Case 6:18-cv FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 9

Similar documents
Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:10-cv JSR Document 77 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case 5:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

Case 1:10-cv JSR Document 77 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30

Case No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI

3:18-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 1:12-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 09/20/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 53 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/01/10 Page: 1 of 21 PAGEID #: 1

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 3:14-cv HTW-LRA Document 108 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:04-cv JGC Document 12-2 Filed 12/29/2004 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 1:17-cv CMA-KLM Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF TENNESSEE FOR THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT MEMPHIS

Case 1:12-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 0:16-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2016 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Notice of Petition; and, Verified Petition For Warrant Of Removal

Case 2:10-cv GCS-RSW Document 1 Filed 03/23/2010 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/06/10 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 5:08-cv GTS-GJD Document 1 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No Civ (Altonaga/Simonton)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case: 4:13-cv HEA Doc. #: 27 Filed: 12/02/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 128

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Voting Rights Act of 1965

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV- COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF COMPLAINT

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 02/10/11 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

REVISED COMPLAINT. Gen. Stat c to warn residents of the towns of Woodbury and Bethlehem concerning a

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) ) Defendant. ) )

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

Case 1:03-cv CAP Document 1 Filed 03/13/2003 Page 1 of 125

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/15/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv MEH Document 4 Filed 04/02/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

... X MARK A. FAVORS, HOWARD LEIB, LILLIE H. GALAN, EDWARD A. MULRAINE, WARREN SCHREIBER, and WEYMAN A. CAREY,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. TOM SCHEDLER, in his official capacity as The Secretary of State of Louisiana, COMPLAINT

Case 3:10-cv ECR-RAM Document 1 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CHANCERY COUNT OF TENNESSEE FOR THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT CHATTANOOGA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CHANCERY DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. Defendant : COMPLAINT. Parties and Jurisdiction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Case 1:15-cv WJM-MJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN TIFFANY MCMILLAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT. vs. 419th JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Defendants. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. COME NOW the Plaintiffs City of Homewood, Alabama ( Homewood ) and James Alan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Plaintiff John David Emerson, for his Complaint against Defendant Timothy

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Plaintiff. The State Board of the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund, Defendant. COURT USE ONLY Case No.

In The Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NO D VICTOR DIMAIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT

Case 1:06-cv PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:16-cv CWR-FKB Document 46 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case: 3:17-cv JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/15/17 1 of 22. PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv DB Document 2 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Case 6:17-cv CEM-TBS Document 1 Filed 04/11/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

Transcription:

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - X DAVID SEUBERT, CAROLINE TOLBERT, MARK WHELAN, DILYS FARNEY, RICHARD HASTINGS, LYNN LANPHEAR and LINDA LANPHEAR and for all similarly situated voters of the Twenty-Fifth Congressional District in the State of New York, Plaintiffs, -against- ANDREW M. CUOMO, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, and THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS Docket No.: COMPLAINT REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION WITH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X There is no other pending or resolved civil action arising out of the Transactions an occurrences alleged in this complaint. FOR THEIR COMPLAINT PLAINTIFFS STATE: 1) This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC Sections 1331 and 1343, and 42 USC 1983. 2) Plaintiffs seek equitable relief and seek to protect, vindicate and enforce civil and constitutional rights under the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York, and this cause is otherwise within the jurisdiction of this honorable court. 3) Plaintiffs, and others similarly situated, are being denied their right to vote for a Representative in the vacant Twenty-Fifth Congressional District of New York due to the failure of Defendant Governor to comply with mandatory provisions of Article I. Section

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 2 of 9 II. Clause IV of the United States Constitution, and New York Public Officers Law Section 42[3]. 4) Plaintiff David Seubert is a citizen of the United States and resident of the State of New York, having residence at 1483 East Ave, Rochester New York and is a duly registered voter of the 25 th Congressional District of the State of New York, and is enrolled in the Republican Party. 5) Plaintiff Caroline Tolbert is a citizen of the United States and resident of the State of New York, having residence at 192 Greenvale Drive, Rochester New York and is a duly registered voter of the 25 th Congressional District of the State of New York, and is not enrolled in a party. 6) Plaintiff Mark Whelan is a citizen of the United States and resident of the State of New York, having residence at 9 Rustic Pines, Pittsford New York and is a duly registered voter of the 25 th Congressional District of the State of New York, and is not enrolled in a party. 7) Plaintiff Dilys Farney is a citizen of the United States and resident of the State of New York, having residence at 280 Ayrault Road, Fairport, New York and is a duly registered voter of the 25 th Congressional District of the State of New York, and is enrolled in the Republican Party. 8) Plaintiff Richard Hastings is a citizen of the United States and resident of the State of New York, having residence at 28 Kings Lacey Way, Fairport New York and is a duly registered voter of the 25 th Congressional District of the State of New York, and is enrolled in the Republican party. 9) Plaintiff Lynn Lanphear is a citizen of the United States and resident of the State of New York, having residence at 14 Jackson Park, Pittsford New York, and is a duly registered 2

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 3 of 9 voter of the 25 th Congressional District of the State of New York, and is enrolled in the Democratic Party. 10) Plaintiff Linda Lanphear is a citizen of the United States and resident of the State of New York, having residence at 14 Jackson Park, Pittsford New York, and is a duly registered voter of the 25 th Congressional District of the State of New York, and is enrolled in the Democratic Party. 11) Defendant ANDREW M. CUOMO, is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of New York, serving in an official capacity as Governor of The State of New York. 12) The Defendant New York State Board of Elections is charged by the laws of the State Of New York with the supervision and administration of the election process in the State of New York, including the subject Congressional District. 13) The Defendant Monroe County Board of Elections is charged by the laws of the State of New York with the administration of elections for the subject Congressional District which is entirely within Monroe County. 14) The Defendants Boards of Elections are named in this action as they are certainly interested parties and may be determined to be necessary parties. 15) This is public interest litigation in which each of the named Plaintiffs, each of whom is experiencing irreparable harm by being denied: representation, the opportunity to vote, as well as other constitutional and civil rights. Statement of Facts 16) Representative Dorothy Louise McIntosh Slaughter died on March 16, 2018. 17) At the time of her death, Dorothy Louise McIntosh Slaughter was a Representative of the Twenty-Fifth Congressional District of the State of New York. 18) To date, the Congressional seat previously held by Dorothy Louise McIntosh Slaughter remains vacant. 3

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 4 of 9 19) Defendants Boards of Elections will conduct an election for Federal offices on June 26, 2018, by law and in accordance with an Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. 20) The Plaintiffs in the instant action are registered voters of the Twenty-Fifth Congressional District. The Plaintiffs represent members of an array of political parties, races, creeds, ethnicities and genders. 21) The Plaintiffs represent a sample of the roughly 750,000 people who comprise the instant Congressional District. 22) Controlling Circuit Court --and most recent District Court-- precedent maintains that a Governor s constitutional duty to issue a Proclamation of Election is triggered by the occurrence of a vacancy in a State s Congressional District. 23) The United States Constitution reserves unto the State Legislature, the discretion to set the time, place and manner of the election. 24) In New York, the time, place, and manner of the election has been determined, by the Legislature, and is expressed in Public Officers Law Section 42 [3]. 25) The Governor s Proclamation should provide for both the call for the special election to the New York State Board of Elections, and should prescribe the date upon which the election shall be held, in compliance with the New York Public Officers Law. 26) Governor Cuomo failed to fulfill his constitutional duty to issue a Proclamation of Election to the New York State Board of Elections, upon the death of Representative Slaughter (i.e. the event that triggered Art. I, Section II, CI. IV). 27) As a result, no special election can be had in and for the Twenty-Fifth Congressional District of New York, and the Plaintiffs, and all those similarly situated, have been, and will continue to be, without a representative. 28) There is currently a Federal election scheduled in New York State for June 26, 2018. 4

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 5 of 9 29) In the past, state election authorities have conducted special elections concurrent with Federal primary elections; indeed, one such instance occurred as recently as 2016. 30) Plaintiffs contend that the Governor s failure to issue a Proclamation violates their rights under the United States Constitution, the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the right of suffrage 42 USC Section 1983, and Article I, Section XI of the New York State Constitution. Count I 31) Plaintiffs incorporate by reference everything stated above, as if fully set forth herein. 32) That the office of Representative Dorothy Louise McIntosh Slaughter of the Twenty-Fifth Congressional District of New York became vacant when she died on March 16, 2018. 33) Article I, Section II, Clause IV of the New York States Constitution states that when vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Elections to fill such Vacancies. 34) The plain meaning of the language of Article I, Section II, Clause IV including the use of the word shall is mandatory. It is designed to assure our citizens of representation in Congress. 35) Where the plain meaning of the terms in the Constitution are discernable, no construction or interpretation is required and the terms are to be enforced as set forth. 36) Defendant was on notice of the vacancy as of March 16, 2018. 37) The Defendant could and should have been prepared to issue a Writ/Proclamation of Election, whereas a prompt and timely special election could have already taken place, pursuant to New York Public Officers Law Section 42 [3]. 38) The Defendant Governor s failure to obey the aforementioned legal mandate has the effect of disenfranchising voters and depriving them of constitutionally protected rights. 5

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 6 of 9 39) Voting is a fundamental civil and political right under both the New York and federal constitutions. 40) Article I, Section XI of the New York State Constitution states that No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws of this state or any subdivision thereof. 41) The Defendant Governor s failure to issue a Writ/Proclamation of Election in a reasonably timely manner has denied each of the Plaintiffs equal enjoyment and exercise of their civil and political rights in violation of Article I, Section XI of the New York State Constitution. 42) The injury to Plaintiffs is ongoing and irreparable. 43) Defendant is causing the violation of the rights of Plaintiffs under color of state law. Wherefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this honorable Court enter an Order [a] declaring that defendant s failure to call a special election in the Twenty-Fifth Congressional District is a violation of Article I, Section II, Clause IV of the US Constitution and related state constitutional provisions, [b] enjoining Defendant ANDREW M. CUOMO from continuing to delay, obstruct and otherwise violate said provisions; [c] requiring Defendant to show cause why a Writ calling for a special election should not immediately be issued; [d] alternatively, providing for a special election to be held on June 26, 2018; [e] requiring Defendant to pay Plaintiffs for attorney fees and costs involved in bringing this action together with such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate. Count II 44) Plaintiffs incorporate by reference everything stated above as if fully set forth herein. 45) The due process clause of the 14 th Amendment of the United States Constitution protects against the disenfranchisement of a states electorate in violation of the United States Constitution and the New York Public Officers Law as detailed above. 6

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 7 of 9 46) The refusal of the Defendant Governor to promptly call a special election for the Twenty- Fifth Congressional District of New York, deprives Plaintiffs of the constitutionally protected right to vote under color of state law. 47) The refusal of the Defendant Governor to promptly call a special election for the Twenty- Fifth Congressional District of New York is a violation of the right of suffrage enjoyed by Plaintiffs under federal law and the United States Constitution (See Rossito-Canty v. Cuomo, (15-CV-0568 [E.D.N.Y]) also see Edwards v. Sammons, 437 F2d 1240 [5 th Cir 1971]). 48) The refusal of the Defendant Governor to call a special election and the resulting disenfranchisement is even more egregious when one considers the fact that an election is already scheduled for June 26, 2018. 49) Rule 81 [b] of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure makes relief heretofore available by mandamus obtainable by Plaintiffs in this Court. 50) The injury to Plaintiffs constitutional and civil rights are irreparable and cannot be justified or excused based upon the costs or difficulties in calling for or holding a special election. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this honorable Court enter an Order: [a] declaring that Defendant s delay, failure or refusal to issue a Writ/Proclamation of Election to fill the vacancy in the Twenty-Fifth Congressional District of New York, is a violation of the constitutional rights set forth above; [b] enjoining Defendant from continuing to unnecessarily delay, deny or refuse to issue such Writ/Proclamation; [c] requiring Defendant to pay Plaintiffs for attorney fees and other costs involved in bringing this action; [d] alternatively, providing for a 7

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 8 of 9 special election to be held on June 26, 2018, and; [e] such other relief heretofore available by mandamus as the Court may deem appropriate. Count III 51) Plaintiffs incorporate by reference everything stated above as if it were fully set forth herein. 52) A separation of powers question is presented when one branch s inaction impermissibly undermines, without appreciable expansion of its own powers, the role of another branch. [See Comodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor, 473 US 833, 106(1986)]. 53) The language of Article I, Section II, Clause IV of the US Constitution is mandatory. Defendant lacks the constitutional authority to reduce the number of House members through his failure or refusal to comply with New York Public Officers Law Section 42[3]. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this honorable Court protect the Constitutional separation of powers and the fundamental political and civil rights of Plaintiffs by entering an Order: [a] declaring that Defendant ANDREW M. CUOMO, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York is in violation of his ministerial duties under the New York State Constitution; [b] enjoining the Defendant from continuing to delay, obstruct or otherwise prevent the occurrence of a special election, and; [c] requiring the Defendant to pay attorney s fees involved in bringing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1981, and; [d] alternatively, providing for a special election to be held on June 26, 2018, along with; [e] such other, further, and different relief as this honorable Court deems proper. Count IV 54) Plaintiffs incorporate by reference everything stated above as if it were fully set forth herein. 8

Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 9 of 9 55) First Amendment freedoms extend to political activities such as running for elective office. 56) State election practices must serve legitimate state interests, narrowly and fairly to avoid obstructing and diluting fundamental liberties such as freedom to run for office. [See Briscoe v Kusper, 435 F2d 1046 [7 th Cir 1970]. 57) It violates the First Amendment freedoms of all residents of the Twenty-Fifth Congressional District of New York who may qualify to run for said seat, to fail to promptly issue the required Writ/Proclamation of Election. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this honorable Court enter an Order: [a] declaring that the failure to promptly issue a Writ/Proclamation for special election in the Twenty- Fifth Congressional District is a violation 28 USC Sections 1981 and 1983 and of the Constitution of the State of New York; [b] Declaring that Defendant s failure to issue the required Writ/Proclamation is a violation of the constitutional and civil rights of Plaintiffs; [c] Ordering Defendant Governor ANDREW M. CUOMO in his official capacity to issue the necessary Writ/Proclamation within five (5) days of entry of the Order; [d] enjoining Defendant from continuing to delay or to refuse to issue the necessary Writ/Proclamation; [e] Such other relief as may be appropriate to protect the interests of Plaintiffs and [f] Ordering Defendant to pay for Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs. Dated: Mineola, New York April 17, 2018 Respectfully submitted on behalf of all Plaintiffs by: BEE READY FISHBEIN, HATTER & DONOVAN, LLP By: /s/ Andrew K. Preston John Ciampoli, of Counsel Attorneys for Plaintiffs 170 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 (516) 746-5599 Fax No. (516) 746-1045 9