Case 4:08-cv JSW Document 767 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

I will continue to provide updates to creditors as relevant matters arise.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :59 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 7

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

No. S IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. KRISTIN M. PERRY et ai., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

Case3:06-md VRW Document738-5 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 8

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 613 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case4:08-cv JSW Document280 Filed09/18/14 Page1 of 12

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 122 Filed 10/30/2006 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 16 EXHIBIT 25

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:12-cv MEJ Document5 Filed01/18/12 Page1 of 5

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT 9

Case4:08-cv JSW Document320 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No.

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 26

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv CG-B Document 18 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 203 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:96-cv TFH-GMH Document 4234 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case4:07-cv SBA Document32 Filed06/20/08 Page1 of 21

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

Case 1:13-cv TSC-DAR Document 104 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2010 INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2010

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Case 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 87 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 6

U.S. District Court California Northern District (Oakland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:12-cv SBA

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

Case4:13-cv JSW Document122 Filed10/31/14 Page1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:12-cv EMC

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Charles Edward Lincoln, pro se 603 Elmwood Place, Suite #6 Austin, Texas Tel:

NOS , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNDER SEAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2014

Case 4:16-cv DMR Document 1 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

)

Case 9:03-cv KAM Document 2795 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2014 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08-cv VBF-PLA

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

PlainSite. Legal Document. Arizona District Court Case No. 4:11-cv Carreon v. Toyota Financial Services Corporation et al.

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-cv Lardner v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. Document 42.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case3:10-cv WHA Document1210 Filed06/20/12 Page1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

Case 3:05-cv J-WMC Document 70-1 Filed 01/24/2007 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

Case 3:18-cv CWR-FKB Document 58 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

* IN THE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AFFIDAVIT OF N. TUCKER MENEELY

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-0-JSW Document Filed 0// Page of STEVEN AMES BROWN Entertainment Law Grand View Avenue San Francisco, California - /-00 Tele /-0 Fax sabrown@entertainmentlaw.com THERESE Y. CANNATA, SBN 0 Cannata, Ching & O Toole, LLP 0 Pine Street San Francisco, California /0-00 Tele /0-0 Fax tcannata@ccolaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION STEVEN AMES BROWN, CIVIL NO. 0-0 JSW (MEJ) Plaintiff, v. Related Case: - JSW (MEJ) ANDREW B. STROUD, an individual and dba STROUD PRODUCTIONS AND ENTERPRISES, INC. Defendant. / METHVEN & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff SCARLETT PARADIES-STROUD, ET AL, Defendants / ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PENDING CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT -0-

Case :0-cv-0-JSW Document Filed 0// Page of SUMMARY A third settlement conference was held in the within matters on December,. The docket entry for that date unequivocally states that the claims as between Plaintiff Brown, the Simone Estate and Sony Music have been resolved. Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley: Settlement Conference held on //. Case settled. Written settlement agreements were signed. Inexplicably, Sony Music refuses to execute a stipulation dismissing those claims. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff Brown administratively moves for entry of an order requiring Sony Music to show cause why the pending claims should not be dismissed as moot. DECLARATION OF STEVEN AMES BROWN I, STEVEN AMES BROWN, declare:. I am the Plaintiff in Brown v. Stroud and a defendant in Methven v. Paradise- Stroud.. The docket entry above-quoted accurately reflects the result of the December, settlement conference. The Simone Estate and I entered into a written settlement agreement with Sony Music which resolved all of our pending claims in these related cases.. Shortly after the settlement agreement was executed we discovered a clerical error in the way one exhibit was incorporated into the body of the document. On or about December, the parties executed a written amendment to the settlement which corrected the clerical error.. On January, the Court signed the order directing the Clerk to distribute the physical property that had been deposited in the interpleader action. Methven v. Paradise-Stroud, Document. --

Case :0-cv-0-JSW Document Filed 0// Page of. With all pending claims having been resolved by a written settlement agreement and the deposited physical items ordered disbursed by the Court, we had no further business before this Court and it was time for the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal. So, on January, I sent a draft stipulation of dismissal to Sony Music. I attach a true copy as Exhibit. I sent the draft to Sony Music a second time on February th. Sony has failed to comment on the draft.. Instead, Sony has requested a fourth settlement conference. I advised Judge Corely, in an email circulated to Sony, that I did not wish to participate in any further settlement conferences. Furthermore, owing to an unfortunate accident one of Sony s trial counsel, Ms. Greer, wasn t even available for such a conference.. From what Sony has made known to me, it appears their purpose in seeking a fourth settlement conference is to renegotiate the signed settlement agreement and obtain further unilateral concessions from the Simone Estate and me. Now that all pending claims have been resolved by a written contract, there is no judicial function to be served by further proceedings. Indeed, there is no longer any case or controversy.. I am acutely aware of how generous the Court has been to date, allowing us two additional settlement conferences to document a settlement read into the record on October,. I cannot think of a justification for potentially depriving another litigant of the opportunity to have a judicially supervised settlement conference so that we can revisit a signed agreement that disposed of all of our pending claims.. Also, I have a number of pending motions requesting the unsealing of documents and Sony has a number of motions requesting the sealing of documents to which I have objected. Those motions do not become moot until the pending claims are dismissed.. I ask that the Court enter the requested order directing Sony to show cause why the pending claims should not be dismissed as moot. Pursuant to the laws of the United States, I declare under penalty of perjury the --

Case :0-cv-0-JSW Document Filed 0// Page of foregoing is true and correct. Dated: February, /X/ STEVEN AMES BROWN --

Case :0-cv-0-JSW Document Filed 0// Page of Pursuant to Local Rule -(a)() please see the last page for a listing of parties represented UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION STEVEN AMES BROWN, v. Plaintiff, ANDREW B. STROUD, an individual and dba STROUD PRODUCTIONS AND ENTERPRISES, INC. Defendant. / METHVEN & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, CIVIL NO. 0-0 JSW (DMR) CIVIL NO. - JSW (MEJ) v. Plaintiff. STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS SCARLETT PARADISE-STROUD, et. al., Defendants / Stip & [Proposed] Order Dismissing Claims Page 0 Exhibit

Case :0-cv-0-JSW Document Filed 0// Page of Steven Ames Brown ( Brown ), San Pasqual Fiduciary Trust Company as administrator of the Estate of Nina Simone ( Simone Estate ) and Sony Music Entertainment ( Sony Music ) hereby stipulate as follows: Brown, the Simone Estate and Sony Music hereby dismiss with prejudice all claims each of them has made against the other in these proceedings, including but not limited to Brown v. Stroud, Documents, 0 and, and Methven v. Paradise-Stroud, Documents and 0, including the sealed versions thereof, with each party bearing its own costs and attorney s fees. These dismissals do not affect any claims against any other party, or the judgment and amendment thereof entered in Brown v. Stroud, Documents 0 and. Dated: January, STEVEN AMES BROWN Entertainment Law Grand View Avenue San Francisco, California - /-00 Tele /-0 Fax sabrown@entertainmentlaw.com Respectfully submitted, /s/ STEVEN AMES BROWN, Plaintiff in pro se /s/ DOROTHY M. WEBER, Shukat, Arrow, Hafer, Weber &, LLP, Attorneys for the Estate of Nina Simone /s/ JULIA GREER, COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP, Attorneys for Reply Counterdefendant Sony Music Entertainment erroneously sued as Sony Music Holdings, Inc. Stip & [Proposed] Order Dismissing Claims Page Exhibit

Case :0-cv-0-JSW Document Filed 0// Page of THERESE Y. CANNATA SBN 0 Cannata, Ching & O Toole, LLP 0 Pine Street San Francisco, California /0-00 Tele /0-0 Fax tcannata@ccolaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Brown DOROTHY M. WEBER, pro hac vice Shukat, Arrow, Hafer, Weber & Herbsman, LLP West th Street, Suite New York, New York 0 /-0 Tele /- Fax dorothy@musiclaw.com Attorneys for Estate of Nina Simone JULIA GREER, Esq. (Bar No. 0) COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 0 San Francisco, CA - /-00 Tele /- Fax jdg@cpdb.com Attorneys for Reply Counterdefendant Sony Music Entertainment, Erroneously sued as Sony Music Holdings, Inc. It is so ordered. [PROPOSED] ORDER Dated: United States District Judge Stip & [Proposed] Order Dismissing Claims Page Exhibit