Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Michael A. Brusca, Shareholder, Stark & Stark, Lawrenceville, N.J.

Similar documents
Deposing Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Witnesses

Drafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes

Defeating Liability Waivers in Personal Injury Cases: Substantive and Procedural Strategies

Summary Judgment Motions: Advanced Strategies for Civil Litigation

Leveraging USPTO Technology Evolution Pilot Program

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Insurance Declaratory Judgment Actions and the Federal Abstention Doctrine: Strategies and Limitations

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Satya Narayan, Attorney, Royse Law Firm, Palo Alto, Calif.

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy: Reconciling the Conflicting Goals of Bankruptcy and Environmental Laws

Defeating Rule 23(b)(3)'s Predominance Requirement Using Defenses and Counterclaims

Mexico's New Anti-Corruption Laws and Implementing Regulations: Private Entities and Individuals in the Crosshairs

Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership Interests

E-Discovery and Spoliation Issues: Litigation Pitfalls, Duty to Preserve, and Claw-Back Agreements

Lay Witness and Expert Witness Depositions in Personal Injury Cases: Advanced Deposition Techniques

Strategic Use of Joint Defense Agreements in Litigation: Avoiding Disqualification and Privilege Waivers

Litigating Employment Discrimination

Preparing for and Navigating PTAB Appeals Before the Federal Circuit

Appellate Practice: Identifying Issues for Appeal, Drafting Questions Presented, and Briefing the Issues

New Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: Impact on Chapter 7, 12 and 13 Secured Creditors

Extraterritorial Reach of Lanham Act and Protection of IP Rights: Pursuing Foreign Infringers

Witness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses

HIPAA Compliance During Litigation and Discovery

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

Discovery Strategies in Wage and Hour Class and Collective Actions Before and After Certification of Putative Class

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions in Employment Litigation

Challenging Unfavorable ICANN Objection and Application Decisions

Provisional Patent Applications: Preserving IP Rights in First-to-File System

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Wilson Chu, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, Dallas

Article III Standing and Rule 23(b)(3) Certification: Emerging Litigation Trends

Navigating Section 112 Issues in IPR Proceedings: Using Section 112 as a Sword or a Shield

Spoliation of Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: Mitigation and Prevention

Structuring MOUs, LOIs, Term Sheets and Other Nonbinding Legal Documents

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions Responding to a Deposition Notice, Selecting and Preparing Witnesses

Law Amendment and the FCPA Best Practices for Responding to a Chinese Government Commercial Bribery Investigation

Third-Party Legal Opinions in Corporate Transactions

Navigating Jurisdictional Determinations Under the Clean Water Act: Impact of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes

Evidentiary Disclosures in Parallel Criminal and Civil Proceedings

Closing Argument Practice Tips

Impeachment of Witnesses in Civil Litigation: Strategies for Discrediting Adverse Witnesses

PRP Contribution Claims Under CERCLA Strategies for Cost Recovery Against Other Potentially Responsible Parties

Solving the CERCLA Statute of Limitations and Preemption Puzzles

PREPARING, TAKING AND APPLYING MEDICAL TESTIMONY TO SUPPORT A PERSONAL INJURY CASE

FCRA Class Actions in Employment on the Rise: Avoiding and Defending Claims

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Managing Patent Infringement Risk in Product Development

UCC Articles 8 and 9 and the Hague Securities Convention: Investment Property Update

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Breach of Employment Contract Litigation: Contract Interpretation, Materiality of Breach, Defenses, Damages

Navigating Section 112 Issues in IPR Proceedings: Using Section 112 as a Sword or a Shield

E-Signatures and Electronic Loan Documentation: Complying with ESIGN/UETA, Interplay With the UCC

Structuring MOUs, LOIs, Term Sheets and Other Preliminary Agreements

Structuring Trademark Coexistence Agreements: Evaluating and Negotiating Agreements to Resolve Trademark Disputes

Patent Infringement Claims and Opinions of Counsel Leveraging Opinion Letters to Reduce the Risks of Liability and Enhanced Damages

Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media

Effective Discovery Strategies in Class Action Litigation Leveraging Trends and Best Practices for Depositions, Expert Witnesses and E-Discovery

Qui Tam Actions: Guidance for Counsel for Managing Whistleblower Suits

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16

Opinions of Counsel in Cross-Border Financial Transactions

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics

Leveraging Post-Grant Patent Proceedings Before the PTAB

Pleading Standards, Affirmative Defenses and Motions to Dismiss in Federal Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

Preparing Witnesses for Deposition: Overcoming Challenges With 30(b)(6) Representatives and Fact and Expert Witnesses

Focus on Leadership: SPAN Liaison

Dynamic Opening Statements How to Establish Credibility and Persuade From the Beginning

Standards Related Patents and Standard Setting Organizations Navigating the Challenges of SSOs: Licensing, Disclosure and Litigation

Elder Care Incapacity Planning: Advanced Directives and POLSTS, POAs, Controversial End-of-Life Healthcare Decisions

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

Direct Examination Tips

RLUIPA Land Use Claims: Latest Litigation Trends and Key Case Law Developments

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Expert Witnesses: Leveraging New Rule 26 Amendments Preserving Work Product Immunity for Expert Opinions and Reports

Adding a Little Bit of Hollywood to Your Trial

Perfecting and Maintaining Article 9 Security Interests

State Wage and Hour Class Actions Navigating Procedural and Substantive Challenges in Pursuing or Defending Dual Filed Claims

PERSONAL INJURY DEFENSE. Six Humble Suggestions. Successfully. By Clifford L. Harrison

Design Patents and IPR: Challenging and Defending Validity at the PTAB

To gain access to the available handouts please click the handout tab then double click the document to download.

Social Media Evidence in Personal Injury Litigation: Admissibility Challenges

FRCP 45 Third-Party Subpoenas: Using or Objecting to Subpoenas to Obtain Testimony and Evidence

Patent Reexamination: The New Strategy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Proceedings

V.-E. DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

PROSECUTING CHILD ABUSE. Dan Patterson Prosecuting Attorney Greene County Prosecutor s Office July 18, 2017

Leveraging the AIA s Joinder Provision, Recent Decisions, and New Court Procedures in Defending Infringement Disputes

[The following paragraph should be given when the court gives the final instructions after the closing arguments:

A Survivor s Guide. to Sexual Assault Prosecution. Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service

Section 112 Issues in IPR Proceedings: Using Section 112 as a Sword or a Shield

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED MAY 2, 2007

Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement

Statistical Evidence in Employment Class Actions After Tyson Foods

New ERISA Supreme Court Rulings in Conkright and Hardt Leveraging Court Guidance on Deferential Review Standards and Attorney Fee Awards

Printable Lesson Materials

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Personal Injury Opening Statements and Closing Arguments: Preparing and Delivering, Handling Objections and Related Motions Developing and Presenting a Persuasive Roadmap, Delivering a Convincing and Memorable Case Summation WEDNESDAY, APRIL 12, 2017 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Michael A. Brusca, Shareholder, Stark & Stark, Lawrenceville, N.J. Robert F. Glass, Partner, Glass & Robson, Atlanta The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-871-8924 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email that you will receive immediately following the program. For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.

Program Materials FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the ^ symbol next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

Opening Statements, Motions, and Closing Argument Michael A. Brusca Stark & Stark NJ and PA 609.996.9060 mbrusca@stark-stark.com

OPENING STATEMENTS 6

Why Important Opening salvo Up to 65% - 80% of jurors reach the verdict they ultimately render Opening Statement 7

What can it give you? Showcase your abilities Organized Gain the moral high ground Opening Statement 8

Tell it, don t sell it You can t advocate You don t have the right Opening Statement 9

Avoid my client s sad story Low activation emotion Focus on the defendant Fear, anger, disgust and hope High activation emotion Opening Statement 10

Begin about three weeks out Follow an outline Cohesive Good transitions Bring my outline up with me Basic Structure No mention of client Rules Terms Story Defenses Opening Statement 11

Folks, I ask you to keep an open mind because, obviously, I talk to you last. I get up here, question witnesses after they re done, when -- Mike was giving his opening, I saw some of you were shaking your heads. I don t know what was going on in your minds but you were shaking your heads. I beg you to keep an open mind on this case. I beg you. Opening Statement 12

MOTIONS 13

Be clear and succinct Preliminary statement less than 40 words Keep it as short as possible Who are you writing for? Clerk maybe with 1,000 motions to read Motions 14

Explain it like someone is 6 Avoid citing 100 cases Short paragraphs, lots of white space Motions 15

Concede the obvious and don t over-reach Gain credibility Motions 16

Attachments cut and pasted in document Avoid see exhibit Motions 17

Closing Argument 18

You can now advocate Your Perry Mason moments Witness credibility Use the instructions Closing Argument 19

Cohesive Usually have and idea before trial Follow opening Use same documents Good transitions Closing Argument 20

What I avoid Don t re-hash the case Don t comment on defense counsel s argument Closing Argument 21

Give the jury what they need If someone tells you you can remind them Closing Argument 22

Personal Injury Opening Statements and Closing Arguments: Preparing and Delivering, Handling Objections, and Related Motions April 12, 2017 Webinar Robert F. Glass Glass & Robson, LLC Atlanta, GA www.glassrobson.com

Opening Statements: Key Elements Storytelling Credibility Explaining why you are there Begin to dismantle defenses Set reasonable expectations Empower the jury as the last chance for hope for your client 24

Opening Statements: Key Elements Storytelling Use the present tense Keep it interesting with adjectives and descriptive words Get the jury s attention and establish a theme early on Practice, practice, practice 25

Opening Statements: Key Elements Credibility First impressions go a long way Be an advocate but don t over advocate without having established your credibility to the jury Be respectful of the jurors and your opposition 26

Opening Statements: Key Elements Why are We Here? Establish yourself as the leader of the trial Begin Dismantling Defenses What can you expect to hear from the opposition Let s put that in perspective Setting Expectations Do not overpromise Empowering the Jury Emphasize the importance of their role 27

Opening Statements: Demonstratives Is a picture is worth 1,000 words? Option 1: Tell the Story: Because of the wreck, Ms. Smith had to have some plates put in her neck to secure her spine after the surgery Option 2: Show the Story... 28

29

Opening Statements: Using Opposing Party s Pleadings Opposing counsel rarely expects to see their pleading responses after they have been filed Using their own words against them seems to get the attention of the jury, especially when it contradicts what the lawyer will say In an injury case, how often do you hear the defense say, we accept responsibility for the wreck? What are they accepting responsibility for? 30

IN THE STATE COURT OF STATE OF GEORGIA COUNTY CHRISTINE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION ) v. ) FILE NO. ) ANGELA ) ) Defendants. ) ) Please admit the following: REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION 10. Please admit that you are liable to Plaintiff for the physical and emotional pain and suffering she has incurred and will incur as a result of the subject collision. Response: Denies. 11. Please admit that you are liable to Plaintiff for the medical expenses she has incurred and will incur as a result of the subject collision. Response: Denies. 31

Opening Statement Pitfalls Over-promising and under-delivering; Using legalease or complicated words; Taking up too much time; Disparaging the opposing party or their counsel; Advancing too much argument rather than expectations of what the evidence will show. 32

Closing Argument: Key Elements Don t rehash the entire case: Hit the high points; Describing events of trial that support your theme advanced in opening; Speak with conviction; Show emotion when appropriate; Maintain a big picture view; Ultimate objective: Arm your favorable jurors with the facts to advocate for your client in jury deliberations. 33

Bolster and Rebut Using Demonstratives: Hired expert vs. Treating Provider Hired Gun versus Lynn s Doctors Dr. Jeffries Not seen at Lynn s request Never met Lynn Never talked to Lynn Never taken medical history Never examined Not an orthopaedist Not a surgeon Reviews films all day Not allowed to operate Never performed spinal fusion Testified for Sharon Ware & Associates over 600 times in his career Made millions of dollars testifying people are not hurt without treating them Testimony is bought and paid for Discredited by Dr. Kelley Admits what Dr. Kelley and Dr. Chappuis say is correct: asymptomatic before wreck, then wreck = need for surgery Dr. James Chappuis and Dr. Lee Kelley Seen in person at Lynn s request Personally examined and treated Lynn Took her medical history Personally reviewed MRI films Board-certified orthopaedic surgeons Operate on their own patients at the patient s request Help their patients on a daily basis Conclusions based on first-hand treatment and medical opinions Dr. Kelley: seen Lynn s cervical spine with his own eyes Dr. Kelley: watched and monitored Lynn s recovery from surgery Not hired by anyone other than Lynn, the patient 34

Bolster and Rebut Using Demonstratives: Prior Treatment for Same Body Part - Timelines 35

Damages: Asking for the Money Medical bills and Lost Wages: The easy part Use a demonstrative or PowerPoint listing medical bills so the jury can see and write them down Non-economic damages Be creative with ways to extrapolate a large lump sum to a daily/weekly/yearly amount For hourly rates, compare a modest amount you ask for to the hourly rate of the opposing side s experts hourly rate Use Mortality Table for permanent injuries 36

Closing Argument: Pitfalls Talking at the jury instead of with them; Not making and maintaining eye contact; Negative statements about opposing counsel; Not emphasizing that this is the client s one chance for justice. 37