PRACTICE DIRECTION HOW TO START PROCEEDINGS. This practice direction supplements Part 9 of the Court of Protection Rules 2007

Similar documents
Consent Form 4. Form for adults who lack the capacity to consent to investigation or treatment

MAKING DECISIONS FOR PEOPLE WHO LACK CAPACITY

Mental Capacity Act 2005

THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR TO THE SENIOR COURTS: APPOINTMENT IN FAMILY PROCEEDINGS AND PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE INHERENT JURISDICTION IN RELATION TO ADULTS

ADVANCED DIRECTIVE DOCUMENTS

CHANGE RECORD DATE AUTHOR NATURE OF CHANGE VERSION No Janis Bottomley & Chris Brace

Urgent Applications in the Court of Protection

Wisconsin: Living Will

NEBRASKA ADVANCE DIRECTIVE PAGE 1 OF 7. Part I: Power of Attorney for Health Care I,, appoint, whose address is,

Official Solicitor: Appointment in Family Proceedings

JUDGMENT. An NHS Trust and others (Respondents) v Y (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and another (Appellants)

Need some help filling out your Living Will document below?

Rhode Island Statute CHAPTER Health Care Power of Attorney

DOWNLOAD COVERSHEET:

Mental Capacity Act Prompt Cards

Advance Directive Forms

Right to a natural death.

DOWNLOAD COVERSHEET:

DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE DECISIONS WARNING TO PERSON EXECUTING THIS DOCUMENT

~ Ohio ~ Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care Christian Version NOTICE TO ADULT EXECUTING THIS DOCUMENT

IMPORTANT TOEIC UPDATE. Directions given for all TOEIC cases in the Court of Appeal on 20 December 2018

IC Chapter 6. Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (POST)

TENNESSEE LIVING WILL

AN BILLE UM CHINNTEOIREACHT CHUIDITHE (CUMAS), 2013 ASSISTED DECISION-MAKING (CAPACITY) BILL Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated

DECLARATION RELATING TO LIFE-SUSTAINING PROCEDURES (Living Will) AND DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE DECISIONS (Medical Power of Attorney)

WASHINGTON HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE (LIVING WILL / HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY) SAMPLE. John Doe

Right to life case - Leslie Burke appeal rejected by European. Court of Human Rights

North Carolina Declaration Of A Desire For A Natural Death

2017 No (L. 16) MENTAL CAPACITY, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Court of Protection Rules 2017

DECLARATION OF A DESIRE FOR A NATURAL DEATH STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

ENDURING POWER OF ATTORNEY

DOWNLOAD COVERSHEET:

DOWNLOAD COVERSHEET:

Practical Tips for Possession: The View from the Housing Possession Duty Desk and Exceptional Funding under LASPO

Third Parties Making Health Care and End of Life Decisions

Need some help filling out your Living Will document below?

Advance directives, best interests and clinical judgement: shifting sands at the end of life

NC General Statutes - Chapter 90 Article 23 1

I. DECLARATION RELATING TO LIFE-SUSTAINING PROCEDURES

& Care & Choice at the End of Life. Advance Directive. Planning for Important Healthcare Decisions

(1) Adult shall mean any person who is nineteen years of age or older or who is or has been married;

1.0 To Displace a Nearest Relative Initial Consultation with Legal Services Preparation for the Application to Court 3

An Bille um Chinnteoireacht Chuidithe (Cumas), 2013 Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill 2013

Mental Capacity Act 2005 Keeling Schedule

Lw,- 4~ '~'r~

Supportive Decision Making Alternatives to Article 17A Guardianship

HUMAN TISSUE (SCOTLAND) BILL

32A-4 through 32A-7. Reserved for future codification purposes.

ASSISTED DECISION-MAKING (CAPACITY) ACT 2015 UPDATE ON IMPLEMENTATION

Application for Civil Legal Aid certificate

Legal Decision- Making and Options for Support

Power of Attorney and Living Will

SUMMARY/COMPARISON OF ADVANCE DIRECTIVES AND SURROGATE HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKING PROCESSES FOR COLORADO

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016

The Halachic Living Will

The Council Standing Orders

Powers of Attorney Act 2006

Midwest Stem Cell Therapy Center; Utilization of Unused Medications Act; SB 199

DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE DECISIONS (Medical Power of Attorney) I,, born, designate

A guide to GMC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings

Arkansas: Advance Directive

Mental Capacity Act 2005 AS IT IS TO BE AMENDED BY THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2007

CODE OF PRACTICE (Third Edition)

CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS BIOMEDICINE

Laws Relating to Individual Decision Making

PRACTICE DIRECTION CASE MANAGEMENT PILOT PART 1 GENERAL

PERSONAL DIRECTIVES ACT

FINAL EXAMINATION SPRING SEMESTER 2005 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I (LAW ) STETSON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Gulfport, Florida GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

THE WITHDRAWAL OF LIFE SUPPORT TREATMENT AND THE COURTS. By Una Doherty, Advocate June 2018

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 S 1 SENATE BILL 1046

Policy for dealing with habitually demanding or vexatious complainants and/or habitually demanding or vexatious behaviour

Legal Framework: Advance Care Planning Gippsland Region Palliative Consortium and McCabe Centre for Law and Cancer (Cancer Council Victoria)

Advance Directives and Living Wills - The way forward

PRACTICE NOTE 1/2015

Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedure of the Management Committee

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 199

Court of Appeal: Lord Woolf M.R. and Roch and Mummery L.JJ.

How to adjust existing bylaws

(No. 160) (Approved November 17, 2001) AN ACT

Age Discrimination and Public Authorities. Andrew Hogan

VICTORIA UNIVERSITY ANIMAL ETHICS COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference And Operating Procedures

Inquests - Exceptional Cases Funding Provider Pack

Professional Title (e.g. Avocat / Rechtsanwalt): No (circle the relevant answer) If yes please provide details (on a separate sheet of paper)

Champaign County Humane Society. Bylaws ARTICLE I NAME

This application is made in accordance with the requirements set out in the Legal Services Board s Rules for Rule Change Applications.

Advance decisions and proxy decision-making in medical treatment and research Guidance from the BMA s Medical Ethics Department

3. Legally binding advance directives may impose unworkable obligations upon medical professionals.

ADULT SUPPORT AND PROTECTION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2007

DSRB SOP Updates in Alignment to Human Biomedical Research Act (HBRA)

Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights *

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Vol. 476 Cape Town 11 February 2005 No

abcdefghijklmnopqrstu

Human Tissue Authority

Mediating trust disputes practical guidance for trustees or personal representatives and beneficiaries

Code of Practice Issued Under Section 377A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Replaces: 2/22/2012 Formulated: 2/92 Reviewed: 10/17. Page 1 of 8 PATIENT SELF-DETERMINATION ACT, NATURAL DEATH ACT, ADVANCE DIRECTIVES ACT

Friends of Medway Archives Rules

NY SCPA 1750-B HEALTH CARE DECISIONS FOR MENTALLY RETARDED PERSONS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act.

E U C O P E S y n o p s i s

Transcription:

PRACTICE DIRECTION HOW TO START PROCEEDINGS This practice direction supplements Part 9 of the Court of Protection Rules 2007 PRACTICE DIRECTION E APPLICATIONS RELATING TO SERIOUS MEDICAL TREATMENT General 1. Rule 71 enables a practice direction to make additional or different provision in relation to specified applications. Applications to which this practice direction applies 2. This practice direction sets out the procedure to be followed where the application concerns serious medical treatment in relation to P. Meaning of serious medical treatment in relation to the Rules and this practice direction 3. Serious medical treatment means treatment which involves providing, withdrawing or withholding treatment in circumstances where: (a) in a case where a single treatment is being proposed, there is a fine balance between its benefits to P and the burdens and risks it is likely to entail for him; (b) in a case where there is a choice of treatments, a decision as to which one to use is finely balanced; or (c) the treatment, procedure or investigation proposed would be likely to involve serious consequences for P. 4. Serious consequences are those which could have a serious impact on P, either from the effects of the treatment, procedure or investigation itself or its wider implications. This may include treatments, procedures or investigations which: (a) cause, or may cause, serious and prolonged pain, distress or side effects; (b) have potentially major consequences for P; or

(c) have a serious impact on P s future life choices. Matters which should be brought to the court 5. Cases involving any of the following decisions should be regarded as serious medical treatment for the purpose of the Rules and this practice direction, and should be brought to the court: (a) decisions about the proposed withholding or withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration from a person in a permanent vegetative state or a minimally conscious state; (b) cases involving organ or bone marrow donation by a person who lacks capacity to consent; and (c) cases involving non-therapeutic sterilisation of a person who lacks capacity to consent. 6. Examples of serious medical treatment may include: (a) certain terminations of pregnancy in relation to a person who lacks capacity to consent to such a procedure; (b) a medical procedure performed on a person who lacks capacity to consent to it, where the procedure is for the purpose of a donation to another person; (c) a medical procedure or treatment to be carried out on a person who lacks capacity to consent to it, where that procedure or treatment must be carried out using a degree of force to restrain the person concerned; (d) an experimental or innovative treatment for the benefit of a person who lacks capacity to consent to such treatment; and (e) a case involving an ethical dilemma in an untested area. 7. There may be other procedures or treatments not contained in the list in paragraphs 5 and 6 above which can be regarded as serious medical treatment. Whether or not a procedure is regarded as serious medical treatment will depend on the circumstances and the consequences for the patient.

Consultation with the Official Solicitor 8. Members of the Official Solicitor s staff are prepared to discuss applications in relation to serious medical treatment before an application is made. Any enquiries about adult medical and welfare cases should be addressed to a senior healthcare lawyer at the Office of the Official Solicitor, Victory House, 30 to 34 Kingsway, London WC2B 6EX, telephone 020 3681 2751, fax 020 3681 2762, email: enquiries@offsol.gsi.gov.uk. Parties to proceedings 9. The person bringing the application will always be a party to proceedings, as will a respondent named in the application form who files an acknowledgment of service. 1 In cases involving issues as to serious medical treatment, an organisation which is, or will be, responsible for providing clinical or caring services to P should usually be named as a respondent in the application form (where it is not already the applicant in the proceedings). (Practice direction B accompanying Part 9 sets out the persons who are to be notified that an application form has been issued.) 10. The court will consider whether anyone not already a party should be joined as a party to the proceedings. Other persons with sufficient interest may apply to be joined as parties to the proceedings 2 and the court has a duty to identify at as early a stage as possible who the parties to the proceedings should be. 3 Allocation of the case 11. Where an application is made to the court in relation to: (a) the lawfulness of withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from a person in a permanent vegetative state, or a minimally conscious state; or (b) a case involving an ethical dilemma in an untested area, 1 Rule 73(1). 2 Rule 75. 3 Rule 5(2)(b)(ii).

the proceedings (including permission, the giving of any directions, and any hearing) must be conducted by the President of the Court of Protection or by another judge nominated by the President. 12. Where an application is made to the court in relation to serious medical treatment (other than that outlined in paragraph 11) the proceedings (including permission, the giving of any directions, and any hearing) must be conducted by a judge of the court who has been nominated as such by virtue of section 46(2)(a) to (c) of the Act (i.e. the President of the Family Division, the Chancellor or a puisne judge of the High Court). Matters to be considered at the first directions hearing 13. Unless the matter is one which needs to be disposed of urgently, the court will list it for a first directions hearing. (Practice direction B accompanying Part 10 sets out the procedure to be followed for urgent applications.) 14. The court may give such directions as it considers appropriate. If the court has not already done so, it should in particular consider whether to do any or all of the following at the first directions hearing: (a) decide whether P should be joined as party to the proceedings, and give directions to that effect; (b) if P is to be joined as a party to the proceedings, decide whether the Official Solicitor should be invited to act as a litigation friend or whether some other person should be appointed as a litigation friend; (c) identify anyone else who has been notified of the proceedings and who has filed an acknowledgment and applied to be joined as a party to proceedings, and consider that application; and (d) set a timetable for the proceedings including, where possible, a date for the final hearing. 15. The court should also consider whether to give any of the other directions listed in

rule 85(2). 16. The court will ordinarily make an order pursuant to rule 92 that any hearing shall be held in public, with restrictions to be imposed in relation to publication of information about the proceedings. Declarations 17. Where a declaration is needed, the order sought should be in the following or similar terms: That P lacks capacity to make a decision in relation to the (proposed medical treatment or procedure). E.g. That P lacks capacity to make a decision in relation to sterilisation by vasectomy ; and That, having regard to the best interests of P, it is lawful for the (proposed medical treatment or procedure) to be carried out by (proposed healthcare provider). 18. Where the application is for the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, the order sought should be in the following or similar terms: That P lacks capacity to consent to continued life-sustaining treatment measures (and specify what these are); and That, having regard to the best interests of P, it is lawful for (name of healthcare provider) to withdraw the life-sustaining treatment from P.