Presented by Marsha Harlan, Esq, Kara Whitworth, Director of Cherokee Nation Child Support Services TRIBAL IV-D 101- FOR STATES

Similar documents
DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION

Public Law as Amended by the Tribal Law and Order Act July 29, 2010

Why Treaties Matter: Sovereignty and Existence

American Indian & Alaska Native. Tribal Government Policy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Enacting and Enforcing Tribal Law to Protect and Restore Natural Resources Part 1: Tribal Law and How it Works RICHARD A. DU BEY

RESERVATION OF RIGHTS A look at Indian land claims in Ohio for gaming purposes. By Keith H. Raker

Case3:12-cv CRB Document32-1 Filed06/22/12 Page1 of 10

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

Working Effectively with Indian Tribes: Communication, Collaboration, Coordination, and Consultation, 2017

July 30, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES, AND INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCIES

Justices for the Court: Garbriel Duvall, William Johnson, Chief Justice John Marshall, John McLean, Joseph Story, Smith Thompson

The Indian Reorganization (W'heeler-Howard Act) June 18, 1934

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Natural Resources Journal

Native Communities - Sociology 3270

Native American Senate Documents 60th Congress (1908) 94th Congress (1975)

[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A G] Final Determination against Federal Acknowledgment of the Georgia Tribe of Eastern Cherokee

Alaskan Native Indian Villages: The Question of Sovereign Rights

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

[Docket ID: OSM ; S1D1S SS SX064A S180110; S2D2S SS SX064A00 19XS501520]

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. Office of the Secretary. 6 CFR Part 37 RIN 1601-AA74. [Docket No. DHS ]

BEFORE THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS

Overview of the Second Draft of the Tribal Declarations Pilot Guidance

Case 1:12-cv JDL Document 34 Filed 08/06/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 330 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Docket ID: OSM ; S1D1S SS SX064A S180110; S2D2S SS SX064A00 18XS501520]

By John Petoskey, General Counsel Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians. Great Lakes Tribal Economic Development Symposium

IHS TRIBAL SELF-GOVERNANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

MEMORANDUM NEW ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT LEGISLATION FOR INDIAN COUNTRY SUMMARY

Tribal Nations United States Relations: Policy Eras and Future Developments

NATIVE AMERICAN LAW & JUSTICE CENTER

2008 SAIGE Annual Training Conference "Blessed by Tradition: Honoring Our Ancestors Through Government Service"

WHEREAS, the Projects lie within the States of South Carolina and Georgia; and,

Consulting with Indian Tribes in the Section 106 Review Process (from Advisory Council on Historic Preservation website)

Case 1:17-cv JCH-KBM Document 9 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. FOURTEEN YEARS, BIRTH FATHER, AND THE CHEROKEE NATION, Respondents.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Sec. 4 A New Era of Trust.

N A T I O N A L C O N G R E S S O F A M E R I C A N I N D I A N S

Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

CONSTITUTION OF THE SHAWNEE TRIBE

N A T I O N A L C O N G R E S S O F A M E R I C A N I N D I A N S. May 20, 2013

History: Present

To: NCAI Membership Fr: NCAI Executive Committee Re: Potential Amendments to Improve NCAI Elections Process Dt: June 9, 2014

SUMMARY; The National Park Service announces two telephonic government-to-government

THE PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE IS CONSIDERING TO AMEND ITS TRIBAL CONSTITUTION

Tribal Fishing Rights & Water Quality Standards under the Clean Water Act

Using Tradition and Custom to Promote Healing in Tribal Courts

Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 470) 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Public Law The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, As Amended

CIVIL JURISDICTION IN INDIAN COUNTRY

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 2nd Extraordinary Session of the 56th Legislature (2018) HOUSE BILL 1031 By: Wallace and Casey of the House AS INTRODUCED

6/16/2017. What will we cover? Working with our Tribal Partners. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Tribal Members

Native American Graves Protection and. Repatriation Act

Presentation outline

N A T I O N A L C O N G R E S S O F A M E R I C A N I N D I A N S

Sec. 470a. Historic preservation program

Justice Rehnquist s Theory of Indian Law: The Evolution from Mazurie to Atkinson Where Did He Leave the Court? Brenna Willott 1

Tribal Consultation VAWA 2013, Section 903. November 18, noon EST

McClanahan v. State Tax Comm'n of. Ariz.

H.R. 1924, THE TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT OF 2009

Utilities. (Amended as of 1/16/13) CHICKASAW NATION CODE TITLE 20 "20. UTILITIES" CHAPTER 1 TRIBAL UTILITY SERVICES

Case: Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 01/24/2014

The National Congress of American Indians Resolution #SAC

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 105 Filed 12/22/14 Page 1 of 27

Lands & Natural Resources. (Amended as of 11/16/12) CHICKASAW NATION CODE TITLE 15 "15. LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES"

CHAMORRO TRIBE I Chamorro Na Taotaogui IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR NATIVE CHAMORROS

COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBE Chapter 675 TRAFFIC ORDINANCE

FederalR eg ister Environm entald o cu m en ts

Tribal Law & Order Act Update. National Congress of American Indians Lincoln, Nebraska June 18, 2012

N A T I O N A L C O N G R E S S O F A M E R I C A N I N D I A N S

BYLAWS (As Amended Through October 8, 2014)

Funds Provided to American Indians/Alaska Natives that are Excluded by Law

UNIFORM CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF LAW [ACT] [RULE] (199_) UNIFORM CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF LAW [ACT] [RULE] (199_)

INDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER CENTRO DE RECURSOS JURÍDICOS PARA LOS PUEBLOS INDÍGENAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[Docket No. FWS R7 SM ; FXFR FF07J00000; Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska and

ERICSA 53rd Annual Training Conference & Exposition May 1-5 Myrtle Beach, South Carolina

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES MARCH 2019 ROBERT R. REYNOLDS, Petitioner

Released for Publication August 4, COUNSEL JUDGES

GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY TRIBAL CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM PROJECT

Rules of Practice and Procedures to Formulate or Amend a Marketing Agreement, a

TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 70 LAW AND ORDER ORDINANCE Abrogation and Greater Restrictions.

Case 5:15-cv L Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay NationIBIA OLES Deputation Agreement Mandatory Public Law 280 Indian Country

Indian Reorganization Era The Indian New Deal

TRIBAL SUPREME COURT PROJECT MEMORANDUM

CONSTITUTION OF THE COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBE PREAMBLE. Our ancestors since the beginning of time have lived and died on

October 19, 2012 GENERAL MEMORANDUM Department of Justice Issues Policy on Eagle Feathers

Department of Veterans Affairs VA Directive 8603 CONSULTATION AND VISITATION WITH AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKAN NATIVES

National Congress of American Indians SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT AS ENACTED - WITH NOTES FOR IMPLEMENTATION

SUMMARY: The Chattooga Wild and Scenic River is located in the Nantahala National

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case 2:13-cv DB Document 2 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 10

[Docket No. FWS R7 SM ; FXFR FF07J00000; FBMS

Diverting Cases to Wellness Court: Strategies for Creative Collaborations for Tribes in Alaska, P.L. 280, and Beyond

Deputation Agreement

Transcription:

Presented by Marsha Harlan, Esq, Kara Whitworth, Director of Cherokee Nation Child Support Services TRIBAL IV-D 101- FOR STATES

HISTORY OF TRIBAL PROGRAMS Prior to PRWORA- authority to operate IV-D programs was vested solely with states 1996-Personal Work& Responsibility Act- Allowed for Direct funding to tribes/tribal organizations

HISTORY OF TRIBAL IV-D PROGRAMS Indian Defined- means a person who is a member of an Indian Tribe Indian tribe and Tribe defined- means any Indian or Alaska Native Tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian Tribe and includes in the list of Federally-recognized Indian Tribal governments as published in the Federal Register pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 479 a-1.

HISTORY OF TRIBAL CHILD SUPPORT 2004- Final Rule promulgated to implement section 455(f) of Social Security Act ( 69 FR 16638) All Federally recognized Indian Tribes or tribal organizations authorized by 1/more federally recognized tribes Applicants must have at least 100 children under age of majority w/in their jurisdiction

HISTORY OF TRIBAL CHILD SUPPORT First tribal IV-D program- Chickasaw Nation(1996- prior to final rule) Currently have 52 IV-D comprehensive Tribal programs 10 start up IV-D Tribal programs State with the most Tribal programs are: Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Washington

HISTORY OF TRIBAL CHILD SUPPORT Tribes receive direct funding to: 1- Ensure tribes can develop and establish child support programs that incorporate the unique cultural values of their citizens as form of selfgovernance ; 2- Create an avenue to establish child support orders in Indian Country -states lack jurisdiction on tribal land base ; 3- provide an avenue for state orders to be enforced via registering in tribal courts system.

TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY Today there are 565+ federally recognized Indian tribes in the U.S. Each with their own unique identity, culture, customs and traditions, as well as their own distinct form of government. Culture- Tribal people share values, attitudes and ways- a unique way of life- that others do not share. Tribal people share most fundamental aspects of life- race, religion, language, traditions, historical experience and values.

TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY Essentially sovereignty means to govern one s own people Tribes continue to hold all attributes of sovereignty we originally held, except for that which has been taken from US government Federal Law defines a federally recognized tribe as those who have been recognized by the federal government who have substantially continuous tribal existence and which have functioned as autonomous entities throughout history until the present. 25 C.F.R. Par 83.3.

TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY Political Aspects- Tribal people are distinguished as a political entity with a right to self-governance. A political entity is a group of people living within a specific territory under a defined government that exercises some level of sovereignty. Trust relationship between Tribes and Federal government

TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY Federal- Tribal Relationships characterized by: Sovereignty limited to Federal government interpretation( Johnson v. McIntosh, 1823) Domestic dependent nations (Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 1831) Trust relationship between Federal Government and Indian Tribes ( Worcester v. Georgia, 1832)

FEDERAL REGULATIONS States are required to cooperate with Tribal IV-D programs pursuant to 45 C.F.R. 302.36 (a)(2). Tribes are required to cooperate with States pursuant to 45 C.F.R. 309.120(a). Uniform Interstate Family Support Act- 42 U.S.C. 666(f). Required by states- but not tribes Full Faith & Credit for Child Support Orders Act- 28 U.S.C. 1738B(b)- applies to both tribes and states

TRIBAL V STATE JURISDICTION Exclusive Tribal jurisdiction- Tribes have exclusive jurisdiction over civil matters in Indian country against tribal members Concurrent jurisdiction- Matters involving Indians against non-indians Exception- P.L. 280 states- states have concurrent jurisdiction of civil matters in Indian country

45 CFR 309- TRIBAL CHILD SUPPORT Tribes are required to perform the same basic services as states- locate, establish paternity, establish orders, and modify orders Some key differences: Tribes do not have access to FPLS, may request this service from the state Tribes must locate, but no specific time frames as to when this must be completed

45 CFR 309 TRIBAL CHILD SUPPORT- KEY DIFFERENCES CONT D Must recognize any state Voluntary Paternity acknowledgements but may not choose to use this form for tribal enrollment purposes; process for voluntary acknowledgements is less prescribed than that of the states Required to establish child support, time- frames are dependent upon the plan; often tribes place emphasis on parties reaching agreements Tribes not required to address health care in orders, but tribes may opt to do so Tribal current support- can include a provision for non-cash support- cannot be used for arrears Tribes have no legal authority to submit cases for tax offset but may request this from states Only mandated enforcement remedy is income withholding. Tribal agency becomes responsible for receiving and processing IWO s from states and other tribes for all employers within the tribes jurisdiction.

THERE ARE DIFFERENCES AMONG TRIBAL PROGRAMS Each tribe has ability to develop own distinct plan for child support within their jurisdictional boundaries. Each tribe has ability to codify their own statutes to enforce child support Each tribe may have unique court set up that deals with child support matters IRG may be useful tool for determining the tribal agencies and their contact information.

Thank you for your attention. Any questions? Comments?