RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

Similar documents
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

May 22, 2002 OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS DIVISION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

April 14, 2006 PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL

OFFICIAL MINUTES RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FORMAL COMMISSION ACTION JANUARY 23, 2004

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Case Document 664 Filed in TXSB on 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12

Article 7. Department of Environmental Quality. Part 1. General Provisions.

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains that this Ordinance is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

REVISED PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY. John Chakales, Hearings Examiner Danny Bivens, Technical Examiner

FPL FARMING, LTD. V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS, L.C.: SUBSURFACE TRESPASS IN TEXAS

CHAPTER 4 Common Law Claims NEGLIGENCE PER SE & STRICT LIABILITY

STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM (LAS) PERMIT GENERAL PERMIT NO.

CHAPTER 21 JUNEAU COUNTY ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE

Session of HOUSE BILL No. 2672

("Petitioner") requesting authority to use the Byrd Salt Dome in Greene County, Mississippi

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Sewage Disposal ARTICLE II SEWAGE RETAINING TANKS

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CLEAN-UP BYLAW NO. 8475

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. Protecting Texas by Reducing and Preventing Pollution. October 31, 2008

TITLE 58. WATERS AND WATER SUPPLY CHAPTER 10B. HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION

March 8, Re: DOCKET REFERENCE NO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT

POLICE, FIRE AND EMERGENCIES

3/12/14. TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO SUPPLY and SALES AGREEMENTS

LEGISLATIVE COUNSELʹS DIGEST

The Environmental Crimes Division

NEW HAMPSHIRE CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS. PART Env-Wq 401 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR GROUNDWATER PROTECTION

CHAPTER 32 WELL ABANDONMENT AND WELL OPERATION PERMIT

SAMPLE DOCUMENT FOR FORMATTING ILLUSTRATION ONLY JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT

RUSK COUNTY ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE

CHAPTER 30 POLICE DEPARTMENT

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside Ordains as Follows:

INSTRUCTIONS FOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The City of Florence shall administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of these regulations. Any powers granted or

Chapter 3 Gaining Entry to Inspect Sites For Actual or Suspected Pollution

CLEANUP OF CLANDESTINE DRUG LAB SITES ORDINANCE. Fillmore County

SECTION 2. BOARD: RULE 2.1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND TAXING AUTHORITY RULE 2.2 BOARD STRUCTURE, OFFICERS... 11

7.10 ANIMAL MANURE STORAGE ORDINANCE AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

Title 27A. Environment and Natural Resources Chapter 4: Emergency Response Notification Article I: Oklahoma Emergency Response Act

FINAL ORDER. Findings. Facts. Counties, A list of the wells at ( Wells ) is. ownership of the rights below a horizontal to permit

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONROE COUNTY FORTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHAPTER 25B. Change of Owner, Operator, or Guarantor for Certain Oil and Gas Facilities

OPEN-END MORTGAGE. Situate in City (Township) of, County, Ohio, and being more particularly described as follows:

FIRST READING: SECOND READING: PUBLISHED: PASSED: TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER BY LAND APPLICATION

Harris-Galveston Subsidence District. Rules

788 Act Nos LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA,

G.S Page 1

DOCKET NO ORDER

Chapter 8-12 GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF OAKLAND CITY OF SYLVAN LAKE ORDINANCE NO. 329

PENN TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NUMBER HOLDING TANKS

Ordinance Crawford County Animal Waste Management Ordinance

HENRY COUNTY PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL ORDINANCE

SOLID WASTE CODE APACHE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Panhandle Groundwater Conservation District Rules Approved March 18, 2014

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS FOR SUPPLYING MATERIALS AND SERVICES TO COCA-COLA SABCO MOZAMBIQUE (GTCCCSM)

2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.

1.11 This ordinance shall be known and referenced as the Mille Lacs County Cleanup of Clandestine Drug Lab and Chemical Dump Sites Ordinance.

CONSTRUCTION LICENSE AGREEMENT

THIS INSTRUMENT IS BEING RECORDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ. NO RECORDING FEE IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 56

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

(01/31/13) Principal Name /PIA No. PAYMENT AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT No.

ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES AND PENALTIES ACT 1989 No. ISO

GUIDE FOR SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY AUDIT PRIVILEGE ACT

ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

TOWN OF PELHAM Office of the Selectmen

WHEREAS, both parties now intend to make substantive revisions to the original agreement;

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL, QUALITY

Rules of the Rolling Plains Groundwater Conservation District

Transcription:

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 6E-0245779 ENFORCEMENT ACTION FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY LONGVIEW DISPOSAL (508525), AS TO THE PETRO-WAX, LLC (08628) LEASE, WELL NO. 1, EAST TEXAS FIELD, GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS FINAL ORDER The Commission finds that after statutory notice the captioned enforcement proceeding was heard by the examiner on April 13, 2006, and that the respondent, Longview Disposal (508525), failed to appear or respond to the notice. Pursuant to 1.49 of the Commission's General Rules of Practice and Procedure [Tex. R. R. Comm'n, 16 TEX. ADMIN. CODE 1.49] and after being duly submitted to the Railroad Commission of Texas at conference held in its offices in Austin, Texas, the Commission makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Longview Disposal (508525), ( Respondent") was given Notice of Opportunity for Hearing by certified mail, addressed to the most recent P-5 address on the Form P-5 Organization Report, which was returned to the Commission marked return to sender, unable to forward. 2. The returned certified receipt containing the Original Complaint and the Notice of Opportunity for Hearing mailed to Respondent s most recent P-5 address was returned to the Commission marked return to sender, unable to forward on March 15, 2006. The certified receipt has been on file with the Commission for 15 days, exclusive of the day of receipt and day of issuance. 3. Larry Taylor, was a person in a position of ownership or control of respondent, as defined by Texas Natural Resources Code Section 91.114, during the time period of the violations of Commission rules committed by respondent. 4. Roy Jordan, was a person in a position of ownership or control of respondent, as defined by Texas Natural Resources Code Section 91.114, during the time period of the violations of Commission rules committed by respondent 5. The violations of Commission rules committed by respondent are related to safety and the control of pollution.

6. Respondent designated itself to the Commission as the operator of Well No. 1 on the Petro-Wax, LLC (08628) Lease ( subject well / subject lease ) by filing a Form P-4 (Producers Transportation of Authority and Certificate of Compliance ) with the Commission effective on February 1, 2003. 7. According to Commission records the Respondent s Form P-5 (Organization Report) became delinquent on June 1, 2006. Respondent paid had a $25,000.00 Letter of Credit as its financial assurance at the time of its last P-5 renewal. 8. The subject well ceased disposal on or before December 2004. 9. The subject well has not been properly plugged in accordance with, and is not otherwise in compliance with, Statewide Rule 14. 10. Usable quality groundwater in the area is likely to be contaminated by migrations or discharges of saltwater and other oil and gas wastes from the subject well. Unplugged wellbores constitute a cognizable threat to the public health and safety because of the probability of pollution. 11. The total estimated cost to the State of plugging the subject well is $15,400.00. 12. A Commission district office inspection was conducted on February 18, 2005 for the Petro- Wax, LLC (08628) Lease. There was approximately 50 barrels of saltwater that had been discharged into the firewall and was seeping out. Follow up inspections were conducted on July 20, 2005, August 11, 2005 and September 21, 2005 indicating that fluids remained in the firewall. 13. No permit has been issued to the Respondent for the discharge of oil and gas wastes on or from the subject lease. 14. The unpermitted discharges of oil and gas wastes or other substances or materials on the subject lease constitute a hazard to public health and safety because leaks and spills of oil and produced waters onto soils can migrate into surface water bodies causing contamination or can leach into the ground and percolate through soils into groundwater supplies. 15. A Commission district office inspection was conducted on July 20, 2005 for the Petro-Wax, LLC (08628) Lease. Live oil and salt water had been discharged into the concrete pit beside the well. Follow up inspections conducted on August 11, 2005, September 21, 2005 and November 14, 2005 indicated that the live oil and salt water remained in the pit and had not been removed. 16. Respondent did not have a permit to dispose of or store oilfield fluids or oil and gas wastes in a pit on the subject lease.

17. The Respondent has not demonstrated good faith since it failed to plug or otherwise place the subject lease and subject well in compliance after being notified of the violations by the District Office and failed to appear at the hearing to explain its inaction. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Proper notice was issued by the Railroad Commission to respondent and to all other appropriate persons legally entitled to notice. 2. All things necessary to the Commission attaining jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties in this hearing have been performed or have occurred. 3. Respondent is in violation of Commission Statewide Rules 8(d)(1), 8(d)(2) and 14(b)(2). 4. Respondent is responsible for maintaining the subject lease in compliance with Statewide Rule 8(d)(1), which prohibits the discharge of oil and gas wastes without a permit. 5. Respondent is responsible for maintaining the subject lease in compliance with Statewide Rule 8(d)(2), which prohibits a person from maintaining or using any pit for storage of oilfield fluids without a permit. 6. Respondent is responsible for maintaining the subject lease and well in compliance with all applicable Commission rules according to Statewide Rules 14, 58, and 79 and Chapters 89 and 91 of the Texas Natural Resources Code. 7. The documented violations committed by the respondent constitute acts deemed serious, a hazard to the public health, and demonstrate a lack of good faith pursuant to TEX. NAT. RES. CODE ANN. 81.0531(c). 8. As a person in a position of ownership or control of respondent at the time respondent violated Commission rules related to safety and the control of pollution, Larry Taylor, and any other organization in which he may hold a position of ownership or control, shall be subject to the restrictions of Texas Natural Resource Code Section 91.114(a)(2) for a period of no more than seven years from the date the order entered in this matter becomes final, or until the conditions that constituted the violations herein are corrected or are being corrected in accordance with a schedule to which the Commission and the organization have agreed; and all administrative, civil, and criminal penalties and all cleanup and plugging costs incurred by the State relating to those conditions are paid or are being paid in accordance with a schedule to which the Commission and the organization have agreed, whichever is earlier.

9. As a person in a position of ownership or control of respondent at the time respondent violated Commission rules related to safety and the control of pollution, Roy Jordan, and any other organization in which he may hold a position of ownership or control, shall be subject to the restrictions of Texas Natural Resource Code Section 91.114(a)(2) for a period of no more than seven years from the date the order entered in this matter becomes final, or until the conditions that constituted the violations herein are corrected or are being corrected in accordance with a schedule to which the Commission and the organization have agreed; and all administrative, civil, and criminal penalties and all cleanup and plugging costs incurred by the State relating to those conditions are paid or are being paid in accordance with a schedule to which the Commission and the organization have agreed, whichever is earlier. IT IS ORDERED THAT within 30 days from the day immediately following the date this order becomes final: 1. Longview Disposal (508525), shall plug or otherwise place the Petro-Wax, LLC (08628) Lease, Well No. 1, East Texas Field, Gregg County, Texas in compliance with applicable Commission rules and regulations; and 2. The Disposal Permit No. 07630, for Well No. 1 on the Petro-Wax, LLC (08628) Lease should be cancelled. 3. Longview Disposal (508525), shall pay to the Railroad Commission of Texas, for disposition as provided by law, an administrative penalty in the amount of THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($3,500.00). It is further ORDERED by the Commission that this order shall not be final and effective until 20 days after a party is notified of the Commission s order. A party is presumed to have been notified of the Commission s order three days after the date on which the notice is actually mailed. If a timely motion for rehearing is filed by any party at interest, this order shall not become final and effective until such motion is overruled, or if such motion is granted, this order shall be subject to further action by the Commission. Pursuant to TEX. GOV'T CODE 2001.146(e), the time allotted for Commission action on a motion for rehearing in this case prior to its being overruled by operation of law, is hereby extended until 90 days from the date the parties are notified of the order. All requested findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not expressly adopted herein are denied. All pending motions and requests for relief not previously granted or granted herein are denied.

Noncompliance with the provisions of this order is subject to enforcement by the Attorney General and subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000.00 per day per violation. Done this 22nd day of August 2006. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS MH/sa (Signatures affixed by Default Master Order dated August 22, 2006)