MATERIAL SUPPORTING THE AGENDA. VOLUME XLVIIb

Similar documents
Meeting No. 929 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-7

Meeting No. 946 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

Meeting No. 960 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

Meeting No. 918 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-4

THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

Meeting No. 1,001 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR MEETING OF BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

Meeting No. 1,155 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-6

HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICIES AND GUIDELINES 1985 TO PRESENT

Meeting No. 1,145 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-5

Meeting No. 1,139 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-22

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM MANUAL

Meeting No. 1,132 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-6

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS POLICY ON CONFLICTS OF INTEREST RELATING TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMMERCIAL VENTURES LOWELL

COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. March 20, Austin, Texas

Meeting No. 1,064 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-10

The University of Texas System System Administration Internal Policy. Procedures for the Handling of an Allegation of Retaliation

Meeting No. 1,037 THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM. Pages 1-4

BOARD OF REGENTS POLICY

;'7i .7+ ,Tr. I ZT s-- /I-),, /f'j /s /"/~,, / ; y/ //1; SIC,%'/ITURE OF OPER,1TOR

Governance & Policy Committee

TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR OUTSIDE COUNSEL. RFP ISSUE DATE: June 13, 2012 PROPOSALS DUE: July 20, 2012

BCM Policies and Procedures

The Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute Act

MINUTES SPECIAL TELEPHONIC MEETING BOARD OF REGENTS THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM HELD IN COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS.

BYLAWS. ARTICLE I Board of Directors. Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Florida International University Research

ARTICLE I: DEFINITIONS

Physical Education Facility All meetings (except executive session) Jim & Pat McCloy Arena, Room 110(A) Executive Session Room 107

MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

SECTION 10 BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

A Patents, Copyrights, Intellectual Property Policy

BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

BYLAWS OF THE UNIVERSITY STAFF CONGRESS

THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations

O P E N M E E T I N G N O T I C E

I. Preamble. Patent Policy Page 1 of 13

San Francisco State University Disclosure of Conflict of Interest for Principal Investigators (University Executive Directive #UED 96-20)

Louisiana State University System

BY-LAWS OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL CONNECTICUT EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL, INC. A CONNECTICUT NON-STOCK, NON-PROFIT CORPORATION

JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM AND

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

SHAWNEE STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Signed May 8, 2018 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Bylaws of the Board of Regents. Memorial University of Newfoundland. March 2016

SCHEDULE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS AND COMMITTEES THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM College Station, Texas, November 3, 2011

TRIUMF PATENT PLAN. TRIUMF Patent Plan. 1. General

Sponsored Research Agreement

BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY SENATE. THE CITY COLLEGE of THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK I. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS 2 II. MEMBERSHIP 4 III.

Charter Audit and Finance Committee Time Warner Inc.

COLLEGE SERVICES GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL REVISED MARCH 10, 2011

BYLAWS OF THE CAPE FEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR AUDIT, COMPLIANCE, AND MANAGEMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE

VICTORIA CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc. Patent and Copyright Agreement ( Agreement )

SCHEDULE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS AND COMMITTEES THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM September 23-24, 2010

Deaccession and Disposition of Museum Objects and Collections Procedure

Copyright and Patent NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY POLICY ARTICLE I. Definitions. Issue Date: August 1987; revised June 1997, October 2004

ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. Corporate Governance Guidelines

O P E N M E E T I N G N O T I C E

Unsolicited Proposal Policy

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM CALENDAR

SEQUENCE OF INTEGRATED COMMITTEE MEETINGS

RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION

ERIE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

O P E N M E E T I N G N O T I C E

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Dr. Mark W. Doubrava, Chair Mr. Cedric Crear Dr. Jason Geddes Mr. Kevin J. Page Mr. Rick Trachok Mr. Michael B. Wixom

BYLAWS OF THE CLOVIS MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES. 1. Introduction This policy is designed to achieve the following objectives:

CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. Amended and Restated By-Laws. (as amended and restated through June 8, 2016) ARTICLE I

Open Meeting Submission

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS AMAZON.COM, INC.

ACT ON THE RIGHT IN EMPLOYEE INVENTIONS, /656

Lobbyist Laws and Rules. Fiscal Year

TITLE 1 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 1 TOWN COUNCIL 1

INDIANA UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedures on Research Misconduct DRAFT Updated March 9, 2017

CONSTITUTION and BYLAWS of the FACULTY SENATE of the TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY PREAMBLE

POLICY. Number: Subject: Inventions and Works

FNSB Platting Board. Rules of Order

9/28/2015. Sunday, September 27, 2015

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS DXC TECHNOLOGY COMPANY. effective March 15, 2018

City State Country Zip. Contact Name Telephone Fax

TTU System Community Conduct Intellectual Property Rights Excerpts from the State Government Code Excerpts from the General Appropriations Act

City of Columbus. Zoning Board of Adjustment. Rules of Procedures

O P E N M E E T I N G N O T I C E

Budget Hearing. There were no questions or comments from those present regarding the budget. The Budget Hearing adjourned at 5:14 p.m.

BY-LAWS OF THE STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION SENATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT MONTICELLO

TRI-CITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY. As used in this Policy, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

Delegations of Authority for The University of Texas at Tyler*

CIT Group Inc. Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Adopted by the Board of Directors October 22, 2003

CONSTITUTION FOR THE STUDENT COMMUNITY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON. Drafted August, Approved by the Student Body April, 1971

BYLAWS of ETUDES. 3.2 Mission. The specific mission and purposes of Etudes are the following:

CONSTITUTION OF THE TEXAS YOUNG REPUBLICAN FEDERATION

BOARD OF GOVERNORS BYLAWS Revised November 28, 2007

BY - LAWS OF THE FACULTY STUDENT ASSOCIATION OF STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT FREDONIA, NEW YORK, INC.

Patent Cooperation Treaty

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF NIGERIA ACT

MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM HELD AT SALADO, TEXAS JULY 26-28, 1995

Case Document 3084 Filed in TXSB on 05/12/14 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Transcription:

MATERIAL SUPPORTING THE AGENDA VOLUME XLVIIb This volume contains the Material Supporting the Agenda furnished to each member of the Board of Regents prior to the meetings held on: April 14, 2000 May 10-11, 2000 August 9-10,2000 The material is divided according to the standing committees and the meetings that were held and is color coded as follows: White paper - for documentation of all items that were presented before the deadline date. Blue paper- Executive Session Yellow paper- for documentation of items submitted after the deadline date for inclusion in the Agenda (late items) and distributed to members of the Board of Regents prior to the meeting. Material distributed at the meeting as additional documentation is not included in the bound volume, because sometimes there is an unusual amount and other times some people get copies and some do not get copies. If the Executive Secretary was furnished a copy, then that material goes into the appropriate subject file.

Special Meeting Board of Regents The University of Texas System Ninth Floor, Ashbel smith.hall, 201 w. 7th street Austin, Texas April 14, 2000 -- 2:30 p.m. C.S.T. (Via Telephone Conference Call) AGENDA A. ROLL CALL Executive Secretary B. CALL TO ORDER (Open Session) Chairman Evans 1. U. T. Austin: Recommendation for ApProval of Proposed Plan to Manage Potential Conflicts of Interest for Dr. Eric v. Anslyn. Dr. John T. McDevitt. Dr. Dean P. Neikirk. and Dr. Jason B. Shear and Authorize Execution of Licensing Agreement and Other Documents Necessary to License Technology to Lab Vision. Inc. 2. u. T. Austin: Request for Approval to Deaccession Certain Artwork Housed in the Jack S. Blanton Museum of Art and Authorization to Enter into Contracts to Facilitate the Sale of the Artwork and to Execute All Documents Related Thereto C. RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. u. T. Dallas: Proposed settlement of Pending Litigation 2. U. T. system: Discussion of candidates for the Position of Chancellor D. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION E. ADJOURNMENT

OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM Austin, Texas SPECIAL MEETING NO. 929 April 12, 2000 TO: Members of the Board of Regents Chairman Donald L. Evans Vice-Chairman Tom Loeffler Vice-Chairman Rita C. Clements Regent Woody L. Hunt Regent Charles Miller Regent Patrick C. Oxford Regent A. W. "Dub" Riter, Jr. Regent Raul R. Romero Regent A. R. (Tony) Sanchez, Jr. 1. U. T. Austin: Recommendation for Approval of Proposed Plan to Manage Potential Conflicts of Interest for Dr. Eric V. Anslyn, Dr. John T. McDevitt, Dr. Dean P. Neikirk. and Dr. Jason B. Shear and Authorize Execution of Licensing Agreement and Other Documents Necessary to License Technology to Lab Vision. Inc. RECOMMENDATION The Chancellor concurs in the recommendation of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, the Vice Chancellor and General Counsel, and President Faulkner that the U. T. Board of Regents approve a proposed Plan to Manage Potential Conflicts of Interest as set forth below for Dr. Eric V. Anslyn, Dr. John T. McDevitt, Dr. Dean P. Neikirk, and Dr. Jason B. Shear, all members of the faculty at U. T. Austin: PLAN TO MANAGE POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Dr. Eric V. Anslyn, Dr. John T. McDevitt, Dr. Dean P. Neikirk, and Dr. Jason B. Shear are the four U. T. Austin inventors of the "Electronic Tongue" technology, a

technology relating to diagnostic fluid analyses using a computer chip sensor array. Each inventor has submitted individual Financial Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Reports to disclose his potential future relationships with Lab Vision, Inc., a company interested in commercializing the U. T. Austin intellectual property related to the technology. Each inventor has received from U. T. Austin an inventor's share of an option Fee payment as a result of an Option Agreement executed between U. T. Austin and Lab Vision, Inc. in 1999. U. T. Austin currently is negotiating sponsored research and licensing agreements with Lab Vision, Inc. Subsequent to successful negotiations of these agreements, the inventors will benefit via U. T. Austin's policy that proceeds from the licensing of intellectual property be shared with the inventors. Further, it is possible that the inventors will be asked by Lab Vision to play some role in the initial phases of commercialization. As required by Texas Education Code Section 51.912(a) and the Regents' Rules and Regulations, Part Two, Chapter XII, Sections 6 and 7, Dr. Anslyn, Dr. McDevitt, Dr. Neikirk, and Dr. Shear have provided U. T. Austin with written disclosures and, when changes necessitate, they will be required to provide U. T. Austin with revised written disclosures of all potential conflicts of interest that might emanate from the terms of the agreements with Lab Vision. Thus, U. T. Austin stands in compliance with regulations governing the definition of potential conflicts that might arise through the conduct of research. The primary mechanism that U. T. Austin employs for managing potential conflicts of interest in this type of situation involves the establishment of an independent Oversight Committee. The following steps will be required under this management plan: a. An Oversight Committee, comprised of the former Chemistry/ Biochemistry Chairman, the current Electrical/Computer Engineering Chairman, and the Associate Dean of the College of Natural Sciences, will review reports and communicate its assessments on the objectivity of the research to the U. T. Austin Objectivity in Research Committee. b. Dr. Anslyn, Dr. McDevitt, Dr. Neikirk, and Dr. Shear will submit to the members of the independent Oversight Committee copies of: ( 1 ) abstracts that describe the scope of the research anticipated related to the "Electronic Tongue" technology and (2) annual research progress reports, which will include a list of persons who derived support from the sponsored research agreement as well as a compilation of any publications that resulted from the sponsored research. Any additional supporting information that is needed for 2

evaluation of the potential conflicts of interest will be provided as requested by the independent members of the Oversight Committee. c. Dr. Anslyn, Dr. McDevitt, Dr. Neikirk, and Dr. Shear will notify the Objectivity in Research Committee annually of any intellectual property disclosures or patentable technologies arising from the research related to the "Electronic Tongue" technology. d. Should either of these committees (Oversight Committee or Objectivity in Research Committee) determine that an actual conflict of interest exists at any point in this oversight process, appropriate remedial action will be taken in accordance with Section 51.912 of the Texas Education Code and corresponding provisions of the U. T. System Intellectual Property Policy. It is further recommended that the Board authorize President Faulkner or his designee to execute a Licensing Agreement and other necessary documents to license the technology to Lab Vision, Inc., with prior approval of the Vice Chancellor and General Counsel. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The proposed arrangement is consistent with Section 51.912 of the Texas Education Code and corresponding provisions of the U. T. System Intellectual Property Policy. Pursuant to Part Two, Chapter XII, Section 6, Subsection 6.2, and Section 7, Subsection 7.1 of the Regents' Rules and Regulations, approval by the U. T. Board of Regents is necessary for Dr. Anslyn, Dr. McDevitt, Dr. Neikirk, and Dr. Shear to take part in sponsored research and licensing agreements (and possible consulting arrangements) with Lab Vision, a company in which they will hold equity, effective upon execution of the agreement. U. T. Austin has determined that future sponsored research and licensing agreements between U. T. Austin and Lab Vision for commercial applications of the research are appropriate since the company-related activities of Dr. Anslyn, Dr. McDevitt, Dr. Neikirk, and Dr. Shear will involve applied research and the manufacturing of "Electronic Tongue" technology, and their University laboratories will be involved in basic research into the technology. As part of the agreement, U. T. Austin will secure a pre-initial Public Offering equity stake of 1.6 million shares 3

of common stock, which will be split between U. T. Austin and the inventors of the technology. Approximately $1.3 million in a sponsored research agreement contracugrant to U. T. Austin will be secured to allow U. T. Austin to further develop the science base needed for the understanding of the basic issues.related to the "Electronic Tongue" technology. Normally, proposed Plans to Manage Potential Conflicts of Interest are submitted routinely for approval in the institutional Docket. However, because Lab Vision is insistent upon an agreement immediately, this item needs consideration earlier than the May 2000 meeting of the U. T. Board of Regents. 2. U. T. Austin: Request for Approval to Deaccession Certain Artwork Housed in the JackS. Blanton Museum of Art and Authorization to Enter into Contracts to Facilitate the Sale of the Artwork and to Execute All Documents Related Thereto RECOMMENDATION The Chancellor concurs in the recommendation of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, the Vice Chancellor and General Counsel, and President Faulkner that authorization be given for U. T. Austin to deaccession a collection of approximately 153 paintings by Australian artists. The collection belongs to U. T. Austin and is housed in the Jack S. Blanton Museum of Art. In addition, it is recommended that authorization be given to President Faulkner or his designee to enter into a contract with a fine arts auction house to provide all services for the sale of the artwork and to facilitate all aspects of the sale. The contract shall be subject to the prior approval of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and the Vice Counsel and General Counsel. It is further recommended that the President of U. T. Austin, or his delegate designated in writing, be authorized to execute all documents, instruments, and other agreements and to take all such further actions deemed necessary, advisable, or proper to carry out the purpose and intent of the foregoing recommendations. 4

BACKGROUND INFORMATION The collection of approximately 153 paintings by Australian artists is known as the Harold Mertz Collection of Australian Paintings and was given to U. T. Austin by the Mertz Art Fund in 1972. Since that time, the collection's exposure and its use in art education in the United States has been less than originally anticipated, and it has become impractical to carry out the gift's original purpose. Australian interest in the paintings, however, is high. Over the years U. T. Austin has been approached repeatedly by Australian collectors, dealers, and auction houses to sell the collection. An appraisal of the collection last year set the value at between $5 and $8 million. In seeking to deaccession the works, U. T. Austin has followed the JackS. Blanton Museum of Art Deaccessioning Policy. Five Australian fine art auction houses made proposals to handle the sale of the works after the Blanton Museum director confirmed with other U. T. System components that the works did not fit those components' collecting goals or funding capabilities. A campus committee studied the proposals and recommended that negotiations commence with the first choice of auction houses. Negotiations are currently underway to provide auctioneering, marketing, and other services related to the sale of the works, but no contract has been finalized. If a satisfactory contract cannot be negotiated with the first choice, U. T. Austin proposes to negotiate instead with one of the other auction houses that previously submitted a proposal. To maximize sales proceeds, it is anticipated that the sale of the works will occur in Australia. While this authorization could be handled as an institutional Docket item, the timing of a potential sale in Australia necessitates consideration prior to the May 2000 Board of Regents' meeting. Following the provisions of the Deaccessioning Policy, the net sale proceeds from the sale of the artwork will be used by U. T. Austin for the acquisition of other works of art, including the Suida-Manning Collection. xes: Chancellor Cunningham Executive Vice Chancellor Mullins Executive Vice Chancellor Burck Executive Vice Chancellor Sharpe Vice Chancellor Farabee Vice Chancellor Perry 5