary course of business; e.g., Police reports Hospital and doctor s s records Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 4

Rule 803 Records and Reports Exceptions 2 Other Rule 803 exceptions for records include: (8) Public records and reports. (9) Records of vital statistics. (10) Absence of public record or entry. (11) Records of religious organizations. (12) Marriage, baptismal, and similar certificates. (13) Family records. (14) Records of documents affecting an interest in property. (15) Statements in documents affecting an interest in property. (16) Statements in ancient documents. (17) Market reports, commercial publications. (18) Learned treatises. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 5

Rule 803: Other Exceptions The reputation reputation exceptions: (19) Reputation concerning personal or family history. (20) Reputation concerning boundaries or general history. (21) Reputation as to character. Note, of course, that evidence of reputation also may have a problem under Article 4 as being character evidence. This exception applies when an exception under Article 4 or 6 applies as well. The judgment judgment exceptions (22) Judgment of previous conviction. Again, watch out for character evidence issues! (23) Judgment as to personal, family or general history, or boundaries. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 6

Rule 804: Declarant Unavailable Rule 804 exceptions only apply if the declarant is unavailable to t testify. This is applicable if the declarant (1) is exempted by ruling of the court on the ground of privilege from testifying concerning the subject matter of the declarant's statement; or (2) persists in refusing to testify concerning the subject matter of the declarant's statement despite an order of the court to do so; or (3) testifies to a lack of memory of the subject matter of the declarant's statement; or (4) is unable to be present or to testify at the hearing because of death or then existing physical or mental illness or infirmity; or (5) is absent from the hearing and the proponent of a statement has been unable to procure the declarant's attendance Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 7

Rule 804 Exceptions 1 Rule 804(b)(1): Former Testimony Previously given sworn testimony can be introduced, but only if the other party had the chance to challenge that testimony by cross examination or something similar, Thus, grand jury testimony usually doesn t t fit this exception. Rule 804(b)(1): Statement Under Belief of Impending Death For this exception to apply, the person doesn t t actually have to have died; nor does the person actually have had to have been in any real danger. The key if the belief of the declarant! Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 8

Rule 804 Exceptions 2 Other Rule 804(b) exceptions (applicable only when the declarant is unavailable) include: (3) Statement against interest. A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, etc. circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement. ent. (4) Statement of personal or family history. A statement concerning the declarant's own birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, legitimacy, relationship by blood, adoption, etc. (6) Forfeiture by wrongdoing. A statement offered against a party that has engaged or acquiesced ed in wrongdoing that was intended to, and did, procure the unavailability of the declarant as a witness. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 9

Hearsay Other Rules Hearsay within Hearsay E.g., Sarah told be that Jim told her that Jane stabbed Jesse. For this to be admissible, there has to be a valid hearsay exception for each level of hearsay! Catch Catch all all Hearsay Exception Rule 807 allows hearsay to be admitted where: The statement is offered as evidence of a material fact. The statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts. The general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 10

Hearsay The Confrontation Clause The 6 th Amendment guarantees a criminal defendant: [the right] to be confronted with the witnesses against him. Admission of hearsay against a criminal defendant can be said to violate that right. Therefore, the Supreme Court has ruled that even if allowable under the hearsay rules, evidence can t t be admitted against a criminal defendant unless: The declarant is unavailable. This applies even where there would be an 803 exception. There are adequate indicia of reliability. This can be satisfied by a showing that the statement falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception or has particularized guarantees of truthworthiness. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 11

Hearsay The Confrontation Clause 2 An exception to the confrontation clause/hearsay rule is often made where a child is the alleged victim of sexual abuse. The child s s out of court statement can be allowed where: The statements concern the commission of sexual abuse. The circumstances of the statement provide guarantees of trustworthiness. The statement was not made in preparation for a legal proceeding. The statement was made prior to the defendant s s initial appearance in court. To protect a child/alleged abuse victim, the course can also force the defendant to watch the trial on closed circuit television monitors. Evidence Lecture 13 Slide 12