UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case5:11-cv RMW Document72 Filed01/10/12 Page1 of 6

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

s~! LED C/:A.teiD,C pi^ JUN ii afluffitii, C(«lE«c.01ter aft!k«,supeti!orccuili Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 5:08-cv RMW Document 7 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

Request for Publication

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

Administrator (hereinafter collectively "TCERA") oppose the Motion to Reconsider filed by

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLASS ACTION. Attorneys for Defendant CHARLES W. MCCALL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

Case 2:15-cv MMD-GWF Document 50 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:04-cv ABC-Mc Document 171 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:126. UNITED STATES DISTRICT ( ClJIr1o;.~"';rj[~J!"";m1. Defendants.

)

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

a. Name of person served:

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENT

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

RESPOND TO ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE. March 3, 2011

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 153 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

Case 1:12-cv LJO-SKO Document 10 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

nee eaven JAN 0 5%018 SAN MATEO COUNTY Joanna Ghosh (SBN

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dear Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Transcription:

JOSEPH M. BURTON (SB No. 142105) STEPHEN H. SUTRO (SB No. 172168) DUANE MORRIS LLP 100 Spear Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 371-2200 Facsimile: (415)371-2201 Attorneys for Defendant ELCOMSOFT COMPANY, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ELCOM LTD., a/k/a ELCOMSOFT CO., LTD., Defendant. Case No.: CR 01-20138 RMW NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS Date: April 1, 2002 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

NOTICE TO THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that at 9:00 a.m. on April 1, 2002 or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in Courtroom 6 of this court, located at 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California 95113, defendant Elcomsoft Company, Ltd., ( Elcomsoft ) will move this court for an order dismissing the indictment brought against it on the grounds that it violates due process under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. 1

Said motion is based on this Notice, a Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, the Declarations of Alexander Katalov and Joseph M. Burton, the files and records of the case, and such other argument as may be offered at the time of the motion. Dated: January 28, 2002 DUANE MORRIS LLP By: JOSEPH M. BURTON Attorneys for Defendant ELCOMSOFT COMPANY, LTD. SF-28625 2

United States of America v. Elcom Ltd., a/k/a Elcomsoft Co., Ltd. Case No.: CR 01-20138 RMW PROOF OF SERVICE I am a resident of the state of California, I am over the age of 18 years, and I am not a party to this lawsuit. My business address is Duane Morris LLP, 100 Spear Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, California 94105. On the date listed below, I served the following document(s): VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS _ by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date during normal business hours. Our facsimile machine reported the "send" as successful. _ by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at San Francisco, California, addressed as set forth below. I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. According to that practice, items are deposited with the United States mail on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing stated in the affidavit. John Keker Keker & Van Nest 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 _ by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, deposited with Federal Express Corporation on the same date set out below in the ordinary course of business; to the person at the address set forth below, I caused to be served a true copy of the attached document(s). Scott H. Frewing Assistant United States Attorney United States District Court Northern District of California 280 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113 _ by causing personal delivery of the document(s) listed above to the person at the address set forth below. _ by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person at the address set forth below. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Dated: January, 2002 3

SF-28625 Lea A. Chase 4