Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. It is, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, unless later modified by Order of this Court,

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

CASE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT BUSINESS COURT CASES

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 143

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Case 2:18-cv KOB Document 49 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 7

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development Bureau of Workers' Compensation

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

Case 5:18-cv DAE Document 9 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 7

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.3

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : :

14 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT DIVISION GENERAL CIVIL RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

Investigations and Enforcement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

Honorable R. Stanton Wettick, Jr. COMPLEX CASES. See Local Rule 249(1).

ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES

AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)

CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. Non-Administered. Arbitration Rules. Effective March 1, tel fax

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

CASE 0:15-cv JRT Document 17 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

Transcription:

Case 3:16-cv-00625-CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE INSIGHT KENTUCKY PARTNERS II, L.P. vs. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, ET AL PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16CV-625-CRS DEFENDANTS SCHEDULING ON AGREED LITIGATION PLANAND DISCOVERY SCHEDULE AND REFERRAL ORDER The parties having submitted to the Court a Report of Parties Planning Meeting with a proposed Discovery Plan (DN 35), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will adopt the parties Report of Planning Meeting and Discovery Plan and the following schedule is established for the preparation of this case for trial: 1. Pre-Discovery Disclosures: To be exchanged by July 10, 2017. The parties are under a continuing duty to supplement their disclosures and responses as required by Rule 26(e) whenever necessary during the entire course of this litigation, but no later than two months before end of fact discovery. 2. Preliminary Discovery: Not applicable. 3. Special Instructions re: Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions and Depositions: The parties agree that the scope of discovery shall be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure subject to the parties right to seek (or agree upon) additional or modified discovery provisions under appropriate circumstances.

Case 3:16-cv-00625-CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 424 A. The parties agree that interrogatories shall be governed by the limits set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 33. The parties also agree that document productions shall be made, so far as practicable and economically reasonable, in electronic, searchable or native format as requested, subject to the right of any party to inspect the original hard copies as necessary. The parties shall confer on protocols for production of electronically stored information. B. The parties agree that depositions of fact witnesses shall be governed by the limits set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 30. The parties agree to establish in advance a system of numbering deposition exhibits to ensure that unique exhibit numbers, suitable for use at trial and in all motion papers and other submissions to the Court, is employed. 4. Identify Experts and Compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2): Due no later than December 4, 2017. Rebuttal reports shall be due by January 8, 2018, and all expert discovery shall be completed by February 5, 2018, unless such limits are subsequently modified by agreement of the parties or by further order of the Court. In the absence of good cause shown, no witness shall be permitted to testify except upon compliance with the provisions of this Order. A. Physician Experts With respect to each treating physician who is expected to testify at trial in person or by deposition, the party who will call the witness shall disclose in writing the substance of the facts and opinion to which the physician is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion. This requirement may be satisfied by furnishing a report signed by the treating physician or by a narrative disclosure. No deposition of any treating physician shall be conducted until after the required disclosure is made. B. Employee Experts If a party intends to use employee experts on any issue at trial, disclosures required under Rule 26(a)(2), including any written reports or summaries of facts and opinion, must be timely made. Whether or not the employee has been deposed as a fact witness, any such employee expert may be deposed regarding his or her expert opinions before the deadline for concluding expert depositions. C. Expert Depositions Any expert who has been identified to give trial testimony may be deposed, subject to the limitation that any expert may be deposed for up to seven (7) hours.

Case 3:16-cv-00625-CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 425 5. Joinder of Additional Parties and Amendment of Pleadings: Due no later than July 31, 2017. 6. Other Miscellaneous Matters: The parties agree to the following: A. Electronically Stored Information The parties agree that they will work in good faith to reach a general stipulation for the preservation and production of documents, including Electronically Stored Information ( ESI ). Should the parties fail to agree, they shall bring the matter before the Court by motion. In no event shall any party refrain from preserving or collecting documents for production based on the fact that the parties have not yet entered into a stipulation. B. Service of Pleadings, Motions, Other Papers, and Discovery Requests and Responses All pleadings, motions, and other papers that are filed are to be served on the other party electronically as provided by the Federal Rules and Local Rules. In addition, the parties agree to serve by e-mail courtesy copies of all discovery requests and written responses and other papers that are not filed. The serving party shall attach the pleading or paper in Portable Document Format (.pdf) or other form of electronic file; if transmission of voluminous materials (such as a compendium of attachments or transcripts) as an e-mail attachment is impractical, then those materials shall be served by overnight delivery via service with the ability to track deliveries and verify receipt. Service of discovery requests, objections and responses by e-mail prior to 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time shall be the equivalent of service by hand that day for purposes of Rules 5 and 6. If service by overnight courier has been used for these papers, it will be the equivalent of service by hand on the date of receipt. The parties agree to exchange listserv addresses or other group e-mail addresses to facilitate service on all parties and all outside counsel for each party. The parties shall serve their discovery requests, responses, and objections on all other parties and outside counsel. C. Drafts and Counsel Communications with Experts The parties agree that no notes, drafts, or other type of preliminary written work by or for experts concerning the subject matter of this civil action shall be the subject of discovery or inquiry at trial. No communication, whether written or oral, between or among any expert(s) and counsel for the party retaining said expert(s) concerning the subject matter of this action shall be the subject of discovery or inquiry at trial. The foregoing shall not apply to any

Case 3:16-cv-00625-CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 426 communications or documents upon which the expert relied in forming his or her opinion as expressed in an affidavit, report or testimony, or on which an expert intends to rely as a basis for an opinion expressed in an affidavit, report or testimony in connection with this action; such communications shall be subject to discovery and inquiry at trial. Materials, communications, and other information exempt from discovery under this paragraph shall be treated as attorney work product. D. Modification A party s agreement to the deadlines and limitations stated in this Discovery Plan is without prejudice to its right to seek modifications of the Plan and pretrial schedule pursuant to Rules 16 and 26. E. Privilege Log The parties agree to make a good-faith effort to provide a privilege log within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of the final document set responsive to document requests. The parties further agree that communications between any party and its litigation counsel in anticipation of this action, and documents and things created after the date of the filing of this lawsuit need not be identified on any such privilege log. F. 30(b)(6) Witness Designations The parties agree to identify the corporate representative being offered to testify as a witness pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) and the topics on which the witness is being offered to testify at least five (5) days in advance of the deposition date. G. Third Party Materials The parties shall provide or make available all materials obtained from third parties pursuant to Rule 45. 7. All Discovery: To be completed by February 5, 2018. Motions pertaining to unresolved discovery disputes may not be filed without first having a joint telephonic conference. Counsel shall jointly contact case manager Theresa Burch at theresa_burch@kywd.uscourts.gov or (502) 625-3546 to schedule the conference. 8. Supplemental Disclosures and Responses: Parties to timely supplement disclosures and responses as necessary.

Case 3:16-cv-00625-CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 427 9. Dispositive Motions: To be filed by February 15, 2018. Deadlines for responses and replies will adhere to the Court s rules for motions practice. 10. Administrative Record: Not applicable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby REFERRED to Honorable Colin H. Lindsay, United States Magistrate Judge, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and disposition of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. The Magistrate Judge is authorized and empowered to conduct all necessary scheduling conferences, hearings or other proceedings which in his discretion he deems necessary in order to properly address the issues which arise in the course of this litigation. The Court will conduct a telephonic status conference thirty (30) days prior to the close of fact discovery. Counsel shall jointly contact case manager Theresa Burch no later than forty-five (45) days prior to the close of fact discovery to schedule the conference. The Magistrate Judge is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time should counsel indicate that a conference would be helpful in resolving the issues. Counsel shall jointly contact case manager Theresa Burch to schedule the conference when so needed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 29, 2017 cc: Counsel of Record CharlesR.Simpson I,SeniorJudge UnitedStatesDistrictCourt