Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv M Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 7:15-cv DAE Document 68 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:10-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:99-mc Document 667 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 25 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 3:18-cv VKD Document 1 Filed 12/18/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv PKC Document 24 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

Transcription:

Case 6:15-cv-00966 Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 SAFE TAN, LLC, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION v. TRU TAN, L.L.C., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-966 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT This is an action for patent infringement in which Safe Tan, LLC ( Plaintiff ) makes the following allegations against Tru Tan, L.L.C. ( Defendant ): PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Safe Tan, LLC is a Texas limited liability company, having a principal place of business of 12647 High Meadows Mews, Dallas, TX 75244. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Tru Tan, L.L.C. is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas, with its principal place of business located at 1400 W. Southwest Loop 323, Ste. 80, Tyler, TX 75701. Upon information and belief, Tru Tan, L.L.C. may be served via its registered agent for service of process: Kelli M. Tyrrell at 5825 Old Bullard Rd., Ste. 200, Tyler, TX 75703. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).

Case 6:15-cv-00966 Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 2 4. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) and 1400(b). On information and belief, Defendant has transacted business in this district, and has committed and/or induced acts of patent infringement in this district. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant is subject to this Court s specific and general personal jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the Texas Long Arm Statute, due at least to its substantial business in this forum, including: (i) at least a portion of the infringements alleged herein; and (ii) regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in Texas and in this Judicial District. U.S. PATENT NO. 6,802,830 6. Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,802,830 ( the 830 Patent ) entitled Device and Method that Generates a Fog Capable of Altering the Color of Human Skin. The 080 Patent issued on October 12, 2004. Brandon Shaw is one of the listed inventors on the 830 Patent. A true and correct copy of the 830 Patent is attached as Exhibit A. COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,802,830 7. Defendant has, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271, has been and is now infringing the 830 Patent in the State of Texas, in this judicial district, and/or elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing, without license, devices and methods that generate a fog capable of altering the color of human skin, such as utilizing a Mystic Tan, VersaSpa and VersaPro. Mystic Tan, VersaSpa and VersaPro fall within the scope of at least claims 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the 830 Patent, as evidenced by Defendant s product descriptions. For example, VersaPro is a sunless tanning system that generates a fog with a tanning solution, DHA (the active ingredient in Sunless tanning solution) See

Case 6:15-cv-00966 Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 3 http://www.versaspa.com/about/faq. VersaPro passes the pressurized tanning solution through tubes connected to three revolutionary HVLP spray nozzles, such that the solution leaves the nozzle as a fog. See http://www.cantan.com/product/versa-spa-pro/. VersaPro provides step-bystep instructions via an enhanced digital audio system during the ten minute session time. See http://sunlessinc.com/gopro/design.html. 8. Defendant is directly infringing, literally infringing, and/or infringing the 830 Patent under the doctrine of equivalents. Defendant is thus liable for infringement of the 830 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271. 9. As a result of Defendant s infringement of the 830 Patent, Plaintiff has suffered monetary damages and is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendant s infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendant, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer damages in the future unless Defendant s infringing activities are enjoined by this Court. 10. Unless a permanent injunction is issued enjoining Defendant and its agents, servants, employees, representatives, affiliates, and all others acting on in active concert therewith from infringing the 830 Patent, Plaintiff will be greatly and irreparably harmed. U.S. PATENT NO. 8,137,328 11. Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 8,137,328 ( the 328 Patent ) entitled Chemically Tanning Human Skin. The 080 Patent issued on March 20, 2012. Brandon Shaw is one of the listed inventors on the 328 Patent. A true and correct copy of the 328 Patent is attached as Exhibit B.

Case 6:15-cv-00966 Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 4 COUNT II INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,137,328 12. Defendant has, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271, has been and is now infringing the 328 Patent in the State of Texas, in this judicial district, and/or elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing, without license, methods that generate a fog capable of altering the color of human skin, such as utilizing a VersaSpa and VersaPro. Defendant s use of a VersaSpa and VersaPro falls within the scope of claim 1 of the 328 Patent, as evidenced by Defendant s product descriptions. For example, VersaPro is a tanning system that generates a fog with a tanning solution comprised of an outer shell with a user control panel. This user control panel allows users to select a tanning solution for passing through the nozzle. VersaPro is a sunless tanning system which includes a frosted semitransparent acrylic panel. See the 2013 VersaSpa Brochure. Additionally, VersaPro includes three revolutionary HVLP spray nozzles. See http://cantan.com/product/versa-spa-pro/. Furthermore, VersaSpa has a revolutionary touchscreen that allows you to formulate flawless, customized application with the swipe of a finger. Id. 13. Defendant is directly infringing, literally infringing, and/or infringing the 328 Patent under the doctrine of equivalents. Defendant is thus liable for infringement of the 328 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271. 14. As a result of Defendant s infringement of the 328 Patent, Plaintiff has suffered monetary damages and is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendant s infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendant, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer damages in the future unless Defendant s infringing activities are enjoined by this Court.

Case 6:15-cv-00966 Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 5 15. Unless a permanent injunction is issued enjoining Defendant and its agents, servants, employees, representatives, affiliates, and all others acting on in active concert therewith from infringing the 328 Patent, Plaintiff will be greatly and irreparably harmed. U.S. PATENT NO. 7,699,822 16. Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 7,699,822 ( the 822 Patent ) entitled Chemically Tanning Human Skin. The 822 Patent issued on April 20, 2010. Brandon Shaw is one of the listed inventors on the 822 Patent. A true and correct copy of the 822 Patent is attached as Exhibit C. COUNT III INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,699,822 17. Defendant has, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271, has been and is now infringing the 822 Patent in the State of Texas, in this judicial district, and/or elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing, without license, devices and methods for chemically tanning human skin, such as utilizing a VersaSpa and VersaPro. Defendant s use of a VersaSpa and VersaPro falls within the scope of at least claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 13, 14, and 15 of the 822 Patent, as evidenced by Defendant s product descriptions. For example, VersaPro is a sunless tanning system that is comprised of a chamber large enough to hold an entire person with easy to use standing position plates. See http://cantan.com/product/versa-spa-pro. VersaPro includes three spray nozzles within the chamber and has performance features such as a built-in solution reservoir, an auto-calibrating solution volume, and precision metering pumps. Id. VersaPro includes a first solution container and a second solution container which are coupled to the pump system. For example, VersaPro contains a smart container system for optimized system efficiency and results. See http://sunlessinc.com/gopro/performance.html.

Case 6:15-cv-00966 Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 6 18. Defendant is directly infringing, literally infringing, and/or infringing the 822 Patent under the doctrine of equivalents. Defendant is thus liable for infringement of the 822 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271. 19. As a result of Defendant s infringement of the 822 Patent, Plaintiff has suffered monetary damages and is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendant s infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendant, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer damages in the future unless Defendant s infringing activities are enjoined by this Court. 20. Unless a permanent injunction is issued enjoining Defendant and its agents, servants, employees, representatives, affiliates, and all others acting on in active concert therewith from infringing the 822 Patent, Plaintiff will be greatly and irreparably harmed. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter: 1. A judgment in favor of Plaintiff that Defendant has infringed the 830, 328, and 822 Patents; 2. A permanent injunction enjoining Defendant and its officers, directors, agents servants, affiliates, employees, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others acting in active concert therewith from infringement, inducing the infringement of, or contributing to the infringement of the 830, 328, and 822 Patents, or such other equitable relief the Court determines is warranted; 3. A judgment and order requiring Defendant pay to Plaintiff its damages, costs, expenses, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest for Defendant s infringement of the 830,

Case 6:15-cv-00966 Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 7 328, and 822 Patents as provided under 35 U.S.C. 284, and an accounting of ongoing postjudgment infringement; and 4. Any and all other relief, at law or equity, to which Plaintiff may show itself to be entitled. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, requests a trial by jury of any issues so triable by right. DATED November 6, 2015. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Hao Ni Hao Ni Texas Bar No. 24047205 hni@nilawfirm.com Timothy T. Wang Texas Bar No. 24067927 twang@nilawfirm.com Neal G. Massand Texas Bar No. 24039038 nmassand@nilawfirm.com Stevenson Moore V Texas Bar No. 24076573 smoore@nilawfirm.com Krystal L. Gibbens Texas Bar No. 24082185 kgibbens@nilawfirm.com NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC 8140 Walnut Hill Ln., Ste. 500 Dallas, TX 75231 Tel: (972) 331-4600 Fax: (972) 314-0900 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SAFE TAN, LLC