Interim Measures Indicated by International Courts

Similar documents
INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION SUBMITTED BY THE SUB REGIONAL FISHERIES COMMISSION (SRFC)

The Practice of the International Court of Justice on Provisional Measures: The Recent Development

The Power of the International Court of Justice to Indicate Provisional Measures to Prevent the Aggravation of a Dispute

The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 16 May 1991 *

Revised Rules of Procedure for the Committee for Environmental Protection (2011)

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)

ORDER OF CASE 792/79 R

OPINION OF MR ADVOCATE GENERAL CAPOTORTI DELIVERED ON 25 MARCH 1980 '

The Charter of the United Nations

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT 12 JULY 1983»

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 9 November 1995 *

ORDER OF THE ACTING PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS* MARCH 24, 2010.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. 16 June 1998 (1)

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Rules of Procedure for the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to prepare a legally binding agreement on forests in Europe

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 22 April 1997 *

JUDGMENT OF JOINED CASES 35 AND 36/82

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) CONTENTS

CONVENTION ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE ORGANIZATION EUTELSAT

Case 62/86 R. AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC KATEKA

Case T-201/04 R. Microsoft Corp. v Commission of the European Communities

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HEIDAR

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE COMMON COURT OF JUSTICE AND ARBITRATION

219. IMMUNITIES AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (EQUATORIAL GUINEA v. FRANCE) Order of 7 December 2016

Japan amends its Commercial Arbitration Rules

THE RIGHTS OF REFUGEES. Report of the Committee and Background Materials

LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATION

Model International Form Under the Patent Law Treaty (PLT)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 18 April 1991 *

The State of Qatar institutes proceedings against the United Arab Emirates and requests the Court to indicate provisional measures

Procedural Decisions in ICC Arbitration

Population Economics

Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them

Amendments to the Staff Regulations and Staff Rules

Case C-387/97. Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

CAMBODIA Trademark Law The Law Concerning Marks, Trade Names and Acts of Unfair Competition as amended on February 07, 2002

A Modern Treatise on the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law

Application and requests for the indication of provisional measures

Rules of Procedure of the WHO Regional Committee for South-East Asia

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 26 November 1996 *

THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES

Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy of the European Union

European Telecommunications Satellite Organisation AMENDED CONVENTION EDITORIAL NOTE

Statutes of the International Council of Ophthalmology

Is Voting for Young People?

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 30 April 1996 *

Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks

The International Court of Justice

RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION. of the Finland Chamber of Commerce

SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, REGULATIONS UNDER THE SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS AND RESOLUTION BY THE DIPLOMATIC

Explanatory Report to the Interim Agreements concerning Social Security Schemes *

10 th Congress of the IASAJ Sydney March 2010.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 26 June 1990*

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 30 June 1988*

DRAFT RULES OF PROCEDURE CONTENTS

DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC FRANCIONI

The General Assembly resolution requesting the Kosovo opinion and the ultra vires issue

Article 1 Field of Application

Conflicts in International Trade Law

Interim Agreements concerning Social Security Schemes. Explanatory Report

ECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES

THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES

Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 8 October 1987 *

Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks

THE PROCEDURE OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL

Tightening the Reins. Towards a Strengthened International Nuclear Safeguards System. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH

VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES BETWEEN STATES AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OR BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

HONG KONG (Updated January 2018)

Globalization, Institutions and Social Cohesion

Elestina Morson and Sewradjie Jhanjan v. State of the Netherlands. (Cases 35-36/82) Before the Court of Justice of the European Communities ECJ

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION WIPO MODEL LAW FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES ON INVENTIONS. Volume 11

E U C O P E S y n o p s i s

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 30 May 1991 *

TRADEMARK LAW TREATY adopted at Geneva on October 27, 1994 Entry into force: see Article 20(2).

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 20 September 1990 *

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE. No 200/2016. of 30 September amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2017/277]

Hong Kong, China-Malaysia Extradition Treaty

International Trade Theory

International Responsibility Today Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter

HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL SCIENCES CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY. Bylaw I Name

EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW

page 1 Delimitation Treaties Infobase accessed on 22/03/2002 DOALOS/OLA - UNITED NATIONS

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

I. Purpose. II. Definitions. III. Place and date of meetings. Rule 1. Rule 2. Rule 3

PART I CITATION AND INTERPRETATION 1. Citation Interpretation 4

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 17 September 1997 * REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty by the Vergabeüberwachungsausschuß.

Official Journal of the European Union L 84/1 REGULATIONS

ARGENTINA. Reply expanding on question No. 13 in the Technical Secretariat 02

Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar v. United Arab Emirates)

Japan Arbitration Update: New JCAA Rules Comparison of Key Asian Arbitral Institutions

RULES OF PROCEDURE LONG FORM

Asociación de Bancos de México ABM, A.C. By-laws

NOMINATION OF A CANDIDATE FOR THE POST OF DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF UNESCO

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

The Anatomy of a Complaint

Transcription:

Rudolf Bernhardt (Ed.) Interim Measures Indicated by International Courts Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Budapest

Contents Preface List of Abbreviations V XI Part One: Reports 1 The Indication of Provisional Measures by the International Court of Justice 1 H. W. A. THIRLWAY I. The legal basis for the indication of provisional measures Powers of the President of the Court 2 II. The purpose of provisional measures 5 A. Preservation of rights 7 B. Prevention of irreparable prejudice 8 C. Non-anticipation of Court's decision 11 D. Non-aggravation or extension of dispute 12 E. Preservation of evidence 16 III. The conditions for the indication of provisional measures... 16 A. Existence of jurisdiction 17 B. Existence ofa prima fade case 23 C. Urgency 25 IV. The content of provisional measures: the "interim judgment". 27 V. Binding or non-binding effect of provisional measures.... 28 VI. The consequences of measures 33 Addendum 34 Interim Measures in the Law and Practice of the Court of Justice of the European Communities 37 FRANCIS G. JACOBS Introduction 37 I. Legal bases for the grant of interim measures 38

VIII Contents A. The founding Treaties 38 1. Article 185 of the EEC Treaty 39 2. Article 186 of the EEC Treaty 40 3. Artides 187 and 192 of the EEC Treaty 41 B. The Statutes of the Court of Justice 41 C. The Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice 42 II. Conditions for the grant of interim measures 44 A. Conditions of admissibility of an application for interim measures 44 B. Conditions of substance concerning the grant of interim measures 47 1. The admissibility of the main action 47 2. The pleas of fact and law establishing a prima fade case for the interim measures applied for 48 3. Urgency: the risk ofserious and irreparable härm... 51 (a) The concept of urgency 51 (b) The bürden of proof 52 (c) The imminent nature of the härm 52 (d) The characteristics of the härm 53 (i) The requirement of härm to the applicant in person 53 (ii) Non-material härm 54 (iii) Potential härm 55 (iv) Financial härm 55 4. The balance of interests 56 III. Permissible content o interim measures 59 IV. Binding force and enforceability of interim measures 60 V. Legal consequences of measures later found unjustified.... 62 VI. Interim measures in respect of Community provisions in the national courts 63 A. Interim measures in national courts to protect Community rights 64 B. Interim measures in national courts to suspend national measures implementing Community regulations 65 C. Interim measures in national courts and the duty to adopt coercive measures required by Community law.. 66 Concluding remarks 68

Contents IX Interim Measures in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights 69 THOMAS BUERGENTHAL Introduction 69 I. Jurisdictional Issues 71 II. The Scope of Article 63(2) 77 III. The Nature of Provisional Measures 81 IV. Inherent Powers 83 V. Legal Effect of Provisional Measures 84 VI. Procedural Issues 89 Conclusion 93 Interim Measures of Protection under the European Convention on Human Rights 95 RUDOLF BERNHARDT Introduction 95 I. Texts and Practices under the European Convention 97 II. The Case of Cruz Varas and the Obligation of States to Adopt Interim Measures of Protection 100 III. General Problems of Interim Measures in Human Rights Matters 101 Annex: Extracts from the Statements in the Case Cru^ Varas. 104 1. Opinion of the Commission of 7 June 1990..' 104 2. Judgmentof the Court of 20 March 1991 109 Part Two: Colloquium 115 Opening Address 115 JOCHEN ABR. FROWEIN Discussion 119 Steinberger, Chairman (119, 120), Tomuschat (120), Rodriguez Iglesias (121), Pescatore (121), von Mangoldt (122), Golsong (124), Hailbronner (125), Herdegen (126), Mosler (127), Delbrück (129), Mosler (129), Zemanek

X Contents (129), Klein (130), Stein (131), Partsch (132), Sir Ian Sinclair (133), Macdonald (134), Seidl-Hohenveldern (134), Bos (135), Thirlway (135), Jacobs (137), Thirlway (139), Bernhardt (140), Doehring (140), Frowein (141), Schiedermair (142), Tomuschat (143), Rodriguez Iglesias (143), Puente Egido (144), Oellers-Frahm (146), Pescatore (147), Hailbronner (147), von Mangoldt (148), Bernhardt (149), Thirlway (150), Jacobs (151), Steinberger (152) List of Participants 153