The Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada

Similar documents
Professional Discipline Procedural Handbook

SEXUAL MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES

ICA ASSESSMENT APPEALS PROCEDURE ICAB584

Canadian Rope Skipping Federation Policy and Procedures Manual Revised: November 16th, 2013

Funeral and Transfer Services Advisory Committee Terms of Reference

CERTIFICATION APPEALS HANDLING PROCESS. For Individual Candidates seeking Certification and Qualified Individuals seeking Re-Certification

Complaints of Sexual Misconduct Against Students

Public Services and Procurement Canada Departmental Oversight Branch

COTHAM SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES

BY-LAW N O 38 September 2017

INITIAL ASSESSMENT FILING A COMPLAINT

The Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Making a complaint about a Member of the Board of the Authority

Complaints in Relation to Child Protection Conferences For parents, carers, children and young people

Department of Aviation Dallas Love Field

Student Senate Bylaws

1.1 Name. The name of this Sierra Club unit is the Orange County Sierra Singles Section (OCSS) of the Angeles Chapter of the Sierra Club (Club).

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ORDINANCE D8. THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE This Ordinance is made pursuant to Part III of the Appendix to the College s Statutes

IMPORTANT NOTICE (IMMEDIATE RESPONSE REQUIRED)

MedBiquitous Standards Program Operating Procedures 12 May 2015

This Guidance applies to complaints where the Complaint Form was received between 01/03/13 and 08/07/15.

The complaint process enquiry, mediation, investigation, adjudication, appeal

ASSOCIATION BYLAWS ALDEN MEADOWS ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I. ADOPTION OF CONDOMINIUM BYLAWS

Rehabilitation Services Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION SERVICES BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

GUIDE TO OIPC PROCESSES (PIPA)

Code of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health

Moot Court Board Constitution. Article I Name

NY PIP Rules. Effective February 1, 2009

COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY, INC. BYLAWS

Complaints Policy. Policy: Complaints Policy Effective Date: December 2014 Revision Number : 3.0 Revised: January 2018

DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS

Nominating Committee Roles & Responsibilities

Nomination Guide for Board Members NOMINATIONS CLOSE 5.00 PM AEST, 31 July 2017.

Resolutions and meetings of Guernsey companies

HUU-AY-AHT FIRST NATIONS

Business Development Committee Charter

Decision 122/2010 Mr Kevin McIntyre and Clackmannanshire Council

JUDICIAL BRANCH- STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION BYLAWS

Financial Dispute Resolution Service (FDRS)

REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES & CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS A. A

SIMCOE COUNTY ELEMENTARY OCCASIONAL TEACHERS LOCAL CONSTITUTION

STEP ESSAY ROUTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY POLICY

Corpus Christi International Airport Title VI Complaint Procedures And Complaint Form

Northern California Convention of. Narcotics Anonymous COMMITTEE GUIDELINES Walters Court Suite A, Fairfield, CA 94533

Table of Contents. Injury Manual Insurer s Decisions and Appeals. Division Summary Information

MAINE BAR ADMISSION RULES

Bylaws. Santa Clarita Group. Angeles Chapter, Sierra Club. January 1, 2001

Policy Number Member Protection Policy - Part G- Complaint Handling Policy

Bylaws. Ozark Chapter, Sierra Club. September 1, 2000

Policies and Procedures for Standards Development for the IEEE Cloud Computing Standards Committee. Date of Submittal: 08 July 2016

THE FINANCE SECTOR NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FORUM CONSTITUTION

Disciplinary procedures for member(s), Committees, Societies and sports clubs.

NBIMS-US PROJECT COMMITTEE RULES OF GOVERNANCE

Rules for Disciplinary Procedures Season 2017

AURORA CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION BYLAWS

Ontario Swimming Coaches Committee Disciplinary and Complaints Procedures

IPAC Ottawa Region Policy Manual

Bylaws. Amended January 2017

RULE VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES

BYLAWS OF SILVER RIDGE SUBDIVISIONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Corporate & Community Relations -Work Instruction CRM Complaints

North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department

STUDENT DISCIPLINE PROCEDURE 2016

RULE EXCEPTIONS - EXPERIMENTS ILLEGAL RECRUITING

Basketball Model Tribunal By-law

ILLEGAL RECRUITING

SGA Bylaws Judicial Branch

HUMANE SOCIETY YUKON CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS (2014) CONSTITUTION

BYLAWS. Chapter 128 NTEU PART I. Constitution PART II. Name, Headquarters-Jurisdiction and Fiscal Year

Practice Directions Directives de procédure

PACE INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW

How to File a Canada Pension Plan Appeal (General Division)

Board Charter Approved 26 April 2016

VICTORIA UNIVERSITY ANIMAL ETHICS COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference And Operating Procedures

Cirencester Housing Limited Complaints Policy

AAUW Colorado State Board Position and Committee Descriptions. State Board Member Responsibilities

SOUTHERN AFRICAN POLYGRAPH FEDERATION (SAPFED) THE CONSTITUTION of the SOUTHERN AFRICAN POLYGRAPH FEDERATION DEFINITIONS

COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINE PROCESS

LMSC STANDARDS As approved by the USMS Board of Directors 3/27/2012

Basketball Australia/Darwin Basketball Model Disciplinary Tribunals By-law Preamble

SELECTION POLICY AND APPEALS PROCESS FOR UCI WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS

Call for Proposals: Compile an Inventory of Current Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP) Practices and Health Care Services for GARs Across Canada

National Commission for Certifying Agencies Policy Manual

RPT-G6. Mobile Homes guidance

Operating Procedures for Accredited Standards Committee C63 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Date of Preparation: 3 March 2016

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING PREPARATION Executive Committee: May 28, 2013 Amended: January 14, 2014

Policies and Procedures for Standards Development for the Industrial Electronics Society (IES) Standards Committee. Date of Submittal: August

A Chapter of PAUMCS ARTICLE II

PRSA MIAMI CHAPTER BYLAWS

APA Rhode Island By-Laws

COMPLAINTS HANDLING POLICY

LMSC MINIMUM STANDARDS As voted by House of Delegates 2009 Convention

COMPLAINTS POLICY. Reference: Delta/EM/DM Issue Number: 2.0 Issue Date: September 2017 Review Date: September 2018 Approved by: Trust Board

Receiving and Responding to a Freedom of Information Act Request: Standard Operating Procedure

COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

Local Building or Fire Prevention Code Boards of Appeals Manual

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. Administrative and Procedural Guidelines

Party Political Broadcast, Party Election Broadcast and Referendum Campaign Broadcast Complaints Process February 2012

Transcription:

The Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada Le Bureau des examinateurs en pharmacie du Canada PEBC s Process for Handling Complaints, Concerns and Appeals There are several levels of review, reconsideration or appeal available to PEBC candidates in certain circumstances. Specifically, candidates concerns or complaints relating to the following matters shall be considered in this process: Examination-Related Issues: Outcome of a request for no standing status in respect of an examination based on a sudden personal circumstance (provided that the request is made within 7 days of the examination) Consideration of an incident affecting examination performance (provided that the incident is documented by the candidate at the examination AND, if an action or response is required, PEBC is notified by the candidate in writing within 7 days of the examination with valid supporting documentation for how the documented incident affected examination performance) Other Issues: Outcome of Document Evaluation Decision regarding eligibility for an examination Outcome of a request for special testing arrangements Decision regarding timeframe for completing examinations Decision regarding sanctions related to cheating or other examination irregularities The following are not subject to appeal: The content, methodology, standards, assessment criteria or scoring of the PEBC examinations; Policies related to the number of attempts on PEBC examinations

Overview of PEBC s Process for Handling Complaints, Concerns and Appeals Examination-related Issues (outcome of request for no standing or consideration of incident affecting exam performance) [documented at exam & to PEBC within 7 days] Performance Exam (Part II OSCE or OSPE) Written / Computer-based MCQ Exam Other Issues (outcome of Document Evaluation or special accommodations request; eligibility for an exam; timeframe for completing exams; sanctions related to cheating or other exam irregularities) Verbally report issue to Exam Personnel & document on Candidate Feedback Questionnaire before leaving exam / sign Waiver Discontinuation of Examination if exam is discontinued Part II Quality Assurance Panel shall consider issue in determining score Verbally report issue to Exam Personnel & document on Incident Report / Post-exam Survey before leaving exam / sign Waiver Discontinuation of Examination if exam is discontinued If action or response required (including no standing request), notify PEBC in writing within 7 days of exam with valid supporting documentation. If seeking no standing, exam results will be withheld until decision rendered. Submit written petition to the Registrar within 30 days of outcome or decision Written response or decision from Registrar or designate, within 30 days Release of exam results If dissatisfied, notify PEBC of intention to petition within 7 days of decision. Exam results will continue to be withheld until petition / appeal process is complete. If dissatisfied Within 30 days of written response / decision from Registrar or designate, submit a petition requesting reconsideration by members of the Executive committee. Written decision from Executive Committee within 30 days of receipt of petition. If dissatisfied, notify PEBC of intention to appeal within 7 days of decision. Exam results will continue to be withheld until petition / appeal process is complete. Within 60 days of written decision from Executive Committee, submit a written appeal requesting a determination by an Appeal Panel consisting of members of the Committee on Examinations and payment of the required fee. An appeal hearing shall be held either by teleconference (or other suitable means of electronic communication) or by in-person hearing. If by teleconference, the hearing will be held within 90 days. If by inperson hearing, the hearing will be held to coincide with the next scheduled PEBC Board meeting as long as the written appeal is received at least 90 days prior to the meeting date. Written decision from Appeal Panel will be issued within 60 days of the hearing. Decision of the Appeal Panel of the Committee on Examinations is final

I. Initial Handling of Concerns and Complaints (i) Examination-Related Issues On the Day of an Examination Candidates must submit any verbal complaints or concerns about any aspect of the examination (e.g., process, examination facilities, and examination administration) or personal circumstances (e.g., illness, bereavement) to exam personnel for immediate attention and correction, if possible, and documentation on a report to PEBC. For written (MCQ) examinations, candidates must request the Candidate Incident Form from the Presiding Officer at the end of the exam to document their concerns or complaints before leaving the examination site. For computer-based (MCQ) examinations, candidates must document their concerns or complaints in the Post-Exam Survey that is presented upon completion of the exam. For the Qualifying Examination Part II (OSCE/OSPE), candidates must document their concerns or complaints in writing on the Candidate Feedback Questionnaire before leaving the examination site. Any complaints or concerns which are not documented by the candidate at the examination site are not considered as part of the Complaints, Concerns and Appeals Process. After an Examination Any candidate who feels that a specific matter that was documented on the day of the examination requires further action or response, or any candidate seeking to request no standing status in respect of the examination due to a sudden illness or other emergency situation, must send such additional comments or request for no standing, along with any supporting documentation, in writing to the PEBC Registrar-Treasurer so that it is received within 7 calendar days after the close of the examination. These written concerns or requests for no standing are investigated and reviewed by the Registrar-Treasurer or designate. A written response from the Registrar-Treasurer, or designate, will be sent to the candidate within 30 days, communicating the information considered, a decision and the reason for the decision. Also, for concerns or complaints about the Qualifying Examination Part II (OSCE/OSPE), the Quality Assurance Panel that meets after every examination reviews the examination data, candidates written concerns and examination centre reports, to ensure that candidates results are based on a fair and accurate assessment of their performance. All reported incidents and written concerns/complaints documented by candidates on examination day are taken into consideration. The Part II Quality Assurance Panel provides advice to the Associate Registrar about how these should be considered in determining the final result, but does not respond to the candidate directly. A candidate that is dissatisfied with the response, may choose to submit a written petition for reconsideration by members of the Executive Committee (see details in section II). Notice of a candidate s intention to petition must be received by PEBC in writing within 7 days of the written decision and the full petition request must be received by PEBC within 30 days of the written decision. Exam results for any candidate requesting no standing status in respect of an examination will be withheld until the petition and appeal process have been completed.

II. (ii) Other Issues Any candidate who feels that a matter not related to a specific examination administration requires further consideration or review must send any concerns and all supporting documentation in writing to the PEBC Registrar-Treasurer within 30 days of the matter arising. These written concerns are investigated and reviewed by the Registrar-Treasurer, or designate. Within 30 days, the candidate shall receive a written response from the Registrar-Treasurer, or designate, communicating the information considered, a decision and the reason for the decision. A candidate that is dissatisfied with the response, within 30 days, may choose to submit a written petition for reconsideration by members of the Executive Committee (see details in section II) Petition for Reconsideration by the Executive Committee A candidate dissatisfied with the initial response from the Registrar-Treasurer, or designate, to the complaint or concern, shall be informed in writing that the next level for reconsideration is by members of the Executive Committee. The candidate shall be advised that a written petition for reconsideration, along with any additional supporting documentation, must be submitted within 30 days of the initial response from the Registrar-Treasurer, or designate. The petition should include the grounds for the petition and the resolution sought. After receiving the petition, the Registrar-Treasurer shall arrange to convene a meeting of three members of the Executive Committee (by teleconference). All documentation submitted by the candidate (e.g., written petition, supporting documentation), as well as any other relevant information (e.g., initial written response from the Registrar-Treasurer or designate; examination administration records; incident reports; quality assurance documents, etc) shall be assembled by PEBC staff for distribution to the members of the Executive Committee in advance of the meeting (teleconference). A deliberation shall be made by the members of the Executive Committee and a report of the Committee s decision shall be forwarded to the Registrar-Treasurer, who shall communicate a written response to the candidate within 30 days of receipt of the petition. A candidate dissatisfied with the response, may choose to submit an appeal to the Appeal Panel of the Committee on Examinations (see details in section III). In this circumstance, the candidate must also indicate any intent to appeal the decision within 7 days of the written decision of the Executive Committee. III. Appeal to the Appeal Panel of the Committee on Examinations A candidate dissatisfied with the outcome of the petition for reconsideration by members of the Executive Committee, shall be informed in writing of the opportunity to file an appeal for consideration by the Appeal Panel. The candidate shall be advised that a detailed written statement outlining the grounds for the appeal and the resolution sought, must be submitted within 60 days of the petition outcome decision of the Executive Committee. The appeal must be accompanied by the Appeal Fee, which is determined annually by the Board. As of the date of revision set out below, the Appeal Fee is $1,000. The written appeal must also state whether the candidate wishes the hearing to be conducted by teleconference or in-person and whether the candidate will be represented by legal counsel. The Appeal Panel shall consist of three or five members of the Committee on Examinations, one of whom shall be designated Chair. After reviewing a written appeal, the Appeal Panel may dismiss an appeal without a hearing, if it considers the matter to be frivolous or vexatious, does not meet the criteria for an appeal or the candidate has failed to comply with any of the timelines noted throughout.

If the hearing is to be held by teleconference (or other suitable means of electronic communication), it shall be scheduled within 90 days of the receipt of the written appeal. If the hearing is to be held inperson, it will be scheduled to coincide with the next PEBC Board meeting (held bi-annually) as long as the written appeal is received at least 90 days prior to the meeting date. The candidate shall receive notice of the date of the hearing at least 30 days in advance. Either party [i.e., the candidate or the Registrar-Treasurer (or designate)] shall be entitled to call witnesses to give evidence and to cross-examine the other party s witnesses. The members of the Appeal Panel may also question the candidate and any other witnesses. The Chair may appoint a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada to act as legal counsel to the Appeal Panel. As well, either party may be represented by legal counsel. After considering the written appeal, the evidence presented at the hearing and the submissions made, the members of the Appeal Panel shall render a decision, determined by a clear majority, as to whether or not the appeal should be granted or denied. The Appeal Panel shall document, in writing, their decision, reasons for their decision and any recommendations, which will be forwarded to the Registrar- Treasurer (or designate). The Registrar-Treasurer shall convey the decision of the Appeal Panel and reasons for the decision to the candidate within 60 days of the appeal hearing. If the appeal is decided in favour of the candidate, the Appeal Fee shall be reimbursed to the candidate. If the Appeal Panel dismisses the appeal, the unsuccessful candidate may be required to pay the legal costs of the Registrar-Treasurer, or designate, on behalf of PEBC as respondent and the legal costs of the Appeal Panel in determining the appeal. The decision of the members of the Appeal Panel of the Committee on Examinations shall be final. October 26, 2012 Revised February 24, 2018