IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Similar documents
Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

8:18-cv Doc # 1 Filed: 07/18/18 Page 1 of 12 - Page ID # 1

Case 1:14-cv RJJ Doc #26 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 16 Page ID#153

Case 5:07-cv RMW Document 1 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Complaint

Case: 4:15-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 1 of 18. PageID #: 1


Attorneys for Plaintiff, Marilee Hall UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Class Action Complaint 2

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Case No.:

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 4:18-cv O Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/15/17 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-cv Lardner v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. Document 42.

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAUSE NO STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY

Case 1:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2017 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

Case Document 735 Filed in TXSB on 05/28/18 Page 1 of 8

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv SPL Document 25 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

[Additional Attorneys on Signature Page]

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. STATE OF ARKANSAS ex rel. DUSTIN McDANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL. v. Case No.

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/26/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/26/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 5:10-cv FB Document 25 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 4:11-cv Document 204 Filed in TXSD on 02/27/15 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

State Consumer and Protection Laws Enforcement and Litigation Trends in Texas. September 20, 2011

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 3:12-cv L-BH Document 43 Filed 04/29/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID 611

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

Case 1:11-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUIT NO. 342-D TARRANT COUNTY, ET AL IN THE DISTRICT COURT MICHAEL P RILEY TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED PETITION

ThSTS. hereby state and allege. bring this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 10/03/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:18-cv MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Case 5:18-cv UJH-MHH Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 11

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LORI COOPER, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. vs. Jury Trial Demanded CLIENT SERVICES, INC., Defendant ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: NATURE OF ACTION 1. This is an action for damages brought by an individual plaintiff for Defendant s violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq. (hereinafter FDCPA ), the Texas Debt Collection Practices Act, Chapter 392 (hereinafter TDCPA ) and the Texas Business and Commerce Code, Subchapter E, Chapter 17, (hereinafter DTPA ), which prohibit debt collectors from engaging in abusive, deceptive, and unfair practices. 2. Plaintiff seeks to recover monetary damages for Defendant s violation of the FDCPA, the TDCPA and the DTPA, and to have an Order or injunction issued by this Court preventing Defendants from continuing its violative behaviors. 3. Service may be made upon Defendant in any other district in which it may be found pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 1132(e)(2).

Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 2 of 8 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. Jurisdiction of this Court arises under 15 U.S.C. 1692k(d), 28 U.S.C. 1331, and 28 U.S.C. 1337. 5. Venue is proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), where the acts and transactions giving rise to Plaintiff s action occurred in this district, where Plaintiff resides in this district, and/or where Defendant transacts business in this district. PARTIES 6. Plaintiff, Lori Cooper ( Plaintiff ), is a natural person residing in Fort Bend County. 7. Plaintiff is a consumer as defined by the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. 1692a(3) and the Texas Business and Commerce Code section 17.50(a)(1) and Texas Finance Code 392.001(1). 8. Defendant, Client Services, Inc. ( Defendant ) is an entity who at all relevant times was engaged, by use of the mails and telephone, in the business of attempting to collect a debt from Plaintiff, as defined by 15 U.S.C. 1692a(5) and by Tex. Fin. Code Ann. 392.001(6). 9. Defendant is a debt collector as defined by 15 U.S.C. 1692a(6) and by Tex. Fin. Code Ann. 392.001(2).

Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 3 of 8 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 10. Plaintiff is a natural person obligated, or allegedly obligated, to pay a debt owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due a creditor other than Defendant. 11. Plaintiff's obligation, or alleged obligation, owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due a creditor other than Defendant, arises from a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services that are the subject of the transaction were incurred primarily for personal, family, or household purposes and Plaintiff incurred the obligation, or alleged obligation, owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due a creditor other than Defendant. 12. Defendant uses instrumentalities of interstate commerce or the mails in a business the principal purpose of which is the collection of any debts, and/or regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due another. 13. In connection with the collection of an alleged debt, Defendant, via its agent and/or employee Michael Bell, placed a call to Plaintiff s residential telephone line on March 16, 2011 at or about 11:00 A.M., and at such time, Defendant falsely represented that Plaintiff owed an alleged credit card debt. However, Plaintiff s alleged debt was actually for a line of credit and not a credit card, and as such, Defendant falsely represented the character, amount, or legal status of Plaintiff s debt. (15 U.S.C. 1692e(2)(A), 1692e(10)).

Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 4 of 8 14. In connection with an attempt to collect a debt, Defendant sent Plaintiff initial written communication dated October 5, 2010 in which Defendant stated, in relevant part, as follows: In stating that Plaintiff s account was placed in a Prelegal status, Defendant implicitly threatened that Plaintiff s account would be referred to an attorney to take legal action if payment was not made, an action Defendant did not actually intend to take, and as such, Defendant falsely represented the character, amount or legal status of Plaintiff s debt and further overshadowed and obscured the disclosures required by 15 USC 1692g(a) et seq. during the thirty-day dispute period. (15 U.S.C. 1692e(2)(A), 1692e(5), 1692e(10), 1692g(b),Tex Fin Code 392.304(a)(8)). SEE correspondence attached hereto as Exhibit A. 15. Defendant s actions constitute conduct highly offensive to a reasonable person, and as a result of Defendant s violations of the FDCPA, Defendant is liable to Plaintiff for Plaintiff s actual damages, statutory damages, and costs and attorney s fees. COUNT I--FDCPA 16. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation contained above.

Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 5 of 8 17. Defendant s aforementioned conduct violated the FDCPA. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief and judgment, as follows: a) Adjudging that Defendant violated the FDCPA; b) Awarding Plaintiff statutory damages, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1692k, in the amount of $1,000.00; c) Awarding Plaintiff actual damages, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1692k; d) Awarding Plaintiff reasonable attorneys fees ands costs incurred in this action; e) Awarding Plaintiff any pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as may be allowed under the law; f) Awarding such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. COUNT II--TDCPA 18. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation above. 19. Defendant violated the Texas Debt Collection Practices Act in one or more of the following ways: a. Misrepresenting the character, extent, or amount of a consumer debt, or misrepresenting the consumer debt's status in a judicial or governmental proceeding. (Tex Fin Code 392.304(a)(8))

Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 6 of 8 b. Using false representations or deceptive means to collect a debt or obtain information concerning a consumer, including (Tex Fin Code 392.304(a)(19)). WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief and judgment, as follows: a) Adjudging that Defendant violated the TDCPA; b) Awarding Plaintiff statutory damages pursuant to the TDCPA; c) Awarding Plaintiff actual damages pursuant to the TDCPA; d) Awarding Plaintiff reasonable attorneys fees ands costs incurred in this action; e) Awarding Plaintiff any pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as may be allowed under the law; f) Awarding such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. COUNT III DTPA 20. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation by reference herein all prior paragraphs above. 21. A violation of the Texas Debt Collection Practices Act is a is a deceptive trade practice under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and is

Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 7 of 8 actionable under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Tex. Fin. Code. Ann. 392.404(a) 22. Defendant violated Tex. Bus. Com. Code 17.50(h). WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief and judgment, as follows: a) Adjudging that Defendant violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Tex. Bus. Com. Code, Chapter 17, Subchapter E. b) Awarding Plaintiff actual damages, pursuant to Tex. Bus. Com. Code 17.50(h); c) Awarding Plaintiff three times actual damages, pursuant to Tex. Bus. Com. Code 17.50(h). d) Awarding Plaintiff reasonable attorneys fees ands costs incurred in this action; e) Awarding Plaintiff any pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as may be allowed under the law; f) Awarding such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. TRIAL BY JURY 23. Plaintiff is entitled to and hereby demands a trial by jury. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Dennis R. Kurz

Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 8 of 8 WEISBERG & MEYERS, L.L.C. Two Allen Center 1200 Smith Street 16th Floor Houston, TX 77002 (888) 595-9111 ext. 412 (866) 565-1327 (fax) Dennis R. Kurz Texas State Bar # 24068183 Southern District Bar No. 1045205 Attorney in Charge for Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on June 29th, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the clerk of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, using the electronic case filing system of the court. /s/ Dennis R. Kurz Dennis R. Kurz