State Court Processing of Domestic Violence Cases

Similar documents
A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Assault and the Criminal Justice System. Alaska Criminal Justice Commission, presentation to ASHNHA

Alaska Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Drivers

BJS Court Related Statistical Programs Presentation

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Office Of The District Attorney

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2000

State Court Processing Statistics: Background, Current Findings, and Future Directions

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Identifying Chronic Offenders

Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992

The Court Response to Intimate Partner Abuse Chapter 13 DR GINNA BABCOCK

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

Summit County Pre Trial Services

MEMORANDUM. STATE OF ALASKA Department of Law. To: Alaska Criminal Justice Commission Date: January 9, 2017

Glossary of Criminal Justice Sentencing Terms

Center for Criminal Justice Research, Policy & Practice: The Rise (and Partial Fall) of Illinois Prison Population. Research Brief

Determinate Sentencing: Time Served December 30, 2015

Profile of Intimate Partner Violence Cases in Large Urban Counties

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma. Detailed Analysis. October 17, Council of State Governments Justice Center

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23

cook county state,s attorney DATA REPORT

State v. Abdullahi Noor. Starts with 911 call

FLORIDA CRIMINAL OFFENSES AMANDA POWERS SELLERS AND JENNA C. FINKELSTEIN

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

Objectives. A very brief history 1/26/18. Jamie Markham. Grid fluency Handbook and form familiarity Avoid common errors

Jail: Who is in on bail?

Jurisdiction Profile: Washington, D.C.

California Law and Immigration. Taking matters into our own hands one bill at a time!

Presentation to the Legislative Finance Committee. January 15, 2018

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME, AND PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR S REPORT. PAAM Corrections Committee. Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

Have you ever been a victim or a witness to a crime? If so, you may be entitled to certain rights under Louisiana's Crime Victim Bill of Rights.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,520 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JESSE N. DUCKENS, Appellant.

IDAHO SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION

DeKalb County Pretrial Services. 2 Year Review

Probation and Parole Violators in State Prison, 1991

crossroads AN EXAMINATION OF THE JAIL POPULATION AND PRETRIAL RELEASE

Understanding the New "Expungement" Law NOVEMBER 16, 2016

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

The True Cost of Justice in Marion County

AMENDED ORDER GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF SELECTED INMATES INTO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS, OSCEOLA COUNTY

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. Statute of Limitations and Speedy Trial CPL ARTICLE 30 2/28/13 3 EVENTS THAT ARE ESSENTIAL IN ANALYZING TIMELINESS

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1007 SUMMARY

CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Alaska Department of Corrections: Post-conviction Incarcerated Population,

Jurisdiction Profile: Arkansas

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Nos. 117, ,795 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma Initial Work Group Meeting

Current Tribal Related Data Collection Efforts at the. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Outline of Presentation

BUILDING TRUST WITH COMMUNITIES, UPHOLDING DUE PROCESS SUPERVISING ATTORNEY IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER SEPTEMBER 2015

For the purposes of this article, the following terms have the following meanings:

Fort Worth ISD EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS CRIMINAL HISTORY AND CREDIT REPORTS

Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Criminal Justice Populations: Data Harmonization Measure

Criminal Records in High Crime Neighborhoods

Effective October 1, 2015

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1301

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESPONSE TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 62 TWENTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2002

REPORT # O L A OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF M INNESOTA PROGRAM EVALUATION R EPORT. Chronic Offenders

Chapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

SECTION 1 LAW ENFORCEMENT EMERGENCY SERVICES AND

2014 Kansas Statutes

Highlights. Federal immigration suspects 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000

THE EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF SECURED AND UNSECURED PRETRIAL RELEASE IN CALIFORNIA'S LARGE URBAN COUNTIES:

ARTICLE 11A. VICTIM PROTECTION ACT OF 1984.

Criminal Statutes of Limitations Arizona

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 22, 2016 FORCED RELEASES

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR:

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

New Mexico Sentencing Commission

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) Balancing Individual Rights and Public Access

Overcrowding Alternatives

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

Male Initial Custody Assessment Procedures

Tribal Law & Order Act: Implementation. Tribal Law & Order Act

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

MISPLACED PRIORITIES: SB90 & THE COSTS TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES

Taking Bail Notes. 1. Introduction. a. Importance of Pretrial Release

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

Effective Dates For most provisions: June 8, 2011 Delayed effective dates for some provisions (noted later)

Immigration Violations

IS MY CLIENT ELIGIBLE TO VACATE AN ADULT CRIMINAL CONVICTION?

2016 Report on Local Government Contracts for the Provision of Services [N.C.G.S. 7A-346.2] Research and Planning Division March 1, 2016

Sentencing in Colorado

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

CALIFORNIA BAIL REFORM MICA DOCTOROFF ACLU OF CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR ADVOCACY AND POLICY

MECKLENBURG COUNTY PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT & PRAXIS. Instruction Manual

North Carolina District Attorney Candidate Questionnaire

Certificates of Restoration of Opportunity. HB 1553 Implementation Training 06/10/2016

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

Transcription:

State Court Processing of Domestic Violence Cases Erica L. Smith Bureau of Justice Statistics Report examines whether domestic violence cases are treated less seriously than other violent crime cases 1) Tracked domestic and non-domestic violence cases in court records from initial case filing to final court disposition 2) Compared DV and non-dv sexual assault and DV and non-dv aggravated assault on 11 measures of prosecution, conviction, and sentencing outcomes 1

Where differences were found, they were in the direction of DV cases being treated more seriously than non-dv 1. Prosecution rate 2. Overall conviction rate 3. Felony conviction rate 4. Violent felony conviction rate 5. Felony sexual/aggravated assault conviction rate 6. Misdemeanor conviction rate 7. Violent misdemeanor conviction rate 8. Misdemeanor sexual/aggravated assault conviction rate 9. Prison incarceration rate 10. Jail incarceration rate 11. Average incarceration sentence length In nearly 70% of the 2,629 felonies tracked, the most serious charge was either sexual assault or aggravated assault 264 sexual assault cases 90 domestic 174 non-domestic 1,538 aggravated assault cases 520 domestic 1,018 non-domestic 2

Prosecution rate was not lower in felony DV cases Sexual assault: Domestic (89%) more likely to be prosecuted than non-domestic (73%) Aggravated assault: Domestic (66%) as likely to be prosecuted as non-domestic (67%) Three-fourths of DV cases were not prosecuted due to lack of victim cooperation. DV and non-dv sexual assault defendants differed on 2 of the 7 CONVICTION rates 1. Overall conviction rate: DV higher than non-dv 2. Felony conviction rate: no difference 3. Violent felony conviction rate: no difference 4. Felony sexual assault conviction rate: DV higher than non-dv 5. Misdemeanor conviction rate: no difference 6. Violent misdemeanor conviction rate: no difference 7. Misdemeanor sexual assault conviction rate: no difference 3

DV and non-dv aggravated assault defendants differed on 4 of the 7 CONVICTION rates 1. Overall conviction rate: DV higher than non-dv 2. Felony conviction rate: no difference 3. Violent felony conviction rate: DV higher than non-dv 4. Felony aggravated assault conviction rate: DV higher than non-dv 5. Misdemeanor conviction rate: DV higher than non-dv 6. Violent misdemeanor conviction rate: no difference 7. Misdemeanor aggravated assault conviction rate: no difference Incarceration rates were not lower in felony DV cases Sexual assault: Prison incarceration rate: no difference between convicted DV and non-dv defendants Jail incarceration rate: no difference Aggravated assault: Prison incarceration rate: no difference Jail incarceration rate: no difference 4

Incarceration sentence lengths were not shorter in felony DV cases Sexual assault: Convicted felony DV defendants sentenced to incarceration received a LONGER sentence than those sentenced for felony non-dv: 6 years versus 3 ¼ years About 15% of DV sexual assault defendants had a sentence of more than 10 years, while none of the non-dv sexual assault defendants had a sentence that long Aggravated assault: No difference in incarceration sentence length between DV and non-dv Other interesting facts: DV aggravated assault defendants were: 1. more likely to have an active CJ status at time of arrest (26% compared to 18% of non-dv); 2. less likely to be granted pretrial release (54% compared to 62% of non-dv). Of those granted pretrial release, courts were more likely to issue a protection order against DV aggravated assault defendants (47% compared to 4% of non-dv) Protection orders were included in the sentences of more DV aggravated assault defendants (41% compared to 12% of non-dv) 5

For additional information, please feel free to contact me: Erica Smith Statistician Bureau of Justice Statistics Erica.L.Smith@usdoj.gov 202-616-3491 6