Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

Similar documents
Intellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai. OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018

Intellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC

ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Provisional Measures or Preliminary Evidence

United States. Edwards Wildman. Author Daniel Fiorello

Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies. (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016)

Preliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes:

Trademark Litigation Issues

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Patents. What is a Patent? 11/16/2017. The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection

Gottschlich & Portune, LLP

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Overview on Damages Available in Copyright and Trademark Disputes in the U.S. by Ralph H. Cathcart 1 COPYRIGHT DAMAGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TOPIC 13 CIVIL REMEDIES. LTC Harms Japan 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Enforcement of Plant Variety IPR in the U.S.

Recent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Detailed Table of Contents

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Basic Patent Information from the USPTO (Redacted) November 15, 2007

WIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM FOR HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Yearbook 2019/2020. A global guide for practitioners. Greece

Trademark Litigation A Global Guide. Greece. Ballas, Pelecanos & Associates LPC George Ballas, Nicholas Gregoriades and Maria Spanos

Litigation Webinar Series. Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

LEGAL INFORMATION NEWSLETTER. No. 5 September, 2011

NEW LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW in the Nordic countries DENMARK. Nicolaj Bording, attorney-at-law (L), partner, LL.M. Side 1

196:163. Executive summary for clients regarding US patent law and practice. Client Executive Summary on U.S. Patent Law and Practice

Nine years after Ebay Should German courts have discretion when deciding on injunctions in patent infringement litigations?

Belgium. Belgium. By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT. Nature of the Action

Canada Intellectual property enforcement

High-Tech Patent Issues

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

IP Impact: Design Patents. Mike Trenholm Ali Razai Terry Tullis

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FUND (STDF)

BARTKO ZANKEL BUNZEL ALERT!

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR FOREIGN PLAINTIFFS IN IP LITIGATION IN CHINA

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

American Chamber of Commerce in the Czech Republic. Position Paper. Questionnaire. On the patent system in Europe. Answering.

U.S. Design Patent Protection. Finnish Patent Office April 10, 2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

LAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.

Israel. Contributing firm Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer

Remedies for patent infringement: Damages or injunctions?

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Issues in Trademark Case Management

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Yearbook 2017/2018. A global guide for practitioners. Greece

... Revision,

Economic Damages in IP Litigation

Japan Japon Japan. Report Q174. in the name of the Japanese Group

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

AAPEX. Intellectual Property Policy Statement. Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights at AAPEX

Plan. 1. Implementation of the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) into Belgian law. C. Belgian Code of Economic Law

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. Civil Action No. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Discovery in a patent infringement suit in Japan particularly about secrecy order (protective order)

Chapter 13 Enforcement and Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-mc Document 135 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 6426 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN

Norway. Norway. By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Contributing firm. Author Henning Hartwig

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pakistan. Contributing firm Khursheed Khan & Associates. Author Zulfiqar Khan. World Trade Organisation Agreement and the Paris Convention.

1:13-cv TLL-CEB Doc # 1 Filed 07/28/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents

Patents in Europe 2011/2012. Greece Lappa

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Trademark and Patent Actions

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 22 Filed: 09/25/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:619

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case 1:12-cv SAS Document 24-3 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Introduction. Viet D. Phan ( * )

Transcription:

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective Elaine B. Gin Attorney - Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement US Patent & Trademark Office

Every right has a remedy Enforcement is the key to obtaining that remedy!!! 10/7/2011 2

copyrights, patents, trademarks & trade secrets Copyright original expression fixed in a tangible medium Utility patents process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, and improvements thereof Plant patents asexually produced plant Design patents ornamental design Trademarks source indicator Trade Secrets any information that is generally not know by the public and has economic benefit that is subject of reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy 10/7/2011 3

Overview of Remedies What relief is available to an intellectual property rights holder? 1) money damages 2) equitable relief 10/7/2011 4

Four Types of Money Damages 1) Compensatory Damages 2) Unjust Enrichment 3) Punitive or Augmented Damages 4) Collateral Damages 10/7/2011 5

Compensatory Damages 1) Lost Profits 2) Statutory Damages 3) Established / reasonable royalties 10/7/2011 6

Compensatory Damages Statutory Damages Trademark - for counterfeit mark 15 U.S.C. 117(c) - for cybersquatting 15 U.S.C. 117(d) Copyright - 17 U.S.C. 504 (c) 10/7/2011 8

Statutory Damages for Counterfeited Trademarks Not less than $500 or more than $100,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods or services sold, offered for sale, or distributed If the court finds that the use of the counterfeit mark was willful, not more than $1,000,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods or services sold 10/7/2011 9

Statutory Damages for Cybersquatting [T]he plaintiff may elect an award of statutory damages in the amount of not less than $1,000 and not more that $100,000 per domain name 10/7/2011 10

Statutory Damages for Copyright With respect to any one work, the sum of not less than $750 or more than $30,000 as the court considers just. If infringement was committed willfully, the court in its discretion may increase the award of statutory damages to a sum or not more than $150,000. 10/7/2011 11

Established / Reasonable Royalties IP rights holder will provide past licensing agreements to prove established royalty rates IP rights holder will provide licensing activities and value of the patent prove reasonable royalty rates 10/7/2011 12

Punitive Damages for Patent Cases Applied in exceptional cases Showing of willfulness Up to treble damages 10/7/2011 13

Augmented Damages for Trademark Cases The court can award up to three times the amount found to be actual damages Discretionary for ordinary trademark infringement Mandatory for trademark counterfeiting 10/7/2011 14

Collateral Damages Interests Attorney s fees are sometimes awarded in exceptional cases, against the American rule that each party bears its own attorney costs 10/7/2011 15

Damages Compared Copyright 1) compensatory damages 2) established /reasonable royalty 3) unjust enrichment 4) statutory damages Trademark 1) compensatory damages 2) established /reasonable royalty 3) unjust enrichment 4) statutory damages for counterfeiting & cyber squatting 5) augmented damages Patents 1) compensatory damages 2) established /reasonable royalty (in Patent Act) 3) punitive damages 10/7/2011 16

Evidence Used to Prove Damages IP right holder s financial information) Infringer s financial information Market place information Royalty information Expert witness (testimony and report) 10/7/2011 17

Equitable Relief Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) (ex parte) Preliminary Injunction (before and during trial) (inter partes) Permanent Injunction Civil Seizures and Destruction of Goods 10/7/2011 18

TRO / Preliminary Injunction Four Factors Test Likelihood of success on the merits Likelihood of irreparable harm if injunction is not granted Balance of hardships Public interest 10/7/2011 19

Permanent Injunction Irreparable harm Inadequacy of money damages Balance of hardship Public interest 10/7/2011 20

Civil Seizures and the Destruction of Goods Prevents infringing articles from entering into the stream of commerce and preserves evidence Copyright Act and Lanham Act contain authorization for civil seizures Seizures may be done pre-trial in copyright and trademark counterfeiting cases 10/7/2011 21

THANK YOU Elaine Gin elaine.gin@uspto.gov (571) 272-9300