Humanitarian Aid Decision F9 (FED9) Humanitarian aid to vulnerable populations in Angola who are food insecure due to heavy rainfall

Similar documents
Humanitarian Aid Decision Title: Humanitarian aid in favour of the population affected by civil conflict in Mindanao Island, Philippines.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Humanitarian Aid Decision

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION DECISION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Emergency Humanitarian Aid Decision

Humanitarian Aid Decision

COMMISSION DECISION of on the financing of emergency humanitarian operations from the general budget of the European Communities in China

COMMISSION DECISION. on the financing of humanitarian actions in Nepal from the general budget of the European Union (ECHO/-FA/BUD/2010/01000)

COMMISSION DECISION. on the financing of primary emergency humanitarian actions in SRI LANKA from the general budget of the European Union

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - DG ECHO. Humanitarian Aid Decision

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION DECISION

Humanitarian Aid Decision Title: Assistance to Vulnerable Groups in Lesotho and Swaziland

COMMISSION DECISION. on the financing of primary emergency humanitarian Actions in Chile from the general budget of the European Union

COMMISSION DECISION. on the financing of humanitarian actions in Peru from the general budget of the European Union (ECHO/PER/BUD/2010/01000)

COMMISSION DECISION of on the financing of emergency humanitarian operations from the general budget of the European Communities in Madagascar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Primary Emergency Humanitarian Aid Decision

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Humanitarian Aid Decision

COMMISSION DECISION. of XXX

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION DECISION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Humanitarian Aid Decision

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Primary Emergency Humanitarian Aid Decision

Humanitarian Aid Decision Title: Commission Decision concerning Humanitarian aid in favour of the Bhutanese refugees in Nepal

COMMISSION DECISION. on the financing of emergency humanitarian actions from the general budget of the European Communities in the Philippines

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Humanitarian Aid Decision

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION DECISION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels C(2010) XXX final COMMISSION DECISION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Title: Emergency Assistance to the Victims of Floods in Guyana

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Humanitarian Aid Decision

COMMISSION DECISION of on the financing of humanitarian operations from the general budget of the European Communities in Iraq

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES HUMANITARIAN AID OFFICE (ECHO) Decision to grant humanitarian aid Budget line

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Emergency Humanitarian Aid Decision

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION DECISION of on the financing of emergency humanitarian operations from the general budget of the European Communities in Peru

ANNEX ANNEX. to the COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION DECISION

Relevant international legal instruments applicable to seasonal workers

Title: Humanitarian assistance to the Burmese refugees living in the camps along the Thai/Burmese border.

SOUTH SUDAN. Working environment

ETHIOPIA HUMANITARIAN FUND (EHF) SECOND ROUND STANDARD ALLOCATION- JULY 2017

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION DECISION

COMMISSION DECISION. of 17/12/2010

INVESTING IN AN OPEN AND SECURE EUROPE Two Funds for the period

ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Decision

Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union. Act of Accession and its Annexes

Important political progress was achieved in some of

Year: 2011 Last update: 16/04/2012. HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) Sri Lanka and Tamil Nadu, India

Mali Crisis Update No. 1 Regional Bureau for West Africa 19 October 2012

South Sudan 2016 Third Quarterly Operational Briefing

Horn of Africa Situation Report No. 19 January 2013 Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan

African Development Bank SOMALIA

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION DECISION. on the financing of humanitarian actions in Yemen from the general budget of the European Union (ECHO/YEM/BUD/2010/01000)

2. The table in the Annex outlines the declarations received by the General Secretariat of the Council and their status to date.

NEGOTIATIONS ON ACCESSION BY BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Programmes in Europe what works?

BANQUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT

FACT SHEET #1, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2016 NOVEMBER 19, 2015

global acute malnutrition rate among refugees in Burkina Faso dropped from approximately 18 per cent in 2012 to below 10 per cent in 2013.

Boats carrying Mauritanian returnees from Podor, Senegal back to Mauritania

Sri Lanka. Operational highlights. Working environment. Persons of concern

Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union. Accession Protocol and its Annexes

Action fiche for Syria. Project approach / Direct Centralised. DAC-code Sector Multi-sector aid

Succinct Terms of Reference

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMANITARIAN / RESIDENT COORDINATOR ON THE USE OF CERF GRANTS. Burundi. Mr. Youssef Mahmoud

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(3) thereof,

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU (25 April 2005)

Insert Mali/Sahel specific picture. Mali and the Sahel First Quarterly Operational Briefing. Presentation to the WFP Executive Board

ACP-EU JOINT PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

FACTSHEET PAKISTAN MONSOON FLOODS

Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid

ANGOLA: HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

EU Main economic achievements. Franco Praussello University of Genoa

EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Average cost and average length of reception for asylum seekers

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ( 1 ),

CONCERNING HUMANITARIAN AID

NIGER. Overview. Working environment GLOBAL APPEAL 2015 UPDATE

Partners' updates. Week of 4-10 October

ICRC U P D A T E ANGOLA. ICRC tracing activities: One year on. Executive summary. Geneva, 26 May 2003

ILO comments on the EU single permit directive and its discussions in the European Parliament and Council

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Humanitarian Aid Decision

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO FRAMEWORK PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH HUMANITARIAN ORGANISATIONS

Zimbabwe Complex Emergency

East Africa Hunger Crisis East Africa Hunger Crisis Emergency Response Emergency Response Mid-2017 Updated Appeal Mid-2017 Appeal

DG for Justice and Home Affairs. Final Report

NEGOTIATIONS ON ACCESSION BY BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

1 - Rationale, needs and target population.

The Dublin system in the first half of 2018 Key figures from selected European countries

Triple disadvantage? The integration of refugee women. Summary of findings

Central African Republic

HIGHLIGHTED UNDERFUNDED SITUATIONS IN 2017

Oxfam (GB) Guiding Principles for Response to Food Crises

ETHIOPIA. Working environment. Planning figures for Ethiopia. The context

CONGO (Republic of the)

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

NIGER. Overview. Working environment. People of concern

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HUMANITARIAN AID OFFICE (ECHO) Humanitarian Aid Decision F9 (FED9) Title: Humanitarian aid to vulnerable populations in Angola who are food insecure due to heavy rainfall Location of operation: ANGOLA Amount of decision: 800,000 euro Decision reference number: ECHO/AGO/EDF/2004/01000 Explanatory Memorandum 1 - Rationale, needs and target population: 1.1. - Rationale: The April 2002 ceasefire in Angola, after 27 years of civil war, laid the building blocks for a lasting peace in Angola. It also lifted the curtain which had hidden the true extent of the humanitarian crisis in the country, and triggered movements on an unprecedented scale of the most vulnerable population groups, IDPs and spontaneously returning refugees. According to Government and OCHA figures, up to 3.800.000 people have moved in Angola since the ceasefire, including 50.000 (UNHCR) refugees who have been repatriated in an organised manner and up to 150.000 who have spontaneously returned from neighbouring countries. Humanitarian partners in Angola estimate that 70% of the returns have taken place without any form of assistance from local authorities or humanitarian organisations to areas where the minimum conditions for resettlement were not in place. Tackling this situation has been the major challenge for humanitarian partners since mid-2003, when the nutritional crisis in the country was generally judged to be over, and the post-conflict transition phase to have begun. In spite of this stabilisation, the food security situation remains critical in many areas where vulnerable local and returnee populations have only been able to plant once, or not at all, since the ceasefire. At the end of the 2003/2004 hunger season, and with the first harvest about to be gathered for many, the WFP estimates that 1.2 million people are still dependent on food aid. However, unusually heavy rains in December, January and February the heaviest for more than 25 years have caused the failure of the maize crop in many areas of north-eastern Benguela, northern Huila, Huambo and Bié provinces, depriving up to 300.000 families of a harvest, of the possibility to recuperate seeds for replanting during the next agricultural campaign, and prolonging their food insecurity for another year. 1

At the same time, due to a decision by the Government of Angola to ban the entry of GMO maize into the country, which effectively halves the quantities of food aid available, and to a shortfall in donor funds, the World Food Programme has recently announced cuts in rations, particularly to beneficiaries who have been receiving food aid for more than two years. Thus, for example, 20.000 vulnerable people in Chipindo, north-eastern Huila province, will no longer receive the rations on which they depend for survival, whilst at the same time their crops have failed due to very heavy rainfall. In other areas where crops have failed, humanitarian partners have already noted a worrying increase in admissions to therapeutic and supplementary feeding centres. In Caconda, for example, where the running of the TFC had been taken over by the local authorities as the patient numbers dropped to 10, admissions rose to more than 30 in April 2004, whilst the INGO-run SFC also noted a sharp increase in admissions coinciding with the end of the lean season and the lack of any prospect of a harvest. A similar phenomenon has been noted by partners working in the municipalities of Mungo and Bailundo in Huambo province. 1.2. - Identified needs: The needs identified in the target area have been detailed in assessments by partners working in the field, summarized in the Famine Early Warning System Network (FEWS) update of April 2004 and by the Humanitarian Coordination Group meeting in Luanda on 30 th April, and confirmed by ECHO during a field mission in April 2004. Interventions in the following areas are required to support vulnerable populations experiencing crop failures : Nutritional support, including surveillance and monitoring; Agricultural inputs ; Food inputs. 1.3. - Target population and regions concerned: This decision will address the emergency nutritional and food security needs for up to 300.000 families, whether resident or returnees, who have lost their maize crops due to heavy rainfall in north-eastern Benguela, southern Huila, Huambo and Bié provinces. The nutritional activities will specifically target children and their mothers. Children and their mothers will also be targeted through the provision of agricultural inputs on a household level. 1.4. - Risk assessment and possible constraints: The perspectives are that additional funding will be required in the short-term to address the problems described above, and support vulnerable populations through the 2004/2005 agricultural campaign. The constraints to the achievement of the objective are the difficulties in access caused by mine and other UXO infestation, and extremely poor infrastructure. 2

2- Objectives and components of the humanitarian intervention proposed: 2.1. Objectives: Principal and specific objective : To support emergency nutrition and food security interventions for vulnerable populations in north-eastern Benguela, northern Huila, Huambo and Bié provinces who remain food insecure due to heavy rainfall 2.2. - Components: a) Nutritional support, including accurate tracking of emergency needs through nutritional monitoring and surveillance; b) Agricultural inputs, as and when appropriate, including to the recovery of agricultural production; c) Food inputs. 3 - Duration foreseen for actions within the framework of the proposed decision: The duration for the implementation of this decision will be 12 months. Humanitarian operations funded by this decision must be implemented within this period. Expenditure under this Decision shall be eligible from 01/06/2004. Start Date: 01/06/2004 If the implementation of the actions envisaged in this decision is suspended due to force majeure or any comparable circumstance, the period of suspension will not be taken into account for the calculation of the duration of the decision. Depending on the evolution of the situation in the field, the Commission reserves the right to terminate the agreements signed with the implementing humanitarian organisations where the suspension of activities is for a period of more than one third of the total planned duration of the action. The procedure established in the Framework Partnership Agreement in this respect will be applied. 3

4 Previous interventions/decisions of the Commission within the context of the crisis concerned herewith List of previous ECHO operations in ANGOLA 2002 2003 2004 Decision number Decision type EUR EUR EUR ECHO/AGO/210/2002/01000 Global Plan 8,000,000 ECHO/AGO/210/2002/02000 Emergency 2,000,000 ECHO/AGO/254/2002/01000 Non Emergency 2,000,000 ECHO/TPS/210/2002/16000* Non Emergency 2,000,000 ECHO/AGO/210/2003/01000 Global Plan 8,000,000 ECHO/TPS/210/2003/07000 Non Emergency 5,000,000 ECHO/TPS/210/2003/12000* Non Emergency 8,100,000 ECHO/AGO/210/2003/02000 Non Emergency 900,000 ECHO/AGO/BUD/2004/01000 Global Plan 8,000,000 Subtotal 14,000,000 22,000,000 8,000,000 Total (y-2)+(y-1)+(y) 14,000,000 22,000,000 8,000,000 Dated : 11/05/2004 Source : HOPE * Allocations for Angola from Southern Africa regional decisions 5 - Other donors and donor co-ordination mechanisms Donors in ANGOLA the last 12 months 1. EU Members States (*) 2. European Commission 3. Others EUR EUR EUR Austria 0 ECHO 22,000,000 Belgium 500,000 Other services Denmark 5,673,619 Finland 2,400,000 France 0 Germany 7,978,072 Greece 0 Ireland 1,091,000 Italy 0 Luxembourg 0 Netherlands 5,865,965 Portugal 416,360 Spain 0 Sweden 7,075,774 United Kingdom 0 Subtotal 31,000,790 Subtotal 22,000,000 Subtotal 0 Grand total 53,000,790 Dated : 11/05/2004 (*) Source : ECHO 14 Points reporting for Members States. https://hac.cec.eu.int Empty cells means either no information is available or no contribution. 6 Amount of decision and distribution by specific objectives: 6.1. - Total amount of the decision: 800,000 euro 4

6.2. - Budget breakdown by specific objectives: Principal objective: To support emergency nutrition and food security interventions for vulnerable populations in north-eastern Benguela, northern Huila, Huambo and Bié provinces who remain food insecure due to heavy rainfall Specific objectives Allocated amount by specific objective (Euro) Possible geographical area of operation Specific objective 1: 800,000 Benguela, Bié, To support emergency Huambo, Huila nutrition and food provinces security interventions for vulnerable populations in northeastern Benguela, northern Huila, Huambo and Bié provinces who remain food insecure due to heavy rainfall TOTAL 800,000 Activities - Nutritional support - Agricultural inputs - Food inputs Potential partners 1 - ACH- ESP - ADRA - DE - MDM - FRA - SOLIDARITES - ZOA 7 - Evaluation Under article 18 of the Regulation the Commission is required to "regularly assess humanitarian aid operations financed by the Community in order to establish whether they have achieved their objectives and to produce guidelines for improving the effectiveness of subsequent operations." These evaluations are structured and organised in overarching and cross cutting issues forming part of ECHO's Annual Strategy such as child-related issues, the security of relief workers, respect for human rights, gender. Each year, an indicative Evaluation Programme is established after a consultative process. This programme is flexible and can be adapted to include evaluations not foreseen in the initial programme, in response to particular events or changing circumstances. More information can be obtained at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/echo/evaluation/index_en.htm. 1 ACCION CONTRA EL HAMBRE, (ESP), ADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF AGENCY (D), MEDECINS DU MONDE, SOLIDARITES, (FR), ZOA-Vluchtelingenzorg 5

COMMISSION DECISION of on the financing of humanitarian operations from the 9 th European Development Fund in ANGOLA THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000, in particular Article 72 thereof 2, Having regard to the Internal Agreement of 15 December 2000 on the Financing and Administration of the Community Aid under the Financial Protocol to the Partnership Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Community and its Member States signed in Cotonou (Benin) on 23 June 2000, in particular Articles 24(3) and 25 thereof 3. Whereas: 1. Heavy rainfall earlier in the year has caused the failure of the maize crop in certain areas of Angola; 2. Up to 300.000 vulnerable families have been lost their opportunity to reestablish their livelihoods and recover agricultural production at household level; 3. Supplies of international food aid to many of the same areas have been cut, giving rise to fears of a further deterioration of the humanitarian situation; 4. The number of cases of children requiring treatment for malnutrition has increased greatly over the past two months; 5. An assessment of the humanitarian situation leads to the conclusion that humanitarian aid operations should be financed by the Community for a period of 12 months; 6. In accordance with the objectives set out in Article 72 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and Article 25(2) of the Internal Agreement it is estimated that an amount of 800,000 Euro from the 9 th European Development Fund is necessary to provide humanitarian assistance to up to 300.000 people, taking into account the available budget, other donors interventions and other factors. HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: 2 OJ L317 of 15.12.2000, p.3 3 OJ L317 of 15.12.2000, p.354 6

Article 1 1. In accordance with the objectives and general principles of humanitarian aid, the Commission hereby approves a total amount of 800,000 euro from the 9 th European Development Fund for humanitarian aid operations to vulnerable populations in Angola who are food insecure due to heavy rainfall. 2. In accordance with Article 72 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, the humanitarian operations shall be implemented in the pursuance of the following specific objective: - To support emergency nutrition and food security interventions for vulnerable populations in north-eastern Benguela, northern Huila, Huambo and Bié provinces who remain food insecure due to heavy rainfall The full amount of this decision is allocated to this objective. Article 2 1. The duration for the implementation of this decision shall be for a maximum period of 12 months, starting on 01/06/2004. Expenditure under this Decision shall be eligible from that date. 2. If the operations envisaged in this Decision are suspended owing to force majeure or comparable circumstances, the period of suspension shall not be taken into account for the calculation of the duration of the implementation of this Decision Article 3 This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption. Done at Brussels, For the Commission Member of the Commission 7

Annex: Breakdown of allocations by specific objective Principal objective: To support emergency nutrition and food security interventions for vulnerable populations in north-eastern Benguela, northern Huila, Huambo and Bié provinces who remain food insecure due to heavy rainfall Specific objectives Allocated amount by specific objective (Euro) Specific objective 1: 800,000 To support emergency nutrition and food security interventions for vulnerable populations in northeastern Benguela, northern Huila, Huambo and Bié provinces who remain food insecure due to heavy rainfall TOTAL 800,000 Grants for the implementation of humanitarian aid within the meaning of Regulation No.1257/96 are awarded in accordance with the Financial Regulation, in particular Article 110 thereof, and its Implementing Rules in particular Article168 thereof. 4 Rate of financing: In accordance with Article169 of the Financial Regulation, grants for the implementation of this Decision may finance 100% of the costs of an action. Humanitarian aid operations funded by the Commission are implemented by NGOs and the Red Cross organisations on the basis of Framework Partnership Agreements (FPA) (in conformity with Article 163 of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation) and by United Nations agencies based on the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement (FAFA). The standards and criteria established in Echo's standard Framework Partnership Agreement to which NGO s and International organisations have to adhere and the procedures and criteria needed to become a partner may be found at http://europa.eu.int/comm/echo/partners/index_en.htm 4 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) n 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002, OJ L 248, 16/09/2002 and n 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002, OJ L 357 of 31/12/2002. 8