MOTION FOR USE OF CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION

Similar documents
BASICS. Appellate Review. Contested Hearings: The Basics. Orders of the clerk after hearing are final acts of a judicial officer.

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1

The Witness and the Justice System in Alberta

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses

Please complete the form by typing or printing legibly in black ink.

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

IN THE PROBATE COURT OF HENRY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA PETITION OF GUARDIAN TO TERMINATE TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA P.O. Box 1160 P.O. Box 702 Durant, OK Talihina, OK (580) (918)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOW COMES Respondents Cody T. McCain ( McCain ), Henry Colvin Jr. ( Colvin )

PETITION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

RESPONSE TO CONTEMPT

When should this form be used?

Arkansas State Code: Sec Name change - Procedure. Sec Use of new name.

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

GRANDPARENT VISITATION FORM PACKET

1.14A EXTENDED MEDIA COVERAGE

RESPONDENT MOTHER'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING OTHER ACTS EVIDENCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS CIVIL DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: COMPLAINT

PETITION FOR TEMPORARY LETTERS OF GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR INSTRUCTIONS

The Admissibility of Child Hearsay Statements in Custody Litigation David Butler, Associate Circuit Judge

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

Vicinage Operations Revised Guidelines on Cameras in the Courts

Court of Appeals. Slip Opinion

He Said / She Said Establishing Credibility Without Witnesses

In-Court Media Coverage Guidelines 2016

IN THE PROBATE COURT OF HENRY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA PETITION OF NATURAL GUARDIAN(S) TO TERMINATE TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR

PETITION FOR TEMPORARY LETTERS OF GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR INSTRUCTIONS

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

Honorable R. Stanton Wettick, Jr. COMPLEX CASES. See Local Rule 249(1).

Protecting the Child s Voice: Use and Application of the Child Victim Hearsay Exception

PARTY OF RECORD INFORMATION PACKET

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

CAPACITY TO TESTIFY AND

RULES FOR ABUSE, NEGLECT AND DEPENDENCY CASES

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM

PRO SE CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION INSTRUCTION PACKET

CASE NO. 1D Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF THE QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA (THE O-GAH-PAH) ) In re Petition for Change of Name of: ) ) ) Petitioner. ) ) )

PETITIONER'S RESPONSIBILITIES - HAL MARCHMAN ACT

INSTRUCTIONS FOR NOMINATING PETITION FOR ANNUAL SCHOOL ELECTIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1 ADOPTION, CITATION, PURPOSE AND SUSPENSION OF LOCAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE AS ADOPTED JANUARY 30, 2009

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed May 17, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Lucas County, Gary G.

Palm Beach County Procedures for Conduct of Quasi-Judicial Hearings

When should this form be used?

Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows:

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER LPS CONSERVATORSHIP REAPPOINTMENT PROCEDURE

Qualifications, Presentation and Challenges to Expert Testimony - Daubert (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert)

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct

Cause No. EX PARTE IN THE COURT COURT DESIGNATION *** COUNTY, TEXAS PETITION FOR EXPUNCTION OF CRIMINAL RECORDS

City Court of Bossier City COURT RULES

Chapter 11 Evidence 1

DISTRICT COURT DIVISION

MOCK TRIAL RULES. The Case 1) The case may contain any or all of the following stipulations: documents, narratives, exhibits, witness statements, etc.

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF DARE 14 INS 00275

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION. No CR. Jason David YEPEZ, Appellant. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. No. 5:07-HC-2020-BR

APPENDIX F. NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY APPELLATE PRACTICE FORMS 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT

U.S. Department of Justice

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

PETITION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

HOW TO CHANGE A YOUR NAME

Petition for Ex-Parte Order

The court staff cannot help you choose or complete any form.

TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FAMILY COURT RULES FOR DOMESTIC COURT

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND EMERGENCY RETURN OF CHILD PACKET

The court staff cannot help you choose or complete any form.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC04-21 LOWER CASE NO.: 2D REPLY BRIEF OF PETITIONER S BRIEF ON THE MERITS

APPEARANCES. Post Office Box Martin Luther King Dr. Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337

Non-Scientific Expert Testimony in Child Abuse Trials

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

The court staff cannot help you choose or complete any form.

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FORM ONE MUST BE SIGNED BY BOTH PARENTS AND NOTARIZED OR WITNESSED BY A CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT. (PHOTO ID IS REQUIRED)

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WAKE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

Criminal Procedure Further Amendment (Evidence) Act 2005 No 25

The court staff cannot help you choose or complete any form.

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.

NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. TOMMY EDWARDS III, Appellant. vs.

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

29.3 Sequestration of Witnesses

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF DURHAM 00 CRS

When should this form be used?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2007-KA SCT OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS VERSUS

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR CHANGING AN ADULT S NAME

12 CVS. Scenic NC, Inc., ) Plaintiff ) ) ) North Carolina Department of MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. ) Transportation, ) Defendant )

Polk County Zoning Board of Adjustment Rules of Procedure for Quasi-Judicial Proceedings. A. General Provisions

Transcription:

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION JUVENILE FILE NO. JA IN THE MATTER OF: PETITIONER S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS NOW COMES Petitioner Cumberland County Department of Social Services and moves the court to allow the following pre-trial motions with regard to the special session of the matter currently scheduled for : MOTION FOR USE OF CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION Petitioner moves this court for an order allowing the use of the closed circuit television equipment for the testimony of the minor child and says to the court in support thereof as follows: 1. That the petitioner alleges that the minor child was subjected to sexual abuse in the home as alleged in the petition filed herein. 2. That the minor child is currently years old. 3. That the petitioner further alleges that the minor child is diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and, according to her current therapist, the minor child will be further traumatized if she must testify in court in the presence of the alleged perpetrator. According to the therapist, the minor child s emotional wellbeing and further therapy would be negatively impacted by her testimony in the presence of the alleged perpetrator. 4. That Petitioner further alleges that the above diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder constitutes more than mere nervousness or excitement or some reluctance to testify and that this emotional condition will interfere with the child s ability to communicate her testimony to the court in

the event she must testify in the presence of the alleged perpetrator and Respondent mother. 5. That Petitioner moves that the closed circuit television equipment installed in Room 206 or other appropriate courtroom be used so that the Respondents can view the minor child s testimony from an adjacent room as well as telephonic equipment which will allow the Respondents to communicate with their respective counsel. 6. That the use of equipment such as this in juvenile cases has been upheld by the Court of Appeals in the case of In re J.B., 172 N.C. App. 1 (2005) in its analysis of the Eldridge factors of fundamental fairness. 7. That the Respondents will not be unduly prejudiced by the use of the closed circuit television equipment during the minor child s testimony in that Respondent counsel will be present for cross examination, Respondents will be able to communicate with their respective counsel and Respondents will see the minor child testify in real time. 8. That the minor child will suffer emotional harm if she must testify in the presence of these Respondents. MOTION TO CLOSE THE COURTROOM and MOTION TO ALLOW SUPPORT PERSON FOR THE MINOR CHILD The Petitioner further moves the court to close the courtroom to all non-essential personnel and to bar the general public from sitting in the courtroom and further that during the testimony of the minor child, that all witnesses be sequestered and relatives of witnesses also be barred from the courtroom to insure the privacy of the minor children. That as a specific exception to this motion, the Petitioner requests that a support person designated by the wishes of the minor child be allowed to be present in the courtroom and available to the minor child during her testimony.

That the Petitioner requests that the said designated support person should be duly cautioned by the court not to influence the testimony of the minor child in any way but to merely be physically present with the child as an emotional support. MOTION TO PREVENT PERSONS FROM ENTERING AND EXITING THE COURTROOM DURING THE TESTIMONY OF THE MINOR CHILD Petitioner further moves this court for an order preventing persons from entering or exiting the courtroom during the testimony of the minor child as this is a significant distraction to the minor child during the serious proceedings before the court. Petitioner requests that a sign be clearly posted on the doors to the courtroom restricting access. MOTION FOR USE OF DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE LANGUAGE DURING DIRECT AND CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE CHILD WITNESS Petitioner further moves this court for an order requiring the use of developmentally appropriate language for the age of the child witness in that all questions should be framed in simple, understandable language, that there should be no compound questions, that there should be no use of double negatives, and that cumulative questions should be disallowed. MOTION TO ALLOW LEADING QUESTIONS DURING THE DIRECT EXAMINATION OF THE MINOR CHILD That pursuant to N.C.G.S. 8C-1, Rule 611 (c) the Petitioner moves this court for an order allowing the use of leading questions as necessary to develop the minor child s testimony in that the subject matter of this testimony is of a delicate, sensitive and embarrassing nature. MOTION REGARDING COURTROOM PROCEDURES AND MODIFICATIONS That pursuant to N.C.G.S. 8C-1, Rule 611(a) the court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth (2) avoid needless consumption of time and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment. In the interest of facilitating the child

witness best interest, the Petitioner requests the following courtroom procedures and modifications during the child s testimony: 1. That the child s testimony be scheduled for 9:00 a.m. 2. That the child be able to bring with them a transitional object such as a stuffed animal. 3. That the judge be dressed in a shirt and tie without his robe. 4. That frequent breaks be taken as needed to allow the child to focus on the questioning. 5. That objections by any attorney be made by raising a hand and stating in a quiet tone of voice the general nature of the objection (i.e. hearsay, relevancy, prejudicial etc.); if a lengthy discussion is necessary for the court to rule on the objection, the Petitioner requests that a break be taken to allow the child to leave the room during the discussion; otherwise Petitioner requests the court to either sustain or overrule the objection without explanation. MOTION FOR USE OF CHILD FRIENDLY OATH Petitioner moves the court for an order allowing the child to be sworn by the clerk using a developmentally appropriate child friendly oath which employs simple and concrete language as follows: Do you *promise* that you *will* tell the truth? (Wait for child s response) THEN Are you going to tell me any lies?

WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays this court for an order allowing the above stated pre-trial motions and for an order allowing the use of the video conferencing equipment for the testimony of the minor child. This the day of September, 2007. Elizabeth Kennedy-Gurnee N.C. State Bar No. 19114 Staff Attorney Cumberland County Department of Social Services P.O. Box 2429 Fayetteville, N.C. 28302 (910) 677-2670

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that I have this date served the following with a copy of the foregoing pre-trial motions and notice of hearing for via the methods indicated and pursuant to the requirements of Rule 5 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure: Attorney for Respondent Via confirmed telefacsimile (910) Attorney for Respondent Via confirmed telefacsimile (910) Attorney for Respondent Via confirmed telefacsimile (910) Attorney Advocate, GAL Via confirmed telefacsimile (910)678-2941 This the day of September, 2007. Elizabeth Kennedy-Gurnee N.C. State Bar No. 19114 Staff Attorney Cumberland County Department of Social Services P.O. Box 2429 Fayetteville, N.C. 28302 (910) 677-2670 (910) 677-2597 fax