Year: 2014 Last update: 15/10/2013 Version: 1

Similar documents
Year: 2013 Last update: 25/10/2012 Version 1. HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) Colombia

Year: 2012 Last update: 31/08/12 Version: 2 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) COLOMBIA

Year: 2011 Last updated: 26/10/2010 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) Title: Colombia

Year: 2014 Last update: 29/10/2013 Version 1

Year: 2014 Last update: 30/07/2014 Version 2

ANNUAL REPORT 2016 COLOMBIA HUMANITARIAN. Photo: NRC: Edwin Tinjacá

Year: 2011 Last update: 16/04/2012. HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) Sri Lanka and Tamil Nadu, India

Year: 2014 Last update: 05/09/2014 Version 2 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) MALI AMOUNT: EUR

Americas. North America and the Caribbean Latin America

Year: 2013 Last update: 15/11/2013 Version 2 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) BURMA/MYANMAR AND THAILAND

FACT SHEET #1, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 APRIL 18, 2018

Year: 2016 Last update: 06/04/16 Version 2 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN 1 AMOUNT: EUR

Year: 2013 Last update: 18/11/2013 Version 1 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CAMBODIA AND VIETNAM - RESPONSE TO CYCLONES WUTIP AND NARI

Progress and challenges ahead

The release of the full HIP amount is conditional on the payment of Member State contributions to the Facility for Refugees in Turkey in 2019.

Year: 2016 Last update: 05/11/2015 Version 1

IOM APPEAL DR CONGO HUMANITARIAN CRISIS 1 JANUARY DECEMBER 2018 I PUBLISHED ON 11 DECEMBER 2017

Year: 2017 Last update: 04/04/2017 Version 2

Year: 2016 Last update: 13/12/16 Version 5 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN 1 AMOUNT: EUR

FACT SHEET #3, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 JULY 18, 2018

HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP)

Sweden s national commitments at the World Humanitarian Summit

IASC-WG Meeting, 17 September Colombia Background Paper

Year: 2011 Last updated: 4/11/2010

South Sudan 2016 Third Quarterly Operational Briefing

2017 Year-End report. Operation: Syrian Arab Republic 23/7/2018. edit (

Year: 2012 Last update: 28/06/2012 Version 3 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) BURMA/MYANMAR AND THAILAND

Cash Transfer Programming in Myanmar Brief Situational Analysis 24 October 2013

UNHCR REGIONAL OFFICE FOR NORTHERN SOUTH AMERICA. Executive Committee Summary COLOMBIA SITUATION

3RP REGIONAL REFUGEE AND RESILIENCE PLAN QUARTERLY UPDATE: 3RP ACHIEVEMENTS MARCH 2018 KEY FIGURES ACHIEVEMENT *

REFUGEES ECHO FACTSHEET. Humanitarian situation. Key messages. Facts & Figures. Page 1 of 5

Year: 2016 Last update: 21/03/2016 Version 2 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) SUDAN and SOUTH SUDAN

2017 Year-End report. Operation: Yemen 23/7/2018. edit ( 7/23/2018 Yemen

Protection, a primary element to humanitarian action

Year: 2011 Last update: 24/02/11. HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) Title: Burma/Myanmar and Thailand

Americas. North America and the Caribbean Latin America

Myanmar. Operational highlights. Working environment. Achievements and impact. Persons of concern. Main objectives and targets

FACT SHEET #1, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2016 NOVEMBER 19, 2015

Evaluation of UNHCR Colombia

Venezuela Situation: Brazil, Colombia, Trinidad & Tobago

Enhanced protection of Syrian refugee women, girls and boys against Sexual Gender-Based Violence (SGBV) Enhanced basic public services and economic

EXPLORATORY MEDICAL COORDINATOR

Americas. The WORKING ENVIRONMENT REGIONAL SUMMARIES

UKRAINE - COMPLEX EMERGENCY

OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS

Year: 2011 Last update: 27/10/2011 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) BURUNDI & TANZANIA

MALI. Overview. Working environment

LEGAL BASIS REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

SUPPLEMENTARY APPEAL 2015

E Distribution: GENERAL WFP/EB.A/2001/4-C 17 April 2001 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH POLICY ISSUES. Agenda item 4

Year: 2016 Last update: 19/07/2016 Version 3 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) SUDAN and SOUTH SUDAN

Year: 2015 Last update: 29/10/2015 Version 5 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN 1 AMOUNT: EUR

Venezuela Situation September 2017

IDPs 1 200, ,000. Tibetan refugees (settled) Mandate urban refugees/asylumseekers

Year: 2017 Last update: 25/10/2016 Version 1

SOMALIA. Overview. Working environment

Year: 2013 Last update: 07/03/2013 Version 1 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) CENTRAL AMERICA / MEXICO

FACT SHEET #3, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2017 MARCH 31, % Humanitarian Coordination & Information Management (11%) 80% 20%

Humanitarian Aid Decision F9 (FED9) Humanitarian aid to vulnerable populations in Angola who are food insecure due to heavy rainfall

AFGHANISTAN. Overview. Operational highlights

Preparing for peace in 2014

SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC. Overview. Working environment GLOBAL APPEAL 2015 UPDATE

ECUADOR. Overview. Working environment GLOBAL APPEAL 2015 UPDATE

SPAIN GRAND BARGAIN REPORT 2018

Colombia Situation. Working environment. Colombia. Costa Rica. Ecuador. Panama. Venezuela. The context. Planning figures

B. Logical Framework for Humanitarian Response. Table: Strategic priorities, corresponding response plan objectives, and key indicators.

HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE PLAN

CONGO (Republic of the)

COLOMBIA. Overview. Operational highlights

Afghanistan. Working environment. Total requirements: USD 54,347,491. The context

RWANDA. Overview. Working environment

HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN, IRAN AND CENTRAL ASIA AMOUNT: EUR

Humanitarian Aid Decision Title: Humanitarian aid in favour of the population affected by civil conflict in Mindanao Island, Philippines.

DRC Afghanistan. Accountability Framework (AF)

Year: 2013 Last update: 29/11/13 Version 4 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) MALI 0. MAJOR CHANGES SINCE PREVIOUS VERSION OF THE HIP

SOUTH SUDAN. Working environment

The Global Compact on Refugees UNDP s Written Submission to the First Draft GCR (9 March) Draft Working Document March 2018

MIDDLE NORTH. A Syrian refugee mother bakes bread for her family of 13 outside their shelter in the Bekaa Valley, Lebanon.

NTCA SITUATION HIGHLIGHTS. NORTHERN TRIANGLE OF CENTRAL AMERICA SITUATION December ,600

Sri Lanka. Pakistan Myanmar Various Refugees

LATIN AMERICA 2013 GLOBAL REPORT UNHCR

FACT SHEET #6, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

REGIONAL MONTHLY UPDATE: 3RP ACHIEVEMENTS NOVEMBER 2017

2018 Planning summary

Colombia UNHCR s Protection and Assistance Programme for IDPs and Refugees March 2004

Afghanistan. Operational highlights. Persons of concern

Colombia Situation. Working environment. Total requirements: USD 41,881,980. The context. Brazil (Amazon region) Colombia. Costa Rica. Ecuador.

Serbia. Working environment. The context. The needs. Serbia

Colombian refugees cross theborderwithecuador.

Somali refugees arriving at UNHCR s transit center in Ethiopia. Djibouti Eritrea Ethiopia Kenya Somalia Uganda. 58 UNHCR Global Appeal

UKRAINE - COMPLEX EMERGENCY

1,174,743 Venezuelans in Colombia. 479,247 Venezuelans in an irregular situation

UKRAINE HUMANITARIAN CRISES ANALYSIS 2017 February 2017

Comprehensive Action Against Anti-personnel Mines: A Regional Initiative to Address Landmine Issues by Carl E. Case [Organization of American States]

Venezuela Situation As of June 2018

Colombia. Operational highlights. Working environment. Persons of concern

UNDP s Response To The Crisis In Iraq

NIGER. Overview. Working environment GLOBAL APPEAL 2015 UPDATE

Emergency Response Fund Colombia

Year 2012 Last update: 13/12/2012 Version 2 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) CUBA

Transcription:

HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) Humanitarian aid for population affected by the Colombian armed conflict The activities proposed hereafter are still subject to the adoption of the financing decision ECHO/WWD/BUD/2014/01000 1. CONTEXT AMOUNT: EUR 13 029 000 ECHO's Integrated Analysis Framework for 2013-14 identified high humanitarian needs in Colombia. The vulnerability of the population affected by the crisis is assessed to be very high. The protracted armed conflict in Colombia continues to cause a major, evolving, humanitarian crisis. Best estimates show that some 4.7 to 5.5 million people have been forcibly displaced since 1985. Moreover, every year some 100 000 to 200 000 people are violently coerced to leave their homes and livelihoods. While many try to seek safer areas within Colombia, many others have no choice but to leave the country requesting asylum in neighbouring states. Compounding an already grave situation, organized armed groups of various origins also impose severe restriction of movement on a large proportion of the civilian population, confining thousands who have not yet been displaced or have returned. While the core of the severe humanitarian situation in Colombia still responds largely to a classical non-international armed conflict, other forms of intense violence are emerging, giving rise to needs to which humanitarian agencies are seeking to respond. There has been a continuous government effort to address the registration, recognition and assistance of the conflict victims; most notably through the socalled June 2011 Victim s Law that recognizes the victims right to emergency aid, including land restoration rights. Nevertheless, much-needed relief assistance provided to the victims, remains insufficient and severe unmet humanitarian needs continue to be documented, particularly in rural zones. In a landmark resolution that fundamentally modifies the previous legal understanding of the Colombian armed conflict framework, in May 2013 the Constitutional Court, ruled that the victims of organized criminal groups, the socalled Bandas Criminales or BACRIMs, are also legally and morally entitled to the recognition, protection and assistance provided to the classical armed conflictvictims by the state. This ruling gives due recognition to an emerging and growing problem, although it is expected to lead to further bottlenecks in the national victims registration and assistance system. Despite the expectations of a positive outcome in the ongoing peace negotiations between the Government of Colombia and the main guerrilla group (FARC-EP) in Cuba, Colombia still faces, and will continue to face for the foreseeable future, the humanitarian consequences of a long, evolving, protracted armed conflict which has directly affected more than 10% of its population (45 million). To date, the Guerrilla (mainly FARC and ELN) and a growing number of criminalized very active former armed-groups soldiers (BACRIM) continue challenging and co-opting the authority ECHOCOL/BUD/2014/91000 1

of the state and fighting 1 for the control of territory, resources or illicit trade trafficking routes. Colombia, in view of the level and severity of the unmet humanitarian needs, the limited international attention to its humanitarian crisis and to the decreasing funding for much-needed humanitarian actions, continues to be a forgotten crisis. 2. HUMANITARIAN NEEDS 1) Affected people/potential beneficiaries: IDPs estimated at 100 000 200 000 new IDPs per year 2. Particular emphasis will be put on those IDPs displaced most recently (especially those displaced within the previous 6 months and in any case not surpassing 1 year since the displacement took place). Inhabitants of areas with high affectation of the armed conflict and/or organised armed groups (weapon contamination, confinement, forced recruitment, war wounded, victims of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence (SGBV). Asylum seekers and refugees in neighbouring countries, particularly: o In Ecuador: 55 000 refugees and around 1 000 new asylum seekers per month. o In Venezuela: 204 560 people in need of international assistance 3 (in total) and around 300-400 new asylum seekers per month. Populations in Colombia who may be affected by disasters caused by natural events in 2014/15. Geographical locations in Colombia. Most affected departments in Colombia are as follows: Antioquia (north-eastern region), Arauca, Caquetá, Cauca, Chocó, Guaviare, Cordoba, Nariño, Norte de Santander, Putumayo, Valle del Cauca and Vichada. Other departments could be also considered based on humanitarian needs. 2) Description of the most acute humanitarian needs. Protection is the most acute humanitarian need. The most recent IDPs and asylum seekers also need basic emergency assistance during the first months of displacement. Protection: Threats, violence (including sexual violence), restriction of free movement, and forced recruitment continues threatening civilians and are the main causes explaining the forced displacement phenomenon. In general the conflict-affected population in rural 1 The current negotiations between the GoC and FARC-EP do not consider any bilateral ceasefire; hostilities between armed forces and FARC continue on the ground. 2 The Victim s Unit registers 127 714 new IDPS in 2012. Monthly Humanitarian Bulletin. OCHA, July 2013. http://www.colombiassh.org/site/img/pdf/130806_monthly_bulletin_july_2013_2_.pdf. 3 UNHCR (web page) http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49e493166.html# ECHOCOL/BUD/2014/91000 2

zones has greater protection needs, as the presence of the Colombian state institutions is weaker than in major urban centres, but also specific populations in urban settings, not covered by the authorities. Protection, in this context, shall be understood not only in terms of ensuring basic physical security, but also as: a) Continued international humanitarian presence in remote conflict affected zones, with a practical impact on the communities life (for instance, through mobile health units, small community infrastructure works or livelihood support projects). b) Protection for People in Need of International Protection (PNIP) - asylum seekers and refugees in neighbouring countries. Food assistance and emergency non-food items: Immediately after displacement, people often arrive in a new zone with only the essential goods they could transport. Due to the displacement they do not have any more access to their livelihoods, hence, their most basic needs remain uncovered. The displaced populations mainly peasants - who move to urban centres or to other villages are food insecure as they usually struggle to feed their families mainly through selling of assets and they cannot access sufficient and adequate food. Similarly, restrictions on movement and on access to basic goods and services imposed by illegal armed actors on rural communities negatively impacts their food security situation. Some pockets of high malnutrition (GAM) are found, mainly among indigenous and Afro-Colombian populations. Due to the displacement, IDPs lack essential items such as basic household items (hygiene oandkitchen sets, mosquito nets ) which are referred to as emergency nonfood items. Shelter and access to safe water: Basic temporary shelter and provision of sufficient drinking water to the victims are two key priorities for DG ECHO actions in Colombia. Both needs are particularly acute following forced displacement. Health: Access to healthcare services is very limited for rural conflict-affected populations, mostly because primary health care does not function regularly in the concerned areas due to prevailing insecurity, IHL infractions against sanitary personnel and absence of permanent health structures. Mine action: In terms of weapon contamination awareness and assistance to victims. To note, 10 445 victims of landmines or UXOs have been registered in Colombia since 1990 (up to June 2013). Of them, 38% were civilians. During the period Jan-Jun 2013 alone, PAICMA reports 212 new victims 4. Emergency education after displacement Displaced children face critical problems during the very first days/weeks following their forced displacement, as integration in schools at the arrival sites is not guaranteed. Specific emergency programmes could be 4 Programa Presidencial para la Acción Integral contra Minas Antipersonal PAICMA. Estadísticas generales. http://www.accioncontraminas.gov.co/paginas/victimas.aspx ECHOCOL/BUD/2014/91000 3

considered to provide education until children are re-enrolled in the official education system and psychosocial care. 3. HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE 1) National / local response and involvement Despite the existence of a sophisticated legal framework and the governmental efforts to enhance the national and local responses, national programmes addressing the victims most urgent humanitarian needs have proven to be insufficient. This, mainly due to the scarcity of resources at municipal level, the delays in the IDP registration process and to the lack of humanitarian access as a result of the prevailing insecurity in many rural areas. Furthermore, the inclusion of the BACRIM victims (as ordered by the Constitutional Court in May 2013) in the general victim assistance programmes may well further increase existing bottlenecks in the official assistance system in 2014. 2) International Humanitarian Response International Humanitarian Coordination in Colombia has witnessed important changes since 2012 with the arrival of a new Head of the OCHA Office, and a keen and proactive Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator, who is currently leading the formulation of a CHAP with OCHA support. Complementing this, a functioning Inter-Agency Standing Committee is in place, participants include key UN agencies and most relevant international NGOs, together with some observers such as the ICRC, MSF and DG ECHO among others donors. In 2014, enhanced coordination is expected amongst humanitarian organizations, but also with the GoC bodies in charge of humanitarian assistance. As has been traditional, DG ECHO plays a significant role in the overall international humanitarian aid effort in Colombia. According to OCHA s Financial Tracking System (FTS) Colombia received in 2012 a total of USD 56.1 million, with DG ECHO being the main donor contributing 26.2% of all assistance, followed by Switzerland (14.7%), Norway (12.2%), Germany (9.5%), and Sweden (8.7%). Moreover, as August 2013 OCHA s FTS reports a total of USD 39.6 million, with the top donors being DG ECHO (41.8%), followed by Sweden, Canada, Spain and Switzerland. The UN CERF also contributes with funding to Colombia s conflict victims with USD 3-4 million per year. Finally, up to July 2013 the UN CERF had contributed USD 1.75 million. OCHA confirms a decreasing trend in the financing of relief assistance on behalf of the Colombian victims; from the USD 75 million contributed in 2010, -64 in 2011- to the 56 in 2012 (a 25.3% reduction in two years); this in ECHOCOL/BUD/2014/91000 4

stark contrast with the 120 USD million still to meet humanitarian needs in 2013, according to OCHA s estimation 5. In 2012, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the European Union for its contribution over six decades to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe. The prize money has been dedicated to children affected by conflict. ECHO through UNHCR supports educational and protection activities that will provide learning opportunities for nearly 5 000 boys and girls displaced by the Colombian conflict in Colombia and Ecuador. 3) Constraints and DG ECHO response capacity Access/humanitarian space: Lack of regular, sufficient access is a constant concern in Colombia. A limited, inconsistent humanitarian space reduced by prevailing insecurity is, in general, a major problem in rural conflict areas and marginal urban zones in Colombia. Nonetheless, humanitarian organizations financed by DG ECHO enjoy an appropriate level of acceptance and respect by the parties in conflict. Access to the civilian population in areas in which the conflict is most acute may become difficult and usually depends on local commanders. Full adherence to the humanitarian principles defined in the EU consensus on humanitarian aid is essential to maintain humanitarian access in Colombia. Most of ECHO partners have a long experience and good understanding of Colombia. Absorption capacity is not a major challenge, bearing in mind that humanitarian access is fairly good for ECHO partners. 4) Envisaged DG ECHO response and expected results of our humanitarian aid interventions. The four main defining criteria in terms of beneficiaries will be: a) Newly forced displaced populations (especially those displaced within the last 6 months) not surpassing one year since their displacement. b) Inhabitants of areas with high affectation of the armed conflict (weapon contamination, confinement, victims of SGBV), including as well those living in areas where the actions of organized criminal groups cause significant humanitarian needs. c) People in need of international protection as result of the Colombian conflict (in particular asylum seekers and refugees in neighbouring countries), and d) Population affected by disasters caused by natural events. 5 Monthly Humanitarian Bulletin. OCHA, July 2013. http://www.colombiassh.org/site/img/pdf/130806_monthly_bulletin_july_2013_2_.pdf. ECHOCOL/BUD/2014/91000 5

Within the beneficiary target group s defined above, particular emphasis will continue to be placed on those populations most affected by violence, i.e. women, children, elderly people as well as ethnic minority groups (indigenous and Afro-Colombian population). Communities hosting displaced population may also benefit from humanitarian aid to prevent potential tensions with arriving IDPs. Additionally, a good level of coordination will be sought with local and national bodies. Sectors to be considered will be those related to the needs as described in section 2 above: 1) protection, 2) food assistance and emergency non-food items, 3) Shelter and access to safe water, 4) health care 5) mine action, 6) emergency education after displacement. Short term institutional capacity building actions - with a clear and rapid impact- could be also considered by DG ECHO for funding, particularly those aimed to strengthen the effective delivery of humanitarian assistance by Unidad de Atención y Reparación Integral a las Víctimas (UARIV) or municipalities. In order to provide a more consistent aid to IDPs, in 2013 it has been designed a basic/integral package of emergency assistance for IDPs recently arrived (< 6 months). The basic package is aimed to ensure three key components: a) food assistance (2,100kcal/day/beneficiary x 90 days), b) shelter (90 days) and c) safe water (household filters delivery). This package can be adapted to particularities on the field (e.g. family composition, response of local authorities) and should ensure that nutrition needs are taken into account. The package can be delivered through cash transfers or vouchers or in kind, depending on the context and preferences of beneficiaries.. It is expected to cover the most pressing needs of IDPs recently displaced during the first stage of their displacement. DG ECHO partners are encouraged to integrate the basic package in their humanitarian operations in 2014. In addition to financing projects addressing protection needs, DG ECHO will continue its advocacy efforts, seeking to enhance official assistance levels towards populations affected. The inclusion of a well-designed advocacy component in the proposed actions is welcomed. Expected results of DG ECHO-funded humanitarian aid interventions are: Rapid response to humanitarian needs of recently displaced people, meeting the needs of rural populations facing humanitarian consequences due to armed conflict (restrictions of access to basic goods and services, weapon contamination, forced recruitment, SGBV, etc.), timely assistance to victims of emerging forms of violence, of People in Need of International Protection, and those affected by natural disasters. Colombia is a highly disaster-prone country. Despite a comprehensive emergency response legal framework, local or national response capacity is sometimes overwhelmed and international assistance may be required, including for reasons of access. In addition, populations affected by the conflict might also be hit by natural hazards, as they usually settle in zones at high risks. Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) measures should be integrated when possible in all DG ECHO operations. Likewise, and in compliance with the EU humanitarian mandate, principles and commitment, all project proposals/reports must demonstrate integration of gender and ECHOCOL/BUD/2014/91000 6

age in a coherent manner, including in the needs assessment and risk analysis, the logical framework, description of activities and the gender-age marker section. Under the HIP 2014, it is expected to assist: At least 50 000 people with emergency assistance in Colombia. Approximately, 40 000 people with protection and early recovery assistance in Colombia. In neighbouring countries (Ecuador, Venezuela) some 60 000 people will benefit from protection and emergency assistance actions. Effective coordination is essential. ECHO supports the Inter-Agency Standing Committee s Transformative Agenda (ITA) and encourages partners to demonstrate their engagement in implementing its objectives, to take part in coordination mechanisms (e.g. Humanitarian Country Team/Clusters) and to allocate resources to foster the ITA roll-out. Partners will be expected to ensure full compliance with visibility requirements and to acknowledge the funding role of the EU/ECHO, as set out in the applicable contractual arrangements. 4. LRRD, COORDINATION AND TRANSITION 1) Other DG ECHO interventions Colombia also benefits from the current DIPECHO regional plan for South America. Depending on the magnitude of a given natural disaster, small scale responses could be also implemented in Colombia. 2) Other services/donors availability Opportunities for Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD) should mainly focus on social institutions of the GoC. Given the increased aid efforts by the Colombian Government, the continuous involvement of the relevant state institutions should be sought by DG ECHO and its partners, without prejudice to the humanitarian principles defined in the EU Consensus on Humanitarian Aid. Given the access conditions in conflict affected zones, the transition of humanitarian actions towards rehabilitation and development remains difficult and depends a lot on the capacity of Government institutions to access remote zones. 3) Other concomitant EU interventions LRRD is also promoted through existing complementarities between DG ECHO and actions financed through other Commission aid instruments such as the Development Cooperation Instrument for Latin America. To ensure coordination, there are regular meetings between the EU Delegation and the DG ECHO office in Bogota and a continued dialogue in Brussels between relevant services. Furthermore, synergies are sought with other EU funded programmes such as the ECHOCOL/BUD/2014/91000 7

European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights, the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) thematic programmes and the Instrument for Stability. 4) Exit scenarios. For the time being there is no self-evident exit strategy available for ECHO. As mentioned above, the evolving armed conflict, together with the growing scale of violence, continues to trigger a major humanitarian crisis in the country; this clearly justifies the presence of DG ECHO, other humanitarian donors, Intenational Organisations as well as INGOs. DG ECHO will closely follow the possible outcomes of negotiations between the Government of Colombia and the FARC. If relevant positive changes occur, ECHO would be able to adapt its 2014 HIP strategy. ECHOCOL/BUD/2014/91000 8