Implementation of the EU Directive and its potential generalisation worldwide. Speaking Points

Similar documents
Draft Resolution. Risk and safety assessments ( stress tests ) of nuclear power plant in the European Union and related activities

STATEMENT REPUBLIC OF POLAND. delivered by Mr Andrzej Przybycin. to the 62. General Conference

Legal Framework for Nuclear Safety (General Overview)

Statement on behalf of Hungary. Ms Andrea Beatrix Kádár

Preparatory Committee for the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) - EU Statement

UJD SR Practices in Communicating with Public

European Union. Statement on the occasion of the 62 nd General Conference of the IAEA

7 th Review Meeting of the Contracting Parties to The Convention on Nuclear Safety. 27 March 7 April 2017 Vienna, Austria.

EUROPEAN HERITAGE LABEL GUIDELINES FOR CANDIDATE SITES

PREAMBLE THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE REPUBLIC O

HERCA-WENRA approach for better cross-border coordination of protective actions during the early phase of a nuclear accident

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Continuous shared learning and improvement of nuclear safety and regulatory organisations through the OECD/NEA

STATEMENT By Mr. Gideon Frank, Director General Israel Atomic Energy Commission At the International Atomic Energy Agency 47 th General Conference

Statement of. Dr. József Rónaky Director General of the Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority,

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 60 th General Conference Vienna, September 2016

Special Eurobarometer 440. Report. Europeans, Agriculture and the CAP

National Statement by Ireland: General Conference of the IAEA: 14 to 18 September 2015

Copy: H.E. MR. DAMIAN GJIKNURI MINISTER OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENERGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

European Union Passport

and note with satisfaction that stocks of nuclear weapons are now at far lower levels than at anytime in the past half-century. Our individual contrib

Data Protection in the European Union: the role of National Data Protection Authorities Strengthening the fundamental rights architecture in the EU II

Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level

Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) Economic Ministers Meeting Chairman s Statement

JOINT COMMUNIQUE Sixth Session of the Barents Euro Arctic Council Bodo, Norway 4 5 March 1999

Page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN ELECTRICITY REGULATORS ASBL - CONSOLIDATED ON 15 SEPTEMBER 2015

CEEP CONTRIBUTION TO THE UPCOMING WHITE PAPER ON THE FUTURE OF THE EU

Steering Group Meeting. Conclusions

Diplomatic Conference to consider a Proposal by Switzerland to amend the Convention on Nuclear Safety. 9 February 2015 Vienna, Austria.

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

DRAFT International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities

European Protection Order Briefing and suggested amendments February 2010

2 nd Extraordinary Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Nuclear Safety August 2012 Vienna, Austria. Final Summary Report

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

IAEA GENERAL CONFERENCE. 28 September 2005 NEW ZEALAND STATEMENT. I would like first to congratulate you on assuming the Presidency of this year's

112, the single European emergency number: Frequently Asked Questions

EUROPEAN HERITAGE LABEL GUIDELINES FOR CANDIDATE SITES

Identification of the respondent: Fields marked with * are mandatory.

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 November 2017 (OR. en)

7517/12 MDL/ach 1 DG I

INVESTING IN AN OPEN AND SECURE EUROPE Two Funds for the period

JOINT COMMUNIQUE EIGHTH CABO VERDE-EU POLITICAL DIALOGUE MEETING AT MINISTERIAL LEVEL. Mindelo, 16 November 2016

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE

The Minutes of the 5th meeting of the Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development under the EU-Korea FTA, 24 March 2017, in Brussels

CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY TEXT

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Joint Statement of the 22 nd EU-ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Brussels, Belgium, 21 January 2019

MINISTERIAL DECLARATION

summary fiche The European Social Fund: Women, Gender mainstreaming and Reconciliation of

Group of Administrative Co-operation Under the R&TTE Directive

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL. Thirteenth report on relocation and resettlement

Statement on behalf of Hungary

Only appropriately regulation for the agency work industry can effectively drive job creation, growth and competitiveness

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Speech by President Barroso on the June European Council

EU DEVELOPMENT AID AND THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS

European Neighbourhood Policy

DRAFT International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities

Message by the Head of Delegation

THE ENLARGEMENT OF THE UNION

Limited THE EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter referred to as the "Union" THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC,

Our Leaders decided at the Kananaskis Summit to launch a new G8 Global Partnership against the Spread

Convention on Nuclear Safety

Conference of the Polish Presidency of the Council of the EU

Eighth United Nations-Republic of Korea Joint Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues

TEXTS ADOPTED. Evaluation of activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. accompanying the

14747/14 MDL/ach 1 DG E1B

BELGIUM. Act on the Phase-out of Nuclear Energy for the Purposes of the Industrial Production of Electricity. Adopted on 31 January 2003.

EU-Canada Summit Declaration Prague, 6 May EU-CANADA SUMMIT DECLARATION...2

"NPT Review Conference 2015: Lessons and Future Prospects" Remarks to the Fifth Prague Agenda Conference

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. On Progress in Bulgaria under the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism

1. Why do third-country audit entities have to register with authorities in Member States?

European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB79.5) ONE YEAR TO GO TO THE 2014 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS Economic and social part DETAILED ANALYSIS

I would like to take this opportunity to extend a warm welcome to Grenada. Turkey stands ready to cooperate with all new members.

Special Eurobarometer 467. Report. Future of Europe. Social issues

Joint Communiqué: European Union Central Asia Foreign Ministers' Meeting, Brussels, 23 November 2018

Ministry of Trade and Industry, Finland Nuclear Energy Act

Vienna Declaration on Nuclear Safety

LEGAL FRAMEWORK BY FRANZ-NIKOLAUS FLAKUS AND LARRY D. JOHNSON

Competition and EU policy-making

JOINT CONVENTION ON THE SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT AND ON THE SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB79.5) ONE YEAR TO GO UNTIL THE 2014 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS Institutional Part ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW

Common ground in European Dismissal Law

Fertility rate and employment rate: how do they interact to each other?

URANIUM MINING AND NUCLEAR FACILITIES (PROHIBITIONS) ACT 1986 No. 194

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

JOINT STATEMENT PRIME MINISTERS COUNCIL OF THE BALTIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

NUCLEAR SAFEGUARDS BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

Presented at the Closing Plenary Session on 11 September 2006

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Q&A on the European Citizens' Initiative

,QIRUPDWLRQQRWHWRWKH&RPPLVVLRQ IURP&RPPLVVLRQHUV/DP\DQG)LVFKOHU

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION. 27th ANNUAL REPORT ON MONITORING THE APPLICATION OF EU LAW (2009) SEC(2010) 1143 SEC(2010) 1144

European Integration Forum Summary report of the first meeting April 2009

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION

Industrial Relations in Europe 2010 report

Transcription:

Senior Regulators' Meeting IAEA, 23 September 2010 Implementation of the EU Directive and its potential generalisation worldwide Speaking Points Introduction Distinguished senior regulators, I am very pleased to attend the 2010 session of the Senior Regulators' Group meeting, which represents a unique opportunity to exchange views and experiences on current policy and technical issues related to nuclear matters. One of the key developments of the European Energy Policy over the last years is the shift towards low carbon energy sources, in particular nuclear energy and renewable energy sources. This shift is essential for the imperative fight against climate change, but also to increase the security of energy supply by reducing the external dependence on oil and gas. 1. Nuclear safety an absolute policy priority for the EU In the current context, nuclear safety is and remains an absolute policy priority for the EU. At present, in Europe, 143 nuclear power plants operating in 14 Member States generate approximately one third of the EU electricity. Nuclear power produces around two thirds of the carbon-free electricity in the EU and by early 2020 s, nearly two thirds of all EU electricity could come from carbon-free sources, essentially from nuclear energy. In addition, today, a number of Member States plan new investments or life extensions of nuclear power plants (e.g. new nuclear power plants are being built in Finland, France, and Slovakia; further projects in several other Member States, like the United Kingdom, Poland, Italy, Bulgaria, Romania and the Czech Republic, have been announced or notified to the European Commission. In addition, lifetime extensions decisions have been recently announced in Belgium and Germany). While it is for each EU country to choose whether or not to rely on nuclear, the role of the EU is to develop in the interest of all its Member States the most advanced legal framework for nuclear energy, meeting the highest standards of safety, security and non-proliferation.

Another important role of the EU is to encourage and support third countries to meet the highest standards of safety, security and nonproliferation, through developing international cooperation in the nuclear energy field, in particular with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Externally, financial EU support instruments are also in place to promote nuclear safety in third countries. The Nuclear Safety Directive was unanimously adopted last year by the 27 EU Member States, benefiting from a very large support of the European Parliament. It was the achievement of the continuous efforts of the Commission to establish a Community-wide legally binding framework governing nuclear safety issues. This legal framework supports the development of a sustainable safety infrastructure at national level and responds to the safety challenges posed by the renewed interest in nuclear energy at EU level and worldwide. Moreover, the legally binding common safety requirements across the EU were also necessary in order to provide appropriate guarantees to the public, which requested reassurance on the safety of nuclear installations across Europe, as reflected in the latest Eurobarometer surveys. Developing nuclear safety to the highest possible standard is a responsibility not only for Europe, but for the world; not only for us but for the next generations. The healthy competition and stimulation that may stem from such an ambition is not to be underestimated. By going ahead, the EU became the first major regional nuclear actor in the world to have legally binding safety rules. This example could initiate other regions in the world to follow the approach of legally binding safety standards. This would not only improve safety worldwide, but could also create a move towards applying a serious safety culture. Moreover, the existence of a Community nuclear safety legislative framework could help to create a level playing field in the context of the negotiations of international agreements in the nuclear field with third parties. This result could not have been achieved without the creation of the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group (ENSREG), which brings together the senior regulators and heads of national authorities in charge of nuclear safety of all the nuclear and non-nuclear Member States. The Commission cooperated with ENSREG and included in its proposal many elements, key principles and guiding lines suggested by the Group. We extend also our thanks to WENRA that has invested a lot in this matter, in particular through the development of the reference levels. In addition, in the preparation of the Directive, the Commission cooperated with the IAEA, which also participates as an observer in 2

ENSREG, in order to ensure the full conformity of the EU legislative proposal with the international IAEA standards and reach agreement on important elements. This ensured a sound and coherent approach and, at the same time, established the ground for a continued enhanced cooperation. 2. The Nuclear Safety Directive a milestone EU legal instrument The main objective of the Nuclear Safety Directive is to establish a solid and flexible legal framework for maintaining and promoting the continuous improvement of nuclear safety and its regulation, based on shared principles already agreed at international level. The Directive introduces into Community law the principles of the IAEA Safety Fundamentals and the obligations of the international Convention on Nuclear Safety, which were both drawn up and endorsed by the Member States. The elaboration of EU legislation on these bases recognises the value of the international progress in the nuclear safety area and takes full advantage of the work carried out by the IAEA in this field. The setting up of binding legal rules at EU level will benefit Member States, as it would give them a reference for their national nuclear safety systems. In this context, it is important to stress that the Directive creates a flexible approach for the continuous improvement of nuclear safety requirements, by leaving a needed appreciation margin to the Member States in the practical implementation. Secondly, it will benefit the national nuclear safety regulatory bodies, as it would ensure that they get enough human and financial means for their work and give them the driving role in implementing the common EU rules. Finally, it will profit EU citizens by enhancing their safety and providing them legal certainty. The underlying principles upon which the Directive is built are the national responsibility for nuclear safety and the continuous improvement of safety. In line with these basic principles, the Directive requires Member States to establish and to maintain a national legislative, regulatory and organisational framework for the safety of nuclear installations. This framework should be improved when appropriate, taking into account operating experience, insights gained from safety analyses for operating nuclear installations, development of technology and results of safety research. In addition, periodic safety assessments of their national framework and competent regulatory authorities shall be organised by the EU Member States, supplemented by international peer reviews. 3

In order to fulfil this requirement related to the international peerreviews, the EU Member States' regulators reunited in ENSREG recommended that the best way forward is the cooperation with the IAEA Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) programme, recognising thus the value of this mutual learning mechanism that represents an opportunity to exchange professional experience and to share lessons learned and good practices in an open and cooperative spirit through advice by peers. The Directive aims to reinforce the role and the independence of the competent national regulatory authorities by building on their competencies. The prime responsibility of licence holders for nuclear safety is also explicitly recognised. Licence holders are required to undertake systematic and verifiable safety assessments, including the verification of "defence-indepth" measures. The Directive requires Member States to ensure that arrangements for education and training are made in order to maintain and to further develop competencies in nuclear safety. Finally, it promotes a high level of transparency of regulatory actions to the public, within the limits of national legislation and international obligations. 3. The transposition and implementation of the Nuclear Safety Directive - follow-up steps subsequent to its adoption The Nuclear Safety Directive is now to be transposed into the national legislation of the Member States by 22 July 2011. Consequently, one of the main priorities of the Commission in the current period is to ensure and support the Member States for the proper and timely transposition of the Directive. A concrete example of Commission assistance was represented by the organisation in May 2010 of a meeting, where Member States' experts were invited to raise, seek clarifications and discuss with our services any issues that they considered of relevance in the transposition process. The discussions within the seminar touched upon all the provisions of the Directive, focussing in particular on aspects such as ensuring regulatory independence, providing sufficient human and financial resources for the regulators etc. In addition, the Commission welcomes and fully supports the commitment taken by ENSREG to actively contribute to the process of transposing and implementing the Directive. Consequently, a specific ENSREG Working Group (n.b. chaired by Mr Mike Weightman, the Chairperson of this morning session) is tasked to suggest and develop a unified structure for the Member States' Reports on the implementation of 4

the Directive, to help establishing a common methodology for the periodic safety self-assessments and a system for the coordination of the international peer-reviews. The Commission follows closely and actively contributes to all these activities. Subsequent to the transposition period, the Member States will have to periodically report to the Commission the status of the implementation of the Directive. The first report is due to be submitted 22 July 2014 and every three years thereafter, taking into account the timing for reporting and regular review meetings under the Convention on Nuclear Safety. This will further support the improvement of the EU contribution to the Convention on Nuclear Safety review process. Furthermore, in order to stimulate the exchange of practical experiences and best practices, the Directive requires Member States to report to the other Member States and to the Commission, the outcomes of the international peer-reviews that they have the obligation to periodically invite, when these are available. 4. The key role of the national regulators in the context of the Nuclear Safety Directive The Nuclear Safety Directive aims to reinforce the role and the independence of the competent national regulatory authorities by building on their competencies. It recognises explicitly that only independent and strong regulators can guarantee the safe operation of the nuclear installations in the EU. In order to facilitate autonomous decisions giving priority to nuclear safety by guaranteeing the freedom of the regulatory authority from undue pressure, the Directive emphasises the basic principle that the regulators should be functionally separated from any body or organisation concerned with the promotion or utilisation of nuclear energy. The Directive requires Member States to ensure that national regulators are vested with adequate authority, including the authority to suspend the operation of a nuclear installation, and are given the legal powers and the means in terms of human and financial resources necessary to fulfil their tasks. In simple words, the Regulator should be independent. In order to ensure the fulfilment of these objectives, the Commission will actively check that the national legislation transposing the Directive sets up adequate mechanisms and guarantees for the independence of the regulatory authorities. If relevant, it will issue recommendations on the draft measures or launch appropriate procedures if the measures adopted are not deemed adequate. The Directive introduces an additional level of supervision by imposing to the regulatory authorities the obligation to ensure that the information on the national regulation of nuclear safety is made available to the general 5

public. It thus offers European civil society a possibility to become more involved in this field. Conclusion Distinguished senior regulators, Let me now summarise: Nuclear safety is and will remain our absolute priority for the EU. To meet this objective, an appropriate binding legal framework for nuclear safety, alongside with a strong safety culture at all levels is fundamental. Through its nuclear safety binding legal framework, the EU can represent an example for other regions. We are ready to cooperate with all countries or regions if you consider our legally binding approach to be attractive. As underlined by the previous IAEA Director General, Dr. El Baradei, at the last year's General Conference, "it is in all our interests to ensure that the highest safety standards are upheld everywhere". However, we have many challenges ahead: the need to maintain the level of safety in situation of lifetime extension, continuous improvement of safety everywhere, ensuring that cost reduction strategies do not reduce safety and helping new countries embarking into nuclear power. We must combine energy policy ambitions with safety considerations. I believe we have a responsibility to implement a sound framework and seek to further enhance it, providing the EU with an excellent opportunity to move ahead and to address nuclear issues in the broadest sense. Throughout this complex process and with a view to addressing the many chalenges, the cooperation between the regulatory bodies is of crucial importance for achieving tangible results in maintaining and enhancing nuclear safety. In this context, as an example of good practice, I would like to highlight the key importance of the activity of ENSREG, which has actively and significantly contributed to boosting communication, coordination and cooperation between EU national regulatory authorities, as well as enhancing their dialogue with the Commission. As mentioned before, we have cooperated fruitfully with the IAEA in the preparation of the Nuclear Safety Directive. Now that the common legal framework on nuclear safety in the EU has been established, we will continue and further reinforce our cooperation in this important field with the aim of reaching our common goals of meeting the highest standards of safety, security and non proliferation. We will also complement the legal framework with a new proposal regarding safety of spent fuel management and safety of radioactive waste management. 6

Thank you for your attention. 7