GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATIONS OF IMMIGRATION LAW LAW 235 SPRING 2013

Similar documents
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATIONS OF IMMIGRATION LAW LAW 235 SPRING 2012

GEORGE MASON SCHOOL OF LAW Immigration Law Law 235 Fall Syllabus

Gaffar v. Atty Gen USA

GEORGE MASON SCHOOL OF LAW Immigration Law Law 235 Fall Syllabus

GEORGE MASON SCHOOL OF LAW Immigration Law Law 235 Fall Syllabus

IMMIGRATION LAW COURSE NUMBER 5297 FALL 2015 PROFESSOR MAURICE HEW, JR.

n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild

REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER INA 240

CANCELLATION OF REMOVAL

New York University School of Law Fall Adam B. Cox Vanderbilt Hall 509

WINTER 2011 IMMIGRATION LAW LAW A577 Tuesday/Thursday 3:30-5:20 Room 207

AFTER TPS: OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Agency No. A versus

Phone# & UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW SPRING 2015 COURSE OUTLINE

ABA Pro Bono Training: The Essentials of Immigration Court Representation Introduction to Immigration Court Proceedings

Screening TPS Beneficiaries for Other Potential Forms of Immigration Relief. By AILA s Vermont Service Center Liaison Committee 1

UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW SPRING 2016 COURSE OUTLINE

Matter of M-A-F- et al., Respondents

Federico Flores v. Atty Gen USA

NW AILA CLE Seattle, WA. Identifying Relief for Clients in Removal Proceedings

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. In the Matter of: ) Brief in Support of N-336 Request

Interoffice Memorandum

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Grounds of Inadmissibility, INA 212(a) Adjustment in Removal; Re-Adjustment of LPR. Aggravated Felonies and Admissibility

Chapter 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO HARDSHIP AND THE MANUAL. This chapter includes:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Follow this and additional works at:

Course Syllabus Family Immigration Law University of Houston Law Center Spring Clinical Prof. Janet Beck

DACA LEGAL SERVICES TOOLKIT Practice Advisory 6 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. BIA Nos. A & A

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

Syllabus: Immigration Law and Business Spring University of Houston Law Center Prof. Janet B. Beck

United States Court of Appeals

OVERVIEW OF REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER INA 240

Asylum and Refugee Provisions

Shahid Qureshi v. Atty Gen USA

Department of Homeland Security Delegation Number: Issue Date: 06/05/2003 DELEGATION TO THE BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES

FALSE CLAIMS TO U.S. CITIZENSHIP: CONSEQUENCES AND POSSIBLE DEFENSES 1 (July 2014) by Jessica Chicco and Zahava Stern 2

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUMEI HUANG, Petitioner, LORETTA LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

Hacer Cakmakci v. Atty Gen USA

Termination of the Central American Minors Parole Program

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Raquel Castillo-Torres petitions for review of an order by the Board of

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: February 18, 2016 Decided: July 29, 2016) Docket No.

Voluntary Departure: When the Consequences of Failing to Depart Should and Should Not Apply

PRACTICE ADVISORY 1 U VISA INADMISSIBILITY WAIVERS IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS. By the National Immigrant Justice Center December 2017 INTRODUCTION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE

Matter of Z. VALDEZ, Respondent

Matter of Enrique CASTREJON-COLINO, Respondent

Immigration Consequences of Criminal Activity

BIA and Circuit Court Appeals Pro Bono Immigration Training San Francisco, CA August 8, 2013

Matter of Khanh Hoang VO, Respondent

Asylum in the Context of Expedited Removal

Chapter 1 CHAPTER 1 REMEDIES AND STRATEGIES FOR PERMANENT RESIDENT CLIENTS. This chapter includes:

Alpha Jalloh v. Atty Gen USA

Immigrant Defense Project

SYLLABUS Immigration Law (5389) University of Houston Law Center Professor: Geoffrey Hoffman Spring 2018 Jan. 17th-Apr. 25th

APPLYING FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS AFTER REENTERING THE UNITED STATES WITHOUT BEING ADMITTED: I-212s, 245(i) and VAWA 2005

Owen Johnson v. Attorney General United States

WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY

A "Fundamentally Unfair" Removal Proceeding: Denial of Due Process and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Contreras v.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Foreword...v Acknowledgments...ix Table of Decisions Index...367

Flor Bermudez, Esq. Transgender Law Center P.O. Box Oakland, CA (510)

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, 4TH ED.

Interoffice Memorandum

Astrit Zhuleku v. Atty Gen USA

USCIS GIVES DE FACTO ACCEPTANCE TO EMERGING VIEW OF CSPA PROVISIONS IN INA 203(h)(3)

Follow this and additional works at:

PRACTICE ADVISORY. April 21, Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano

United States Court of Appeals

PRACTICE ADVISORY 1. February 20, 2017

Case No APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Agency No. A

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

SYLLABUS Immigration Law (5389) University of Houston Law Center Professor: Geoffrey Hoffman Fall 2018 Aug. 20-Nov. 26

Kwame Dwumaah v. Attorney General United States

Immigration-Related Document Fraud: Overview of Civil, Criminal, and Immigration Consequences

Update: The LPR Bars to 212(h) To Whom Do They Apply?

Losseny Dosso v. Attorney General United States

Fnu Evah v. Attorney General United States

Our Mission Statement:

Looking Beyond DACA/DAPA Part 1: Advance Parole June 28, 2016

IMMIGRATION LAW. Professor Cinthia I. Rivera University of La Verne College of Law Summer 2018 CLASS SYLLABUS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Carrera-Garrido v. Atty Gen USA

ARTICLE MISSED OPPORTUNITIES AND SECOND CHANCES: APPELLATE LITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS IN REINSTATEMENT CASES.

In the Supreme Court of the United States

BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION AND THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE RESPONDENT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Okado v. Atty Gen USA

CHAPTER 2 Inadmissibility, Deportability, Waivers, and Relief from Removal

Overview of Immigration and the Law

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Agency No. A

Below are some of the housekeeping items, including our course text and other details which you should keep in mind this summer. Please read closely.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Agency No. A

United States Court of Appeals

5 Motions before the Immigration Court

CLINIC Newsletter October 2017

OVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES ANALYSIS

CRS Report for Congress

Jiang v. Atty Gen USA

Transcription:

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATIONS OF IMMIGRATION LAW LAW 235 SPRING 2013 Adjunct Professors: Board Member Anne J. Greer Telephone: (703) 605-1390 Office Hours: By appointment Teresa L. Donovan tldonovan@earthlink.net Telephone: (703) 605-5239 Office Hours: By appointment Required Texts: Anne J. Greer and Teresa L. Donovan Foundations of Immigration Law. 2013 Bender s Immigration and Nationality Act Pamphlet. 2013 Grading Method: Grading will be based on the following: Class participation 15% Application Exercise 15% (Topic assigned March 19 and due on April 18) Final exam 70% 1

Case Preparation Guidelines: The text, Foundations of Immigration Law, consists of a series of topic narratives and administrative and judicial cases that cover the fundamentals of immigration law. Please be able to outline the case according to the following format. In addition, there are specific questions contained in the text that accompany each case. 1. Identify the type of immigration proceeding We will study several different forms of immigration proceeding, e.g., visa petition proceedings and removal proceedings. You will need to understand the type of proceeding involved. 2. Procedural posture Explain the procedural posture of the case, including identifying the forum in which the case began and tracing its progress to different levels of administrative and judicial review, as applicable. 3. Relevant charges in cases that involve removal, exclusion or deportation proceedings Identify the grounds of inadmissibility or deportability charged. Be able to specify the statutory sections. 4. Forms of relief from removal Identify any forms of relief that the alien requested. Be able to specify the statutory sections. 5. Facts Summarize the relevant facts. 6. Issue identification Identify the issues on appeal, and the parties legal arguments for each issue. 7. Legal Analysis Evaluate the Board or court s analysis of the legal arguments raised. 8. Outcome Identify the holding(s) of the Board or the court on each issue. 2

Class Assignments: Date Topic Statutory Cites Materials to be Read Before Class 1-8-13 History 212(a) 237(a) Introduction: Disclaimer Foundations of Immigration Law: Table of Contents AILA s Bibliography AILA s Definitions & Concepts Appendix A: Case Preparation Guidelines Appendix B: Board of Immigration Appeals ------------------------------------------------------------ Text: Chapter 1 Ping v. United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889). Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893). Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86 (1903). 1-10-13 Foundation Cases United States Ex. Rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537 (1950). Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206 (1953). Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). 1-15-13 Foundation Cases Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580 (1952). Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972). 3

1-17-13 Nonimmigrants: Visa Classification & Admission Procedures 101(a)(15)(B), (E), 217 Text: Chapter 2 Matter of Hira, 11 I&N Dec. 824 (BIA 1965). Lauvik v. INS, 910 F.2d 658 (9th Cir. 1990). E regulations 8 C.F.R. 214.2(e) 1-22-13 Nonimmigrants: Visa Classification & Admission Procedures continued 101(a)(15)(H), (L), (O) & (P) 101(a)(44) 212(n) 214(b), (c)(2) (g), (h) and (i) 1-24-13 Nonimmigrants: Visa Classification & Admission Procedures continued 221, 222, 235, 248 EG Enterprises, Inc. v. DHS, 467 F. Supp. 2d 728 (2006). H-1B regulations 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h) Matter of Chartier, 16 I&N Dec. 284 (BIA 1977). L Regulations 8 C.F.R. 214.2(l) O Regulations 8 C.F.R. 214.2(o) P Regulations 8 C.F.R. 214.2(p) Matter of Healy and Goodchild, 17 I&N Dec. 22 (BIA 1979). Problem. 1-29-13 Family-based (FB) immigrant visas 201(b)(2)(A)(i) 101(b)(1) 203(a ) and (d) 216(b) and (c) Text: Chapter 3 Chart: Acquiring LPR Status via Family Based Visa petition. Department of State Visa Bulletin (Dec. 2012). Fiallo v. Bell, 430 U.S. 787 (1977). Matter of Laureano, 19 I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 1983). Matter of Torres, 22 I&N Dec. 28 (BIA 1998). Matter of Anderson, 20 I&N Dec. 888 (BIA 1998). 1-31-13 Continuation of FB visas 4

2-5-13 Employment-based (EB) immigrant visas 203(b) 212(a)(5)(A)(i)(I) and (II) Chart: Acquiring LPR Status via Employment Based Visa Petition. 8 C.F.R. 204.5. 2-7-13 Continuation of EB visas EB-3; Labor certification process; visa petition process Muni v. INS, 891 F. Supp. 440 (N.D. Ill. 1995). Sunshine Rehab Services, Inc. v. USCIS, 2010 WL 3325442 (E.D. Mich. 2010). Hoosier Care, Inc. v Chertoff, 482 F.3d 987 (7th Cir. 2007). 2-12-13 Acquiring & Losing LPR Status 221, 222 235 245 246 Text: Chapter 4 Matter of Quilantan, 25 I&N Dec. 285 (BIA 2010). Matter of Hall, 18 I&N Dec. 203 (BIA 1982). Bradley v. US Att y Gen., 603- F.3d 235 (3d Cir. 2010). 2-14-13 Acquiring & Losing LPR Status continued Matter of Jara Riero, 24 I&N Dec. 267 (BIA 2007). Matter of Huang, 19 I&N Dec. 230 (BIA 1988). 2-19-13 Admission & Admissibility 101(a)(13)(A), (B), and (C) 212(a)(1), (2), (3)(B) 212(d)(3)(A), (B) 212(g) 212(h) Text: Chapter 5 Chart: Selected Grounds of Inadmissibility & Corresponding Waivers. Matter of K-, 7 I&N Dec. 549 (BIA 1957). Matter of Michel, 21 I&N Dec. 1101(BIA 1998). Matter of Hranka, 16 I&N Dec. 491 (BIA 1976). 5

2-21-13 Admission & Admissibility continued 212(a)(6) 212(d)(11) Abufayad v. Holder, 632 F.3d 623 (9 th Cir. 2011). Aguilar Gonzales v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 2008). 2-26-13 Admission & Admissibility continued 212(a)(5), (7), (9) 212(i), (k) 217 2-28-13 Grounds of Deportability 237(a) 101(a)(13)(A), (B) and (C) 101(a)(43)(A) - (U) Matter of Cervantes, 22 I&N Dec. 560 (BIA 1999). Text: Chapter 6 Matter of Tobar-Lobo, 24 I&N Dec. 143 (BIA 2007). Flores-Arellano v. INS, 5 F.3d 360 (9th Cir. 1993). Matter of Aruna, 24 I&N Dec. 452 (BIA 2008). 3-5-13 Continuation of deportability: Matter of Garcia-Madruga, 24 I&N Dec. 436 (BIA 2008). Matter of Ramos, 23 I&N Dec. 336 (BIA 2002)._ 3-7-13 Conviction 101(a)(48)(A) and (B) Text: Chapter 7 Matter of Punu, 22 I&N Dec. 224 (BIA 1998). Matter of Roldan, 22 I&N Dec. 512 (BIA 1999). 3-12-13 3-14-13 Spring Break 6

3-19-13 Relief from Removal: cancellation of removal 240(A) Text: Chapter 8 Matter of Koloamantangi, 23 I&N Dec. 548 (BIA 2003). Matter of Blancas-Lara, 23 I&N Dec. 458 (BIA 2002). Matter of Campos-Torres, 22 I&N Dec. 1289 (BIA 2000). Matter of C-V-T, 22 I&N Dec. 7 (BIA 1998). Matter of Monreal, 23 I&N Dec. 56 (BIA 2001). 3-21-13 Relief from Removal: voluntary departure 240B Text: Chapter 9 Text: Chapter 9 8 C.F.R. 1240.26 Matter of Arguelles, 22 I&N Dec. 811 (BIA 1999). Matter of Cordova, 22 I&N Dec. 966 (BIA 1999). Matter of Ocampo, 22 I&N Dec. 1301 (BIA 2000). 3-26-13 Relief from Removal: adjustment of status 245(a), (c) and (e) Text: Chapter 10 Text: Chapter 10 Matter of Mendez, 21 I&N Dec. 296 (BIA 1996). Matter of Velarde, 23 I&N Dec. 253 (BIA 2002). Matter of Hashmi, 24 I&N Dec. 785 (BIA 2009). 7

3-28-13 Asylum, Withholding of Removal & the Convention Against Torture Part One: Asylum 101(a)(42) 208 241(b)(3) Text: Chapter 11 Chart: Compare asylum with withholding of removal. 8 C.F.R. 1208.13 Matter of M-Z-M-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 28 (BIA 2012). Matter of L-S-, 25 I&N Dec. 705 (BIA 2012). Matter of J-B-N- & S-M-, 24 I&N Dec. 208 (BIA 2007). 4-2-13 Asylum, Withholding of Removal & the Convention Against Torture continued Matter of N-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 526 (BIA 2011). Matter of S-E-G-, 24 I&N Dec. 579 (BIA 2008). Matter of E-A-, 26 I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 2012). 4-4-13 Asylum, Withholding of Removal & the Convention Against Torture continued Matter of D-X- & Y-Z-, 25 I&N Dec. 664 (BIA 2012). 8 C.F.R. 1208.18 Matter of J-E-, 23 I&N Dec. 291 (BIA 2002). Ramirez-Peyro v. Holder, 574 F.3d 893 (8 th Cir. 2009). 4-9-13 Removal Procedure 239 240 Text: Chapter 12 Matter of M-R-A-, 24 I&N Dec. 665 (BIA 2008). Matter of Lozada, 19 I&N Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). Kiareldeen v. Ashcroft, 273 F.3d 542 (3rd Cir. 2001). INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984). 8

4-11-13 Motions & Administrative Appellate Review 240(a)(6)(A),(B) & (C) Text: Chapter 13 8 C.F.R. 1003.23, Reopening or reconsideration before the Immigration Court INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94 (1988). Matter of O-S-G-, 24 I&N Dec. 56 (BIA 2006). 8 C.F.R. 1003.1, General authorities. 4-16-13 Judicial Review Section of the Act: 242 4-18-13 United States Citizenship 101(c) 301, 309 312, 316, 318, and 334(b)(1) 320 Max-George v. INS, 205 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 2000). Matter of Cerna, 20 I&N Dec. 399 (BIA 1991) (appendix) Text: Chapter 14 Zheng v. Chertoff, 2008 WL 4899342 (E.D. Pa). Matter of Hines, 24 I&N Dec. 544 (BIA 2008). 9

Application Exercise: Once an alien s inadmissibility under section 212(a) of the Act or deportability under section 237(a) of the Act has been established, the issue arises of whether the alien is eligible for a form of relief from (or an exception to) removability. You will be assigned to report on a specific section of the Immigration and Nationality Act waiving or excepting removability as listed below. Your assignment will be to prepare a short paper (4-8 typed pages, double spacing, with appropriate headings) analyzing this section of the statute. The purpose of this exercise is for you to be able to explain how your statutory waiver/exception provision operates and for what purpose. Your paper should address the following, as applicable: Purpose of the waiver Statutory bars to eligibility Statutory eligibility requirements Discretionary requirements, including how discretion is exercised Application process, including identifying the forum in which to apply and whether a form (with accompanying documentation) is required. A hypothetical fact scenario in which an alien would qualify to apply for the waiver or exception You will need to examine and cite the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions, as well as pertinent case law, from the Board of Immigration Appeals and the federal courts. 10