George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS

Similar documents
George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Spring 2015 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool

CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

The Tundra Docket: Western District Of Wisconsin

Pretrial Litigation Guidelines Fall Wednesday Class 6-9 p.m. Rm TBA

What is Post Grant Review?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Trial Day In Court Out of Court

Civil Litigation Forms Library

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

Presidential Candidate Declaration of Intent

Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Paralegal Section MCLE Meeting DCBA Bar Center Date: November 8, 2017

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

Nebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual

Presentation to SDIPLA

Case3:12-cv SI Document33 Filed10/21/14 Page1 of 10

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Fall 2018 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101

New Local Patent Rules In Northern District Of Ill.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Interrogatories Are Written Questions For Which Written Answers Are Prepared And Signed Under Oath

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

Third, it should provide for the orderly admission of evidence.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

CIVIL PRETRIAL PRACTICE SPRING 2006 SYLLABUS

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect

PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences

George Mason University School of Law Legal Practicum Regulatory Comments LAW Spring Term 2013, Tuesdays 6:00-7:50 PM.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

TU TU

University of Washington School of Law Spring Quarter, 2017 SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKING SYLLABUS

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005

U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv RWT

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

CLASS ACTION JURY TRIALS

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

THE HONORABLE MEL DICKSTEIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRACTICE POINTERS & PREFERENCES

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

LEG 283T.01: Trial Preparation

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Issues Proposed Rules for Post-Issuance Patent Review under the America Invents Act

William B. Gould IV Collection. Papers, linear feet 2 storage boxes

The Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution

CIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS:

Insight from Carlton Fields

Calendar of Important Dates

USPTO Post Grant Proceedings

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

University of Houston Law Center. Fall 2014 Course Syllabus. Procedure for Patent Litigation - 6:00-8:00 PM (Wed)

Vacated in part; claims construed; previous motion for summary judgment of non-infringement granted.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Document List. Representaciones e Investigaciones Medicas, S.A. de C.V. et al - v. - Fernando Espinosa Abdala et al

PART VI. BOARD OF CLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )

U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:97-cv FNS

Northern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

Patent Practice in View Of PTAB AIA Proceedings

~/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

Case 1:11-mc RLW Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

Ellen Matheson. PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY THE CASE (Doc. 100)

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings. Jeffrey S. Bergman Kevin Kuelbs Laura Witbeck

LAW 898A LSN CRIMINAL LITIGATION Spring 2010

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Overview. n Discovery-Related Considerations n Scope of Discovery n Typical Types of Fact Discovery n Expert Discovery

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

By Amended Order dated March 22, 2017, the Court issued final. and Noble, Inc., BarnesandNoble.com LLC, and Nook Media LLC

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION Spring 2016 Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS William B. Raich 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 408-4210 william.raich@finnegan.com Robert F. Shaffer 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 408-4375 Robert.shaffer@finnegan.com Luke McCammon 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 408-4273 luke.mccammon@finnegan.com Robert L. Burns 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 (571) 203-2736 robert.burns@finnegan.com Susan Y. Tull 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 408-4489 susan.tull@finnegan.com 1

PATENT LITIGATION Spring 2016 Course Materials (1) Case File (2) Selected statutes, rules, cases, and articles that may be assigned for reading during the semester. 2

PATENT LITIGATION (SPRING 2016) CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION FILINGS 1 JAN 12 None 2 JAN 19 Draft Complaint Present Web Site Overview DJ Plaintiff AMC (GMU) to Serve Complaint Sun., Jan. 24 Present Draft Position Paper 3 JAN 26 Present Revised Draft Position Paper Draft Initial Disclosures Draft Discovery Requests DJ Defendant GGI (SUFFOLK) to Serve Answer and Counterclaims Sun. Jan. 31 Parties to Serve Initial Disclosures Sun. Jan. 31 Parties to Serve Discovery Requests Sun. Jan. 31 4 FEB 2 Draft Discovery Responses Draft Reply to Counterclaim Plaintiff to Serve Reply to Counterclaim Wed., Feb. 3 Parties to Serve Discovery Responses Sun., Feb. 7 3

CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION 5 FEB 9 Draft Claim Chart (Invalidity) Review Discovery Responses 6 FEB 16 Draft of Markman Brief Draft Motions to Compel FILINGS Parties to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Disclosures (Plaintiff re Infringement; Defendant re Invalidity) Sun., Feb. 14 Parties to Exchange Proposed Claim Terms To Be Construed Sun., Feb. 14 Parties to Meet and Confer Final Claim Terms to be Construed Fri., Feb. 19 by 5 p.m. Serve Motions to Compel (if necessary) Sun., Feb. 21 Parties to Exchange Proposed Constructions Sun., Feb. 21 7 FEB 23 Continue Draft of Markman Brief Draft Reply Motion to Compel 8 MAR 1 Discuss Markman Argument Review of Deposition Preparations Parties to Serve Markman Briefs Sun., Feb. 28 Serve Reply to Motion to Compel Sun., Feb. 28 Markman Hearing Thur. Mar. 3 at 9 PM (Finnegan offices at 901 New York Ave., NW, Washington DC 20001) 4

CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION FILINGS MAR 8 SPRING BREAK NO CLASS 9 MAR 15 Draft Motion for Summary Judgment Parties to Complete Two Depositions Each Sun. Mar. 20 10 MAR 22 Draft Expert Reports (Technical, Legal) Parties to Serve Any Motions for Summary Judgment Sun. Mar. 27 Parties to Serve Expert Reports Sun., Mar. 27 11 MAR 29 Draft Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment Draft Trial Brief, Testimony Parties to Serve Replies to Any Motions for Summary Judgment Sun., Apr. 3 12 APR 5 Revise Draft Trial Brief, Testimony Draft Motions in Limine Draft Jury Instructions Parties to Serve Trial Briefs; Parties to Serve Any Motions in Limine Sun., April 10 Parties to Serve Proposed Jury Instructions Sun., April 10 5

CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION 13 APR 12 Trial Preparation Draft Demonstrative Exhibits FILINGS Parties to Serve Witness Lists Wed. Apr. 13 (midnight) Parties to Serve Demonstrative Exhibits Fri. April 15 (noon) Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions in Limine Fri. April 15 (noon) 14 SAT. APR. 16 (9:00 am - 5:00 pm) TRIAL BOSTON, MA 6

DUE DATES 1. DJ Plaintiff (GMU LAW) to Serve Complaint JAN 24 2. DJ Defendant (SUFFOLK LAW) to Serve Answer and Counterclaims JAN 31 3. Parties to Serve Initial Disclosures JAN 31 4. Parties to Serve Discovery Requests JAN 31 5. Plaintiff to Serve Reply to Counterclaim FEB 3 6. Parties to Serve Discovery Responses FEB 7 7. Parties to Serve Infringement & Invalidity Disclosures (GGI re Infringement; AMD re Invalidity) FEB 14 8. Parties to Exchange Proposed Claim Terms to be Construed FEB 14 9. Parties to Meet and Confer on Final Claim Terms to be Construed FEB 19 (by 5 pm) 10. Parties to Serve Motions to Compel (If Any) FEB 21 11. Parties to Exchange Proposed Constructions FEB 21 12. Parties to Serve Markman Briefs FEB 28 13. Parties to Serve Reply to Motions to Compel FEB 28 14. Markman Hearing (video conference) MAR 3 (9:00 pm) 15. Parties to Complete Two (2) Depositions Each MAR 20 16. Parties to Serve Any Motions for Summary Judgment MAR 27 17. Parties to Serve Expert Reports MAR 27 18. Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions for Summary Judgment APR 3 19. Parties to Serve Trial Briefs (If Requested) APR 10 20. Parties to Serve Any Motions in Limine APR 10 7

21. Parties to Serve Proposed Joint Jury Instructions APR 10 22. Parties to Serve Witness List APR 13 (midnight) 23. Parties to Serve Demonstrative Exhibits APR 15 (noon) 24. Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions in Limine APR 15 (noon) 25. Motions Hearing APR 16 (Boston) 26. Trial APR 16 (Boston) 8

Local Rules 1.0 All service to be made by 10:00 p.m. on date due (unless otherwise noted). 2.0 All service to opposing counsel to be made via email, with copies to william.raich@finnegan.com; luke.mccammon@finnegan.com; susan.tull@finnegan.com and Pswain@Foleyhoag.com. 3.0 Depositions limited to two (2) each side, one hour limit each (taking party to provide transcript in five (5) days). 4.0 Interrogatories limited to five (5) each side, counting subparts. 5.0 No requests for admission permitted. 6.0 No expert depositions permitted. 7.0 Markman hearing by video conference, 30 minutes per side. 8.0 No damages discovery permitted (damages issues bifurcated). 9