SUBJECT: Sample Interview & Interrogation Policy

Similar documents
ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION PROCEDURES

BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS Baltimore School Police Force MIRANDA WARNINGS

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE

Marquette University Police Department

BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT. DATE ISSUED: February 28, 2005 GENERAL ORDER I-18 PURPOSE

ASHEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY MANUAL

Miranda Rights. Interrogations and Confessions

ROLE AND AUTHORITY WRITTEN DIRECTIVE: 1.10 EFFECTIVE DATE: REVISION DATE: SUPERSEDES EDITION DATED:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Mental Illness Commitments

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,589 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, EDGAR HUGH EAKIN, Appellee.

Miranda Procedure Checklist. Requirements for a valid waiver of Miranda rights were described in Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S.

Bowie State University Police Department General Order

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLOCKS, HAROLD W. L., Judge of the Superior Court.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRYSTAL STROBEL NO. COA Filed: 18 May 2004

California Bar Examination

UNIFORM LAW COMMISSIONERS' MODEL PUBLIC DEFENDER ACT

I. PURPOSE DEFINITIONS RESPECT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. Page 1 of 8

Contemporary Issues in Criminal Investigation and Prosecution Working Group EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION Model Policy February 2016

Say What?! A Review of Recent U.S. Supreme Court 5 th Amendment Self-incrimination Case Law

This policy outlines the process and procedures to be considered and followed by members when making an arrest.

CUSTODIAL INTERROGATIONS

LESSON PLAN FOR CONDUCTING A UNIT OF INSTRUCTION IN MIRANDA v. ARIZONA YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT

Detentions And Photographing Detainees

COLUMBIA POLICE DEPARTMENT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. The State of New Hampshire. Thomas Auger Docket No. 01-S-388, 389 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 29,570. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY Gary L. Clingman, District Judge

THURMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT

Court of Common Pleas

SUSPECT IDENTIFICATION

LONDONDERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Missouri Police Chiefs Association SAMPLE POLICY ANNOUNCEMENT CREATED BY HB RSMo.

Case 1:08-cr SLR Document 24 Filed 07/14/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2008

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 7 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT

BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS Baltimore School Police Force STOP AND FRISK

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Defining & Interpreting Custodial Interrogation. Alexander Lindvall 2013 Adviser: K.M. Waggoner, Ph.D., J.D. Iowa State University

Criminal Justice 100

Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 12/10/13

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date November 1, 2015

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2016 STATE OF MARYLAND BENJAMIN PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ

A digest of twenty one (21) significant US Supreme Court decisions interpreting Miranda

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

No. 05SA251, People v. Wood Miranda Interrogation - Due Process Right to Counsel Voluntariness

DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER. Rev. 29 Sep 97. Index as: Lineups Prisoner Lineups Show-Ups, Prisoner M-6 PRISONER LINEUPS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

'MINOR I.' FROM NABI SALEH

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

DUTIES OF A MAGISTRATE. Presented by: Judge Suzan Thompson Justice of the Peace, Precinct #2 Matagorda County, Texas

Subject CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CITATION PROCEDURES. DRAFT 7 April By Order of the Police Commissioner

POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RULES

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses

Case 3:16-cr JJB-EWD Document 26 05/15/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

DECEPTION Moran v. Burbine*

POLYGRAPH EXAMINATIONS

MILWAUKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS * CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHTO. The indictment

2017 CO 100. In this interlocutory appeal, the supreme court concludes that the conversation

PRACTICAL ISSUES OF NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION IMPACT ON THE WORK OF THE POLICE

United States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc. v. ) No. SC APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY Honorable Jack A.L.

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Protocol 3: Domestic Violence Investigation

California Bar Examination

v No Macomb Circuit Court

AFFIDAVIT OF UNDERTAKING AND WAIVER

Recording Interrogations: Best Practice in Massachusetts

Constitutional Law - Right to Counsel

This section covers coordination of services between agencies and the youth correctional system. STANDARDS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

Prosper Warning: Part 2. R. v. Weeseekase(2007) 1. By Gino Arcaro B.Sc., M.Ed. I. Executive Summary

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO

Chapter 11: Rights in Juvenile Proceedings

Follow this and additional works at:

Chief of Police: Review Date: July 1

THURMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Page Page Page Page V. VI. VII.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NUMBER HINDS COUNTY DRUG COURT PROBATION PROGRAM

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Wesley Paxson III, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2011

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )

East Haven Police Department

Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 4/17/13. To establish a policy and procedure for the Financial Investigations Squad (FIS).

Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association LINE-UP AND SHOW-UP PROCEDURES (Eyewitness Identification) MODEL POLICY GENERAL ORDER

University of Pittsburgh Police Department. Rules & Regulations Manual. Transporting Prisoners. Title: 5-4 PLEAC

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

2. If the DUI/DWAI arrestee is non-combative: a. The arrestee may be permitted to sign the summons.

POLICIES and PROCEDURES TOWN OF NORTON. PARKS and RECREATION COMMISSION

Identification Procedures

Court of Appeals of Ohio

MR. FLYNN: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court: This case concerns itself with the conviction of a defendant of two crimes of rape and

DISSENTING OPINION BY NAKAMURA, C.J.

Transcription:

TO: FROM: All Members Education Committee SUBJECT: Sample Interview & Interrogation Policy DATE: February 2011 Attached is a SAMPLE Interview & Interrogation policy that may be of use to your department. Please understand that this should serve only as a Starting Point for those departments who may wish to update their Rules & Regulations Manual in this area. To best serve your department, it should be reviewed and revised by you, your Municipality and Insurance Carrier. Again, it is only a draft and should serve as a starting point. 1

SAMPLE INTERVIEW & INTERROGATION POLICY 01. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to provide Police Officers with general guidelines on Interview & Interrogation and possible related activity. This policy is for departmental use only and does not apply in any criminal or civil proceeding. This department s policy should not be construed as a creation of a higher standard of safety or care in an evidentiary sense with respect to third party claims. It should serve as a general guideline, which, under unusual circumstances, may warrant departure from in order to respond appropriately. 02. POLICY I. Interviews and Interrogations A. Interviews Definition: A non-accusatory conversation in which through questions and answers, the police interviewer tries to develop investigative and behavioral information that will test the veracity of statements made by a suspect, victim or witness. (1). Procedures: B. Interrogations (a). Interviews may occur in a variety of circumstances and locations. (b). Officers shall conduct interviews in the same manner as if they were engaging in any normal conversation. (c). Officers conducting interviews shall be aware of the nature of questions, their location, the interviewed persons location, and the conditions present when conducting interviews so that the subject does not have any reason to believe he is in custody. Definition: An accusatory procedure designed to elicit from the subject a confession, or an acknowledgment that he did not tell the truth during an initial statement, whether that person is a suspect who originally denied involvement in an incident, or a victim who fabricated the nature of the alleged offense. 2

(1). Procedures - Officers shall consider the following criteria when initiating interrogations: (a). Non-Custodial Interrogations (i). Miranda warnings are not required to be given to a subject by Officers when the subject is being interrogated, but is not in custody. (ii). A statement form shall be used when taking non-custodial statements from victims, witnesses and suspects, when conditions permit. (b). Custodial Interrogations (i). The test for determining whether a person is being subjected to custodial interrogation, so as to require Miranda warnings, is whether he is physically deprived of his freedom in any significant way or is placed in a situation in which a reasonable person would believe that his freedom of action or movement is restricted by such interrogation. (ii). Officers shall provide, verbally (via Miranda Card) and/or written, Miranda warning advisements whenever a person in custody is subjected to custodial interrogation or its equivalent. (written forms are preferred). (iii). When providing written Miranda warnings during custodial interrogations, Officers shall use the Department Waiver of Rights form, when conditions permit. Attachment #1. (iv). All original rights forms and written statement(s) received, shall be submitted with the investigation report and placed in the original case folder. II. Access to Counsel Officers shall consider the following procedure when safeguarding a detainee s access to counsel during interrogation: A. Right to Counsel (1). When a subject has been placed under arrest by a Officer, and the subject is being subjected to a custodial interrogation, he shall be advised of the right to speak to counsel through the Miranda warning advisement. If they do not waive the right, the interrogation shall not proceed. 3

(2). When a detainee requests to speak to an attorney before, or during, a custodial interrogation, the interrogator shall cease questioning and provide the detainee the opportunity to confer with counsel. B. Waiver of Right to Counsel (1). Detainees may waive their right to counsel following the Miranda warnings. However, interrogators shall document that the waiver was a knowing and intelligent waiver, e.g., that the detainee knew of his right to consult with counsel before answering questions and he freely chose to proceed with the interrogation without exercising that right. (a). Documentation of the waiver shall be on a Department Miranda Rights Form and/or in an incident report filed by the interrogating Officer(s). Attachment #2. (2). If the suspect waives his right to counsel after receiving the Miranda warnings, law enforcement officers are free to question him. But if a suspect requests counsel at any time during the interview, the interrogating officer shall not subject him to further questioning until a lawyer has been made available or the suspect freely requests the continuation of the interrogation. The re-initiation of the interrogation should be preceded by clarification questions that establish the suspect s intention to re-waive the presence of counsel. A second Miranda warning form should be executed specifying the date and time to clearly evidence the suspect s intention of waiving his right to counsel. Caution should always be used when a suspect freely reinitiates conversation. A call may be made to an ADA to determine if the interview should continue. (3). The interrogating Officer must ensure that the suspect clearly requests counsel. A suspect must articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently enough that a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney. If the statement fails to meet the requisite level of clarity, interrogating Officers are not required to stop questioning the suspect. 4

Form may be used on your department letterhead POLICE DEPARTMENT MIRANDA RIGHTS WARNING PLACE DATE & TIME (1) You have the right to remain silent. (2) Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. (3) You have the right to talk to an attorney and have him/her present with you while you are being questioned. (4) If you cannot afford to hire an attorney, one will be appointed to represent you free of charge before any questioning, if you wish. (5) You can decide at any time to exercise these rights and not answer any questions or make any statements. WAIVER I am not unduly under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol. I am making this waiver voluntarily and without threats, pressures, coercion or promises of any kind being made to me. I understand my rights and I am willing to answer questions. Signature I certify the above statements were read to before he/she was questioned. Police Officer Police Officer Attachment #1 5