) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Nos and IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

a. Name of person served:

West Lincoln Avenue Tel: (714) of the Long Beach Pediatric Surgery

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

Case 2:15-cv MMD-GWF Document 50 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

Case 5:14-cv DMG-DTB Document 110 Filed 08/27/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:925

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 50 Filed 05/04/17 Entered 05/04/17 14:14:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

Case 1:09-cv RWR Document 17 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 24 Filed 03/21/17 Entered 03/21/17 10:59:09 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

( -9. N~kfl082 1OCKETED ONCM. 1 Todd G. Friedland (SBN PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHA 2 PITTMAN LLP 650 Town Center Drive, 7

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2014

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

Centex Homes v. Superior Court (City of San Diego)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

Case: LTS Doc#:111 Filed:05/25/17 Entered:05/25/17 13:40:50 Document Page 1 of 6

1 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv RAJ Document 8 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

F ADV.NOTICE.LODGMENT

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

August 3, Re: Request for Publication of Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker B (July 25, 2017)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

DSV Air & Sea GmbH et al v. Bragg Investment Company Inc. et al View Document View Docket

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. The Motion of Plaintiff Leonard Labow in the above-entitled action, for an

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-0-GAF -CT Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 S. FIGUEROA ST., SUITE 00 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00- TELEPHONE ( -00 FAX ( - Andrew R. Hall (CA SBN andyhall@dwt.com Catherine E. Maxson (CA SBN 0 catherinemaxson@dwt.com OF COUNSEL: BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK 00-0 TELEPHONE ( -0 FAX ( -0 Victor A. Kovner (NY SBN victorkovner@dwt.com 0 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 0-0 TELEPHONE (0-0 FAX (0-00 Stuart R. Dunwoody (WA SBN (admitted pro hac vice stuartdunwoody@dwt.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 DAVID CASSIRER, AVA CASSIRER, and UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, a California non-profit corporation, vs. Plaintiffs, THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA COLLECTION FOUNDATION, an agency or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Spain, Defendant. Case No. CV 0--GAF (CTx STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES Date: N/A Time: N/A Dept.: N/A The Honorable Gary Allen Feess DWT v 00-00000

Case :0-cv-0-GAF -CT Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 STIPULATION This Stipulation is entered into by the parties through their undersigned counsel of record, as follows:. WHEREAS the current Scheduling and Case Management Order, entered August, 0, sets a trial date of July, 0, a discovery cutoff of April, 0, and an expert disclosure deadline of January, 0;. WHEREAS the Defendant filed its motion to dismiss the complaint on September, 0, argument on the motion was heard on January, 0, and the motion to dismiss is under consideration;. WHEREAS to conserve resources the parties have postponed depositions, some of which will likely take place outside the U.S., pending the outcome of the motion to dismiss;. WHEREAS the parties will need to conduct additional fact discovery before they will be able to prepare expert reports in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. (a(; and. WHEREAS to conserve resources the parties wish to postpone preparation of expert reports until after the Court has ruled on the motion to dismiss. WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows:. The parties respectfully request that the trial date be continued by ninety days, to October, 0, and that the pre-trial deadlines be similarly extended. DWT v 00-00000 S. FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 00 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00- ( -00 Fax: ( -

Case :0-cv-0-GAF -CT Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 DATED: January, 0. DATED: January, 0. STUART R. DUNWOODY ANDREW R. HALL CATHERINE E. MAXSON By: s/stuart R. Dunwoody Stuart R. Dunwoody Attorneys for Plaintiff CLAUDE CASSIRER NIXON PEABODY LLP THADDEUS J. STAUBER KELLY L. KRESS By: s/thaddeus J. Stauber Thaddeus J. Stauber Attorneys for Defendant THYSSEN- BORNEMISZA COLLECTION FOUNDATION DWT v 00-00000 S. FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 00 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00- ( -00 Fax: ( -

Case :0-cv-0-GAF -CT Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 DWT v 00-00000 PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed in the County of King, State of Washington. I am over the age of and not a party to the within action. My business address is Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Suite 00, 0 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 0-0. On January, 0, I caused the following document described as: OF TRIA DATE AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES to be filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the interested parties in this action or proceeding, or by placing a true copy of said document(s enclosed in a sealed envelope(s for parties that are not on the email notice list addressed as below, with the name and address of the person served shown on the envelope as follows: Thaddeus J. Stauber Kelly L. Kress Nixon Peabody LLP Gas Company Tower West Fifth Street, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel: ( -000 Fax: ( 00- Email: tstauber@nixonpeabody.com Email: kkress@nixonpeabody.com Attorneys for Defendant Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation U.S. Mail Hand Delivery Overnight Mail Facsimile Email x CM/ECF Notice I placed such envelope(s with postage thereon fully prepaid for deposit in the United States Mail in accordance with the office practice of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. I am familiar with the office practice of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, which practice is that when correspondence is deposited with the Davis Wright Tremaine LLP personnel responsible for delivering correspondence in the United States Postal Service, such correspondence is delivered to the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. S. FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 00 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00- ( -00 Fax: ( -

Case :0-cv-0-GAF -CT Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Executed on January, 0. State I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct. Federal I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP and Stuart R. Dunwoody, admitted pro hac vice, at whose direction the service was made. s/marilyn N. Boyd Marilyn N. Boyd 0 0 DWT v 00-00000 S. FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 00 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00- ( -00 Fax: ( -