Behavioral Public Choice. Professor Rebecca Morton New York University

Similar documents
POLS G4371 LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS AND FORMAL THEORIES IN POLITICAL SCIENCE. Tuesday 10:10a-12:00p International Affairs Building 711

Communication and Information in Games of Collective Decision: A Survey of Experimental Results

HANDBOOK OF EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS RESULTS

Compulsory versus Voluntary Voting Mechanisms: An Experimental Study

Collective Choice and Democracy

Laboratory Experiments in Political Economy by Thomas R. Palfrey, Princeton University CEPS Working Paper No. 111 July 2005

Information Aggregation and Turnout in Proportional Representation: A Laboratory Experiment

CURRICULUM VITAE. Thomas R. Palfrey, III

Compulsory versus Voluntary Voting An Experimental Study

Sequential vs. Simultaneous Voting: Experimental Evidence

Compulsory versus Voluntary Voting An Experimental Study

CURRICULUM VITAE. Thomas R. Palfrey, III

CURRICULUM VITAE. Thomas R. Palfrey, III

Extended Abstract: The Swing Voter s Curse in Social Networks

Proposed New Undergraduate Class: Experimental Methods in Political Science. Course Description

Curriculum Vitae February 17, Rebecca B. Morton

Communication and Voting Rules in Bargaining Games,

ECO/PSC 582 Political Economy II

Information Aggregation in Voting with Endogenous Timing

Information Acquisition and Voting Mechanisms: Theory and Evidence

On Optimal Voting Rules under Homogeneous Preferences

The determinants of voting in multilateral bargaining games

Hypothetical Thinking and Information Extraction in the Laboratory

Formal Modeling in Political Science Mon & Wed 10:00-11:50

At least since Downs s (1957) seminal work An Economic Theory of Democracy,

Formal Political Theory II: Applications

Testing Political Economy Models of Reform in the Laboratory

PSC/PEC/ECON 582: POLITICAL ECONOMY II

The Swing Voter's Curse *

INFORMATION AND STRATEGIC VOTING

Communication and Information in Games of Collective Decision: A Survey of Experimental Results

Hypothetical Thinking and Information Extraction: Strategic Voting in the Laboratory

Let the Experts Decide? Asymmetric Information, Abstention, and Coordination in Standing Committees 1

EQUILIBRIA IN MULTI-DIMENSIONAL, MULTI-PARTY SPATIAL COMPETITION 1

The Dark Side of the Vote: Biased Voters, Social Information, and Information Aggregation Through Majority Voting

Curriculum Vitae March 19, Rebecca B. Morton Contact:

Communication in Multilateral Bargaining

Agendas and Strategic Voting

Voting Power in Weighted Voting Games: A Lobbying Approach by Maria Montero, Alex Possajennikov and Martin Sefton 1 April 2011

Jury Voting without Objective Probability

Experimental economics and public choice

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Get Out the (Costly) Vote: Institutional Design for Greater Participation

Reference Point Effects in Legislative Bargaining: Experimental Evidence *

Collective Decision with Costly Information: Theory and Experiments

Divided Majority and Information Aggregation: Theory and Experiment

Expert Information and Majority Decisions

Get Out the (Costly) Vote: Institutional Design for Greater Participation. Current Version: May 10, 2015

The welfare effects of public opinion polls

Public opinion polls, voter turnout, and welfare: An experimental study *

Why do people vote? While many theories have

A Simultaneous Analysis of Turnout and Voting under Proportional Representation: Theory and Experiments. Aaron Kamm & Arthur Schram

Costly Advice. Mehmet Ekmekci and Stephan Lauermann. August 31, 2017

An Experimental Study of Collective Deliberation. August 17, 2010

Get Out the (Costly) Vote: Institutional Design for Greater Participation. Current Version: November 26, 2008

Veto Power in Committees: An Experimental Study* John H. Kagel Department of Economics Ohio State University

External Validation of Voter Turnout Models by Concealed Parameter Recovery 1

Political Institutions POLS 689

Refinements of Nash equilibria. Jorge M. Streb. Universidade de Brasilia 7 June 2016

Veto Power in Committees: An Experimental Study* John H. Kagel Department of Economics Ohio State University

Multicandidate Elections: Aggregate Uncertainty in the Laboratory

Divided Majority and Information Aggregation: Theory and Experiment

Transparency Versus Backroom Deals in Bargaining

Transparency Versus Backroom Deals in Bargaining

ALESSANDRA CASELLA March Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Ma, Ph.D in Economics, Thesis: "Hyperinflations".

The E ects of Identities, Incentives, and Information on Voting 1

Voluntary Voting: Costs and Benefits

Balanced Voting. Kamali Wickramage. based on joint work with Hans Gersbach. ETH Zurich. June, 2014

COSTLY VOTING: A LARGE-SCALE REAL EFFORT EXPERIMENT

THE PARADOX OF VOTER PARTICIPATION? A LABORATORY STUDY

The Citizen Candidate Model: An Experimental Analysis

Expert Information and Majority Decisions

Corruption in Committees: An Experimental Study of Information Aggregation through Voting 1

Expert Information and Majority Decisions

Should Straw Polls be Banned?

Veto Power in Committees: An Experimental Study* John H. Kagel Department of Economics Ohio State University

PUBLIC DELIBERATION, PRIVATE COMMUNICATION, AND COLLECTIVE CHOICE

THE FUTURE OF ANALYTICAL POLITICS...

Massimo Morelli. Dottorato in Economia Politica at University of Pavia, 1995.

Expert Information and Majority Decisions

ISSN , Volume 13, Number 2

The Case for Nil Votes: Voter Behavior under Asymmetric Information in Compulsory and Voluntary Voting Systems

The Swing Voter s Curse in Proportional Representation Systems (Evidence from Multiple Elections)

The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online

Political Institutions

ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, April 2011 University of St. Gallen. Workshop Proposal

Enriqueta Aragones Harvard University and Universitat Pompeu Fabra Andrew Postlewaite University of Pennsylvania. March 9, 2000

Tues. 3:30-6:15 p.m. Office: Baldwin 408, (706) Office Hours: Mon & Wed 3:30-5:00 pm. An Introduction to Rational Choice

Econ 7384: Political Economy Department of Economics, University of Houston Fall 2016

The Value of Votes in Weighted Voting Games: An Experimental Study of Majoritarian Contests with Asymmetric Battlefields 1

Published in Canadian Journal of Economics 27 (1995), Copyright c 1995 by Canadian Economics Association

ESSAYS ON STRATEGIC VOTING. by Sun-Tak Kim B. A. in English Language and Literature, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea, 1998

HANDBOOK OF SOCIAL CHOICE AND VOTING Jac C. Heckelman and Nicholas R. Miller, editors.

Understanding political behavior: Essays in experimental political economy Gago Guerreiro de Brito Robalo, P.M.

The Swing Voter s Curse in Social Networks

Gamson s Law versus Non-Cooperative. Bargaining Theory

CURRICULUM VITAE Randall Calvert (Oct. 18, 2017)

Citation for published version (APA): Tyszler, M. (2012). Political economics in the laboratory Amsterdam: Thela Thesis

The Marginal Voter s Curse

Spring 2017 SOCI Social Science Inquiry III

Transcription:

Behavioral Public Choice Professor Rebecca Morton New York University Reading List Ali, Nageeb, Jacob Goeree, Navin Kartik, and Thomas Palfrey. 2008a. Information Aggregation in Ad Hoc and Standing Committees. American Economic Review. 98(2): 181 186. Aragones, Enriqueta and Thomas R. Palfrey. 2004. The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study. American Political Science Review. 98, 77 90. Austen Smith, David and Jeffrey Banks. 1996. Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem. American Political Science Review. 90, 34 45. Baron, David P. and John A. Ferejohn. 1989. Bargaining in Legislatures. American Political Science Review. 83, 1181 1206. Battaglini, Marco, Rebecca Morton, and Thomas Palfrey. 2008a. Efficiency, Equity, and Timing in Voting Mechanisms. American Political Science Review. 101(3): 409 423. Battaglini, Marco, Rebecca Morton, and Thomas Palfrey. 2010. The Swing Voter s Curse in the Laboratory. Review of Economic Studies. 77: 61 89. Battaglini, Marco, RebeccaMorton, and Thomas Palfrey. 2008b. Information Aggregation and Strategic Abstention in Large Laboratory Elections. American Economic Review. 98(2): 194 200. Battaglini, Marco, Salvatore Nunnari, and Thomas Palfrey. 2010. Political Institutions and the Dynamics of Public Investment, Social Science Working Paper #1318, California Institute of Technology. Battaglini, Marco, Salvatore Nunnari, and Thomas Palfrey. 2011. Legislative Bargaining and the Dynamics of Public Investment, Social Science Working Paper #1352, California Institute of Technology. Battaglini, Marco and Thomas Palfrey. 2011. The Dynamics of Distributive Politics. Econommic Theory. in press. Casella, Alessandra. 2005. Storable Votes. Games and Economic Behavior 51(May):391 419.

2 Casella, Alessandra. 2011, Storable Votes: Protecting the Minority Voice, Oxford University Press. New York. Casella, Alessandra. 2011, Agenda Control as a Cheap Talk Game. Theory and Experiments with Storable Votes, Games and Economic Behavior, 72(May):46 76. Casella, Alessandra, Andrew Gelman, and Thomas R. Palfrey. 2006. An Experimental Study of Storable Votes. Games and Economic Behavior, 57(1), 123 54. Casella, Alessandra, Thomas R. Palfrey and Raymond Riezman. 2008. Minorities and Storable Votes Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3(2): 165 200. Diermeier, Daniel and Sean Gailmard (2006) "Self Interest, Inequality, and Entitlement in Majoritarian Decision Making," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1: 327 350. Diermeier, Daniel and Rebecca Morton (2006) "Experiments in Majoritarian Bargaining," in Social Choice and Strategic Decisions: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey S. Banks, D. Austen Smith and J. Duggan eds. Springer: Heidelberg: 201 26. Duffy, John and Margit Tavits (2008). "Beliefs and Voting Decisions: A Test of the Pivotal Voting Model." American Journal of Political Science, 52(3): 603 18. Feddersen, Timothy and Pesendorfer Wolfgang, 1996. The Swing Voter s Curse, American Economic Review. 86(3), pp. 404 24. Feddersen, Timothy and Pesendorfer Wolfgang, 1997. Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information. Econometrica. 65, pp. 1029 58. Feddersen, Timothy and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. 1998. Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts. American Political Science Review. 92, 23 36. Feddersen, Timothy and Pesendorfer Wolfgang, 1999. Absetention in Elections with Asymmetric Information and Diverse Preferences. American Political Science Review. 93(2), pp. 381 98. Forsythe, Robert, Roger Myerson, Thomas Rietz, and Robert Weber. 1993. An Experiment on Coordination in Multi candidate Elections: The Importance of Polls and Election Histories. Social Choice and Welfare. 10, 223 47. *Forsythe, Robert, Roger Myerson, Thomas Rietz, and Robert Weber. 1996. An Experimental Study of Voting Rules and Polls in Three Way Electins. International Journal of Game Theory. 25, 355 83.

3 Frechette, Guillaume, John H. Kagel and Steven F. Lehrer (2003) Bargaining in Legislatures: An Experimental Investigation of Open versus Closed Amendment Rules, American Political Science Review, 97(May): 221 32. Frechette, Guillaume, John H. Kagel and Massimo Morelli (2005a) Gamson s Law versus Non Cooperative Bargaining Theory, Games and Economic Behavior, 51(May): 365 90. Frechette, Guillaume, John H. Kagel and Massimo Morelli (2005b) Nominal Bargaining Power, Selection Protocol, and Discounting in Legislative Bargaining, Journal of Public Economics, 89(August): 1497 1517. Frechette, Guillaume, John H. Kagel andmassimomorelli (2005c) Behavioral Identification in Coalitional Bargaining: An Experimental Analysis of Demand Bargaining and Alternating Offers, Econometrica, 73 (October): 1893 1938. Frechette, Guillaume, John H. Kagel andmassimomorelli (2011) Pork Versus Public Goods: An Experimental Study of Public Good Provision Within a Legislative Bargaining Framework." Economic Theory, In press. Gerber, Elisabeth, Rebecca Morton, and Thomas Rietz. 1998. Minority Representation in Multimember Districts. American Political Science Review. 92, 127 44. Goeree, Jacob and Leeat Yariv. 2010. An Experimental Study of Collective Deliberation. Econometrica 79(3): 893 921 Grosser, Jens and Arthur Schram. 2006. Neighborhood Information Exchange and Voter Participation: An Experimental Study. American Political Science Review. 100(2), 235 48. Grosser, Jens and Arthur Schram. 2010. Public Opinion Polls, Voter Turnout, and Welfare: An Experimental Study. American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 700 717. *Guarnaschelli, Serena, Richard D. McKelvey, and Thomas R. Palfrey. 2000. An Experimental Study of Jury Decision Rules. American Political Science Review. 94(2), 407 423. Hortala Vallve, Rafael and Aniol Llorente Saguer. 2010. A Simple Mechanism for Resolving Con ict. Games and Economic Behavior, 70: 375 91. Hung, Angela and Charles R. Plott. 2001, Information Cascades: Replication and an Extension to Majority Rule and Conformity Rewarding Institutions. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1508 1520..

4 Levine, David and Thomas R. Palfrey. 2007. The Pardox of Voter Participation American Political Science Review. 101(1), 143 158. McKelvey, Richard D. 1991. An Experiment Test of a Stochastic Game Model of Committee Bargaining. In Contemporary Laboratory Research in Political Economy (ed. T. Palfrey). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. McKelvey, Richard D., and Peter C. Ordeshook (1990a) Information and Elections; Retrospective Voting and Rational Expectations, in Information and Democratic Processes, edited by J. Ferejohn and J. Kuklinski, Urbana Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 281 312. McKelvey, Richard D. and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1990b. A Decade of Experimental Research on Spatial Models of Elections and Committees. In Government, Democracy, and Social Choice, Melvin J. Hinich and James Enelow, eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. retical Politics. 19: 301 328. Morton, Rebecca and Jean Robert Tyran. 2010. Let the experts decide? Asymmetric Information, Abstention and Coordination in Standing Committees Games and Economic Behavior Morton, Rebecca and Thomas Rietz. 2008. Majority Requirements and Minority Representation, NYU Annual Survey of American Law, 63: 691 725. Morton, Rebecca and Kenneth Williams. 1999. Information Asymmetries and Simultaneous versus Sequential Voting. American Political Science Review. 93, 51 67. Morton, Rebecca and Kenneth Williams. 2001. Learning by Voting. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Myerson, Roger Thomas Rietz, and Robert Weber. 1998. Campaign Finance Levels as Coordinating Signals in Three Way, Experimental Elections. Economics and Politics, 10, 3, 185 217. Palfrey, Thomas R. and Howard Rosenthal. 1983. A Strategic Calculus of Voting. Public Choice. 41: 7 53. Palfrey, Thomas R. and Howard Rosenthal. 1985. Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty. American Political Science Review. 79, 62 78. Rietz, Thomas. 2008. Three way Experimental Election Results: Strategic Voting, Coordinated Outcomes and Duverger s Law. In The Handbook of Experimental Economics Results.. Charles Plott and Vernon Smith, eds. Elsevier:Amsterdam. In Press.

5 Rietz, Thomas, Roger Myerson, and Robert Weber. 1998. Campaign Finance Levels as Coordinating Signals in Three Way, Experimental Elections. Economics and Politics, 10, 3, 185 217. Schram, Arthur and Joep Sonnemans. Voter Turnout as a Participation Game: An Experimental Investigation. International Journal of Game Theory. 25, 385 406. Schram, Arthur, and Joep Sonnemans (1996) Why People Vote: Experimental Evidence, Journal of Economic Psychology, 17:4 (August), 417 442.