EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1379-L ORDER

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and The Heil Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO I. INTRODUCTION. 1. This action originated with a discrimination charge filed by Travis Woods

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Houston Area Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship Committee, Defendant.

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

United States of America v. City of Lubbock, Texas

US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Erika Morales, et al., v. ABM Industries Inc., et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. Zale Corporation

EEOC v. Sunrise Hospitality BC II, LLC d/b/a Microtel Inns & Suites

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 3-10-2008 EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc. Judge Sam A. Lindsay Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc. Keywords Eric Mitchel, Francisco Ochoa, Christopher Digiorgio, Carl Gaines, Mark Barret, Andrew Cervantes, Tristian Fernandez, Henry Firth, Walter Kelley, Wilborn Lyles, David McCoy, Scotty Miles, Michael Nelson, Jerome Sloan, Josh Toram Sr., Anthony Walker, Mark Webster, Willie Winters, Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc., 3:05-CV-1379L, Consent Decree, Disparate Treatment, Retaliation, Terms and Conditions, Race, National Origin, Aerospace, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/319

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, and Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:05-CV-1379L ERIC MITCHEL, FRANCISCO OCHOA, CHRISTOPHER DIGIORGIO, CARL GAINES, MARK BARRET, ANDREW CERVANTES, TRISTIAN FERNANDEZ HENRY FIRTH, WALTER KELLEY, WILBORN LYLES, DAVID McCOY, SCOTTY MILES, MICHAEL NELSON JEROME SLOAN, JOSH TORAM SR., ANTHONY WALKER, MARK WEBSTER, and WILLIE WINTERS, v. Intervenors ALLIED AVIATION SERVICES, INC., ALLIED AVIATION FUELING OF DALLAS, LP, ALLIED AVIATION FUELING COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC. Defendants. THIS is made and entered into by and between the Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ), the Intervenors ERIC MITCHEL, FRANCISCO OCHOA, CHRISTOPHER DIGIORGIO, CARL GAINES, MARK BARRET, ANDREW CERVANTES, TRISTIAN FERNANDEZ, HENRY FIRTH, WALTER KELLEY, 1

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 2 of 9 WILBORN LYLES, DAVID McCOY, SCOTTY MILES, MICHAEL NELSON, JEROME SLOAN, JOSH TORAM SR., ANTHONY WALKER, MARK WEBSTER, and WILLIE WINTERS ( Intervenors ), and the Defendants ALLIED AVIATION SERVICES, INC., ALLIED AVIATION FUELING OF DALLAS, LP, ALLIED AVIATION FUELING COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC. ( Defendants ) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, with regard to the Complaints and Amended Complaints filed by the EEOC and Intervenors ( the Complaints ), in Civil Action No. 3:05- CV-1379L. The Complaints were based upon Charges of Discrimination filed by the Intervenors against the Defendants with the EEOC. The Complaints allege that the Defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, by subjecting the Intervenors to a hostile work environment and disparate treatment because of their race and national origin, and by subjecting some of the Intervenors to retaliation. The Intervenors Complaint also includes claims of discrimination under 42 U.S.C. Section 1981. The EEOC, Intervenors and the Defendants agree to compromise and settle the differences embodied in the Complaints, and intend that the terms and conditions of the compromise and settlement be set forth in this Consent Decree ( Consent Decree ). It is understood and agreed that this Consent Decree is in compromise of disputed claims, and that this Consent Decree shall not in any way be construed as an admission by Defendants of a violation of any federal, state, or local statute, law or regulation, or a violation of any right of the aggrieved individuals or any other person. 2

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 3 of 9 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements set forth herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows, the Court finds appropriate and therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. This Consent Decree resolves all issues raised in EEOC charges of discrimination filed by Eric Mitchel, Francisco Ochoa, Carl Gaines and Christopher DiGiorgio. This Decree further resolves all issues in the Complaints filed by the EEOC and the Intervenors in this civil action. The EEOC and Intervenors waive further claims and/or litigation on all issues raised in the above-referenced Charges and Complaints. The EEOC does not waive processing or litigating charges other than the above-referenced Charges. 2. Defendants agree that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 or 42 U.S.C. Section 1981, they shall conduct all employment practices in a manner which does not subject any employee to race or national origin discrimination, including harassment, disparate terms and conditions of employment and/or retaliation. 3. Defendants and their officers, agents, management (including supervisory employees), successors and assigns, and all those in active concert or participation with them, or any of them, agrees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 or 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 to refrain from: (i) discriminating against employees on the basis of race; (ii) engaging in or being a party to any action, policy or practice that is intended to or is known to them to have the effect of harassing or intimidating any employee on the basis of his/her race; and/or (iii) creating, facilitating or permitting the existence of a work environment that is racially hostile to its employees. 3

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 4 of 9 4. Defendants agree that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 or 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 there shall be no discrimination or retaliation of any kind against any person because of opposition to any practice declared unlawful under Title VII or because of the filing of a charge; giving testimony or assistance or participating in any manner in any investigation, proceeding or hearing under Title VII. 5. Defendants and their officers, agents, management (including supervisory employees), successors and assigns, and all those in active concert or participation with them, or any of them, agrees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 or 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 to refrain from engaging in, implementing or permitting any action, policy or practice with the purpose of retaliating against any current or former employee because he or she opposed any practice of race discrimination, racial harassment or racially hostile work environment, made unlawful under Title VII; filed a Charge of Discrimination alleging any such practice; testified or participated in any manner in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing in connection with this case and/or relating to any claim of race discrimination, racial harassment or racially hostile work environment, was identified as a possible witness in this action; asserted any rights under this Consent Decree; or sought and/or received any monetary and/or non-monetary relief in accordance with this Consent Decree. 6. Defendants agrees to post the Notice appended hereto as Attachment A on the employee bulletin board(s) in prominent and conspicuous locations at all Allied Aviation facilities within thirty (30) days after entry of this Consent Decree. Defendants will report to the EEOC that they have complied with this requirement within thirty (30) days after posting the Notice. Defendants agree to distribute the Notice attached as Attachment A to each current 4

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 5 of 9 and future employee of Allied Aviation, stating the following: This is a copy of Allied Aviation s policy against discrimination. Allied Aviation hereby states its commitment to providing a workplace free of discrimination of any kind. Please read the policy and keep a copy for your records. Defendants agree to distribute this policy to each current employee within 30 days after entry of this Consent Decree. New employees will be given a copy of the notice upon hire. This procedure will remain in effect during the three-year pendency of this Consent Decree 7. The Notice shall also inform employees where to report violations of Defendants policy against harassment, the name of the designated company official to whom they should report said violations, along with the address and telephone number of the Dallas District Office of the EEOC. The notice shall remain posted for the duration of this Consent Decree. In the event that the persons and/or departments to whom individuals should make complaints alleging racial harassment, race or national origin-based discrimination and/or retaliation change during the term of the Consent Decree such that the information contained in the notice is no longer accurate, Defendants shall immediately prepare and post a revised notice that contains the correct information. Defendants shall promptly thereafter forward a copy of the revised notice to the EEOC. 8. Defendants agree to conduct training once a year for all of its employees, owners and managers at all Allied Aviation facilities, advising them of the requirements and prohibitions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Defendants will also establish a process to train new employees about the requirements and prohibitions of Title VII. The training will inform the employees of the complaint procedure for individuals who believe they have experienced discrimination. The training will also advise the employees of the consequences of violating 5

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 6 of 9 Title VII. The training will also include a specific discussion or instruction relating to the issue of racial and national origin harassment and a hostile work environment. The training shall be at least one hour in duration. Defendants agree to give written notice to the EEOC within fourteen (14) days after each training session, providing the following information: (a) the date and location of the training; (b) the list of employees attending; (c) the name of the person providing the training; and (d) the substance of the training. 9. Defendants agree they shall impose discipline--up to and including termination, suspension without pay or demotion--upon any supervisor or manager who is found by reasonable evidence to have engaged in discrimination or race-based or national origin harassment or permitted any such conduct to occur in his or her work area or among employees under his or her supervision, or who retaliated against any person who complained or participated in any investigation or proceeding concerning any such conduct. Defendants shall communicate this policy to all of their supervisors and managers, including but not limited to line supervisors, duty managers, operating managers and general managers. 10. Defendants agrees that they shall continue to advise all managers and supervisors of their duty to actively monitor their work areas to ensure employees compliance with the company s policy against racial harassment, and to report any incidents and/or complaints of discrimination, race-based or national origin harassment and/or retaliation of which they become aware to the persons charged with handling such complaints. 11. Within fourteen (14) days after entry of this Consent Decree, Defendants agree to remove from the Intervenors personnel files all documents, entries and references relating to the following: the facts and circumstances which led to the filing of her charge of discrimination; the 6

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 7 of 9 charge itself; and the complaint filed by the EEOC in federal court based upon their Charges of Discrimination. Defendants shall send a report to the EEOC within fourteen (14) days after expungement, describing the specific items expunged from the Intervenors personnel files. 12. Without making any admission of liability or agreeing that any violation of federal, state or local law, statute or regulation took place, but instead only to compromise and resolve disputed claims, Defendants agree to pay $ 1,885,000.00 to resolve all claims for damages to the Intervenors, including attorney s fees. The Intervenors shall be responsible for any tax liability arising out of the payment and shall indemnify and hold Defendants harmless therefrom. 13. Within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Consent Decree or within sixty (60) days of the receipt of valid addresses and social security numbers of the Intervenors from the Intervenors' counsel, whichever is later, Defendants will issue a check, made payable to each Intervenor, in the amounts specified by the EEOC, with a copy of the checks sent to EEOC Supervisory Trial Attorney Suzanne M. Anderson, 207 S. Houston Street, Third Floor, Dallas, Texas 75202. 14. Defendants agree to forward to the EEOC copies of all complaints alleging discrimination on the basis of race, national origin or retaliation against the Defendants, including any notes or other written documentation evidencing Defendant s investigation of the complaints and the remedial action taken, if any, during the 3-year term of this Consent Decree. 15. Defendants agree to report to the EEOC within thirty (30) days of entry of this Consent Decree regarding its compliance with the agreements set forth in paragraphs 5 through 7

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 8 of 9 15, above. Defendants shall report to the EEOC regarding training as specifically outlined in paragraph No. 8. 16. All reports to the EEOC required by this Decree shall be sent to Suzanne M. Anderson, Supervisory Trial Attorney, EEOC, 207 S. Houston, Third Floor, Dallas, Texas 75202. 17. If Defendants fail to tender payment or otherwise fails to timely comply with the terms of paragraphs 12-13, above, Defendants shall: a. Pay interest at the rate calculated pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Section 6621(b) on any untimely or unpaid amounts from date of non-compliance; and b. Bear any additional costs incurred by the EEOC caused by the non-compliance or delay of the Defendants. 18. Neither the EEOC, the Intervenors nor the Defendants shall contest the validity of this Consent Decree nor the jurisdiction of the federal district court to enforce this Consent Decree and its terms or the right of any party to the Consent Decree to bring an enforcement action upon breach of any term of this Consent Decree by any such party. Nothing in this Decree shall be construed to preclude the EEOC from enforcing this Decree in the event that Defendants fail to perform the promises and representations contained herein. The EEOC shall determine whether Defendants have complied with the terms of this Consent Decree and shall be authorized to seek compliance with the Consent Decree through civil action in the United States District Court. 19. The term of this Decree shall be for three (3) years. SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED this 10 th day of March, 2008. Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge 8

Case 3:05-cv-01379 Document 116 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 9 of 9 AGREED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE: FOR THE PLAINTIFF EEOC FOR THE DEFENDANTS: ROBERT A. CANINO Regional Attorney Oklahoma Bar No. 011782 /s/ Suzanne M. Anderson SUZANNE M. ANDERSON Supervisory Trial Attorney Texas Bar No. 14009470 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 207 S. Houston Dallas, Texas 75202 (214) 253-2740 (214) 253-2749 (Facsimile) FOR THE INTERVENORS: /s/ Jay D. Ellwanger JAY D. ELLWANGER Texas Bar No. 24036522 /s/ Paul Hash PAUL ELLIS HASH Texas Bar No. JACKSON LEWIS 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75219 (214) 520-2400 (214) 520-2008 (Facsimile) RACHEL D ZIOLKOWSKI Texas Bar No. JACKSON LEWIS 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75219 (214) 520-2400 DINOVO PRICE ELLWANGER LLP P.O. Box 201690 Austin, Texas 78720-1690 (512) 681-4012 (512) 628-3410 (Facsimile) /s/ James Vagnini JAMES VAGNINI Valli Kane & Vagnini LLP 600 Old Country Rd Suite 207 Garden City, NY 11530 (516) 203-7180 (516) 706-0248 (Facsimile) 9