Case 6:08-cv Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 1 of 5 COMPLAINT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:09-cv CE Document 1 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:14-cv HRH Document 37 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. C.A. NO. Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 1:17-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 2:10-cv TJW-CE Document 1 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv IMK Document 250 Filed 08/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 2905 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/03/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:15-cv TSZ Document 15 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:06-cv DFH-TAB Document 11 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 24

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Case 6:08-cv-00507 Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ABBOTT BIORESEARCH CENTER, INC., AND ABBOTT BIOTECHNOLOGY LTD. Civil Action No. 6:08cv507 Jury Trial Requested Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Bayer HealthCare LLC ( Bayer or Plaintiff ) files this Complaint for patent infringement against Abbott Laboratories ( Abbott Labs ), Abbott Bioresearch Center, Inc. ( ABC ), and Abbott Biotechnology Ltd. ( ABL ) (collectively Abbott or Defendants ), and alleges as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Bayer is a limited liability corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 555 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, New York 10591. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Abbott Labs is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, with its principal place of business at 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, Illinois 60064.

Case 6:08-cv-00507 Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 2 of 5 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant ABC is a wholly owned subsidiary corporation of Abbott Labs that is organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has a principal place of business at 100 Research Drive, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant ABL is a wholly owned subsidiary corporation of Abbott Labs that is organized and existing under the laws of Bermuda and has a place of business at Carr #2 Km. 59.2, Segundo Piso, Barceloneta, Puerto Rico 00617. 5. Defendants manufacture, use, offer for sale, and/or sell a treatment for, inter alia, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn s disease and plaque psoriasis, under the trade name HUMIRA. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code. 7. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 8. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Defendants have conducted and do conduct business within the State of Texas. Defendants, directly or through intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, pharmacists, doctors, and others), ship, distribute, offer for sale, sell, and advertise their products in the United States, the State of Texas, and the Eastern District of Texas. Defendants have purposefully and voluntarily placed one or more of their infringing products into the stream of commerce with the expectation that consumers in the Eastern District of Texas will purchase these infringing products. Consumers in the Eastern District of Texas have purchased and continue to purchase these infringing products. Defendants 2

Case 6:08-cv-00507 Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 3 of 5 have committed the tort of patent infringement within the State of Texas and, more particularly, within the Eastern District of Texas. 9. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b). COUNT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT 10. Plaintiff refers to and incorporates herein the allegations of Paragraphs 1-9 above. 11. On August 5, 1997, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 5,654,407 ( the 407 patent ), entitled Human Anti-TNF Antibodies, after a full and fair examination. Plaintiff is the lawful owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the 407 patent, including all right to sue and recover for past damages. A true and correct copy of the 407 patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint. 12. Upon information and belief, Defendants manufacture, use, offer to sell, and/or sell in the United States, including this Judicial District, human monoclonal antibodies that bind specifically to human tumor necrosis factor alpha ( TNF-α ), known generally under the trade name HUMIRA and the International Nonproprietary Name adalimumab, for use in treatment of, inter alia, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn s disease and plaque psoriasis. 13. Upon information and belief, Defendants manufacture, use, offer for sale, and/or sale of HUMIRA infringes, induces infringement and/or contributes to the infringement of one or more claims of the 407 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271. 3

Case 6:08-cv-00507 Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 4 of 5 14. Upon information and belief, Defendants have been aware of the existence of the 407 patent, but nevertheless have been and are now infringing one or more claims of the 407 patent. This infringement by Defendants has been willful and deliberate and in disregard of Bayer s lawful rights under the 407 patent, thus rendering this case exceptional, as that term is set forth in 35 U.S.C. 285. 15. Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer damages as a result of Defendants infringement. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Bayer prays for judgment against Defendants as follows: A. Adjudging that the 407 patent is valid and enforceable; B. Adjudging that Defendants have infringed the 407 patent directly and/or indirectly by way of contributing to and/or inducing infringement, literally, and/or under the doctrine of equivalents; C. Awarding Bayer the damages to which it is entitled under 35 U.S.C. 284 for Defendants infringement and any continuing or future infringement, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs as fixed by the Court; D. Adjudging that Defendants infringement has been willful, and awarding Bayer treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; E. Declaring this to be an exceptional case and awarding Bayer its attorney fees, as provided by 35 U.S.C. 285; and F. Awarding Bayer such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 4

Case 6:08-cv-00507 Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 5 of 5 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of any and all issues triable of right by a jury. Dated: December 24, 2008 Respectfully Submitted, T. John Ward, Jr. Lead Attorney WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM Texas State Bar No. 00794818 111 W Tyler Street Longview, Texas 75601 Telephone: (903) 757-6400 Facsimile: (903) 305-6400 jw@jwfirm.com Eric M. Albritton ALBRITTON LAW FIRM Texas State Bar No. 00790215 P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 Telephone: (903) 757-8449 Facsimile: (903) 758-7397 ema@emafirm.com Peter B. Bensinger, Jr. (pro hac vice pending) Kaspar J. Stoffelmayr (pro hac vice pending) BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: (312) 494-4400 Facsimile: (312) 494-4440 peter.bensinger@bartlit-beck.com kaspar.stoffelmayr@bartlit-beck.com Bradford J. Badke (pro hac vice pending) ROPES & GRAY LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 596-9000 Facsimile: (212) 596-9090 jim.badke@ropesgray.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Bayer HealthCare LLC 5