* DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0802(CNS)

Similar documents
* DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/0345(NLE)

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0371(COD)

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0047(COD)

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0125(COD)

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0101(COD)

Committee on International Trade Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/0013(COD)

***II RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING

Committee on Legal Affairs Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

DGD 1 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 22 February 2017 (OR. en) 2015/0307 (COD) PE-CONS 55/16 FRONT 484 VISA 393 SIRIS 169 COMIX 815 CODEC 1854

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0225(COD)

*** DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

***I REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0065/

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2017/458 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 15 March 2017

* REPORT. EN United in diversity EN A7-0019/

***I REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0434/

***I REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0316/

* REPORT. EN United in diversity EN A7-0058/

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Session document

JAI.1 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 8 November 2018 (OR. en) 2016/0407 (COD) PE-CONS 34/18 SIRIS 69 MIGR 91 SCHENGEN 28 COMIX 333 CODEC 1123 JAI 829

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2012/0010(COD)

***I ORIENTATION VOTE RESULT

***I REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0345/

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/2283(INI)

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2150(INI) on the 2018 Commission Report on Turkey (2018/2150(INI))

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2017(INI)

Western Balkans ECR-WESTERN BALKAN-FLD-V2.indd 1

THE ENLARGEMENT OF THE UNION

***I REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0004/

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2310(INI)

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) REGULATION (EC) No 1931/2006 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 20 December 2006

Transitional Measures concerning the Schengen acquis for the states of the last accession: the cases of Bulgaria and Romania.

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 77(2)(a) thereof,

***II RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

AS DELIVERED. EU Statement by

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2011/0093(COD)

*** DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2143(INI)

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0000M(NLE)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 8 February 2016 (OR. en)

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2158(INI) on the state of EU-Russia political relations (2018/2158(INI))

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

POLICE COOPERATION ISSUES RELATED TO (PREPARATION TO ACCESSION) SCHENGEN OPERATIONAL CROSS BORDER CO-OPERATION BORDER POLICE DIRECTORATE

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2084(INI) on WTO: the way forward (2018/2084(INI))

L 347/74 Official Journal of the European Union

Romania 10 Years since Accession to EU. Report on Quantitative Survey November 2017

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2159(INI)

EIGHTH TRILATERAL MINISTERIAL MEETING OF BULGARIA, GREECE AND ROMANIA JOINT DECLARATION

14618/16 JdSS/fp 1 DGD 1A

*** DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

Priorities and programme of the Hungarian Presidency

Irish Presidency of the European Union Informal meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Ministers Dublin, Ireland 22/23 January 2004

ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Decision

The EU Macro-regional Strategies relevant for Western Balkans, with specific Focus on the Environmental Issues

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

OSCE commitments on freedom of movement and challenges to their implementation

(FRONTEX), COM(2010)61

I. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2314(INI) on the 2016 Commission Report on Kosovo (2016/2314(INI))

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 April 2014 (OR. en) 2012/0309 (COD) PE-CONS 29/14 VISA 36 COMIX 84 CODEC 336

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

***I POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Trade and Economic relations with Western Balkans

6310/1/16 REV 1 BM/cr 1 DG D 1 A

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

13380/10 MM/GG/cr 1 DG H 1 A

A year in review. First 12 months of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency

Committee on International Trade

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Timeline - response to migratory pressures

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

WHITE PAPER ON EUROPEAN INTEGRATION OF THE WESTERN BALKANS. Adopted by the YEPP Council in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina on September 18, 2010.

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Council of the European Union Brussels, 16 October 2017 (OR. en)

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

9117/16 JdSS/ml 1 DG D 1A

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2011/0288(COD)

9166/3/11REV3RESTREINTUE/EURESTRICTED. Delegationswilfindatachedthedeclasifiedversionoftheabovedocument.

Brussels, September 2005 Riccardo Serri European Commission DG Enlargement

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

THE WESTERN BALKANS LEGAL BASIS OBJECTIVES BACKGROUND INSTRUMENTS

BS/IM/R(2000)1 REPORT OF THE FOURTH MEETING OF THE MINISTERS OF INTERIOR OF THE BSEC MEMBER STATES. Poiana Braşov, Romania, April 2000

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

LIMITE EN COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 March /1/09 REV 1 LIMITE ASIM 21 RELEX 208

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Europe Needs a Strong Communitarian Immigration, Asylum and External Border Security Approach A Step to European Internal Affairs Government

A8-0013/35/rev. Amendment 35/rev Adina-Ioana Vălean on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

External dimensions of EU migration law and policy

Delegations will find attached Commission document C(2008) 2976 final.

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Transcription:

European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 2018/0802(CNS) 22.3.2018 * DRAFT REPORT on the draft Council decision on the putting into effect of the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (15820/2017 C8-0017/2018 2018/0802(CNS)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Monica Macovei PR\1145938.docx PE618.142v01-00 United in diversity

PR_NLE-CN_LegAct_app Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act Amendments by Parliament set out in two columns Deletions are indicated in bold italics in the left-hand column. Replacements are indicated in bold italics in both columns. New text is indicated in bold italics in the right-hand column. The first and second lines of the header of each amendment identify the relevant part of the draft act under consideration. If an amendment pertains to an existing act that the draft act is seeking to amend, the amendment heading includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Amendments by Parliament in the form of a consolidated text New text is highlighted in bold italics. Deletions are indicated using either the symbol or strikeout. Replacements are indicated by highlighting the new text in bold italics and by deleting or striking out the text that has been replaced. By way of exception, purely technical changes made by the drafting departments in preparing the final text are not highlighted. PE618.142v01-00 2/7 PR\1145938.docx

CONTTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION... 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMT... 6 PR\1145938.docx 3/7 PE618.142v01-00

PE618.142v01-00 4/7 PR\1145938.docx

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the draft Council decision on the putting into effect of the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (15820/2017 C8-0017/2018 2018/0802(CNS)) (Consultation) The European Parliament, having regard to the Council draft (15820/2017), having regard to Article 4(2) of the Act of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0017/2018), having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0000/2018), 1. Approves the Council draft; 2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; 3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; 4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. PR\1145938.docx 5/7 PE618.142v01-00

EXPLANATORY STATEMT A. Background 1. According to the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) of the Act of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, the provisions of the Schengen acquis, other than those listed in Annex II to that Act, to which the Republic of Bulgaria ( Bulgaria ) and Romania shall adhere upon accession, are to apply in Bulgaria and Romania pursuant to a Council decision to that effect, after verification that the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of the Schengen acquis have been met. 2. On 9 June 2011, the Council concluded, in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures, that the conditions in all the areas of the Schengen acquis relating to air borders, land borders, police cooperation, data protection, the SIS, sea borders and visas had been fulfilled by Bulgaria and Romania. 3. However, despite repeated calls from the European Parliament for these countries to join the Schengen area, the Council has yet to take the final decision, which is dependent of a unanimous vote by all Schengen Member States. 4. The provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System ( SIS ) started to apply to Bulgaria and Romania from 15 October 2010 1, with the exception of the obligation to refuse entry into or stay on its territory to third country nationals for whom an alert has been issued by another Member State and the obligation to refrain from issuing SIS alerts and entering additional information on third country nationals for the purposes of refusing entry or stay (the remaining restrictions ). 5. The present draft Council Decision aims to lift the remaining restrictions concerning the use of SIS by Bulgaria and Romania. The checks performed by Bulgaria and Romania at their external borders and in their territory should become more effective by issuing SIS alerts for the purposes of refusing entry or stay and by executing such alerts introduced by other Member States, in particular if such alerts are based on a threat to public policy or public security or national security. B. Position of the rapporteur The rapporteur recalls that in June 2011 the European Parliament gave its approval for Bulgaria and Romania to join the Schengen area, stating in a legislative resolution that Bulgaria and Romania where ready to join the Schengen border check-free area. Since 2011, the European Parliament has made reiterated calls for the enlargement of the Schengen area to these two countries and has counted with the support of the European Commission, requesting the Council to take the final decision allowing for the lifting of checks at internal borders for Bulgaria and Romania. 1 Decision 2010/365/EU of 29 January 2010 on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (OJ L 166, 1.7.2010, p.17) PE618.142v01-00 6/7 PR\1145938.docx

In October 2017, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2017/1908 1 putting into effect certain provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Visa Information System ( VIS ) in Bulgaria and Romania. This would allow Bulgaria and Romania to access the VIS data for consultation purposes, thereby increasing the level of security in the Schengen area and facilitating tethe fight against serious crime and terrorism. The European Parliament endorsed the draft Council s Decision. Bulgaria and Romania play a key role in surveillance - related operations in the Black Sea, as well as on the Danube River, both strategic corridors open to naval international traffic and subject to border vulnerabilities. Bulgaria and Romania share borders with Turkey, Moldova, Ukraine, Serbia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, securing significant buffer zones for entry into the Schengen area. Romania has been, for many years in a row, a main contributor to the logistical operations of the European Boarder and Coast Guard Agency. In view of all above-mentioned elements, the current Council Decision aiming at lifting the remaining restrictions concerning the use of SIS by Bulgaria and Romania is a welcomed development for the participation of these two countries in the Schengen acquis. It will increase the level of security in the Schengen area and make the fight against serious crime and terrorism more effective. By eliminating all restrictions to the use of SIS, Romania and Bulgaria would be able to ensure the same level of protection of the Union external borders as other Schengen member states. The rapporteur recommends that Parliament endorse the draft Council s text without amendments to encourage the Member States to proceed speedily with the adoption of the Decision. 1 Council Decision (EU) 2017/1908 of 12 October 2017 on the putting into effect of certain provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Visa Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (OJ L 269, 19.10.2017, p. 39). PR\1145938.docx 7/7 PE618.142v01-00