SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT ACTION SHEET. SP-lS-01 Douglas County Transportation and Land Services

Similar documents
SP-l3-03 Douglas County Transportation and Land Services

SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT ACTION SHEET. Brian Miller 340 W. Marine View Dr. Orondo, WA

SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT ACTION SHEET

SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMI ACTION SHEET

SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT ACTION SHEET

SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT SHEET. SP Douglas County Transportation and Land. o Denied. September 21, 2018

Douglas County Hearing Examiner

BEFORE THE DOUGLAS COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER I. FINDINGS OF FACT

DOUGLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEARING EXAMINER h Street NW East Wenatchee, WAS BEFORE THE DOUGLAS COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY

CITY OF MEDFORD RIPARIAN CORRIDOR ORDINANCE. Adopted: June 1, 2000 by Ordinance #

AGENDA Wednesday January 9, :30 PM Douglas County Public Services Building Hearing Room th Street NW, East Wenatchee, WA

Chapter 7 Administrative Procedures

STEVENS COUNTY TITLE 8 TIMBER AND FOREST PRACTICES

DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)

Enforcement violations - penalties

Accessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015)

C HAPTER 9: ENFORCEMENT AND VIOLATIONS. Enforcement Responsibilities

EROSION AND SEDIMENT ORDINANCE OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY (Effective: July 20, 1994)

ORD-3258 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:

CHAPTER 3. Building Code

CITY OF EAGLE REZONE APPLICATION CROSS REF. FILES: Owner. Purchaser APPLICANT ADDRESS: APPLICANT OWNER ADDRESS: OWNER REPRESENTED BY:

Enforcement violations - penalties

EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE

CHAPTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOREST PRACTICE REGULATIONS

Stream Protection Buffer Variance Request

Chapter AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, LAND USE MAP, AND DEVELOPMENT CODE

ORDINANCE NO. 33 PENINSULA TOWNSHIP STORM WATER CONTROL ORDINANCE. Description of Purpose and Nature:

11.01 Minimum Application Requirements. Okanogan County Regional Shoreline Master Program April 1, 2009 DRAFT Chapter 11 Administration

SUBTITLE II CHAPTER GENERAL PROVISIONS

CRYSTAL CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC

(3) "Conservation district" means a conservation district authorized under part 93.

BY-LAW NO the protection, preservation. and removal of Trees on private property within the Township of Georgian Bay

Suburban; Rural Town of Brookhaven Tree Preservation Ordinance. Abstract. Resource. Topic:

MEMORANDUM. FIRST READ: Amendments to Chapter 16 related to Streams and Stream Buffers (Rich Edinger)

Middlesex County EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE Adopted September 16, 2008

CHAPTER BUILDING PERMITS

Compiler's note: The repealed sections pertained to definitions and soil erosion and sedimentation control program.

6.1 Planned Unit Development District

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (ZBA)

WHATCOM COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER

Chapter FOREST PRACTICES

Title 26 Findings - Page 1 ORDINANCE NO.

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (EXCERPT) Act 451 of 1994 PART 353 SAND DUNES PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT

U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT REGIONAL AND PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMIT SWG

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE JURISDICTION OF,

A. Implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan for citizen involvement and the planning process;

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V ELLEN C. GRIFFIN SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JANUARY 5, 2016 ORDERED BY:

1.000 Development Permit Procedures and Administration

AQUIA HARBOUR PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

Variance Information Sheet Pursuant to Skagit County Code Chapter Visit: for detailed information

BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION. (1) Special Use Permit; (2)Variance

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF HASTINGS HIGHLANDS BY-LAW

NOTICE ANNOUNCING RE-ISSUANCE OF A REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT

SOUTHBOROUGH WETLANDS BY-LAW First Draft 1/2/92, (last revised 2/22/95) Approved at Annual Town Meeting of April 10, 1995 (Article #48)

City of Aurora PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES January 20, 2016

SECTION I. Article 6 (commencing with Section 19331) is added to Chapter 3.5 of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code, to read:

ARTICLE 2.0 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT

LOCAL LAW NO. OF 2018 TOWN BOARD TOWN OF NEW CASTLE PROPOSED LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 121 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF NEW CASTLE

COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF DOUGLAS COUNTY EAST WENATCHEE, WASHINGTON November 13, :30 P.M.

PENN TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NUMBER HOLDING TANKS

ERP Individual Permit. PERMIT NUMBER: ERP DATE ISSUED: May 23, 2016 DATE EXPIRES: May 23, 2021 COUNTY: Levy

CHAPTER 159 CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

Article 14: Nonconformities

Article VII - Administration and Enactment

ARTICLE 10: ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ORDINANCE

Mooring Regulations Ordinance

Town of Otis Landfill Area Protection Ordinance

O2-CD Zoning. B1-CD Zoning. O2-CD Zoning. RZ-1: Technical Data Sheet CHARLOTTE ETJ LIMITS 75' CLASS C RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT, LEFT IN ACCESS POINT

CERTIFICATE. Final. Upon. Instructions: letterhead. Page 1 of 3. CDC Documents. Revised 1/22/2018

Chapter 503 Zoning Administration

MODEL STREAM BUFFER PROTECTION ORDINANCE

ARTICLE XI ENFORCEMENT, PERMITS, VIOLATIONS & PENALTIES

CHAPTER 20B. CD DISTRICT (COASTAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT)

ORDINANCE NO * * * * * WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mont Belvieu, Texas, ( City ) is

Assembly Bill No. 243 CHAPTER 688

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF LANSING INGHAM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 50.2

TITLE III. PARKS AND BOULEVARDS

Model Zoning Ordinance

Readopt with amendment Env-Wq , eff (doc. #9188), to read as follows:

CITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

ARTICLE 1 BASIC PROVISIONS SECTION BASIC PROVISIONS REGULATIONS

ARTICLE 12. ZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL

CHAPTER 27 Amendments

LAKE OF THE OZARKS PERMIT No. Activity: DOCK Sq. Ft.: Slips: Organization: Lake Mile: Township: Name: County: Range: Legal Desc.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS PIEDMONT BRANCH 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE. Chapter 57 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL*

LEGISLATIVE COUNSELʹS DIGEST

ARTICLE VI. SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION PREVENTION*

SEPA ORDINANCE. Flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) Preparation of EIS--Additional considerations

This ordinance shall be known as the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance of Pulaski County, Virginia.

Scott Sherrill, Town Clerk/Planning Administrator Town of Pine Knoll Shores

COUNTY OF OAKLAND CITY OF NOVI ORDINANCE NO. 03- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE (Planned Rezoning Overlay)

Title 20 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PROCEDURES AND ADMINISTRATION. Title GENERAL PROVISIONS

ARTICLE II. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DIVISION 1. GENERALLY. Sec Definitions.

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE TRI-COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT

CHAPTER USES 1

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 03C-10

Transcription:

SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT ACTION SHEET Application #: Administering Agency SP-lS-01 Douglas County Transportation and Land Services Type of Permit: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Action: Approved 0 Denied Date of Action: April 17 th, 2015 Date Mailed to DOE!AG Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW and the Shoreline Master Program ofdouglas County, a permit is hereby granted to: Jim & Teresa 21415 19 th St. Ct E., Lake Tapps, W A 98391 To undertake the following development: An application for a shoreline substantial development permit for a residential ground-based boatlift and a shoreline-access stairway. Upon the following property: The boatlift and stairway will serve 72 Orchard Place, Orondo. The property is described as Lot 3 ofthe Granny Smith Short Plat. The property is further described as being located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 26N, Range 21 EWM, Douglas County, Washington. The Douglas County Assessor's number is 26211210026. Within 200 feet ofthe Columbia River and/or its associated wetlands. The project will be within a shoreline of state-wide significance CRCW 90.58.030). The project will be located within a Rural Conservancy designation. The Douglas County Shoreline Master Program is applicable to this development. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken in conformance with the following terms and conditions: 1. All conditions imposed herein shall be binding on the "Applicant," which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. The project shall proceed in substantial conformance with the plans and application materials on file submitted on January 26, 2015 except as amended by the conditions herein. 3. The applicant shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. SP-IS-Ol Page 1 on

4. A copy ofthis pennit and attached conditions shall be kept on-site and provided to the contractor and all others working within the shoreline area at all times. The applicant, contractor, machinery operators and all others working within the shoreline area shall have read this peru1it and attached conditions and shall follow its conditions at all times. 5. The boatlift shall be marked with reflectors, or shall be otherwise identified to prevent unnecessarily hazardous conditions for water surface users during day or night. 6. The project application shall proceed consistent with the Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan prepared by Grette Associates, dated January 2015. 7. Where necessary, a pennanent means of irrigation shall be installed for the mitigation plantings that are designed by a landscape architect or equivalent professional. Said design shall meet the specific needs ofriparian and shrub steppe vegetation. 8. Mitigation planting as shown on the mitigation planting plan sheet 6 of 6, dated 12/19114 shall be planted upon completion ofthe boatlift and stairs. 9. A perfonnance surety agreement in confonnance with Title 14, D.C.C. shall be entered into between the property owner and Douglas County Transportation and Land Services prior to issuance ofthe building pennit. Douglas County must approve quotes for the cost of installation, delivery, plant material, soil amendments, irrigation, seed mix and necessary monitoring visits and reports by the biologist of record and Washington State sales tax. 10. The mitigation site shall be maintained to ensure the management and mitigation plan objectives are successful Maintenance shall ensure 80% survival during the 5 year monitoring period and shall include corrective actions to rectify problems, include rigorous, as-needed elimination of undesirable plants; protection ofshrubs and small trees from competition by grasses and herbaceous plants, and repair and replacement ofany dead plants. 11. A five year monitoring period shall commence upon placement ofthe planting materials and irrigation system. A perfonnance surety agreement in confonnance with Title 14 ofdouglas County Code shall be entered into between the property owner and Douglas County Transportation and Land Services. Douglas County must approve quotes for the cost ofinstallation, delivery, plant material, soil amendments, pennanent irrigation, seed mix, and 3 monitoring visits and reports by a qualified biologist, and the quotes shall include Washington State sales tax. 12. Onsite monitoring and monitoring reports shall be submitted to Douglas County Transportation and Land Services 1 year after mitigation installation; 3 years after mitigation installation; and 5 years after mitigation installation. Monitoring reports shall be submitted by a qualified biologist, as defined by Douglas County Code. The biologist must verify that the conditions ofapproval and provisions in the Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan submitted by Grette Associates, dated January 2015 have been satisfied. 13. Sequential release of funds associated with the surety agreement shall be reviewed for confonnance with the conditions of approval and the management and mitigation plan. Release offunds may occur in increments of 1/3 for substantial confonnance with the plan and conditions of approval. If the standards that are not met are only minimally out of compliance and contingency actions are actively being pursued by the property owner to bring the project into compliance, the County may choose to consider a partial release ofthe scheduled increment. Non-compliance can result in one or more of the following actions: carry-over of the surety amount to the next review period; use of SP-lS-Ol Page 2 of7

funds to remedy the nonconformance; scheduling a hearing with the Douglas County Hearing Examiner to review conformance with the conditions of approval and to determine what actions may be appropriate. 14. Where a condition imposed herein may be found inconsistent with the requirements ofthe Washington State Department offish and Wildlife, lipa Permit, or permitting issued by the United States Army Corps ofengineers, the Douglas County Land Services Director shall have discretion to allow for project redesign consistent vvith the approvals granted by said agencies; ifthe redesign can be found consistent with the DougJas County Code, the Shoreline Master Program, and the Shoreline Management Act. 15. Prior to installation ofthe boatlift, copies of approval from applicable agencies must be submitted to the County. 16. A building permit application must be submitted to the County for installation ofthe shoreline access stairs. 17. Construction ofthe project for which this permit has been granted must be commenced within two (2) years ofthe effective date of this permit. Authorization to conduct development activities granted by the permit shall terminate five (5) years from the filing date ofthe permit. FINDIJ~GS OF FACT 1. The applicants are Jim & Teresa, 21415 19 th S1. Ct Lake Tapps, WA 98391. 2. General Description: An application for a shoreline substantial development permit for a groundbased boat lift and shoreline access stairs. 3. The boatlift will serve 72 Orchard Place, Orondo. The property is described as being Lot 3 ofthe Granny Smith short plat. The property is further described as located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 26N, Range 21 EWM, Douglas County, Washington. 4. The Douglas County Assessor's number is 26211210026. 5. The Comprehensive Plan Designation is Rural Resource 5 Acres. 6. The subject property is located in the RR-5 zoning district. 7. The Columbia River Shoreline section ofthe subject property is designated as "Rural Conservancy" by the Douglas County Shoreline Master Program. 8. WAC 173-27-150 establishes minimum review criteria for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permits. This criteria states that a substantial development permit shall be granted only when the development proposed is consistent with the policies and procedures ofthe Act; the provisions ofthis regulation; and the applicable master program adopted or approved for the area. 9. A Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan dated January 2015 was performed for the project by Grette Associates. SP-lS-01 Page 3 on

10. The Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan established the riparian setback from OHWM as the 100 ft. Zone 1 riparian buffer as designated for the rural conservancy shoreline environment. 11. The installation ofthe boatlift will impact the aquatic environment. A Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan has determined that a total of 125 square feet ofaquatic habitat will be disturbed by the boatlift. The application proposes 680 square feet ofmitigation. A planting plan is proposed on sheet 6 of 6 ofthe diagrams in the Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan. 12. The installation of the shoreline access stairs will impact the riparian environment. A Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan has determined that a total of 120 square feet of riparian habitat will be disturbed by the stairs. The application proposes 120 square feet of mitigation. A planting plan is proposed on sheet 6 of6 of the diagrams in the Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan. 13. The mitigation proposed in the Fish & Wildlife Management and Mitigation Plan meets the requirements ofthe Douglas County Regional Shoreline Master Program. 14. Comments from reviewing agencies have been considered and addressed where appropriate. 15. Chelan County PUD submitted written comment on March 2,2015. 16. Douglas County issued a Determination ofnon-significance on March 16,2015 in accordance \'lith WAC 197-11-355 (Optional DNS). 17. Surrounding property owners were given the opportunity to comment on the proposals, can request a copy ofthe decision, and can appeal the decision subject to the requirements outlined in DCC Title 14. 18. Proper legal requirements were met and surrounding property owners were given the opportunity to comment on the proposal at a public hearing. 19. WAC 173-27-090 requires that construction must be commenced within 2 years ofthe effective date ofthe shoreline permit and that authorization for construction shall terminate 5 years after the effective date ofthe shoreline permit. 20. As conditioned, the development will not adversely affect the general public, health, safety and general welfare. 21. The Douglas County Department ofland Services recommended approval of the requested permit, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. 22. An open record public hearing after legal notice was held on April 16 th, 2015. Appearing and testifying at the hearing on behalf ofthe applicant was Larry Lehman. Mr. Lehman testified that he was an agent ofthe applicant and was authorized to appear and speak on behalf ofthe applicant. Mr. Lehman testified that the applicant had no objection to the proposed Conditions ofapproval. Mr. Leman further testified that the applicants will still have the right to use the joint use dock that serves the applicant's property. 23. No member ofthe public appeared at the hearing. SP-15-0! Page 4 of7

24. At the open record public hearing, the entire planning staff file was admitted into the record. 25. Public agencies with potential jurisdiction over this project were given an opportunity to review the proposal. Agencies that responded with comments were admitted into the record and considered by the Hearing Examiner in rendering this Decision. 26. Any Conclusion of Law that is more correctly a Finding of Fact is hereby incorporated as such by this reference. CONCLUSIONS 1. The Hearing Examiner has been granted authority to render this Decision. 2. As conditioned, the development meets the goals, policies and implementation recommendations as set forth in the Douglas County Countywide Comprehensive Plan and the Douglas County Shoreline Master Program. 3. As conditioned, this proposal is consistent with applicable federal and state laws and regulations. 4. As proposed, revised, and conditioned, potential impacts of the project can be mitigated. 5. Public interests will be served by approval of this proposal. 6. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with Title 18 "Zoning" and Title 19 "Environment" of the Douglas County Code. 7. Any Finding of Fact that is more correctly a Conclusion of Law is hereby incorporated as such by this reference. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Master Program of DougJas County, as amended, and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(7) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms and conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUA.NT TO TillS PERMIT SHALL NOT BEGIN NOR IS AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY-Ol\'E (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173-14-090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS Th'ITIATED WITillN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). Substantial progress toward construction of the project for which this permit has been granted must be accomplished within two (2) years of the filing date of this permit. Authorization to conduct development activities granted by this permit shall terminate five (5) years from the filing date of this permit. SP-!5-0! Page 5 of7

Approved this 17 th day of April, 2015. ) Anyone aggrieved by this decision has twenty-one (21) days from the "date of receipt" as defined in RCW 43.21B.OOl to file a petition for review with the Shorelines Hearings Board as provided for in Washington law. SP-I5-0! Page 6 of7

TIDS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT Date received by the Department " Denied This conditional use/variance permit is approved/denied by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: Date Signature of Authorized Department Official SP-lS-Ol Page 7 of7